CONTRIBUTING: add some notes about contributions

Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
This commit is contained in:
Stephen J Day 2016-12-13 15:36:59 -08:00
parent b1f547c13b
commit 4f04e52d74
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: FB5F6B2905D7ECF3

View file

@ -1,5 +1,65 @@
# Contributing
Contributions should be made via pull requests. Pull requests will be reviewed
by one or more maintainers and merged when acceptable.
This project is in an early state, making the impact of contributions much
greater than at other stages. In this respect, it is important to consider any
changes or additions for their future impact more so than their current impact.
## Successful Changes
We ask that before contributing, please make the effort to coordinate with the
maintainers of the project before submitting large or high impact PRs. This
will prevent you from doing extra work that may or may not be merged.
PRs that are just submitted without any prior communication will likely be
summarily closed.
While pull requests are the methodology for submitting changes to code, changes
are much more likely to be accepted if they are accompanied by additional
engineering work. While we don't define this explicitly, most of these goals
are accomplished through communication of the design goals and subsqeuent
solutions. Often times, it helps to first state the problem before presenting
solutions.
Typically, the best methods of accomplishing this are to submit an issue,
stating the problem. This issue can include a problem statement and a
checklist with requirements. If solutions are proposed, alternatives should be
listed and eliminated. Even if the criteria for elimination of a solution is
frivelous, say so.
Larger arcs typically work best with design documents, similar to those found
in `design/`. These are focused on providing context to the design at the time
the feature was conceived and can inform future documentation contributions.
## Commit Messages
There are times for one line commit messages and this is not one of them.
Commit messages should follow best practices, including explaining the context
of the problem and how it was solved, including in caveats or follow up changes
required. They should tell the story of the change and provide readers
understanding of what led to it.
If you're lost about what this even means, please see [How to Write a Git
Commit Message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/) for a start.
In practice, the best approach to maintaining a nice commit message is to
leverage a `git add -p` and `git commit --amend` to formulate a solid
changeset. This allows one to piece together a change, as information becomes
available.
If you squash a series of commits, don't just submit that. Re-write the commit
message, as if the series of commits was a single stroke of brilliance.
That said, there is no requirement to have a single commit for a PR, as long as
each commit tells the story. For example, if there is a feature that requires a
package, it might make sense to have the package in a separate commit then have
a subsequent commit that uses it.
Remember, you're telling part of the story with the commit message. Don't make
your chapter wierd.
## Sign your work
The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the patch. Your