Allow deletion of content over the GRPC interface. For now, we are going
with a model that conducts reference management outside of the content
store, in the metadata store but this design is valid either way.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
For clients which only want to know about one container this is simpler than
searching the result of execution.List.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@docker.com>
After implementing pull, a few changes are required to the content store
interface to make sure that the implementation works smoothly.
Specifically, we work to make sure the predeclaration path for digests
works the same between remote and local writers. Before, we were
hesitent to require the the size and digest up front, but it became
clear that having this provided significant benefit.
There are also several cleanups related to naming. We now call the
expected digest `Expected` consistently across the board and `Total` is
used to mark the expected size.
This whole effort comes together to provide a very smooth status
reporting workflow for image pull and push. This will be more obvious
when the bulk of pull code lands.
There are a few other changes to make `content.WriteBlob` more broadly
useful. In accordance with addition for predeclaring expected size when
getting a `Writer`, `WriteBlob` now supports this fully. It will also
resume downloads if provided an `io.Seeker` or `io.ReaderAt`. Coupled
with the `httpReadSeeker` from `docker/distribution`, we should only be
a lines of code away from resumable downloads.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
Add registration for more subsystems via plugins
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
Move content service to separate package
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
