kmemleak-test.c was moved to the samples directory in 1abbef4f51
("mm,kmemleak-test.c: move kmemleak-test.c to samples dir").
If CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST=m and CONFIG_SAMPLES is unset,
kmemleak-test.c will be unnecessarily compiled.
So move the entry for CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST from mm/Kconfig and add a
new CONFIG_SAMPLE_KMEMLEAK in samples/ to control whether kmemleak-test.c
is built or not.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330060904.292975-1-gehao@kylinos.cn
Fixes: 1abbef4f51 ("mm,kmemleak-test.c: move kmemleak-test.c to samples dir")
Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ye Xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Add vm_map_ram()/vm_unmap_ram() test case to our stress test-suite.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix whitespace, per Lorenzo]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330190639.431589-2-urezki@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
A global vmap_blocks-xarray array can be contented under heavy usage of
the vm_map_ram()/vm_unmap_ram() APIs. The lock_stat shows that a
"vmap_blocks.xa_lock" lock is a second in a top-list when it comes to
contentions:
<snip>
----------------------------------------
class name con-bounces contentions ...
----------------------------------------
vmap_area_lock: 2554079 2554276 ...
--------------
vmap_area_lock 1297948 [<00000000dd41cbaa>] alloc_vmap_area+0x1c7/0x910
vmap_area_lock 1256330 [<000000009d927bf3>] free_vmap_block+0x4a/0xe0
vmap_area_lock 1 [<00000000c95c05a7>] find_vm_area+0x16/0x70
--------------
vmap_area_lock 1738590 [<00000000dd41cbaa>] alloc_vmap_area+0x1c7/0x910
vmap_area_lock 815688 [<000000009d927bf3>] free_vmap_block+0x4a/0xe0
vmap_area_lock 1 [<00000000c1d619d7>] __get_vm_area_node+0xd2/0x170
vmap_blocks.xa_lock: 862689 862698 ...
-------------------
vmap_blocks.xa_lock 378418 [<00000000625a5626>] vm_map_ram+0x359/0x4a0
vmap_blocks.xa_lock 484280 [<00000000caa2ef03>] xa_erase+0xe/0x30
-------------------
vmap_blocks.xa_lock 576226 [<00000000caa2ef03>] xa_erase+0xe/0x30
vmap_blocks.xa_lock 286472 [<00000000625a5626>] vm_map_ram+0x359/0x4a0
...
<snip>
that is a result of running vm_map_ram()/vm_unmap_ram() in
a loop. The test creates 64(on 64 CPUs system) threads and
each one maps/unmaps 1 page.
After this change the "xa_lock" can be considered as a noise
in the same test condition:
<snip>
...
&xa->xa_lock#1: 10333 10394 ...
--------------
&xa->xa_lock#1 5349 [<00000000bbbc9751>] xa_erase+0xe/0x30
&xa->xa_lock#1 5045 [<0000000018def45d>] vm_map_ram+0x3a4/0x4f0
--------------
&xa->xa_lock#1 7326 [<0000000018def45d>] vm_map_ram+0x3a4/0x4f0
&xa->xa_lock#1 3068 [<00000000bbbc9751>] xa_erase+0xe/0x30
...
<snip>
Running the test_vmalloc.sh run_test_mask=1024 nr_threads=64 nr_pages=5
shows around ~8 percent of throughput improvement of vm_map_ram() and
vm_unmap_ram() APIs.
This patch does not fix vmap_area_lock/free_vmap_area_lock and
purge_vmap_area_lock bottle-necks, it is rather a separate rework.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330190639.431589-1-urezki@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The free_area_empty() helper is only used inside mm/ so move it there to
reduce noise in include/linux/mmzone.h
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230326160215.2674531-1-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
After commit 446ec83805 ("mm/page_alloc: use might_alloc()") and commit
84172f4bb7 ("mm/page_alloc: combine __alloc_pages and
__alloc_pages_nodemask"), the comment is no longer accurate. Flag
'__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM' is clear enough on its own, so remove the comment
rather than update it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230327034149.942-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Sidhartha Kumar removed the last caller of PageHeadHuge(), so we can now
remove it and make folio_test_hugetlb() the real implementation. Add
kernel-doc for folio_test_hugetlb().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230327151050.1787744-1-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-15-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-14-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
sh defines insane ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER allowing MAX_ORDER up to
63, which implies maximal contiguous allocation size of 2^63 pages.
Drop bogus definitions of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a
simple integer with sensible defaults.
Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will
be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges.
[rppt@kernel.org: untweak ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER's `range']
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-13-rppt@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-13-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
[rppt@kernel.org: tweak ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER's `range']
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-12-rppt@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-12-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
PowerPC defines ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER some of which are insanely
allowing MAX_ORDER up to 63, which implies maximal contiguous allocation
size of 2^63 pages.
Drop bogus definitions of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a
simple integer with sensible defaults.
Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will
be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-11-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-10-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
nios2 defines range for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER allowing MAX_ORDER up to 19,
which implies maximal contiguous allocation size of 2^19 pages or 2GiB.
Drop bogus definition of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a
simple integer with sensible default.
Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will
be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-9-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-8-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-7-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
It is enough to keep default values for base and huge pages without
letting users to override ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER.
Drop the prompt to make the option unvisible in *config.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-6-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The default value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER matches the generic default
defined in the MM code, the architecture does not support huge pages, so
there is no need to keep ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER option available.
Drop it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-5-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
[rppt@kernel.org: change ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER dependencies]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-4-rppt@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-4-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
It is not a good idea to change fundamental parameters of core memory
management. Having predefined ranges suggests that the values within
those ranges are sensible, but one has to *really* understand implications
of changing MAX_ORDER before actually amending it and ranges don't help
here.
Drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and make its prompt
visible only if EXPERT=y
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-3-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "arch,mm: cleanup Kconfig entries for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER",
v3.
Several architectures have ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER in their Kconfig and
they all have wrong and misleading prompt and help text for this option.
Besides, some define insane limits for possible values of
ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER, some carefully define ranges only for a subset of
possible configurations, some make this option configurable by users for no
good reason.
This set updates the prompt and help text everywhere and does its best to
update actual definitions of ranges where applicable.
kbuild generated a bunch of false positives because it assigns -1 to
ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER, hopefully this will be fixed soon.
This patch (of 14):
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-1-rppt@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-1-rppt@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-2-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Leonardo Bras has noticed that pcp charge cache draining might be
disruptive on workloads relying on 'isolated cpus', a feature commonly
used on workloads that are sensitive to interruption and context switching
such as vRAN and Industrial Control Systems.
There are essentially two ways how to approach the issue. We can either
allow the pcp cache to be drained on a different rather than a local cpu
or avoid remote flushing on isolated cpus.
The current pcp charge cache is really optimized for high performance and
it always relies to stick with its cpu. That means it only requires
local_lock (preempt_disable on !RT) and draining is handed over to pcp WQ
to drain locally again.
The former solution (remote draining) would require to add an additional
locking to prevent local charges from racing with the draining. This adds
an atomic operation to otherwise simple arithmetic fast path in the
try_charge path. Another concern is that the remote draining can cause a
lock contention for the isolated workloads and therefore interfere with it
indirectly via user space interfaces.
Another option is to avoid draining scheduling on isolated cpus
altogether. That means that those remote cpus would keep their charges
even after drain_all_stock returns. This is certainly not optimal either
but it shouldn't really cause any major problems. In the worst case (many
isolated cpus with charges - each of them with MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH i.e 64
page) the memory consumption of a memcg would be artificially higher than
can be immediately used from other cpus.
Theoretically a memcg OOM killer could be triggered pre-maturely.
Currently it is not really clear whether this is a practical problem
though. Tight memcg limit would be really counter productive to cpu
isolated workloads pretty much by definition because any memory reclaimed
induced by memcg limit could break user space timing expectations as those
usually expect execution in the userspace most of the time.
Also charges could be left behind on memcg removal. Any future charge on
those isolated cpus will drain that pcp cache so this won't be a permanent
leak.
Considering cons and pros of both approaches this patch is implementing
the second option and simply do not schedule remote draining if the target
cpu is isolated. This solution is much more simpler. It doesn't add any
new locking and it is more more predictable from the user space POV.
Should the pre-mature memcg OOM become a real life problem, we can revisit
this decision.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: memcontrol.c needs sched/isolation.h]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303180617.7E3aIlHf-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230317134448.11082-3-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Suggested-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Reported-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "memcg, cpuisol: do not interfere pcp cache charges draining
with cpuisol workloads".
Leonardo has reported [1] that pcp memcg charge draining can interfere
with cpu isolated workloads. The said draining is done from a WQ context
with a pcp worker scheduled on each CPU which holds any cached charges for
a specific memcg hierarchy. Operation is not really a common operation
[2]. It can be triggered from the userspace though so some care is
definitely due.
Leonardo has tried to address the issue by allowing remote charge draining
[3]. This approach requires an additional locking to synchronize pcp
caches sync from a remote cpu from local pcp consumers. Even though the
proposed lock was per-cpu there is still potential for contention and less
predictable behavior.
This patchset addresses the issue from a different angle. Rather than
dealing with a potential synchronization, cpus which are isolated are
simply never scheduled to be drained. This means that a small amount of
charges could be laying around and waiting for a later use or they are
flushed when a different memcg is charged from the same cpu. More details
are in patch 2. The first patch from Frederic is implementing an
abstraction to tell whether a specific cpu has been isolated and therefore
require a special treatment.
This patch (of 2):
Provide this new API to check if a CPU has been isolated either through
isolcpus= or nohz_full= kernel parameter.
It aims at avoiding kernel load deemed to be safely spared on CPUs running
sensitive workload that can't bear any disturbance, such as pcp cache
draining.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230317134448.11082-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230317134448.11082-2-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Some unknown -mllvm options (i.e. those starting with the letter "h")
don't cause an error to be returned by clang, so the cc-option helper adds
the unknown hwasan-kernel-mem-intrinsic-prefix=1 flag to CFLAGS with
compilers that are new enough for hwasan but too old for this option.
This causes a rather unreadable build failure:
fixdep: error opening file: scripts/mod/.empty.o.d: No such file or directory
make[4]: *** [/home/arnd/arm-soc/scripts/Makefile.build:252: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 2
fixdep: error opening file: scripts/mod/.devicetable-offsets.s.d: No such file or directory
make[4]: *** [/home/arnd/arm-soc/scripts/Makefile.build:114: scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s] Error 2
Add a version check to only allow this option with clang-15, gcc-13
or later versions.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230418122350.1646391-1-arnd@kernel.org
Fixes: 51287dcb00 ("kasan: emit different calls for instrumentable memintrinsics")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANpmjNMwYosrvqh4ogDO8rgn+SeDHM2b-shD21wTypm_6MMe=g@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The current implementation of the compaction loop fails to set the source
zspage pointer to NULL in all cases, leading to a potential issue where
__zs_compact() could use a stale zspage pointer. This pointer could even
point to a previously freed zspage, causing unexpected behavior in the
putback_zspage() and migrate_write_unlock() functions after returning from
the compaction loop.
Address the issue by ensuring that the source zspage pointer is always set
to NULL when it should be.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230417130850.1784777-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Fixes: 5a845e9f2d ("zsmalloc: rework compaction algorithm")
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Tested-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
clang produces a build failure on x86 for some randconfig builds after a
change that moves around code to mm/mm_init.c:
Cannot find symbol for section 2: .text.
mm/mm_init.o: failed
I have not been able to figure out why this happens, but the __weak
annotation on arch_has_descending_max_zone_pfns() is the trigger here.
Removing the weak function in favor of an open-coded Kconfig option check
avoids the problem and becomes clearer as well as better to optimize by
the compiler.
[arnd@arndb.de: fix logic bug]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230415081904.969049-1-arnd@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414080418.110236-1-arnd@kernel.org
Fixes: 9420f89db2 ("mm: move most of core MM initialization to mm/mm_init.c")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
23baf831a3 ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely") results in
various boot failures (hang) on arm targets Debug messages reveal the
reason.
########### MAX_ORDER=10 start=0 __ffs(start)=-1 min()=10 min_t=-1
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If start==0, __ffs(start) returns 0xfffffff or (as int) -1, which min_t()
interprets as such, while min() apparently uses the returned unsigned long
value. Obviously a negative order isn't received well by the rest of the
code.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment, per Mike]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZDBa7HWZK69dKKzH@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230406072529.vupqyrzqnhyozeyh@box.shutemov.name
Fixes: 23baf831a3 ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely")
Signed-off-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9460377a-38aa-4f39-ad57-fb73725f92db@roeck-us.net
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Syzbot still reports uninit-value in nilfs_add_checksums_on_logs() for
KMSAN enabled kernels after applying commit 7397031622 ("nilfs2:
initialize "struct nilfs_binfo_dat"->bi_pad field").
This is because the unused bytes at the end of each block in segment
summaries are not initialized. So this fixes the issue by padding the
unused bytes with null bytes.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230417173513.12598-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+048585f3f4227bb2b49b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=048585f3f4227bb2b49b
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
A bug was reported by Yuanxi Liu where allocating 1G pages at runtime is
taking an excessive amount of time for large amounts of memory. Further
testing allocating huge pages that the cost is linear i.e. if allocating
1G pages in batches of 10 then the time to allocate nr_hugepages from
10->20->30->etc increases linearly even though 10 pages are allocated at
each step. Profiles indicated that much of the time is spent checking the
validity within already existing huge pages and then attempting a
migration that fails after isolating the range, draining pages and a whole
lot of other useless work.
Commit eb14d4eefd ("mm,page_alloc: drop unnecessary checks from
pfn_range_valid_contig") removed two checks, one which ignored huge pages
for contiguous allocations as huge pages can sometimes migrate. While
there may be value on migrating a 2M page to satisfy a 1G allocation, it's
potentially expensive if the 1G allocation fails and it's pointless to try
moving a 1G page for a new 1G allocation or scan the tail pages for valid
PFNs.
Reintroduce the PageHuge check and assume any contiguous region with
hugetlbfs pages is unsuitable for a new 1G allocation.
The hpagealloc test allocates huge pages in batches and reports the
average latency per page over time. This test happens just after boot
when fragmentation is not an issue. Units are in milliseconds.
hpagealloc
6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6
vanilla hugeallocrevert-v1r1 hugeallocsimple-v1r2
Min Latency 26.42 ( 0.00%) 5.07 ( 80.82%) 18.94 ( 28.30%)
1st-qrtle Latency 356.61 ( 0.00%) 5.34 ( 98.50%) 19.85 ( 94.43%)
2nd-qrtle Latency 697.26 ( 0.00%) 5.47 ( 99.22%) 20.44 ( 97.07%)
3rd-qrtle Latency 972.94 ( 0.00%) 5.50 ( 99.43%) 20.81 ( 97.86%)
Max-1 Latency 26.42 ( 0.00%) 5.07 ( 80.82%) 18.94 ( 28.30%)
Max-5 Latency 82.14 ( 0.00%) 5.11 ( 93.78%) 19.31 ( 76.49%)
Max-10 Latency 150.54 ( 0.00%) 5.20 ( 96.55%) 19.43 ( 87.09%)
Max-90 Latency 1164.45 ( 0.00%) 5.53 ( 99.52%) 20.97 ( 98.20%)
Max-95 Latency 1223.06 ( 0.00%) 5.55 ( 99.55%) 21.06 ( 98.28%)
Max-99 Latency 1278.67 ( 0.00%) 5.57 ( 99.56%) 22.56 ( 98.24%)
Max Latency 1310.90 ( 0.00%) 8.06 ( 99.39%) 26.62 ( 97.97%)
Amean Latency 678.36 ( 0.00%) 5.44 * 99.20%* 20.44 * 96.99%*
6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6 6.3.0-rc6
vanilla revert-v1 hugeallocfix-v2
Duration User 0.28 0.27 0.30
Duration System 808.66 17.77 35.99
Duration Elapsed 830.87 18.08 36.33
The vanilla kernel is poor, taking up to 1.3 second to allocate a huge
page and almost 10 minutes in total to run the test. Reverting the
problematic commit reduces it to 8ms at worst and the patch takes 26ms.
This patch fixes the main issue with skipping huge pages but leaves the
page_count() out because a page with an elevated count potentially can
migrate.
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217022
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414141429.pwgieuwluxwez3rj@techsingularity.net
Fixes: eb14d4eefd ("mm,page_alloc: drop unnecessary checks from pfn_range_valid_contig")
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Reported-by: Yuanxi Liu <y.liu@naruida.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The maple tree limits the gap returned to a window that specifically fits
what was asked. This may not be optimal in the case of switching search
directions or a gap that does not satisfy the requested space for other
reasons. Fix the search by retrying the operation and limiting the search
window in the rare occasion that a conflict occurs.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414185919.4175572-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
Fixes: 3499a13168 ("mm/mmap: use maple tree for unmapped_area{_topdown}")
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The internal function of mas_awalk() was incorrectly skipping the last
entry in a node, which could potentially be NULL. This is only a problem
for the left-most node in the tree - otherwise that NULL would not exist.
Fix mas_awalk() by using the metadata to obtain the end of the node for
the loop and the logical pivot as apposed to the raw pivot value.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414145728.4067069-2-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
Fixes: 54a611b605 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure")
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Stop using maple state min/max for the range by passing through pointers
for those values. This will allow the maple state to be reused without
resetting.
Also add some logic to fail out early on searching with invalid
arguments.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414145728.4067069-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
Fixes: 54a611b605 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure")
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Similarly to kmsan_vmap_pages_range_noflush(), kmsan_ioremap_page_range()
must also properly handle allocation/mapping failures. In the case of
such, it must clean up the already created metadata mappings and return an
error code, so that the error can be propagated to ioremap_page_range().
Without doing so, KMSAN may silently fail to bring the metadata for the
page range into a consistent state, which will result in user-visible
crashes when trying to access them.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230413131223.4135168-2-glider@google.com
Fixes: b073d7f8ae ("mm: kmsan: maintain KMSAN metadata for page operations")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Reported-by: Dipanjan Das <mail.dipanjan.das@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CANX2M5ZRrRA64k0hOif02TjmY9kbbO2aCBPyq79es34RXZ=cAw@mail.gmail.com/
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
As reported by Dipanjan Das, when KMSAN is used together with kernel fault
injection (or, generally, even without the latter), calls to kcalloc() or
__vmap_pages_range_noflush() may fail, leaving the metadata mappings for
the virtual mapping in an inconsistent state. When these metadata
mappings are accessed later, the kernel crashes.
To address the problem, we return a non-zero error code from
kmsan_vmap_pages_range_noflush() in the case of any allocation/mapping
failure inside it, and make vmap_pages_range_noflush() return an error if
KMSAN fails to allocate the metadata.
This patch also removes KMSAN_WARN_ON() from vmap_pages_range_noflush(),
as these allocation failures are not fatal anymore.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230413131223.4135168-1-glider@google.com
Fixes: b073d7f8ae ("mm: kmsan: maintain KMSAN metadata for page operations")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Reported-by: Dipanjan Das <mail.dipanjan.das@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CANX2M5ZRrRA64k0hOif02TjmY9kbbO2aCBPyq79es34RXZ=cAw@mail.gmail.com/
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
commit f1a7941243 ("mm: convert mm's rss stats into percpu_counter")
introduces a memory leak by missing a call to destroy_context() when a
percpu_counter fails to allocate.
Before introducing the per-cpu counter allocations, init_new_context() was
the last call that could fail in mm_init(), and thus there was no need to
ever invoke destroy_context() in the error paths. Adding the following
percpu counter allocations adds error paths after init_new_context(),
which means its associated destroy_context() needs to be called when
percpu counters fail to allocate.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330133822.66271-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Fixes: f1a7941243 ("mm: convert mm's rss stats into percpu_counter")
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
syzbot is reporting circular locking dependency which involves
zonelist_update_seq seqlock [1], for this lock is checked by memory
allocation requests which do not need to be retried.
One deadlock scenario is kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) from an interrupt handler.
CPU0
----
__build_all_zonelists() {
write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq); // makes zonelist_update_seq.seqcount odd
// e.g. timer interrupt handler runs at this moment
some_timer_func() {
kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) {
__alloc_pages_slowpath() {
read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq) {
// spins forever because zonelist_update_seq.seqcount is odd
}
}
}
}
// e.g. timer interrupt handler finishes
write_sequnlock(&zonelist_update_seq); // makes zonelist_update_seq.seqcount even
}
This deadlock scenario can be easily eliminated by not calling
read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq) from !__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM allocation
requests, for retry is applicable to only __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM allocation
requests. But Michal Hocko does not know whether we should go with this
approach.
Another deadlock scenario which syzbot is reporting is a race between
kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) from tty_insert_flip_string_and_push_buffer() with
port->lock held and printk() from __build_all_zonelists() with
zonelist_update_seq held.
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
pty_write() {
tty_insert_flip_string_and_push_buffer() {
__build_all_zonelists() {
write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq);
build_zonelists() {
printk() {
vprintk() {
vprintk_default() {
vprintk_emit() {
console_unlock() {
console_flush_all() {
console_emit_next_record() {
con->write() = serial8250_console_write() {
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
tty_insert_flip_string() {
tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag() {
__tty_buffer_request_room() {
tty_buffer_alloc() {
kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN) {
__alloc_pages_slowpath() {
zonelist_iter_begin() {
read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq); // spins forever because zonelist_update_seq.seqcount is odd
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags); // spins forever because port->lock is held
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
// message is printed to console
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
write_sequnlock(&zonelist_update_seq);
}
}
}
This deadlock scenario can be eliminated by
preventing interrupt context from calling kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC)
and
preventing printk() from calling console_flush_all()
while zonelist_update_seq.seqcount is odd.
Since Petr Mladek thinks that __build_all_zonelists() can become a
candidate for deferring printk() [2], let's address this problem by
disabling local interrupts in order to avoid kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC)
and
disabling synchronous printk() in order to avoid console_flush_all()
.
As a side effect of minimizing duration of zonelist_update_seq.seqcount
being odd by disabling synchronous printk(), latency at
read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq) for both !__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM and
__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM allocation requests will be reduced. Although, from
lockdep perspective, not calling read_seqbegin(&zonelist_update_seq) (i.e.
do not record unnecessary locking dependency) from interrupt context is
still preferable, even if we don't allow calling kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC)
inside
write_seqlock(&zonelist_update_seq)/write_sequnlock(&zonelist_update_seq)
section...
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8796b95c-3da3-5885-fddd-6ef55f30e4d3@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Fixes: 3d36424b3b ("mm/page_alloc: fix race condition between build_all_zonelists and page allocation")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZCrs+1cDqPWTDFNM@alley [2]
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+223c7461c58c58a4cb10@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=223c7461c58c58a4cb10 [1]
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Patrick Daly <quic_pdaly@quicinc.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Linux Security Modules (LSMs) that implement the "capable" hook will
usually emit an access denial message to the audit log whenever they
"block" the current task from using the given capability based on their
security policy.
The occurrence of a denial is used as an indication that the given task
has attempted an operation that requires the given access permission, so
the callers of functions that perform LSM permission checks must take care
to avoid calling them too early (before it is decided if the permission is
actually needed to perform the requested operation).
The __sys_setres[ug]id() functions violate this convention by first
calling ns_capable_setid() and only then checking if the operation
requires the capability or not. It means that any caller that has the
capability granted by DAC (task's capability set) but not by MAC (LSMs)
will generate a "denied" audit record, even if is doing an operation for
which the capability is not required.
Fix this by reordering the checks such that ns_capable_setid() is checked
last and -EPERM is returned immediately if it returns false.
While there, also do two small optimizations:
* move the capability check before prepare_creds() and
* bail out early in case of a no-op.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230217162154.837549-1-omosnace@redhat.com
Fixes: 1da177e4c3 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This is a proposal to revert commit 914eedcb9b.
I found this when writing a simple UFFDIO_API test to be the first unit
test in this set. Two things breaks with the commit:
- UFFDIO_API check was lost and missing. According to man page, the
kernel should reject ioctl(UFFDIO_API) if uffdio_api.api != 0xaa. This
check is needed if the api version will be extended in the future, or
user app won't be able to identify which is a new kernel.
- Feature flags checks were removed, which means UFFDIO_API with a
feature that does not exist will also succeed. According to the man
page, we should (and it makes sense) to reject ioctl(UFFDIO_API) if
unknown features passed in.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220722201513.1624158-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412163922.327282-2-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: 914eedcb9b ("userfaultfd: don't fail on unrecognized features")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
KASAN report null-ptr-deref:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in bdi_split_work_to_wbs+0x5c5/0x7b0
Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000000 by task sync/943
CPU: 5 PID: 943 Comm: sync Tainted: 6.3.0-rc5-next-20230406-dirty #461
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x7f/0xc0
print_report+0x2ba/0x340
kasan_report+0xc4/0x120
kasan_check_range+0x1b7/0x2e0
__kasan_check_write+0x24/0x40
bdi_split_work_to_wbs+0x5c5/0x7b0
sync_inodes_sb+0x195/0x630
sync_inodes_one_sb+0x3a/0x50
iterate_supers+0x106/0x1b0
ksys_sync+0x98/0x160
[...]
==================================================================
The race that causes the above issue is as follows:
cpu1 cpu2
-------------------------|-------------------------
inode_switch_wbs
INIT_WORK(&isw->work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn)
queue_rcu_work(isw_wq, &isw->work)
// queue_work async
inode_switch_wbs_work_fn
wb_put_many(old_wb, nr_switched)
percpu_ref_put_many
ref->data->release(ref)
cgwb_release
queue_work(cgwb_release_wq, &wb->release_work)
// queue_work async
&wb->release_work
cgwb_release_workfn
ksys_sync
iterate_supers
sync_inodes_one_sb
sync_inodes_sb
bdi_split_work_to_wbs
kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC)
// alloc memory failed
percpu_ref_exit
ref->data = NULL
kfree(data)
wb_get(wb)
percpu_ref_get(&wb->refcnt)
percpu_ref_get_many(ref, 1)
atomic_long_add(nr, &ref->data->count)
atomic64_add(i, v)
// trigger null-ptr-deref
bdi_split_work_to_wbs() traverses &bdi->wb_list to split work into all
wbs. If the allocation of new work fails, the on-stack fallback will be
used and the reference count of the current wb is increased afterwards.
If cgroup writeback membership switches occur before getting the reference
count and the current wb is released as old_wd, then calling wb_get() or
wb_put() will trigger the null pointer dereference above.
This issue was introduced in v4.3-rc7 (see fix tag1). Both
sync_inodes_sb() and __writeback_inodes_sb_nr() calls to
bdi_split_work_to_wbs() can trigger this issue. For scenarios called via
sync_inodes_sb(), originally commit 7fc5854f8c ("writeback: synchronize
sync(2) against cgroup writeback membership switches") reduced the
possibility of the issue by adding wb_switch_rwsem, but in v5.14-rc1 (see
fix tag2) removed the "inode_io_list_del_locked(inode, old_wb)" from
inode_switch_wbs_work_fn() so that wb->state contains WB_has_dirty_io,
thus old_wb is not skipped when traversing wbs in bdi_split_work_to_wbs(),
and the issue becomes easily reproducible again.
To solve this problem, percpu_ref_exit() is called under RCU protection to
avoid race between cgwb_release_workfn() and bdi_split_work_to_wbs().
Moreover, replace wb_get() with wb_tryget() in bdi_split_work_to_wbs(),
and skip the current wb if wb_tryget() fails because the wb has already
been shutdown.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230410130826.1492525-1-libaokun1@huawei.com
Fixes: b817525a4a ("writeback: bdi_writeback iteration must not skip dying ones")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Cc: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Cc: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In mas_alloc_nodes(), "node->node_count = 0" means to initialize the
node_count field of the new node, but the node may not be a new node. It
may be a node that existed before and node_count has a value, setting it
to 0 will cause a memory leak. At this time, mas->alloc->total will be
greater than the actual number of nodes in the linked list, which may
cause many other errors. For example, out-of-bounds access in
mas_pop_node(), and mas_pop_node() may return addresses that should not be
used. Fix it by initializing node_count only for new nodes.
Also, by the way, an if-else statement was removed to simplify the code.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230411041005.26205-1-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com
Fixes: 54a611b605 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure")
Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
When using cull option with 'tg' flag, the fprintf is using pid instead
of tgid. It should use tgid instead.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230411034929.2071501-1-steve_chou@pesi.com.tw
Fixes: 9c8a0a8e59 ("tools/vm/page_owner_sort.c: support for user-defined culling rules")
Signed-off-by: Steve Chou <steve_chou@pesi.com.tw>
Cc: Jiajian Ye <yejiajian2018@email.szu.edu.cn>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/d79bc6eaf65e68bd1c2a1e1510ab6291ce5926a6.1681162487.git.jtoppins@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@redhat.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
set_mempolicy_home_node() iterates over a list of VMAs and calls
mbind_range() on each VMA, which also iterates over the singular list of
the VMA passed in and potentially splits the VMA. Since the VMA iterator
is not passed through, set_mempolicy_home_node() may now point to a stale
node in the VMA tree. This can result in a UAF as reported by syzbot.
Avoid the stale maple tree node by passing the VMA iterator through to the
underlying call to split_vma().
mbind_range() is also overly complicated, since there are two calling
functions and one already handles iterating over the VMAs. Simplify
mbind_range() to only handle merging and splitting of the VMAs.
Align the new loop in do_mbind() and existing loop in
set_mempolicy_home_node() to use the reduced mbind_range() function. This
allows for a single location of the range calculation and avoids
constantly looking up the previous VMA (since this is a loop over the
VMAs).
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000c93feb05f87e24ad@google.com/
Fixes: 66850be55e ("mm/mempolicy: use vma iterator & maple state instead of vma linked list")
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+a7c1ec5b1d71ceaa5186@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230410152205.2294819-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
Tested-by: syzbot+a7c1ec5b1d71ceaa5186@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
split_huge_page_to_list() WARNs when called for huge zero pages, which
sounds to me too harsh because it does not imply a kernel bug, but just
notifies the event to admins. On the other hand, this is considered as
critical by syzkaller and makes its testing less efficient, which seems to
me harmful.
So replace the VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO with pr_warn_ratelimited.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230406082004.2185420-1-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev
Fixes: 478d134e95 ("mm/huge_memory: do not overkill when splitting huge_zero_page")
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+07a218429c8d19b1fb25@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000a6f34a05e6efcd01@google.com/
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Xu Yu <xuyu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
When the loop over the VMA is terminated early due to an error, the return
code could be overwritten with ENOMEM. Fix the return code by only
setting the error on early loop termination when the error is not set.
User-visible effects include: attempts to run mprotect() against a
special mapping or with a poorly-aligned hugetlb address should return
-EINVAL, but they presently return -ENOMEM. In other cases an -EACCESS
should be returned.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230406193050.1363476-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
Fixes: 2286a6914c ("mm: change mprotect_fixup to vma iterator")
Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Khugepaged collapse an anonymous thp in two rounds of scans. The 2nd
round done in __collapse_huge_page_isolate() after
hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(), during which all the locks will be released
temporarily. It means the pgtable can change during this phase before 2nd
round starts.
It's logically possible some ptes got wr-protected during this phase, and
we can errornously collapse a thp without noticing some ptes are
wr-protected by userfault. e1e267c792 wanted to avoid it but it only
did that for the 1st phase, not the 2nd phase.
Since __collapse_huge_page_isolate() happens after a round of small page
swapins, we don't need to worry on any !present ptes - if it existed
khugepaged will already bail out. So we only need to check present ptes
with uffd-wp bit set there.
This is something I found only but never had a reproducer, I thought it
was one caused a bug in Muhammad's recent pagemap new ioctl work, but it
turns out it's not the cause of that but an userspace bug. However this
seems to still be a real bug even with a very small race window, still
worth to have it fixed and copy stable.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230405155120.3608140-1-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: e1e267c792 ("khugepaged: skip collapse if uffd-wp detected")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Looks like what we fixed for hugetlb in commit 44f86392bd ("mm/hugetlb:
fix uffd-wp handling for migration entries in
hugetlb_change_protection()") similarly applies to THP.
Setting/clearing uffd-wp on THP migration entries is not implemented
properly. Further, while removing migration PMDs considers the uffd-wp
bit, inserting migration PMDs does not consider the uffd-wp bit.
We have to set/clear independently of the migration entry type in
change_huge_pmd() and properly copy the uffd-wp bit in
set_pmd_migration_entry().
Verified using a simple reproducer that triggers migration of a THP, that
the set_pmd_migration_entry() no longer loses the uffd-wp bit.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230405160236.587705-2-david@redhat.com
Fixes: f45ec5ff16 ("userfaultfd: wp: support swap and page migration")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
