We already parse every image if there's a label filter so that we can
check against the filter, so when we do that, go ahead and read the
OCI-format configuration and inspection data as well, and use an image's
creation date as recorded in inspection data everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@redhat.com>
Make getStore() take a config struct from which it pulls the store
options, then update the kpod commands so that they call getConfig()
and pass the config into getStore()
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cole <rcyoalne@gmail.com>
Avoid parsing metadata that the image library keeps in order to find an
image's top layer and creation date; instead, use the values which the
storage library now makes available, which will be correct once we merge
PR #654 or something like it.
Instead of assuming the last blob which was added for the image was the
manifest, read it directly and compute its digest ourselves.
Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@redhat.com>
Switch from using the lower-level storage APIs (accessing LayerStore,
ImageStore, and ContainerStore types directly) in favor of the
higher-level ones that take care of synchronization and locking for us.
Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@redhat.com>
Bump containers/image (pulling in its new dependency on ostree-go),
containers/storage, and updated image-spec.
This pulls in the OCI v1.0 specifications and code that allows us to
support 1.0 images.
Signed-off-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@redhat.com>
Design: The output of the `info` subcommand ought to be directly
consumable in a format like JSON or yaml.
The structure being a map of sorts.
Each subsection of information being an individual cluster under the
top-level, like platform info, debug, storage, etc.
Even if there are errors under the top level key, the value will be a
map with the key of "error" and the value as the message of the
`err.Error()`. In this way, the command always returns usable output.
Ideally there will be a means for anything that can register info to do
so independently from it being in the single info.go, so this approach
is having a typed signature for the function that gives info, but i'm
sure it could be better.
Current iteration of this outputs the following as a limited user:
```yaml
host:
MemFree: 711307264
MemTotal: 2096222208
SwapFree: 2147479552
SwapTotal: 2147479552
arch: amd64
cpus: 1
os: linux
store:
error: 'mkdir /var/run/containers/storage: permission denied'
```
and as root (`sudo kpod info -D`):
```yaml
debug:
compiler: gc
go version: go1.7.6
goroutines: 3
host:
MemFree: 717795328
MemTotal: 2096222208
SwapFree: 2147479552
SwapTotal: 2147479552
arch: amd64
cpus: 1
os: linux
store:
ContainerStore:
number: 1
GraphDriverName: overlay2
GraphRoot: /var/lib/containers/storage
ImageStore:
number: 1
```
And with the `--json --debug` flag:
```json
{
"debug": {
"compiler": "gc",
"go version": "go1.7.6",
"goroutines": 3
},
"host": {
"MemFree": 709402624,
"MemTotal": 2096222208,
"SwapFree": 2147479552,
"SwapTotal": 2147479552,
"arch": "amd64",
"cpus": 1,
"os": "linux"
},
"store": {
"ContainerStore": {
"number": 1
},
"GraphDriverName": "overlay2",
"GraphRoot": "/var/lib/containers/storage",
"ImageStore": {
"number": 1
}
}
}
```
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@hashbangbash.com>
We now have actual kpod code, so no reason to have a not implemented feature.
Especially when we don't intend to create kpod launch.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
'kpod images' lists all images on a system. 'kpod rmi' removes
one or more images from a system. The images will not be removed
if they are associated with a running container, unless the -f
option is used
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cole <rcyoalne@gmail.com>
The ocid project was renamed to CRI-O, months ago, it is time that we moved
all of the code to the new name. We want to elminate the name ocid from use.
Move fully to crio.
Also cric is being renamed to crioctl for the time being.
Signed-off-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>