Make getStore() take a config struct from which it pulls the store
options, then update the kpod commands so that they call getConfig()
and pass the config into getStore()
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cole <rcyoalne@gmail.com>
update libkpod's New() function to use a config struct, and update
server.New() to call into libkpod.New()
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cole <rcyoalne@gmail.com>
If sandbox is in the same package as server, there will be a circular dependency when
kpod create is implemented
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cole <rcyoalne@gmail.com>
Move container state data to libkpod, separate from the sandbox
data in server. However, the move was structured such that sandbox
data could easily be moved over into libkpod in the future
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cole <rcyoalne@gmail.com>
Move non-kubernetes-dependent portions of server struct to libkpod.
So far, only the struct fields have been moved and not their dependent
functions
Signed-off-by: Ryan Cole <rcyoalne@gmail.com>
Use unix.Prctl() instead of manually reimplementing it using
unix.RawSyscall. Also use unix.SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER instead of locally
defining it.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
The syscall package is locked down and the comment in [1] advises to
switch code to use the corresponding package from golang.org/x/sys. Do
so and replace usage of package syscall where possible (leave
syscall.SysProcAttr and syscall.Stat_t).
[1] https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/src/syscall/syscall.go#L21-L24
This will also allow to get updates and fixes just by re-vendoring
golang.org/x/sys/unix instead of having to update to a new go version.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
This matches the current kube behavior. This will probably
be provided over the CRI at which point we won't have to
define a constant in cri-o code.
Signed-off-by: Mrunal Patel <mpatel@redhat.com>
If we get a kubelet annotation about the sandbox trust level, we use it
to toggle our sandbox trust flag.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Container runtimes provide different levels of isolation, from kernel
namespaces to hardware virtualization. When starting a specific
container, one may want to decide which level of isolation to use
depending on how much we trust the container workload. Fully verified
and signed containers may not need the hardware isolation layer but e.g.
CI jobs pulling packages from many untrusted sources should probably not
run only on a kernel namespace isolation layer.
Here we allow CRI-O users to define a container runtime for trusted
containers and another one for untrusted containers, and also to define
a general, default trust level. This anticipates future kubelet
implementations that would be able to tag containers as trusted or
untrusted. When missing a kubelet hint, containers are trusted by
default.
A container becomes untrusted if we get a hint in that direction from
kubelet or if the default trust level is set to "untrusted" and the
container is not privileged. In both cases CRI-O will try to use the
untrusted container runtime. For any other cases, it will switch to the
trusted one.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
