Build and install from GOPATH

* Rename 'vendor/src' -> 'vendor'
  * Ignore vendor/ instead of vendor/src/ for lint
* Rename 'cmd/client' -> 'cmd/ocic' to make it 'go install'able
* Rename 'cmd/server' -> 'cmd/ocid' to make it 'go install'able
* Update Makefile to build and install from GOPATH
* Update tests to locate ocid/ocic in GOPATH/bin
* Search for binaries in GOPATH/bin instead of PATH
* Install tools using `go get -u`, so they are updated on each run

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Yu <jawnsy@redhat.com>

vendor/github.com/opencontainers/runtime-tools/generate/seccomp/syscall_compare.go

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+package seccomp
+
+import (
+	"fmt"
+	"reflect"
+	"strconv"
+	"strings"
+
+	rspec "github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/specs-go"
+)
+
+// Determine if a new syscall rule should be appended, overwrite an existing rule
+// or if no action should be taken at all
+func decideCourseOfAction(newSyscall *rspec.Syscall, syscalls []rspec.Syscall) (string, error) {
+	ruleForSyscallAlreadyExists := false
+
+	var sliceOfDeterminedActions []string
+	for i, syscall := range syscalls {
+		if syscall.Name == newSyscall.Name {
+			ruleForSyscallAlreadyExists = true
+
+			if identical(newSyscall, &syscall) {
+				sliceOfDeterminedActions = append(sliceOfDeterminedActions, nothing)
+			}
+
+			if sameAction(newSyscall, &syscall) {
+				if bothHaveArgs(newSyscall, &syscall) {
+					sliceOfDeterminedActions = append(sliceOfDeterminedActions, seccompAppend)
+				}
+				if onlyOneHasArgs(newSyscall, &syscall) {
+					if firstParamOnlyHasArgs(newSyscall, &syscall) {
+						sliceOfDeterminedActions = append(sliceOfDeterminedActions, "overwrite:"+strconv.Itoa(i))
+					} else {
+						sliceOfDeterminedActions = append(sliceOfDeterminedActions, nothing)
+					}
+				}
+			}
+
+			if !sameAction(newSyscall, &syscall) {
+				if bothHaveArgs(newSyscall, &syscall) {
+					if sameArgs(newSyscall, &syscall) {
+						sliceOfDeterminedActions = append(sliceOfDeterminedActions, "overwrite:"+strconv.Itoa(i))
+					}
+					if !sameArgs(newSyscall, &syscall) {
+						sliceOfDeterminedActions = append(sliceOfDeterminedActions, seccompAppend)
+					}
+				}
+				if onlyOneHasArgs(newSyscall, &syscall) {
+					sliceOfDeterminedActions = append(sliceOfDeterminedActions, seccompAppend)
+				}
+				if neitherHasArgs(newSyscall, &syscall) {
+					sliceOfDeterminedActions = append(sliceOfDeterminedActions, "overwrite:"+strconv.Itoa(i))
+				}
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	if !ruleForSyscallAlreadyExists {
+		sliceOfDeterminedActions = append(sliceOfDeterminedActions, seccompAppend)
+	}
+
+	// Nothing has highest priority
+	for _, determinedAction := range sliceOfDeterminedActions {
+		if determinedAction == nothing {
+			return determinedAction, nil
+		}
+	}
+
+	// Overwrite has second highest priority
+	for _, determinedAction := range sliceOfDeterminedActions {
+		if strings.Contains(determinedAction, seccompOverwrite) {
+			return determinedAction, nil
+		}
+	}
+
+	// Append has the lowest priority
+	for _, determinedAction := range sliceOfDeterminedActions {
+		if determinedAction == seccompAppend {
+			return determinedAction, nil
+		}
+	}
+
+	return "", fmt.Errorf("Trouble determining action: %s", sliceOfDeterminedActions)
+}
+
+func hasArguments(config *rspec.Syscall) bool {
+	nilSyscall := new(rspec.Syscall)
+	return !sameArgs(nilSyscall, config)
+}
+
+func identical(config1, config2 *rspec.Syscall) bool {
+	return reflect.DeepEqual(config1, config2)
+}
+
+func identicalExceptAction(config1, config2 *rspec.Syscall) bool {
+	samename := sameName(config1, config2)
+	sameAction := sameAction(config1, config2)
+	sameArgs := sameArgs(config1, config2)
+
+	return samename && !sameAction && sameArgs
+}
+
+func identicalExceptArgs(config1, config2 *rspec.Syscall) bool {
+	samename := sameName(config1, config2)
+	sameAction := sameAction(config1, config2)
+	sameArgs := sameArgs(config1, config2)
+
+	return samename && sameAction && !sameArgs
+}
+
+func sameName(config1, config2 *rspec.Syscall) bool {
+	return config1.Name == config2.Name
+}
+
+func sameAction(config1, config2 *rspec.Syscall) bool {
+	return config1.Action == config2.Action
+}
+
+func sameArgs(config1, config2 *rspec.Syscall) bool {
+	return reflect.DeepEqual(config1.Args, config2.Args)
+}
+
+func bothHaveArgs(config1, config2 *rspec.Syscall) bool {
+	return hasArguments(config1) && hasArguments(config2)
+}
+
+func onlyOneHasArgs(config1, config2 *rspec.Syscall) bool {
+	conf1 := hasArguments(config1)
+	conf2 := hasArguments(config2)
+
+	return (conf1 && !conf2) || (!conf1 && conf2)
+}
+
+func neitherHasArgs(config1, config2 *rspec.Syscall) bool {
+	return !hasArguments(config1) && !hasArguments(config2)
+}
+
+func firstParamOnlyHasArgs(config1, config2 *rspec.Syscall) bool {
+	return !hasArguments(config1) && hasArguments(config2)
+}