058c4dfc3e
Can't safely use uint32 for locker since we need to decrement the count, which requires loading the unit and doing some math, which is inherintly racey. Instead use Int32 which we can safely use with atomic and AddInt32 with `-1` Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
locker.go | ||
locker_test.go | ||
README.md |
Locker
locker provides a mechanism for creating finer-grained locking to help free up more global locks to handle other tasks.
The implementation looks close to a sync.Mutex, however the user must provide a reference to use to refer to the underlying lock when locking and unlocking, and unlock may generate an error.
If a lock with a given name does not exist when Lock
is called, one is
created.
Lock references are automatically cleaned up on Unlock
if nothing else is
waiting for the lock.
Usage
package important
import (
"sync"
"time"
"github.com/docker/docker/pkg/locker"
)
type important struct {
locks *locker.Locker
data map[string]interface{}
mu sync.Mutex
}
func (i *important) Get(name string) interface{} {
i.locks.Lock(name)
defer i.locks.Unlock(name)
return data[name]
}
func (i *important) Create(name string, data interface{}) {
i.locks.Lock(name)
defer i.locks.Unlock(name)
i.createImportant(data)
s.mu.Lock()
i.data[name] = data
s.mu.Unlock()
}
func (i *important) createImportant(data interface{}) {
time.Sleep(10 * time.Second)
}
For functions dealing with a given name, always lock at the beginning of the function (or before doing anything with the underlying state), this ensures any other function that is dealing with the same name will block.
When needing to modify the underlying data, use the global lock to ensure nothing else is modfying it at the same time. Since name lock is already in place, no reads will occur while the modification is being performed.