drivers/base/memory: rename base_memory_block_id to memory_block_id

memory_block may have a larger granularity than section, this is why we
have base_section_nr. But base_memory_block_id seems a little
misleading, since there is no larger granularity concept which groups
several memory_block.

What we need here is the exact memory_block_id to a section_nr. Let's
rename it to make it more precise.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200623025701.2016-2-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Wei Yang 2020-06-23 10:57:01 +08:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 40ba2cde77
commit 178bdbed3e

View file

@ -50,14 +50,14 @@ int memhp_online_type_from_str(const char *str)
static int sections_per_block;
static inline unsigned long base_memory_block_id(unsigned long section_nr)
static inline unsigned long memory_block_id(unsigned long section_nr)
{
return section_nr / sections_per_block;
}
static inline unsigned long pfn_to_block_id(unsigned long pfn)
{
return base_memory_block_id(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn));
return memory_block_id(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn));
}
static inline unsigned long phys_to_block_id(unsigned long phys)
@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static struct memory_block *find_memory_block_by_id(unsigned long block_id)
*/
struct memory_block *find_memory_block(struct mem_section *section)
{
unsigned long block_id = base_memory_block_id(__section_nr(section));
unsigned long block_id = memory_block_id(__section_nr(section));
return find_memory_block_by_id(block_id);
}
@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static int add_memory_block(unsigned long base_section_nr)
if (section_count == 0)
return 0;
return init_memory_block(base_memory_block_id(base_section_nr),
return init_memory_block(memory_block_id(base_section_nr),
MEM_ONLINE);
}