With this changeset, image store access is now moved to completely
accessible over GRPC. No clients manipulate the image store database
directly and the GRPC client is fully featured. The metadata database is
now managed by the daemon and access coordinated via services.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Server and Client images of the image store are now provided. We have
created an image metadata interface and converted the bolt functions to
implement that interface over an transaction. A remote client
implementation is provided that implements the same interface.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
This is a first pass at the metadata required for supporting an image
store. We use a shallow approach to the problem, allowing this
component to centralize the naming. Resources for this image can then be
"snowballed" in for actual implementations. This is better understood
through example.
Let's take pull. One could register the name "docker.io/stevvooe/foo" as
pointing at a particular digest. When instructed to pull or fetch, the
system will notice that no components of that image are present locally.
It can then recursively resolve the resources for that image and fetch
them into the content store. Next time the instruction is issued, the
content will be present so no action will be taken.
Another example is preparing the rootfs. The requirements for a rootfs
can be resolved from a name. These "diff ids" will then be compared with
what is available in the snapshot manager. Any parts of the rootfs, such
as a layer, that isn't available in the snapshotter can be unpacked.
Once this process is satisified, the image will be runnable as a
container.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
This adds very simple deletion of images by name. We still need to
consider the approach to handling image name, so this may change. For
the time being, it allows one to delete an image entry in the metadata
database.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
We need to set +x on the overlay dirs or after dropping from root to a
non-root user an eperm will happen on exec or other file access
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Krasi Georgiev krasi@vip-consult.solutions
the development reports are so useful so it would be great to put a link in the main README.md
Signed-off-by: Krasi Georgiev <krasi@vip-consult.solutions>
Allow usage of the experimental docker resolver as a package. There are
very few changes to the consuming code, demonstrating the effectiveness
of the abstraction. This move will allow future contributions to a more
featured resolver implementation.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
As a demonstration of the power of the visitor implementation, we now
report the image size in the `dist images` command. This is the size of
the packed resources as would be pushed into a remote. A similar method
could be added to calculate the unpacked size.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
