From 0d84f058f41aea4382f86b3e6fa05121bae6fec2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Aniszczyk Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:21:55 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Address comments in #71 https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/71#issuecomment-350858244 --- PRINCIPLES.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/PRINCIPLES.md b/PRINCIPLES.md index 62d7760..48b6b5f 100644 --- a/PRINCIPLES.md +++ b/PRINCIPLES.md @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Identify projects that have a real shot at being a useful tool in the evolving b Some considerations: - Transparent, consistent technical and governance quality bar for [graduation](https://www.cncf.io/projects/graduation-criteria/) from incubation -- Has users, preferably in production; is a high quality, high-velocity project +- Has users, preferably in production; is a high quality, high-velocity project (for incubation and graduated projects). Inception level projects are targeted at earlier-stage projects to cultivate a community/technology - Has a committed and excited team that appears to understand the challenges ahead and wishes to meet them - Has a fundamentally sound design without obvious critical compromises that will inhibit potential widespread adoption - Is useful for cloud native deployments & ideally, is architected in a cloud native style