thdltools/www
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Put a date with the errata.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
dchandler 2003-07-12 15:13:18 +00:00
parent 0ad1992d2f
commit 8cc59d03a8
1 changed files with 13 additions and 8 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

21
htdocs/Tibetan51Errata.html
View file

@ -193,26 +193,26 @@ The first section of text is the short "introduction" about the Theme and the va
<p> <p>
This document contains some known errors in the <a This document contains some known errors in the <a
href="http://iris.lib.virginia.edu/tibet/tools/tib5doc.pdf">documentation</a> href="http://iris.lib.virginia.edu/tibet/tools/tib5doc.pdf">documentation</a>
for <i>Tibetan! 5.1 for Word</i>.&nbsp; These errata apply mainly to for <i>Tibetan! 5.1 for Word</i> circa August 2001.&nbsp; These
the appendix dealing with the <a errata apply mainly to the appendix dealing with the <a
href="http://iris.lib.virginia.edu/tibet/tools/tmw.html">Tibetan href="http://iris.lib.virginia.edu/tibet/tools/tmw.html">Tibetan
Machine Web</a> (TMW) font. Machine Web</a> (TMW) font.
</p> </p>
<ul> <ul>
<li> <li>
TibetanMachineSkt4.102 (TibetanMachineWeb8.102) has Unicode correspondence TibetanMachineSkt4.102 (TibetanMachineWeb8.102) has Unicode
U+0F37 listed; in fact, it is U+0F35. correspondence U+0F37 listed; in fact, it is U+0F35.
</li> </li>
<li> <li>
TibetanMachineSkt4.103 (TibetanMachineWeb8.103) has Unicode correspondence TibetanMachineSkt4.103 (TibetanMachineWeb8.103) has Unicode
U+0F35 listed; in fact, it is U+0F38. correspondence U+0F35 listed; in fact, it is U+0F38.
</li> </li>
<li> <li>
TibetanMachineWeb.94 has Unicode correspondence U+0F48 listed; TibetanMachineWeb.94 has Unicode correspondence U+0F48 listed; in
in fact, it is U+0F49. fact, it is U+0F49.
</li> </li>
<li> <li>
@ -268,6 +268,11 @@ The first section of text is the short "introduction" about the Theme and the va
</li> </li>
</ul> </ul>
<p>
If your copy of the documentation is newer than August 2001, then it
may have the above corrections woven in.
</p>
<p> <p>
Please Please