# Docker Registry v2 authentication via central service This document outlines the v2 Docker registry authentication scheme:  1. Attempt to begin a push/pull operation with the registry. 2. If the registry requires authorization it will return a `401 Unauthorized` HTTP response with information on how to authenticate. 3. The registry client makes a request to the authorization service for a Bearer token. 4. The authorization service returns an opaque Bearer token representing the client's authorized access. 5. The client retries the original request with the Bearer token embedded in the request's Authorization header. 6. The Registry authorizes the client by validating the Bearer token and the claim set embedded within it and begins the push/pull session as usual. ## Requirements - Registry clients which can understand and respond to token auth challenges returned by the resource server. - An authorization server capable of managing access controls to their resources hosted by any given service (such as repositories in a Docker Registry). - A Docker Registry capable of trusting the authorization server to sign tokens which clients can use for authorization and the ability to verify these tokens for single use or for use during a sufficiently short period of time. ## Authorization Server Endpoint Descriptions The described server is meant to serve as a standalone access control manager for resources hosted by other services which wish to authenticate and manage authorizations using a separate access control manager. A service like this is used by the official Docker Registry to authenticate clients and verify their authorization to Docker image repositories. As of Docker 1.6, the registry client within the Docker Engine has been updated to handle such an authorization workflow. ## How to authenticate Registry V1 clients first contact the index to initiate a push or pull. Under the Registry V2 workflow, clients should contact the registry first. If the registry server requires authentication it will return a `401 Unauthorized` response with a `WWW-Authenticate` header detailing how to authenticate to this registry. For example, say I (username `jlhawn`) am attempting to push an image to the repository `samalba/my-app`. For the registry to authorize this, I will need `push` access to the `samalba/my-app` repository. The registry will first return this response: ``` HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Docker-Distribution-Api-Version: registry/2.0 Www-Authenticate: Bearer realm="https://auth.docker.io/token",service="registry.docker.io",scope="repository:samalba/my-app:pull,push" Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:32:31 GMT Content-Length: 235 Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000 {"errors":[{"code":"UNAUTHORIZED","message":"access to the requested resource is not authorized","detail":[{"Type":"repository","Name":"samalba/my-app","Action":"pull"},{"Type":"repository","Name":"samalba/my-app","Action":"push"}]}]} ``` Note the HTTP Response Header indicating the auth challenge: ``` Www-Authenticate: Bearer realm="https://auth.docker.io/token",service="registry.docker.io",scope="repository:samalba/my-app:pull,push" ``` This format is documented in [Section 3 of RFC 6750: The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: Bearer Token Usage](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6750#section-3) This challenge indicates that the registry requires a token issued by the specified token server and that the request the client is attempting will need to include sufficient access entries in its claim set. To respond to this challenge, the client will need to make a `GET` request to the URL `https://auth.docker.io/token` using the `service` and `scope` values from the `WWW-Authenticate` header. ## Requesting a Token #### Query Parameters

service

The name of the service which hosts the resource.

scope

The resource in question, formatted as one of the space-delimited entries from the scope parameters from the WWW-Authenticate header shown above. This query parameter should be specified multiple times if there is more than one scope entry from the WWW-Authenticate header. The above example would be specified as: scope=repository:samalba/my-app:push.

#### Example For this example, the client makes an HTTP GET request to the following URL: ``` https://auth.docker.io/token?service=registry.docker.io&scope=repository:samalba/my-app:pull,push ``` The token server should first attempt to authenticate the client using any authentication credentials provided with the request. As of Docker 1.8, the registry client in the Docker Engine only supports Basic Authentication to these token servers. If an attempt to authenticate to the token server fails, the token server should return a `401 Unauthorized` response indicating that the provided credentials are invalid. Whether the token server requires authentication is up to the policy of that access control provider. Some requests may require authentication to determine access (such as pushing or pulling a private repository) while others may not (such as pulling from a public repository). After authenticating the client (which may simply be an anonymous client if no attempt was made to authenticate), the token server must next query its access control list to determine whether the client has the requested scope. In this example request, if I have authenticated as user `jlhawn`, the token server will determine what access I have to the repository `samalba/my-app` hosted by the entity `registry.docker.io`. Once the token server has determined what access the client has to the resources requested in the `scope` parameter, it will take the intersection of the set of requested actions on each resource and the set of actions that the client has in fact been granted. If the client only has a subset of the requested access **it must not be considered an error** as it is not the responsibility of the token server to indicate authorization errors as part of this workflow. Continuing with the example request, the token server will find that the client's set of granted access to the repository is `[pull, push]` which when intersected with the requested access `[pull, push]` yields an equal set. If the granted access set was found only to be `[pull]` then the intersected set would only be `[pull]`. If the client has no access to the repository then the intersected set would be empty, `[]`. It is this intersected set of access which is placed in the returned token. The server then constructs an implementation-specific token with this intersected set of access, and returns it to the Docker client to use to authenticate to the audience service: ``` HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: application/json {"token": "eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJFUzI1NiIsImtpZCI6IlBZWU86VEVXVTpWN0pIOjI2SlY6QVFUWjpMSkMzOlNYVko6WEdIQTozNEYyOjJMQVE6WlJNSzpaN1E2In0.eyJpc3MiOiJhdXRoLmRvY2tlci5jb20iLCJzdWIiOiJqbGhhd24iLCJhdWQiOiJyZWdpc3RyeS5kb2NrZXIuY29tIiwiZXhwIjoxNDE1Mzg3MzE1LCJuYmYiOjE0MTUzODcwMTUsImlhdCI6MTQxNTM4NzAxNSwianRpIjoidFlKQ08xYzZjbnl5N2tBbjBjN3JLUGdiVjFIMWJGd3MiLCJhY2Nlc3MiOlt7InR5cGUiOiJyZXBvc2l0b3J5IiwibmFtZSI6InNhbWFsYmEvbXktYXBwIiwiYWN0aW9ucyI6WyJwdXNoIl19XX0.QhflHPfbd6eVF4lM9bwYpFZIV0PfikbyXuLx959ykRTBpe3CYnzs6YBK8FToVb5R47920PVLrh8zuLzdCr9t3w"} ``` ## Using the Bearer token Once the client has a token, it will try the registry request again with the token placed in the HTTP `Authorization` header like so: ``` Authorization: Bearer eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJFUzI1NiIsImtpZCI6IkJWM0Q6MkFWWjpVQjVaOktJQVA6SU5QTDo1RU42Ok40SjQ6Nk1XTzpEUktFOkJWUUs6M0ZKTDpQT1RMIn0.eyJpc3MiOiJhdXRoLmRvY2tlci5jb20iLCJzdWIiOiJCQ0NZOk9VNlo6UUVKNTpXTjJDOjJBVkM6WTdZRDpBM0xZOjQ1VVc6NE9HRDpLQUxMOkNOSjU6NUlVTCIsImF1ZCI6InJlZ2lzdHJ5LmRvY2tlci5jb20iLCJleHAiOjE0MTUzODczMTUsIm5iZiI6MTQxNTM4NzAxNSwiaWF0IjoxNDE1Mzg3MDE1LCJqdGkiOiJ0WUpDTzFjNmNueXk3a0FuMGM3cktQZ2JWMUgxYkZ3cyIsInNjb3BlIjoiamxoYXduOnJlcG9zaXRvcnk6c2FtYWxiYS9teS1hcHA6cHVzaCxwdWxsIGpsaGF3bjpuYW1lc3BhY2U6c2FtYWxiYTpwdWxsIn0.Y3zZSwaZPqy4y9oRBVRImZyv3m_S9XDHF1tWwN7mL52C_IiA73SJkWVNsvNqpJIn5h7A2F8biv_S2ppQ1lgkbw ``` This is also described in [Section 2.1 of RFC 6750: The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: Bearer Token Usage](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6750#section-2.1)