lib/test: fix spelling mistakes

Fix some spelling mistakes in comments found by "codespell":
thats ==> that's
unitialized ==> uninitialized
panicing ==> panicking
sucess ==> success
possitive ==> positive
intepreted ==> interpreted

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210607133036.12525-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>	[test_bfp.c]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Zhen Lei 2021-07-07 18:07:28 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent a931dd33d3
commit 53b0fe36ab
5 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
* get_count_order/long * get_count_order/long
*/ */
/* use an enum because thats the most common BITMAP usage */ /* use an enum because that's the most common BITMAP usage */
enum bitops_fun { enum bitops_fun {
BITOPS_4 = 4, BITOPS_4 = 4,
BITOPS_7 = 7, BITOPS_7 = 7,

View File

@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{ {
"RET_A", "RET_A",
.u.insns = { .u.insns = {
/* check that unitialized X and A contain zeros */ /* check that uninitialized X and A contain zeros */
BPF_STMT(BPF_MISC | BPF_TXA, 0), BPF_STMT(BPF_MISC | BPF_TXA, 0),
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0) BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0)
}, },

View File

@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static void kasan_global_oob(struct kunit *test)
{ {
/* /*
* Deliberate out-of-bounds access. To prevent CONFIG_UBSAN_LOCAL_BOUNDS * Deliberate out-of-bounds access. To prevent CONFIG_UBSAN_LOCAL_BOUNDS
* from failing here and panicing the kernel, access the array via a * from failing here and panicking the kernel, access the array via a
* volatile pointer, which will prevent the compiler from being able to * volatile pointer, which will prevent the compiler from being able to
* determine the array bounds. * determine the array bounds.
* *

View File

@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int tally_work_test(struct kmod_test_device_info *info)
* If this ran it means *all* tasks were created fine and we * If this ran it means *all* tasks were created fine and we
* are now just collecting results. * are now just collecting results.
* *
* Only propagate errors, do not override with a subsequent sucess case. * Only propagate errors, do not override with a subsequent success case.
*/ */
static void tally_up_work(struct kmod_test_device *test_dev) static void tally_up_work(struct kmod_test_device *test_dev)
{ {
@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static int trigger_config_run(struct kmod_test_device *test_dev)
* wrong with the setup of the test. If the test setup went fine * wrong with the setup of the test. If the test setup went fine
* then userspace must just check the result of config->test_result. * then userspace must just check the result of config->test_result.
* One issue with relying on the return from a call in the kernel * One issue with relying on the return from a call in the kernel
* is if the kernel returns a possitive value using this trigger * is if the kernel returns a positive value using this trigger
* will not return the value to userspace, it would be lost. * will not return the value to userspace, it would be lost.
* *
* By not relying on capturing the return value of tests we are using * By not relying on capturing the return value of tests we are using
@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ trigger_config_store(struct device *dev,
* Note: any return > 0 will be treated as success * Note: any return > 0 will be treated as success
* and the error value will not be available to userspace. * and the error value will not be available to userspace.
* Do not rely on trying to send to userspace a test value * Do not rely on trying to send to userspace a test value
* return value as possitive return errors will be lost. * return value as positive return errors will be lost.
*/ */
if (WARN_ON(ret > 0)) if (WARN_ON(ret > 0))
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;

View File

@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ static void __init numbers_prefix_overflow(void)
/* /*
* 0x prefix in a field of width 2 using %i conversion: first field * 0x prefix in a field of width 2 using %i conversion: first field
* converts to 0. Next field scan starts at the character after "0x", * converts to 0. Next field scan starts at the character after "0x",
* which will convert if can be intepreted as decimal but will fail * which will convert if can be interpreted as decimal but will fail
* if it contains any hex digits (since no 0x prefix). * if it contains any hex digits (since no 0x prefix).
*/ */
test_number_prefix(long long, "0x67", "%2lli%lli", 0, 67, 2, check_ll); test_number_prefix(long long, "0x67", "%2lli%lli", 0, 67, 2, check_ll);