2009-04-01 Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
Reapply fix from 2008-07-28 which was accidentally reverted; also perform the same fix to a similar check in same function. * disk/raid.c (grub_raid_scan_device): Do not abort when two disks with the same number are found, just use issue a warning with grub_dprintf(), as this error has been reported to be non-fatal.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d818b7e5c
commit
9c3dd8544c
2 changed files with 14 additions and 8 deletions
13
disk/raid.c
13
disk/raid.c
|
@ -495,18 +495,15 @@ insert_array (grub_disk_t disk, struct grub_raid_array *new_array,
|
|||
if (array->total_devs == array->nr_devs)
|
||||
/* We found more members of the array than the array
|
||||
actually has according to its superblock. This shouldn't
|
||||
happen normally, but what is the sanest things to do in such
|
||||
a case? */
|
||||
return grub_error (GRUB_ERR_BAD_NUMBER,
|
||||
"array->nr_devs > array->total_devs (%d)?!?",
|
||||
array->total_devs);
|
||||
happen normally. */
|
||||
grub_dprintf ("raid", "array->nr_devs > array->total_devs (%d)?!?",
|
||||
array->total_devs);
|
||||
|
||||
if (array->device[new_array->index] != NULL)
|
||||
/* We found multiple devices with the same number. Again,
|
||||
this shouldn't happen.*/
|
||||
return grub_error (GRUB_ERR_BAD_NUMBER,
|
||||
"Found two disks with the number %d?!?",
|
||||
new_array->number);
|
||||
grub_dprintf ("raid", "Found two disks with the number %d?!?",
|
||||
new_array->number);
|
||||
|
||||
if (new_array->disk_size < array->disk_size)
|
||||
array->disk_size = new_array->disk_size;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue