Updates `image.StoreImage()` to always ensure that images
that are installed in Docker have a tarsum.v1 checksum.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Josh Hawn <josh.hawn@docker.com> (github: jlhawn)
While the v2 pull operation is writing the body of the layer blob to disk
it now computes the tarsum checksum of the archive before extracting it to
the backend storage driver. If the checksum does not match that from the
image manifest an error is raised.
Also adds more debug logging to the pull operation and fixes existing test
cases which were failing. Adds a reverse lookup constructor to the tarsum
package so that you can get a tarsum object using a checksum label.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Josh Hawn <josh.hawn@docker.com> (github: jlhawn)
If .dockerignore mentions either then the client will send them to the
daemon but the daemon will erase them after the Dockerfile has been parsed
to simulate them never being sent in the first place.
an events test kept failing for me so I tried to fix that too
Closes#8330
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Another update to TarSum tests, this patch fixes an issue where
the benchmarks were generating archives incorrectly by not closing
the tarWriter.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Josh Hawn <josh.hawn@docker.com> (github: jlhawn)
These two cases did not actually read the same content with each iteration
of the benchmark. After the first read, the buffer was consumed. This patch
corrects this by using a bytes.Reader and seeking to the beginning of the
buffer at the beginning of each iteration.
Unfortunately, this benchmark was not actually as fast as we believed. But
the new results do bring its results closer to those of the other benchmarks.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Josh Hawn <josh.hawn@docker.com> (github: jlhawn)
I noticed that 3 of the tarsum test cases had expected a tarsum with
a sha256 hash of
e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855
As I've been working with sha256 quite a bit lately, it struck me that
this is the initial digest value for sha256, which means that no data
was processed. However, these tests *do* process data. It turns out that
there was a bug in the test handling code which did not wait for tarsum
to end completely. This patch corrects these test cases.
I'm unaware of anywhere else in the code base where this would be an issue,
though we definitily need to look out in the future to ensure we are
completing tarsum reads (waiting for EOF).
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Josh Hawn <josh.hawn@docker.com> (github: jlhawn)
The current Dev version of TarSum includes hashing of extended
file attributes and omits inclusion of modified time headers.
I refactored the logic around the version differences to make it
more clear that the difference between versions is in how tar
headers are selected and ordered.
TarSum Version 1 is now declared with the new Dev version continuing
to track it.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Josh Hawn <josh.hawn@docker.com> (github: jlhawn)
When read is called on a tarsum with a two different read sizes, specifically the second call larger than the first, the dynamic buffer does not get reallocated causing a slice read error.
Signed-off-by: Derek McGowan <derek@mcgstyle.net> (github: dmcgowan)
Not breaking the default cipher and algorithm for calculating checksums,
but allow for using alternate block ciphers during the checksum
calculation.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com> (github: vbatts)
If a tar were constructed with duplicate file names, then depending on
the order, it could result in same tarsum.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com>
Tarsum now correctly closes the internal TarWriter which appends
a block of 1024 zeros to the end of the returned archive.
Signed-off-by: Josh Hawn <josh.hawn@docker.com>
this is to enhance the tarsum algorithm, but _MUST_ be done in lock step
with the same for docker-registry. (PR will be cited)
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com> (github: vbatts)
This introduces Versions for TarSum checksums.
Fixes: https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/7526
It preserves current functionality and abstracts the interface for
future flexibility of hashing algorithms. As a POC, the VersionDev
Tarsum does not include the mtime in the checksum calculation, and would
solve https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/7387 though this is not a
settled Version is subject to change until a version number is assigned.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com>
This commit makes tarsum buffer allocation dynamic. This change
is required to avoid allocating memory excessively after the archive
buffering changes.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Cristian Staretu <cristian.staretu@gmail.com> (github: unclejack)
This code is vital to the security of the project and it is important
we assure it is well-maintained and guarded.
I am vested in assuring this code maintains security and
provides as much compatibility as possible between releases.
Signed-off-by: Eric Windisch <eric@windisch.us>
