Changes the security scanner code to raise exceptions now for non-successful operations. One of the new exceptions raised is MissingParentLayerException, which, when raised, will cause the security worker to perform a full rescan of all parent images for the current layer, before trying once more to scan the current layer. This should allow the system to be "self-healing" in the case where the security scanner engine somehow loses or corrupts a parent layer.
Currently, if a user tries to confirm an invite sent to them on an account with a mismatching email address, we simply redirect to the org (where they get a 403). This change ensures they get the proper error response message, and restyles the error page to be nicer.
Fixes#2227
Fixes https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/136088507
The FakeSecurityScanner mocks out all calls that Quay is expected to make to the security scanner API, and returns faked data that can be adjusted by the calling test case
Following this change, anytime a layer is indexed by the security scanner, we only send notifications out if the layer previously had a security_indexed_engine value of `-1`, thus ensuring it has *never* been indexed previously. This will allow us to change to version of the security scanner upwards, and have all the images be re-indexed, without firing off notifications in a spammy manner.
Adds the missing field on the query_user calls, updates the external auth tests to ensure it is returned properly, and adds new end-to-end tests which call the external auth engines via the *API*, to ensure this doesn't break again
- Switches database schema creation to alembic, which solves the MySQL issue (and makes sure we test migrations as well)
- Adds a few time.sleep(1) to work around MySQL's second-precision issue when adding items to queues and then immediately retrieving them
- Disables the storage proxy tests when running against non-SQLite databases, as it causes failures with the multiple process and multiple transactions
- Changes initdb to support only populating the database, as well as fixing a few small items around the test data when working with non-SQLite data
Note that the test suite doesn't fully verify that each validation succeeds; rather, it ensures that the proper system (storage, security scanning, etc) is called with the configuration and returns at all (usually with an expected error). This should prevent us from forgetting to update these code paths when we change config-based systems. Longer term, we might want to have these tests stand up fake/mock versions of the endpoint services as well, for end-to-end testing.
Instead of having the Swift storage engine try to delete the empty chunk(s) synchronously, we simply queue them and have a worker come along after 30s to delete the empty chunks. This has a few key benefits: it is async (doesn't slow down the push code), helps deal with Swift's eventual consistency (less retries necessary) and is generic for other storage engines if/when they need this as well
