grammars: x{min,max} repetition operator (#6640)
* grammars: x{min,max} repetition operator + tweak +/*/? to avoid duplication of original over alternates * grammars: handle `x{n}` and fix `x{n,n}` * grammars: document new repetition operators * grammars: uniform use of int for min & max * grammars: refactor parser test * grammar: parsing tests w/ natural pretty print of updated expectations * grammars: much prettier print of expectations (+ TEST_GRAMMAR_PARSER_PRINT_ALL=1 to force all) * grammars: improve test pretty print again * grammars: pretty print rules and chars * grammars: fix copy rule skipping * grammars: disallow `a{,}` (not allowed in regexps) * Update common/grammar-parser.cpp Co-authored-by: Clint Herron <hanclinto@gmail.com> * grammars: fix copy rule skipping (again) & display of expectations * grammars: more test cases * grammars: update reps parsing to bring ? / * / + closer to before * json: use new GBNF repetitions{m,n} syntax * grammars: update performance gotchas w/ repetition advice * Update examples/json_schema_to_grammar.py Co-authored-by: Clint Herron <hanclinto@gmail.com> * Update examples/server/public/json-schema-to-grammar.mjs Co-authored-by: Clint Herron <hanclinto@gmail.com> * grammars: comment on rule repetitions * grammars: ensure unambiguous number alternatives * grammar: nit typo switched error msgs * grammar: nit numbering in comment * json: update numeric rule to be unambiguous * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Clint Herron <hanclinto@gmail.com> * Update examples/server/public/json-schema-to-grammar.mjs Co-authored-by: Clint Herron <hanclinto@gmail.com> * json: fix integral-part * grammar: add repetition tests --------- Co-authored-by: Clint Herron <hanclinto@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f5d7b268ec
commit
55b2d0849d
9 changed files with 736 additions and 418 deletions
|
@ -59,9 +59,13 @@ Parentheses `()` can be used to group sequences, which allows for embedding alte
|
|||
|
||||
## Repetition and Optional Symbols
|
||||
|
||||
- `*` after a symbol or sequence means that it can be repeated zero or more times.
|
||||
- `+` denotes that the symbol or sequence should appear one or more times.
|
||||
- `?` makes the preceding symbol or sequence optional.
|
||||
- `*` after a symbol or sequence means that it can be repeated zero or more times (equivalent to `{0,}`).
|
||||
- `+` denotes that the symbol or sequence should appear one or more times (equivalent to `{1,}`).
|
||||
- `?` makes the preceding symbol or sequence optional (equivalent to `{0,1}`).
|
||||
- `{m}` repeats the precedent symbol or sequence exactly `m` times
|
||||
- `{m,}` repeats the precedent symbol or sequence at least `m` times
|
||||
- `{m,n}` repeats the precedent symbol or sequence at between `m` and `n` times (included)
|
||||
- `{0,n}` repeats the precedent symbol or sequence at most `n` times (included)
|
||||
|
||||
## Comments and newlines
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -98,4 +102,4 @@ Grammars currently have performance gotchas (see https://github.com/ggerganov/ll
|
|||
|
||||
A common pattern is to allow repetitions of a pattern `x` up to N times.
|
||||
|
||||
While semantically correct, the syntax `x? x? x?.... x?` (with N repetitions) will result in extremely slow inference. Instead, you can write `(x (x (x ... (x)?...)?)?)?` (w/ N-deep nesting)
|
||||
While semantically correct, the syntax `x? x? x?.... x?` (with N repetitions) may result in extremely slow sampling. Instead, you can write `x{0,N}` (or `(x (x (x ... (x)?...)?)?)?` w/ N-deep nesting in earlier llama.cpp versions).
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue