SOTA 3-bit quants (#5196)
* iq3_xxs: quantize/dequantize RMSE seems a bit high-ish at about half-way between q2_K and q3_K, so need to check more. * iq3_xxs: CUDA dequantize works * iq2_xxs: tuning quantization * iq3_xxs: starting to look better PPL on wiki.test.raw LLaMA-v1-7B: 6.4218 LLaMA-v2-7B: 6.3560 Mistral-7B : 6.0717 This is better than Q3_K_XS, with a 5% reduction in quantized model size. * iq3_xxs: CUDA dot product We have PP-512: 5891 t/s TG-128: 143.9 t/s * iq3_xxs: scalar and AVX2 dot products * iq3_xxs: ARM_NEON and Metal Metal performance is decent, ARM_NEON is pathetic * iq3_xxs: slightly better grid points * Faster iq3_xxs and iq2_xs dot products on CUDA * iq3_xxs: add some quant mix * iq3_xxs: fix failing quantization test Dot product still fails. Is this real? * iq3_xxs: hopefully fix ROCm * iq3_xxs: failing tests This time the dot product accuracy did find an actual bug in the AVX2 implementation. * Add IQ3_XXS to test-backend-ops --------- Co-authored-by: Iwan Kawrakow <iwan.kawrakow@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2256f36b79
commit
f4d7e54974
14 changed files with 1215 additions and 18 deletions
|
@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ static const std::vector<struct quant_option> QUANT_OPTIONS = {
|
|||
{ "IQ2_XS", LLAMA_FTYPE_MOSTLY_IQ2_XS, " 2.31 bpw quantization", },
|
||||
{ "Q2_K", LLAMA_FTYPE_MOSTLY_Q2_K, " 2.63G, +0.6717 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B", },
|
||||
{ "Q2_K_S", LLAMA_FTYPE_MOSTLY_Q2_K_S, " 2.16G, +9.0634 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B", },
|
||||
{ "IQ3_XXS",LLAMA_FTYPE_MOSTLY_IQ3_XXS," 3.06 bpw quantization", },
|
||||
{ "Q3_K", LLAMA_FTYPE_MOSTLY_Q3_K_M, "alias for Q3_K_M" },
|
||||
{ "Q3_K_XS",LLAMA_FTYPE_MOSTLY_Q3_K_XS,"3-bit extra small quantization" , },
|
||||
{ "Q3_K_S", LLAMA_FTYPE_MOSTLY_Q3_K_S, " 2.75G, +0.5551 ppl @ LLaMA-v1-7B", },
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue