# Snapshots Docker containers, from the beginning, have long been built on a snapshotting methodology known as _layers_. _Layers_ provide the ability to fork a filesystem, make changes then save the changeset back to a new layer. Historically, these have been tightly integrated into the Docker daemon as a component called the `graphdriver`. The `graphdriver` allows one to run the docker daemon on several different operating systems while still maintaining roughly similar snapshot semantics for committing and distribution changes to images. The `graphdriver` is deeply integrated with the import and export of images, including managing layer relationships and container runtime filesystems. The behavior of the `graphdriver` informs the transport of image formats. In this document, we propose a more flexible model for managing layers. It focuses on providing an API for the base snapshotting functionality without coupling so tightly to the structure of images and their identification. The minimal API simplifies behavior without sacrificing power. This makes the surface area for driver implementations smaller, ensuring that behavior is more consistent between implementations. These differ from the concept of the graphdriver in that the LayerManipulator has no knowledge of images or containers. Users simply prepare and commit directories. We also avoid the integration between graph drivers and the tar format used to represent the changesets. The best aspect is that we can get to this model by refactoring the existing graphdrivers, minimizing the need to new code and sprawling tests. ## Scope In the past, the `graphdriver` component has provided quite a lot of funcionality in Docker. This includes serialization, hashing, unpacking, packing, mounting. This _snapshot manager_ will only provide mount-oriented oriented snapshot access with minimal metadata. Serialization, hashing, unpacking, packing and mounting are not included in this design, opting for common implementations between graphdrivers, rather than specialized ones. This is less of a problem for performance, since direct access to changesets is provided in the interface. ## Architecture The _Snapshot Manager_ provides an API for allocating, snapshotting and mounting abstract, layer-based filesytems. The model works by building up sets of directories with parent-child relationships, known as _Snapshots_. Creating _snapshots_ is a transactional operation. Each _Snapshot_ may have a parent snapshot. When one starts a transaction on an existing snapshot, the result may only be used as a parent _after_ being committed. Every snapshot has an associated `diff` directory, which contains driver specific data. This may include parent information and changeset data, depending on the implementation. We define the empty string as the ancestor of all snapshots, which corresponds to the empty snapshot. The `target` directory represents the active snapshot location. The driver may maintain internal metadata associated with the `target` but the contents is generally manipulated by the client. ### Operations The manifestation of _snapshots_ is facilitated by the _mount_ object and user-defined directories used for opaque data storage. When creating a new snapshot, the caller provides a directory where they would like the _snapshot_ to be mounted, called the _target_. This operation returns a list of mounts that, if mounted, will have the fully prepared snapshot at the requested path. We call this the _prepare_ operation. Once a path is _prepared_ and mounted, the caller may write new data to the snapshot. Depending on application, a user may want to capture these changes or not. If the user wants to keep the changes, the _commit_ operation is employed. The _commit_ operation takes the `target` directory, which represents an open transaction, and a `diff` directory. A successful result will end up with the difference between the parent and snapshot in the `diff` directory, which should be treated as opaque by the caller. This new `diff` directory can then be used as the `parent` in calls to future _prepare_ operations. If the user wants to discard the changes, the _rollback_ operation will release any resources associated with the snapshot. While rollback may a rare operation in other transactional systems, this is a common operation for containers. After removal, most containers will have _rollback_ called. For both _rollback_ and _commit_ the mounts provided by _prepare_ should be unmounted before calling these methods. ### Graph metadata As snapshots are imported into the container system, a "graph" of snapshots and their parents will form. Queries over this graph must be a supported operation. Subsequently, each snapshot ends up representing ## How snapshots work To bring the terminology of _snapshots_, we are going to demonstrate the use of the _snapshot manager_ from perspective of importing layers. We'll use a Go API to represent the process. ### Importing a Layer To import a layer, we simply have the _Snapshot Manager_ provide a list of mounts to be applied such that our dst will capture a changeset. We start out by getting a path to the layer tar file and creating a temp location to unpack it to: layerPath, tmpLocation := getLayerPath(), mkTmpDir() // just a path to layer tar file. Per the terminology above, `tmpLocation` is known as the `target`. `layerPath` is simply a tar file, representing a changset. We start by using `SnapshotManager` to prepare the temporary location as a snapshot point: lm := SnapshotManager() mounts, err := lm.Prepare(tmpLocation, "") if err != nil { ... } Note that we provide "" as the `parent`, since we are applying the diff to an empty directory. We get back a list of mounts from `SnapshotManager.Prepare`. Before proceeding, we perform all these mounts: if err := MountAll(mounts); err != nil { ... } Once the mounts are performed, our temporary location is ready to capture a diff. In practice, this works similar to a filesystem transaction. The next step is to unpack the layer. We have a special function, `unpackLayer` that applies the contents of the layer to target location and calculates the DiffID of the unpacked layer (this is a requirement for docker implementation): digest, err := unpackLayer(tmpLocation, layer) // unpack into layer location if err != nil { ... } When the above completes, we should have a filesystem the represents the contents of the layer. Careful implementations should verify that digest matches the expected DiffID. When completed, we unmount the mounts: unmount(mounts) // optional, for now Now that we've verified and unpacked our layer, we create a location to commit the actual diff. For this example, we are just going to use the layer `digest`, but in practice, this will probably be the `ChainID`: diffPath := filepath.Join("/layers", digest) // name location for the uncompressed layer digest if err := lm.Commit(diffPath, tmpLocation); err != nil { ... } The new layer has been imported as a _snapshot_ into the `SnapshotManager` under the name `diffPath`. `diffPath`, which is a user opaque directory location, can then be used as a parent in later snapshots. ### Importing the Next Layer Making a layer depend on the above is identical to the process described above except that the parent is provided as diffPath when calling `Snapshot.Prepare`: mounts, err := lm.Prepare(tmpLocation, parentDiffPath) Because have a provided a `parent`, the resulting `tmpLocation`, after mounting, will have the changes from above. Any new changes will be isolated to the snapshot `target`. We run the same unpacking process and commit as above to get the new `diff`. ### Running a Container To run a container, we simply provide `SnapshotManager.Prepare` the `diff` of the image we want to start the container from. After mounting, the prepared path can be used directly as the container's filesystem: mounts, err := lm.Prepare(containerRootFS, imageDiffPath) The returned mounts can then be passed directly to the container runtime. If one would like to create a new image from the filesystem, SnapshotManipulator.Commit is called: if err := lm.Commit(newImageDiff, containerRootFS); err != nil { ... } Alternatively, for most container runs, Snapshot.Rollback will be called to signal `SnapshotManager` to abandon the changes.