linux-stable/net/dsa/tag_ocelot.c

200 lines
5.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Copyright 2019 NXP Semiconductors
*/
#include <linux/dsa/ocelot.h>
#include <soc/mscc/ocelot.h>
#include "dsa_priv.h"
static void ocelot_xmit_ptp(struct dsa_port *dp, void *injection,
struct sk_buff *clone)
{
struct ocelot *ocelot = dp->ds->priv;
struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port;
u64 rew_op;
ocelot_port = ocelot->ports[dp->index];
rew_op = ocelot_port->ptp_cmd;
/* Retrieve timestamp ID populated inside skb->cb[0] of the
* clone by ocelot_port_add_txtstamp_skb
*/
if (ocelot_port->ptp_cmd == IFH_REW_OP_TWO_STEP_PTP)
rew_op |= clone->cb[0] << 3;
ocelot_ifh_set_rew_op(injection, rew_op);
}
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: create separate tagger for Seville The ocelot tagger is a hot mess currently, it relies on memory initialized by the attached driver for basic frame transmission. This is against all that DSA tagging protocols stand for, which is that the transmission and reception of a DSA-tagged frame, the data path, should be independent from the switch control path, because the tag protocol is in principle hot-pluggable and reusable across switches (even if in practice it wasn't until very recently). But if another driver like dsa_loop wants to make use of tag_ocelot, it couldn't. This was done to have common code between Felix and Ocelot, which have one bit difference in the frame header format. Quoting from commit 67c2404922c2 ("net: dsa: felix: create a template for the DSA tags on xmit"): Other alternatives have been analyzed, such as: - Create a separate tag_seville.c: too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Create a separate DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE under tag_ocelot.c, just like tag_brcm.c, which would have a separate .xmit function. Again, too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Allocate the template from the init function of the tag_ocelot.c module, instead of from the driver: couldn't figure out a method of accessing the correct port template corresponding to the correct tagger in the .xmit function. The really interesting part is that Seville should have had its own tagging protocol defined - it is not compatible on the wire with Ocelot, even for that single bit. In principle, a packet generated by DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT when booted on NXP LS1028A would look in a certain way, but when booted on NXP T1040 it would look differently. The reverse is also true: a packet generated by a Seville switch would be interpreted incorrectly by Wireshark if it was told it was generated by an Ocelot switch. Actually things are a bit more nuanced. If we concentrate only on the DSA tag, what I said above is true, but Ocelot/Seville also support an optional DSA tag prefix, which can be short or long, and it is possible to distinguish the two taggers based on an integer constant put in that prefix. Nonetheless, creating a separate tagger is still justified, since the tag prefix is optional, and without it, there is again no way to distinguish. Claiming backwards binary compatibility is a bit more tough, since I've already changed the format of tag_ocelot once, in commit 5124197ce58b ("net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress"). Therefore I am not very concerned with treating this as a bugfix and backporting it to stable kernels (which would be another mess due to the fact that there would be lots of conflicts with the other DSA_TAG_PROTO* definitions). It's just simpler to say that the string values of the taggers have ABI value starting with kernel 5.12, which will be when the changing of tag protocol via /sys/class/net/<dsa-master>/dsa/tagging goes live. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:37:58 +00:00
static void ocelot_xmit_common(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev,
__be32 ifh_prefix, void **ifh)
{
struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(netdev);
struct sk_buff *clone = DSA_SKB_CB(skb)->clone;
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: create separate tagger for Seville The ocelot tagger is a hot mess currently, it relies on memory initialized by the attached driver for basic frame transmission. This is against all that DSA tagging protocols stand for, which is that the transmission and reception of a DSA-tagged frame, the data path, should be independent from the switch control path, because the tag protocol is in principle hot-pluggable and reusable across switches (even if in practice it wasn't until very recently). But if another driver like dsa_loop wants to make use of tag_ocelot, it couldn't. This was done to have common code between Felix and Ocelot, which have one bit difference in the frame header format. Quoting from commit 67c2404922c2 ("net: dsa: felix: create a template for the DSA tags on xmit"): Other alternatives have been analyzed, such as: - Create a separate tag_seville.c: too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Create a separate DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE under tag_ocelot.c, just like tag_brcm.c, which would have a separate .xmit function. Again, too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Allocate the template from the init function of the tag_ocelot.c module, instead of from the driver: couldn't figure out a method of accessing the correct port template corresponding to the correct tagger in the .xmit function. The really interesting part is that Seville should have had its own tagging protocol defined - it is not compatible on the wire with Ocelot, even for that single bit. In principle, a packet generated by DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT when booted on NXP LS1028A would look in a certain way, but when booted on NXP T1040 it would look differently. The reverse is also true: a packet generated by a Seville switch would be interpreted incorrectly by Wireshark if it was told it was generated by an Ocelot switch. Actually things are a bit more nuanced. If we concentrate only on the DSA tag, what I said above is true, but Ocelot/Seville also support an optional DSA tag prefix, which can be short or long, and it is possible to distinguish the two taggers based on an integer constant put in that prefix. Nonetheless, creating a separate tagger is still justified, since the tag prefix is optional, and without it, there is again no way to distinguish. Claiming backwards binary compatibility is a bit more tough, since I've already changed the format of tag_ocelot once, in commit 5124197ce58b ("net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress"). Therefore I am not very concerned with treating this as a bugfix and backporting it to stable kernels (which would be another mess due to the fact that there would be lots of conflicts with the other DSA_TAG_PROTO* definitions). It's just simpler to say that the string values of the taggers have ABI value starting with kernel 5.12, which will be when the changing of tag protocol via /sys/class/net/<dsa-master>/dsa/tagging goes live. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:37:58 +00:00
void *injection;
__be32 *prefix;
net: dsa: felix: create a template for the DSA tags on xmit With this patch we try to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. First of all, some switches that use tag_ocelot.c don't have the exact same bitfield layout for the DSA tags. The destination ports field is different for Seville VSC9953 for example. So the choices are to either duplicate tag_ocelot.c into a new tag_seville.c (sub-optimal) or somehow take into account a supposed ocelot->dest_ports_offset when packing this field into the DSA injection header (again not ideal). Secondly, tag_ocelot.c already needs to memset a 128-bit area to zero and call some packing() functions of dubious performance in the fastpath. And most of the values it needs to pack are pretty much constant (BYPASS=1, SRC_PORT=CPU, DEST=port index). So it would be good if we could improve that. The proposed solution is to allocate a memory area per port at probe time, initialize that with the statically defined bits as per chip hardware revision, and just perform a simpler memcpy in the fastpath. Other alternatives have been analyzed, such as: - Create a separate tag_seville.c: too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Create a separate DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE under tag_ocelot.c, just like tag_brcm.c, which would have a separate .xmit function. Again, too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Allocate the template from the init function of the tag_ocelot.c module, instead of from the driver: couldn't figure out a method of accessing the correct port template corresponding to the correct tagger in the .xmit function. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-07-13 16:57:04 +00:00
injection = skb_push(skb, OCELOT_TAG_LEN);
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress There are 2 goals that we follow: - Reduce the header size - Make the header size equal between RX and TX The issue that required long prefix on RX was the fact that the ocelot DSA tag, being put before Ethernet as it is, would overlap with the area that a DSA master uses for RX filtering (destination MAC address mainly). Now that we can ask DSA to put the master in promiscuous mode, in theory we could remove the prefix altogether and call it a day, but it looks like we can't. Using no prefix on ingress, some packets (such as ICMP) would be received, while others (such as PTP) would not be received. This is because the DSA master we use (enetc) triggers parse errors ("MAC rx frame errors") presumably because it sees Ethernet frames with a bad length. And indeed, when using no prefix, the EtherType (bytes 12-13 of the frame, bits 96-111) falls over the REW_VAL field from the extraction header, aka the PTP timestamp. When turning the short (32-bit) prefix on, the EtherType overlaps with bits 64-79 of the extraction header, which are a reserved area transmitted as zero by the switch. The packets are not dropped by the DSA master with a short prefix. Actually, the frames look like this in tcpdump (below is a PTP frame, with an extra dsa_8021q tag - dadb 0482 - added by a downstream sja1105). 89:0c:a9:f2:01:00 > 88:80:00:0a:00:1d, 802.3, length 0: LLC, \ dsap Unknown (0x10) Individual, ssap ProWay NM (0x0e) Response, \ ctrl 0x0004: Information, send seq 2, rcv seq 0, \ Flags [Response], length 78 0x0000: 8880 000a 001d 890c a9f2 0100 0000 100f ................ 0x0010: 0400 0000 0180 c200 000e 001f 7b63 0248 ............{c.H 0x0020: dadb 0482 88f7 1202 0036 0000 0000 0000 .........6...... 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 001f 7bff fe63 ............{..c 0x0040: 0248 0001 1f81 0500 0000 0000 0000 0000 .H.............. 0x0050: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ............ So the short prefix is our new default: we've shortened our RX frames by 12 octets, increased TX by 4, and headers are now equal between RX and TX. Note that we still need promiscuous mode for the DSA master to not drop it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-09-26 19:32:04 +00:00
prefix = skb_push(skb, OCELOT_SHORT_PREFIX_LEN);
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: create separate tagger for Seville The ocelot tagger is a hot mess currently, it relies on memory initialized by the attached driver for basic frame transmission. This is against all that DSA tagging protocols stand for, which is that the transmission and reception of a DSA-tagged frame, the data path, should be independent from the switch control path, because the tag protocol is in principle hot-pluggable and reusable across switches (even if in practice it wasn't until very recently). But if another driver like dsa_loop wants to make use of tag_ocelot, it couldn't. This was done to have common code between Felix and Ocelot, which have one bit difference in the frame header format. Quoting from commit 67c2404922c2 ("net: dsa: felix: create a template for the DSA tags on xmit"): Other alternatives have been analyzed, such as: - Create a separate tag_seville.c: too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Create a separate DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE under tag_ocelot.c, just like tag_brcm.c, which would have a separate .xmit function. Again, too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Allocate the template from the init function of the tag_ocelot.c module, instead of from the driver: couldn't figure out a method of accessing the correct port template corresponding to the correct tagger in the .xmit function. The really interesting part is that Seville should have had its own tagging protocol defined - it is not compatible on the wire with Ocelot, even for that single bit. In principle, a packet generated by DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT when booted on NXP LS1028A would look in a certain way, but when booted on NXP T1040 it would look differently. The reverse is also true: a packet generated by a Seville switch would be interpreted incorrectly by Wireshark if it was told it was generated by an Ocelot switch. Actually things are a bit more nuanced. If we concentrate only on the DSA tag, what I said above is true, but Ocelot/Seville also support an optional DSA tag prefix, which can be short or long, and it is possible to distinguish the two taggers based on an integer constant put in that prefix. Nonetheless, creating a separate tagger is still justified, since the tag prefix is optional, and without it, there is again no way to distinguish. Claiming backwards binary compatibility is a bit more tough, since I've already changed the format of tag_ocelot once, in commit 5124197ce58b ("net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress"). Therefore I am not very concerned with treating this as a bugfix and backporting it to stable kernels (which would be another mess due to the fact that there would be lots of conflicts with the other DSA_TAG_PROTO* definitions). It's just simpler to say that the string values of the taggers have ABI value starting with kernel 5.12, which will be when the changing of tag protocol via /sys/class/net/<dsa-master>/dsa/tagging goes live. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:37:58 +00:00
*prefix = ifh_prefix;
memset(injection, 0, OCELOT_TAG_LEN);
ocelot_ifh_set_bypass(injection, 1);
ocelot_ifh_set_src(injection, ds->num_ports);
ocelot_ifh_set_qos_class(injection, skb->priority);
/* TX timestamping was requested */
if (clone)
ocelot_xmit_ptp(dp, injection, clone);
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: create separate tagger for Seville The ocelot tagger is a hot mess currently, it relies on memory initialized by the attached driver for basic frame transmission. This is against all that DSA tagging protocols stand for, which is that the transmission and reception of a DSA-tagged frame, the data path, should be independent from the switch control path, because the tag protocol is in principle hot-pluggable and reusable across switches (even if in practice it wasn't until very recently). But if another driver like dsa_loop wants to make use of tag_ocelot, it couldn't. This was done to have common code between Felix and Ocelot, which have one bit difference in the frame header format. Quoting from commit 67c2404922c2 ("net: dsa: felix: create a template for the DSA tags on xmit"): Other alternatives have been analyzed, such as: - Create a separate tag_seville.c: too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Create a separate DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE under tag_ocelot.c, just like tag_brcm.c, which would have a separate .xmit function. Again, too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Allocate the template from the init function of the tag_ocelot.c module, instead of from the driver: couldn't figure out a method of accessing the correct port template corresponding to the correct tagger in the .xmit function. The really interesting part is that Seville should have had its own tagging protocol defined - it is not compatible on the wire with Ocelot, even for that single bit. In principle, a packet generated by DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT when booted on NXP LS1028A would look in a certain way, but when booted on NXP T1040 it would look differently. The reverse is also true: a packet generated by a Seville switch would be interpreted incorrectly by Wireshark if it was told it was generated by an Ocelot switch. Actually things are a bit more nuanced. If we concentrate only on the DSA tag, what I said above is true, but Ocelot/Seville also support an optional DSA tag prefix, which can be short or long, and it is possible to distinguish the two taggers based on an integer constant put in that prefix. Nonetheless, creating a separate tagger is still justified, since the tag prefix is optional, and without it, there is again no way to distinguish. Claiming backwards binary compatibility is a bit more tough, since I've already changed the format of tag_ocelot once, in commit 5124197ce58b ("net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress"). Therefore I am not very concerned with treating this as a bugfix and backporting it to stable kernels (which would be another mess due to the fact that there would be lots of conflicts with the other DSA_TAG_PROTO* definitions). It's just simpler to say that the string values of the taggers have ABI value starting with kernel 5.12, which will be when the changing of tag protocol via /sys/class/net/<dsa-master>/dsa/tagging goes live. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:37:58 +00:00
*ifh = injection;
}
static struct sk_buff *ocelot_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct net_device *netdev)
{
struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(netdev);
void *injection;
ocelot_xmit_common(skb, netdev, cpu_to_be32(0x8880000a), &injection);
ocelot_ifh_set_dest(injection, BIT_ULL(dp->index));
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: create separate tagger for Seville The ocelot tagger is a hot mess currently, it relies on memory initialized by the attached driver for basic frame transmission. This is against all that DSA tagging protocols stand for, which is that the transmission and reception of a DSA-tagged frame, the data path, should be independent from the switch control path, because the tag protocol is in principle hot-pluggable and reusable across switches (even if in practice it wasn't until very recently). But if another driver like dsa_loop wants to make use of tag_ocelot, it couldn't. This was done to have common code between Felix and Ocelot, which have one bit difference in the frame header format. Quoting from commit 67c2404922c2 ("net: dsa: felix: create a template for the DSA tags on xmit"): Other alternatives have been analyzed, such as: - Create a separate tag_seville.c: too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Create a separate DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE under tag_ocelot.c, just like tag_brcm.c, which would have a separate .xmit function. Again, too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Allocate the template from the init function of the tag_ocelot.c module, instead of from the driver: couldn't figure out a method of accessing the correct port template corresponding to the correct tagger in the .xmit function. The really interesting part is that Seville should have had its own tagging protocol defined - it is not compatible on the wire with Ocelot, even for that single bit. In principle, a packet generated by DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT when booted on NXP LS1028A would look in a certain way, but when booted on NXP T1040 it would look differently. The reverse is also true: a packet generated by a Seville switch would be interpreted incorrectly by Wireshark if it was told it was generated by an Ocelot switch. Actually things are a bit more nuanced. If we concentrate only on the DSA tag, what I said above is true, but Ocelot/Seville also support an optional DSA tag prefix, which can be short or long, and it is possible to distinguish the two taggers based on an integer constant put in that prefix. Nonetheless, creating a separate tagger is still justified, since the tag prefix is optional, and without it, there is again no way to distinguish. Claiming backwards binary compatibility is a bit more tough, since I've already changed the format of tag_ocelot once, in commit 5124197ce58b ("net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress"). Therefore I am not very concerned with treating this as a bugfix and backporting it to stable kernels (which would be another mess due to the fact that there would be lots of conflicts with the other DSA_TAG_PROTO* definitions). It's just simpler to say that the string values of the taggers have ABI value starting with kernel 5.12, which will be when the changing of tag protocol via /sys/class/net/<dsa-master>/dsa/tagging goes live. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:37:58 +00:00
return skb;
}
static struct sk_buff *seville_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct net_device *netdev)
{
struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(netdev);
void *injection;
ocelot_xmit_common(skb, netdev, cpu_to_be32(0x88800005), &injection);
seville_ifh_set_dest(injection, BIT_ULL(dp->index));
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: create separate tagger for Seville The ocelot tagger is a hot mess currently, it relies on memory initialized by the attached driver for basic frame transmission. This is against all that DSA tagging protocols stand for, which is that the transmission and reception of a DSA-tagged frame, the data path, should be independent from the switch control path, because the tag protocol is in principle hot-pluggable and reusable across switches (even if in practice it wasn't until very recently). But if another driver like dsa_loop wants to make use of tag_ocelot, it couldn't. This was done to have common code between Felix and Ocelot, which have one bit difference in the frame header format. Quoting from commit 67c2404922c2 ("net: dsa: felix: create a template for the DSA tags on xmit"): Other alternatives have been analyzed, such as: - Create a separate tag_seville.c: too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Create a separate DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE under tag_ocelot.c, just like tag_brcm.c, which would have a separate .xmit function. Again, too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Allocate the template from the init function of the tag_ocelot.c module, instead of from the driver: couldn't figure out a method of accessing the correct port template corresponding to the correct tagger in the .xmit function. The really interesting part is that Seville should have had its own tagging protocol defined - it is not compatible on the wire with Ocelot, even for that single bit. In principle, a packet generated by DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT when booted on NXP LS1028A would look in a certain way, but when booted on NXP T1040 it would look differently. The reverse is also true: a packet generated by a Seville switch would be interpreted incorrectly by Wireshark if it was told it was generated by an Ocelot switch. Actually things are a bit more nuanced. If we concentrate only on the DSA tag, what I said above is true, but Ocelot/Seville also support an optional DSA tag prefix, which can be short or long, and it is possible to distinguish the two taggers based on an integer constant put in that prefix. Nonetheless, creating a separate tagger is still justified, since the tag prefix is optional, and without it, there is again no way to distinguish. Claiming backwards binary compatibility is a bit more tough, since I've already changed the format of tag_ocelot once, in commit 5124197ce58b ("net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress"). Therefore I am not very concerned with treating this as a bugfix and backporting it to stable kernels (which would be another mess due to the fact that there would be lots of conflicts with the other DSA_TAG_PROTO* definitions). It's just simpler to say that the string values of the taggers have ABI value starting with kernel 5.12, which will be when the changing of tag protocol via /sys/class/net/<dsa-master>/dsa/tagging goes live. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:37:58 +00:00
return skb;
}
static struct sk_buff *ocelot_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct net_device *netdev,
struct packet_type *pt)
{
u64 src_port, qos_class;
u64 vlan_tci, tag_type;
u8 *start = skb->data;
struct dsa_port *dp;
u8 *extraction;
u16 vlan_tpid;
u64 cpuq;
/* Revert skb->data by the amount consumed by the DSA master,
* so it points to the beginning of the frame.
*/
skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress There are 2 goals that we follow: - Reduce the header size - Make the header size equal between RX and TX The issue that required long prefix on RX was the fact that the ocelot DSA tag, being put before Ethernet as it is, would overlap with the area that a DSA master uses for RX filtering (destination MAC address mainly). Now that we can ask DSA to put the master in promiscuous mode, in theory we could remove the prefix altogether and call it a day, but it looks like we can't. Using no prefix on ingress, some packets (such as ICMP) would be received, while others (such as PTP) would not be received. This is because the DSA master we use (enetc) triggers parse errors ("MAC rx frame errors") presumably because it sees Ethernet frames with a bad length. And indeed, when using no prefix, the EtherType (bytes 12-13 of the frame, bits 96-111) falls over the REW_VAL field from the extraction header, aka the PTP timestamp. When turning the short (32-bit) prefix on, the EtherType overlaps with bits 64-79 of the extraction header, which are a reserved area transmitted as zero by the switch. The packets are not dropped by the DSA master with a short prefix. Actually, the frames look like this in tcpdump (below is a PTP frame, with an extra dsa_8021q tag - dadb 0482 - added by a downstream sja1105). 89:0c:a9:f2:01:00 > 88:80:00:0a:00:1d, 802.3, length 0: LLC, \ dsap Unknown (0x10) Individual, ssap ProWay NM (0x0e) Response, \ ctrl 0x0004: Information, send seq 2, rcv seq 0, \ Flags [Response], length 78 0x0000: 8880 000a 001d 890c a9f2 0100 0000 100f ................ 0x0010: 0400 0000 0180 c200 000e 001f 7b63 0248 ............{c.H 0x0020: dadb 0482 88f7 1202 0036 0000 0000 0000 .........6...... 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 001f 7bff fe63 ............{..c 0x0040: 0248 0001 1f81 0500 0000 0000 0000 0000 .H.............. 0x0050: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ............ So the short prefix is our new default: we've shortened our RX frames by 12 octets, increased TX by 4, and headers are now equal between RX and TX. Note that we still need promiscuous mode for the DSA master to not drop it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-09-26 19:32:04 +00:00
/* We don't care about the short prefix, it is just for easy entrance
* into the DSA master's RX filter. Discard it now by moving it into
* the headroom.
*/
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress There are 2 goals that we follow: - Reduce the header size - Make the header size equal between RX and TX The issue that required long prefix on RX was the fact that the ocelot DSA tag, being put before Ethernet as it is, would overlap with the area that a DSA master uses for RX filtering (destination MAC address mainly). Now that we can ask DSA to put the master in promiscuous mode, in theory we could remove the prefix altogether and call it a day, but it looks like we can't. Using no prefix on ingress, some packets (such as ICMP) would be received, while others (such as PTP) would not be received. This is because the DSA master we use (enetc) triggers parse errors ("MAC rx frame errors") presumably because it sees Ethernet frames with a bad length. And indeed, when using no prefix, the EtherType (bytes 12-13 of the frame, bits 96-111) falls over the REW_VAL field from the extraction header, aka the PTP timestamp. When turning the short (32-bit) prefix on, the EtherType overlaps with bits 64-79 of the extraction header, which are a reserved area transmitted as zero by the switch. The packets are not dropped by the DSA master with a short prefix. Actually, the frames look like this in tcpdump (below is a PTP frame, with an extra dsa_8021q tag - dadb 0482 - added by a downstream sja1105). 89:0c:a9:f2:01:00 > 88:80:00:0a:00:1d, 802.3, length 0: LLC, \ dsap Unknown (0x10) Individual, ssap ProWay NM (0x0e) Response, \ ctrl 0x0004: Information, send seq 2, rcv seq 0, \ Flags [Response], length 78 0x0000: 8880 000a 001d 890c a9f2 0100 0000 100f ................ 0x0010: 0400 0000 0180 c200 000e 001f 7b63 0248 ............{c.H 0x0020: dadb 0482 88f7 1202 0036 0000 0000 0000 .........6...... 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 001f 7bff fe63 ............{..c 0x0040: 0248 0001 1f81 0500 0000 0000 0000 0000 .H.............. 0x0050: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ............ So the short prefix is our new default: we've shortened our RX frames by 12 octets, increased TX by 4, and headers are now equal between RX and TX. Note that we still need promiscuous mode for the DSA master to not drop it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-09-26 19:32:04 +00:00
skb_pull(skb, OCELOT_SHORT_PREFIX_LEN);
/* And skb->data now points to the extraction frame header.
* Keep a pointer to it.
*/
extraction = skb->data;
/* Now the EFH is part of the headroom as well */
skb_pull(skb, OCELOT_TAG_LEN);
/* Reset the pointer to the real MAC header */
skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
skb_reset_mac_len(skb);
/* And move skb->data to the correct location again */
skb_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN);
/* Remove from inet csum the extraction header */
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress There are 2 goals that we follow: - Reduce the header size - Make the header size equal between RX and TX The issue that required long prefix on RX was the fact that the ocelot DSA tag, being put before Ethernet as it is, would overlap with the area that a DSA master uses for RX filtering (destination MAC address mainly). Now that we can ask DSA to put the master in promiscuous mode, in theory we could remove the prefix altogether and call it a day, but it looks like we can't. Using no prefix on ingress, some packets (such as ICMP) would be received, while others (such as PTP) would not be received. This is because the DSA master we use (enetc) triggers parse errors ("MAC rx frame errors") presumably because it sees Ethernet frames with a bad length. And indeed, when using no prefix, the EtherType (bytes 12-13 of the frame, bits 96-111) falls over the REW_VAL field from the extraction header, aka the PTP timestamp. When turning the short (32-bit) prefix on, the EtherType overlaps with bits 64-79 of the extraction header, which are a reserved area transmitted as zero by the switch. The packets are not dropped by the DSA master with a short prefix. Actually, the frames look like this in tcpdump (below is a PTP frame, with an extra dsa_8021q tag - dadb 0482 - added by a downstream sja1105). 89:0c:a9:f2:01:00 > 88:80:00:0a:00:1d, 802.3, length 0: LLC, \ dsap Unknown (0x10) Individual, ssap ProWay NM (0x0e) Response, \ ctrl 0x0004: Information, send seq 2, rcv seq 0, \ Flags [Response], length 78 0x0000: 8880 000a 001d 890c a9f2 0100 0000 100f ................ 0x0010: 0400 0000 0180 c200 000e 001f 7b63 0248 ............{c.H 0x0020: dadb 0482 88f7 1202 0036 0000 0000 0000 .........6...... 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 001f 7bff fe63 ............{..c 0x0040: 0248 0001 1f81 0500 0000 0000 0000 0000 .H.............. 0x0050: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ............ So the short prefix is our new default: we've shortened our RX frames by 12 octets, increased TX by 4, and headers are now equal between RX and TX. Note that we still need promiscuous mode for the DSA master to not drop it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-09-26 19:32:04 +00:00
skb_postpull_rcsum(skb, start, OCELOT_TOTAL_TAG_LEN);
ocelot_xfh_get_src_port(extraction, &src_port);
ocelot_xfh_get_qos_class(extraction, &qos_class);
ocelot_xfh_get_tag_type(extraction, &tag_type);
ocelot_xfh_get_vlan_tci(extraction, &vlan_tci);
ocelot_xfh_get_cpuq(extraction, &cpuq);
skb->dev = dsa_master_find_slave(netdev, 0, src_port);
if (!skb->dev)
/* The switch will reflect back some frames sent through
* sockets opened on the bare DSA master. These will come back
* with src_port equal to the index of the CPU port, for which
* there is no slave registered. So don't print any error
* message here (ignore and drop those frames).
*/
return NULL;
skb->offload_fwd_mark = 1;
skb->priority = qos_class;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
if (eth_hdr(skb)->h_proto == cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_MRP) &&
cpuq & BIT(OCELOT_MRP_CPUQ))
skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0;
#endif
/* Ocelot switches copy frames unmodified to the CPU. However, it is
* possible for the user to request a VLAN modification through
* VCAP_IS1_ACT_VID_REPLACE_ENA. In this case, what will happen is that
* the VLAN ID field from the Extraction Header gets updated, but the
* 802.1Q header does not (the classified VLAN only becomes visible on
* egress through the "port tag" of front-panel ports).
* So, for traffic extracted by the CPU, we want to pick up the
* classified VLAN and manually replace the existing 802.1Q header from
* the packet with it, so that the operating system is always up to
* date with the result of tc-vlan actions.
* NOTE: In VLAN-unaware mode, we don't want to do that, we want the
* frame to remain unmodified, because the classified VLAN is always
* equal to the pvid of the ingress port and should not be used for
* processing.
*/
dp = dsa_slave_to_port(skb->dev);
vlan_tpid = tag_type ? ETH_P_8021AD : ETH_P_8021Q;
if (dsa_port_is_vlan_filtering(dp) &&
eth_hdr(skb)->h_proto == htons(vlan_tpid)) {
u16 dummy_vlan_tci;
skb_push_rcsum(skb, ETH_HLEN);
__skb_vlan_pop(skb, &dummy_vlan_tci);
skb_pull_rcsum(skb, ETH_HLEN);
__vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, htons(vlan_tpid), vlan_tci);
}
return skb;
}
static const struct dsa_device_ops ocelot_netdev_ops = {
.name = "ocelot",
.proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT,
.xmit = ocelot_xmit,
.rcv = ocelot_rcv,
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress There are 2 goals that we follow: - Reduce the header size - Make the header size equal between RX and TX The issue that required long prefix on RX was the fact that the ocelot DSA tag, being put before Ethernet as it is, would overlap with the area that a DSA master uses for RX filtering (destination MAC address mainly). Now that we can ask DSA to put the master in promiscuous mode, in theory we could remove the prefix altogether and call it a day, but it looks like we can't. Using no prefix on ingress, some packets (such as ICMP) would be received, while others (such as PTP) would not be received. This is because the DSA master we use (enetc) triggers parse errors ("MAC rx frame errors") presumably because it sees Ethernet frames with a bad length. And indeed, when using no prefix, the EtherType (bytes 12-13 of the frame, bits 96-111) falls over the REW_VAL field from the extraction header, aka the PTP timestamp. When turning the short (32-bit) prefix on, the EtherType overlaps with bits 64-79 of the extraction header, which are a reserved area transmitted as zero by the switch. The packets are not dropped by the DSA master with a short prefix. Actually, the frames look like this in tcpdump (below is a PTP frame, with an extra dsa_8021q tag - dadb 0482 - added by a downstream sja1105). 89:0c:a9:f2:01:00 > 88:80:00:0a:00:1d, 802.3, length 0: LLC, \ dsap Unknown (0x10) Individual, ssap ProWay NM (0x0e) Response, \ ctrl 0x0004: Information, send seq 2, rcv seq 0, \ Flags [Response], length 78 0x0000: 8880 000a 001d 890c a9f2 0100 0000 100f ................ 0x0010: 0400 0000 0180 c200 000e 001f 7b63 0248 ............{c.H 0x0020: dadb 0482 88f7 1202 0036 0000 0000 0000 .........6...... 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 001f 7bff fe63 ............{..c 0x0040: 0248 0001 1f81 0500 0000 0000 0000 0000 .H.............. 0x0050: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ............ So the short prefix is our new default: we've shortened our RX frames by 12 octets, increased TX by 4, and headers are now equal between RX and TX. Note that we still need promiscuous mode for the DSA master to not drop it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-09-26 19:32:04 +00:00
.overhead = OCELOT_TOTAL_TAG_LEN,
.promisc_on_master = true,
};
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: create separate tagger for Seville The ocelot tagger is a hot mess currently, it relies on memory initialized by the attached driver for basic frame transmission. This is against all that DSA tagging protocols stand for, which is that the transmission and reception of a DSA-tagged frame, the data path, should be independent from the switch control path, because the tag protocol is in principle hot-pluggable and reusable across switches (even if in practice it wasn't until very recently). But if another driver like dsa_loop wants to make use of tag_ocelot, it couldn't. This was done to have common code between Felix and Ocelot, which have one bit difference in the frame header format. Quoting from commit 67c2404922c2 ("net: dsa: felix: create a template for the DSA tags on xmit"): Other alternatives have been analyzed, such as: - Create a separate tag_seville.c: too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Create a separate DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE under tag_ocelot.c, just like tag_brcm.c, which would have a separate .xmit function. Again, too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Allocate the template from the init function of the tag_ocelot.c module, instead of from the driver: couldn't figure out a method of accessing the correct port template corresponding to the correct tagger in the .xmit function. The really interesting part is that Seville should have had its own tagging protocol defined - it is not compatible on the wire with Ocelot, even for that single bit. In principle, a packet generated by DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT when booted on NXP LS1028A would look in a certain way, but when booted on NXP T1040 it would look differently. The reverse is also true: a packet generated by a Seville switch would be interpreted incorrectly by Wireshark if it was told it was generated by an Ocelot switch. Actually things are a bit more nuanced. If we concentrate only on the DSA tag, what I said above is true, but Ocelot/Seville also support an optional DSA tag prefix, which can be short or long, and it is possible to distinguish the two taggers based on an integer constant put in that prefix. Nonetheless, creating a separate tagger is still justified, since the tag prefix is optional, and without it, there is again no way to distinguish. Claiming backwards binary compatibility is a bit more tough, since I've already changed the format of tag_ocelot once, in commit 5124197ce58b ("net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress"). Therefore I am not very concerned with treating this as a bugfix and backporting it to stable kernels (which would be another mess due to the fact that there would be lots of conflicts with the other DSA_TAG_PROTO* definitions). It's just simpler to say that the string values of the taggers have ABI value starting with kernel 5.12, which will be when the changing of tag protocol via /sys/class/net/<dsa-master>/dsa/tagging goes live. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:37:58 +00:00
DSA_TAG_DRIVER(ocelot_netdev_ops);
MODULE_ALIAS_DSA_TAG_DRIVER(DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT);
net: dsa: tag_ocelot: create separate tagger for Seville The ocelot tagger is a hot mess currently, it relies on memory initialized by the attached driver for basic frame transmission. This is against all that DSA tagging protocols stand for, which is that the transmission and reception of a DSA-tagged frame, the data path, should be independent from the switch control path, because the tag protocol is in principle hot-pluggable and reusable across switches (even if in practice it wasn't until very recently). But if another driver like dsa_loop wants to make use of tag_ocelot, it couldn't. This was done to have common code between Felix and Ocelot, which have one bit difference in the frame header format. Quoting from commit 67c2404922c2 ("net: dsa: felix: create a template for the DSA tags on xmit"): Other alternatives have been analyzed, such as: - Create a separate tag_seville.c: too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Create a separate DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE under tag_ocelot.c, just like tag_brcm.c, which would have a separate .xmit function. Again, too much code duplication for just 1 bit field difference. - Allocate the template from the init function of the tag_ocelot.c module, instead of from the driver: couldn't figure out a method of accessing the correct port template corresponding to the correct tagger in the .xmit function. The really interesting part is that Seville should have had its own tagging protocol defined - it is not compatible on the wire with Ocelot, even for that single bit. In principle, a packet generated by DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT when booted on NXP LS1028A would look in a certain way, but when booted on NXP T1040 it would look differently. The reverse is also true: a packet generated by a Seville switch would be interpreted incorrectly by Wireshark if it was told it was generated by an Ocelot switch. Actually things are a bit more nuanced. If we concentrate only on the DSA tag, what I said above is true, but Ocelot/Seville also support an optional DSA tag prefix, which can be short or long, and it is possible to distinguish the two taggers based on an integer constant put in that prefix. Nonetheless, creating a separate tagger is still justified, since the tag prefix is optional, and without it, there is again no way to distinguish. Claiming backwards binary compatibility is a bit more tough, since I've already changed the format of tag_ocelot once, in commit 5124197ce58b ("net: dsa: tag_ocelot: use a short prefix on both ingress and egress"). Therefore I am not very concerned with treating this as a bugfix and backporting it to stable kernels (which would be another mess due to the fact that there would be lots of conflicts with the other DSA_TAG_PROTO* definitions). It's just simpler to say that the string values of the taggers have ABI value starting with kernel 5.12, which will be when the changing of tag protocol via /sys/class/net/<dsa-master>/dsa/tagging goes live. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-02-13 22:37:58 +00:00
static const struct dsa_device_ops seville_netdev_ops = {
.name = "seville",
.proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE,
.xmit = seville_xmit,
.rcv = ocelot_rcv,
.overhead = OCELOT_TOTAL_TAG_LEN,
.promisc_on_master = true,
};
DSA_TAG_DRIVER(seville_netdev_ops);
MODULE_ALIAS_DSA_TAG_DRIVER(DSA_TAG_PROTO_SEVILLE);
static struct dsa_tag_driver *ocelot_tag_driver_array[] = {
&DSA_TAG_DRIVER_NAME(ocelot_netdev_ops),
&DSA_TAG_DRIVER_NAME(seville_netdev_ops),
};
module_dsa_tag_drivers(ocelot_tag_driver_array);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");