vbatts/cri-o
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Wiki Activity

vendor: upgrade containers/storage

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Antonio Murdaca <runcom@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Antonio Murdaca 2017-05-17 19:18:35 +02:00
parent 5addc8caf0
commit ecd0006e80
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B2BEAD150DE936B9
114 changed files with 11464 additions and 1003 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
vendor/github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/README.md generated vendored
View file

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Additional documentation about how this group operates:
- [Releases](RELEASES.md)
- [Project Documentation](project.md)
The _optional_ and _base_ layers of all OCI projects are tracked in the [OCI Scope Table](https://www.opencontainers.org/governance/oci-scope-table).
The _optional_ and _base_ layers of all OCI projects are tracked in the [OCI Scope Table](https://www.opencontainers.org/about/oci-scope-table).
## Running an OCI Image
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ To support this UX the OCI Image Format contains sufficient information to launc
**Q: Why doesn't this project mention distribution?**
A: Distribution, for example using HTTP as both Docker v2.2 and AppC do today, is currently out of scope on the [OCI Scope Table](https://www.opencontainers.org/governance/oci-scope-table).
A: Distribution, for example using HTTP as both Docker v2.2 and AppC do today, is currently out of scope on the [OCI Scope Table](https://www.opencontainers.org/about/oci-scope-table).
There has been [some discussion on the TOB mailing list](https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/d/msg/tob/A3JnmI-D-6Y/tLuptPDHAgAJ) to make distribution an optional layer, but this topic is a work in progress.
**Q: Why a new project?**