Commit graph

130 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Frederic Weisbecker
e787644caf rcu: Defer RCU kthreads wakeup when CPU is dying
When the CPU goes idle for the last time during the CPU down hotplug
process, RCU reports a final quiescent state for the current CPU. If
this quiescent state propagates up to the top, some tasks may then be
woken up to complete the grace period: the main grace period kthread
and/or the expedited main workqueue (or kworker).

If those kthreads have a SCHED_FIFO policy, the wake up can indirectly
arm the RT bandwith timer to the local offline CPU. Since this happens
after hrtimers have been migrated at CPUHP_AP_HRTIMERS_DYING stage, the
timer gets ignored. Therefore if the RCU kthreads are waiting for RT
bandwidth to be available, they may never be actually scheduled.

This triggers TREE03 rcutorture hangs:

	 rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
	 rcu:     4-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=9874/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=0/0 fqs=20 rcuc=21071 jiffies(starved)
	 rcu:     (t=21035 jiffies g=938281 q=40787 ncpus=6)
	 rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 20964 jiffies! g938281 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=0
	 rcu:     Unless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior.
	 rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
	 task:rcu_preempt     state:R  running task     stack:14896 pid:14    tgid:14    ppid:2      flags:0x00004000
	 Call Trace:
	  <TASK>
	  __schedule+0x2eb/0xa80
	  schedule+0x1f/0x90
	  schedule_timeout+0x163/0x270
	  ? __pfx_process_timeout+0x10/0x10
	  rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x37c/0x5b0
	  ? __pfx_rcu_gp_kthread+0x10/0x10
	  rcu_gp_kthread+0x17c/0x200
	  kthread+0xde/0x110
	  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
	  ret_from_fork+0x2b/0x40
	  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
	  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
	  </TASK>

The situation can't be solved with just unpinning the timer. The hrtimer
infrastructure and the nohz heuristics involved in finding the best
remote target for an unpinned timer would then also need to handle
enqueues from an offline CPU in the most horrendous way.

So fix this on the RCU side instead and defer the wake up to an online
CPU if it's too late for the local one.

Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Fixes: 5c0930ccaa ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
2024-01-24 22:46:17 +05:30
Paul E. McKenney
5b404fdaba rcu: Add RCU CPU stall notifier
It is sometimes helpful to have a way for the subsystem causing
the stall to dump its state when an RCU CPU stall occurs.  This
commit therefore bases rcu_stall_chain_notifier_register() and
rcu_stall_chain_notifier_unregister() on atomic notifiers in order to
provide this functionality.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2023-09-11 22:10:47 +02:00
Paul E. McKenney
9146eb2549 rcu: Mark additional concurrent load from ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp
The per-CPU rcu_data structure's ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp field is updated
only on the instance corresponding to the current CPU, but can be read
more widely.  Unmarked accesses are OK from the corresponding CPU, but
only if interrupts are disabled, given that interrupt handlers can and
do modify this field.

Unfortunately, although the load from rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() is always
carried out from the corresponding CPU, interrupts are not necessarily
disabled.  This commit therefore upgrades this load to READ_ONCE.

Similarly, the diagnostic access from synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait()
might run with interrupts disabled and from some other CPU.  This commit
therefore marks this load with data_race().

Finally, the C-language access in rcu_preempt_ctxt_queue() is OK as
is because interrupts are disabled and this load is always from the
corresponding CPU.  This commit adds a comment giving the rationale for
this access being safe.

This data race was reported by KCSAN.  Not appropriate for backporting
due to failure being unlikely.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-05-11 13:42:39 -07:00
Zqiang
3c1566bca3 rcu: Protect rcu_print_task_exp_stall() ->exp_tasks access
For kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y, the following scenario can
result in a NULL-pointer dereference:

           CPU1                                           CPU2
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore                rcu_print_task_exp_stall
  if (special.b.blocked)                            READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks) != NULL
    raw_spin_lock_rcu_node
    np = rcu_next_node_entry(t, rnp)
    if (&t->rcu_node_entry == rnp->exp_tasks)
      WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks, np)
      ....
      raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node
                                                    raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node
                                                    t = list_entry(rnp->exp_tasks->prev,
                                                        struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry)
                                                    (if rnp->exp_tasks is NULL, this
                                                       will dereference a NULL pointer)

The problem is that CPU2 accesses the rcu_node structure's->exp_tasks
field without holding the rcu_node structure's ->lock and CPU2 did
not observe CPU1's change to rcu_node structure's ->exp_tasks in time.
Therefore, if CPU1 sets rcu_node structure's->exp_tasks pointer to NULL,
then CPU2 might dereference that NULL pointer.

This commit therefore holds the rcu_node structure's ->lock while
accessing that structure's->exp_tasks field.

[ paulmck: Apply Frederic Weisbecker feedback. ]

Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05 13:47:44 +00:00
Zqiang
7ea91307ad rcu: Permit start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() to be invoked early
According to the commit log of the patch that added it to the kernel,
start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() can be invoked very early, as
in long before rcu_init() has been invoked.  But before rcu_init(),
the rcu_data structure's ->mynode field has not yet been initialized.
This means that the start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() function's
attempt to set the CPU's leaf rcu_node structure's ->exp_seq_poll_rq
field will result in a segmentation fault.

This commit therefore causes start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() to
set ->exp_seq_poll_rq only after rcu_init() has initialized all CPUs'
rcu_data structures' ->mynode fields.  It also removes the check from
the rcu_init() function so that start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited(
is unconditionally invoked.  Yes, this might result in an unnecessary
boot-time grace period, but this is down in the noise.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05 13:47:44 +00:00
Zqiang
e22abe180c rcu: Fix set/clear TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP bitmask race
For kernels built with CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, the following scenario can result
in the scheduling-clock interrupt remaining enabled on a holdout CPU after
its quiescent state has been reported:

	CPU1                                                 CPU2
rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult                          synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait
   acquires rnp->lock                               mask = rnp->expmask;
                                                    for_each_leaf_node_cpu_mask(rnp, cpu, mask)
   rnp->expmask = rnp->expmask & ~mask;                rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu1);
   for_each_leaf_node_cpu_mask(rnp, cpu, mask)
      rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu1);
      if (!rdp->rcu_forced_tick_exp)
             continue;                                 rdp->rcu_forced_tick_exp = true;
                                                       tick_dep_set_cpu(cpu1, TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP);

The problem is that CPU2's sampling of rnp->expmask is obsolete by the
time it invokes tick_dep_set_cpu(), and CPU1 is not guaranteed to see
CPU2's store to ->rcu_forced_tick_exp in time to clear it.  And even if
CPU1 does see that store, it might invoke tick_dep_clear_cpu() before
CPU2 got around to executing its tick_dep_set_cpu(), which would still
leave the victim CPU with its scheduler-clock tick running.

Either way, an nohz_full real-time application running on the victim
CPU would have its latency needlessly degraded.

Note that expedited RCU grace periods look at context-tracking
information, and so if the CPU is executing in nohz_full usermode
throughout, that CPU cannot be victimized in this manner.

This commit therefore causes synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait to hold
the rcu_node structure's ->lock when checking for holdout CPUs, setting
TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP, and invoking tick_dep_set_cpu(), thus preventing
this race.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
2023-04-05 13:47:43 +00:00
Paul E. McKenney
92987fe8bd rcu: Allow expedited RCU CPU stall warnings to dump task stacks
This commit introduces the rcupdate.rcu_exp_stall_task_details kernel
boot parameter, which cause expedited RCU CPU stall warnings to dump
the stacks of any tasks blocking the current expedited grace period.

Reported-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-01-03 17:47:44 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney
2d7f00b2f0 rcu: Suppress smp_processor_id() complaint in synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait()
The normal grace period's RCU CPU stall warnings are invoked from the
scheduling-clock interrupt handler, and can thus invoke smp_processor_id()
with impunity, which allows them to directly invoke dump_cpu_task().
In contrast, the expedited grace period's RCU CPU stall warnings are
invoked from process context, which causes the dump_cpu_task() function's
calls to smp_processor_id() to complain bitterly in debug kernels.

This commit therefore causes synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait() to disable
preemption around its call to dump_cpu_task().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2023-01-03 17:28:34 -08:00
Joel Fernandes (Google)
3cb278e73b rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power
Implement timer-based RCU callback batching (also known as lazy
callbacks). With this we save about 5-10% of power consumed due
to RCU requests that happen when system is lightly loaded or idle.

By default, all async callbacks (queued via call_rcu) are marked
lazy. An alternate API call_rcu_hurry() is provided for the few users,
for example synchronize_rcu(), that need the old behavior.

The batch is flushed whenever a certain amount of time has passed, or
the batch on a particular CPU grows too big. Also memory pressure will
flush it in a future patch.

To handle several corner cases automagically (such as rcu_barrier() and
hotplug), we re-use bypass lists which were originally introduced to
address lock contention, to handle lazy CBs as well. The bypass list
length has the lazy CB length included in it. A separate lazy CB length
counter is also introduced to keep track of the number of lazy CBs.

[ paulmck: Fix formatting of inline call_rcu_lazy() definition. ]
[ paulmck: Apply Zqiang feedback. ]
[ paulmck: Apply s/call_rcu_flush/call_rcu_hurry/ feedback from Tejun Heo. ]

Suggested-by: Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-11-29 14:02:23 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney
5c0ec49004 Merge branches 'doc.2022.08.31b', 'fixes.2022.08.31b', 'kvfree.2022.08.31b', 'nocb.2022.09.01a', 'poll.2022.08.31b', 'poll-srcu.2022.08.31b' and 'tasks.2022.08.31b' into HEAD
doc.2022.08.31b: Documentation updates
fixes.2022.08.31b: Miscellaneous fixes
kvfree.2022.08.31b: kvfree_rcu() updates
nocb.2022.09.01a: NOCB CPU updates
poll.2022.08.31b: Full-oldstate RCU polling grace-period API
poll-srcu.2022.08.31b: Polled SRCU grace-period updates
tasks.2022.08.31b: Tasks RCU updates
2022-09-01 10:55:57 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
43ff97cc99 rcu: Make synchronize_rcu_expedited() fast path update .expedited_sequence
This commit causes the early boot single-CPU synchronize_rcu_expedited()
fastpath to update the rcu_state structure's ->expedited_sequence
counter.  This will allow the full-state polled grace-period APIs to
detect all expedited grace periods without the need to track the special
combined polling-only counter, which is another step towards removing
the ->rgos_polled field from the rcu_gp_oldstate, thereby reducing its
size by one third.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-08-31 05:09:21 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
e8755d2bde rcu: Remove expedited grace-period fast-path forward-progress helper
Now that the expedited grace-period fast path can only happen during
the pre-scheduler portion of early boot, this fast path can no longer
block run-time RCU Trace grace periods.  This commit therefore removes
the conditional cond_resched() invocation.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-08-31 05:09:21 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
8df13f0160 rcu: Add full-sized polling for cond_sync_exp_full()
The cond_synchronize_rcu_expedited() API compresses the combined expedited and
normal grace-period states into a single unsigned long, which conserves
storage, but can miss grace periods in certain cases involving overlapping
normal and expedited grace periods.  Missing the occasional grace period
is usually not a problem, but there are use cases that care about each
and every grace period.

This commit therefore adds yet another member of the full-state RCU
grace-period polling API, which is the cond_synchronize_rcu_exp_full()
function.  This uses up to three times the storage (rcu_gp_oldstate
structure instead of unsigned long), but is guaranteed not to miss
grace periods.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-08-31 05:08:08 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
6c502b14ba rcu: Add full-sized polling for start_poll_expedited()
The start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() API compresses the combined
expedited and normal grace-period states into a single unsigned long,
which conserves storage, but can miss grace periods in certain cases
involving overlapping normal and expedited grace periods.  Missing the
occasional grace period is usually not a problem, but there are use
cases that care about each and every grace period.

This commit therefore adds yet another member of the
full-state RCU grace-period polling API, which is the
start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited_full() function.  This uses up to
three times the storage (rcu_gp_oldstate structure instead of unsigned
long), but is guaranteed not to miss grace periods.

[ paulmck: Apply feedback from kernel test robot and Julia Lawall. ]

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-08-31 05:08:08 -07:00
Zqiang
fcb42c9a77 rcu: Add QS check in rcu_exp_handler() for non-preemptible kernels
Kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPTION=n and CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y maintain
preempt_count() state.  Because such kernels map __rcu_read_lock()
and __rcu_read_unlock() to preempt_disable() and preempt_enable(),
respectively, this allows the expedited grace period's !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
version of the rcu_exp_handler() IPI handler function to use
preempt_count() to detect quiescent states.

This preempt_count() usage might seem to risk failures due to
use of implicit RCU readers in portions of the kernel under #ifndef
CONFIG_PREEMPTION, except that rcu_core() already disallows such implicit
RCU readers.  The moral of this story is that you must use explicit
read-side markings such as rcu_read_lock() or preempt_disable() even if
the code knows that this kernel does not support preemption.

This commit therefore adds a preempt_count()-based check for a quiescent
state in the !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU version of the rcu_exp_handler()
function for kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y, reporting an
immediate quiescent state when the interrupted code had both preemption
and softirqs enabled.

This change results in about a 2% reduction in expedited grace-period
latency in kernels built with both CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=n and
CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220622103549.2840087-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com/
2022-08-31 05:03:14 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
34bc7b454d Merge branch 'ctxt.2022.07.05a' into HEAD
ctxt.2022.07.05a: Linux-kernel memory model development branch.
2022-07-21 17:46:18 -07:00
Zqiang
28787e04fb rcu: Add irqs-disabled indicator to expedited RCU CPU stall warnings
If a CPU has interrupts disabled continuously starting before the
beginning of a given expedited RCU grace period, that CPU will not
execute that grace period's IPI handler.  This will in turn mean
that the ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp field in that CPU's rcu_data structure
will continue to contain the boolean value false.

Knowing whether or not a CPU has had interrupts disabled can be helpful
when debugging an expedited RCU CPU stall warning, so this commit
adds a "D" indicator expedited RCU CPU stall warnings that signifies
that the corresponding CPU has had interrupts disabled throughout.

This capability was tested as follows:

runqemu kvm slirp nographic qemuparams="-m 4096 -smp 4"  bootparams=
"isolcpus=2,3 nohz_full=2,3 rcu_nocbs=2,3 rcutree.dump_tree=1
rcutorture.stall_cpu_holdoff=30 rcutorture.stall_cpu=40
rcutorture.stall_cpu_irqsoff=1 rcutorture.stall_cpu_block=0
rcutorture.stall_no_softlockup=1" -d

The rcu_torture_stall() function ran on CPU 1, which displays the "D"
as expected given the rcutorture.stall_cpu_irqsoff=1 module parameter:

............
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected expedited stalls on CPUs/tasks:
{ 1-...D } 26467 jiffies s: 13317 root: 0x1/.
rcu: blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug): l=1:0-1:0x2/.
Task dump for CPU 1:
task:rcu_torture_sta state:R  running task     stack:    0 pid:   76  ppid:     2 flags:0x00004008

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-07-21 17:41:56 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
82e445697d rcu: Diagnose extended sync_rcu_do_polled_gp() loops
This commit dumps out state when the sync_rcu_do_polled_gp() function
loops more than expected.  This is a debugging aid.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-07-21 17:41:56 -07:00
Zqiang
ef4f9d9b92 rcu: Put panic_on_rcu_stall() after expedited RCU CPU stall warnings
When a normal RCU CPU stall warning is encountered with the
panic_on_rcu_stall sysfs variable is set, the system panics only after
the stall warning is printed.  But when an expedited RCU CPU stall
warning is encountered with the panic_on_rcu_stall sysfs variable is
set, the system panics first, thus never printing the stall warning.
This commit therefore brings the expedited stall warning into line with
the normal stall warning by printing first and panicking afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-07-21 17:41:56 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
d96c52fe49 rcu: Add polled expedited grace-period primitives
This commit adds expedited grace-period functionality to RCU's polled
grace-period API, adding start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() and
cond_synchronize_rcu_expedited(), which are similar to the existing
start_poll_synchronize_rcu() and cond_synchronize_rcu() functions,
respectively.

Note that although start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() can be invoked
very early, the resulting expedited grace periods are not guaranteed
to start until after workqueues are fully initialized.  On the other
hand, both synchronize_rcu() and synchronize_rcu_expedited() can also
be invoked very early, and the resulting grace periods will be taken
into account as they occur.

[ paulmck: Apply feedback from Neeraj Upadhyay. ]

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220121142454.1994916-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNKWW9jQyfjxw2E8dsXVTdvZYh0HnYeSHDKog9jhdN8/edit?usp=sharing
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-07-21 17:41:56 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
dd04140531 rcu: Make polled grace-period API account for expedited grace periods
Currently, this code could splat:

	oldstate = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
	synchronize_rcu_expedited();
	WARN_ON_ONCE(!poll_state_synchronize_rcu(oldstate));

This situation is counter-intuitive and user-unfriendly.  After all, there
really was a perfectly valid full grace period right after the call to
get_state_synchronize_rcu(), so why shouldn't poll_state_synchronize_rcu()
know about it?

This commit therefore makes the polled grace-period API aware of expedited
grace periods in addition to the normal grace periods that it is already
aware of.  With this change, the above code is guaranteed not to splat.

Please note that the above code can still splat due to counter wrap on the
one hand and situations involving partially overlapping normal/expedited
grace periods on the other.  On 64-bit systems, the second is of course
much more likely than the first.  It is possible to modify this approach
to prevent overlapping grace periods from causing splats, but only at
the expense of greatly increasing the probability of counter wrap, as
in within milliseconds on 32-bit systems and within minutes on 64-bit
systems.

This commit is in preparation for polled expedited grace periods.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220121142454.1994916-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNKWW9jQyfjxw2E8dsXVTdvZYh0HnYeSHDKog9jhdN8/edit?usp=sharing
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-07-21 17:41:56 -07:00
Frederic Weisbecker
62e2412df4 rcu/context_tracking: Move dynticks counter to context tracking
In order to prepare for merging RCU dynticks counter into the context
tracking state, move the rcu_data's dynticks field to the context
tracking structure. It will later be mixed within the context tracking
state itself.

[ paulmck: Move enum ctx_state into global scope. ]

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Cc: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
2022-07-05 13:32:59 -07:00
Kalesh Singh
9621fbee44 rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT kthread_worker
Enabling CONFIG_RCU_BOOST did not reduce RCU expedited grace-period
latency because its workqueues run at SCHED_OTHER, and thus can be
delayed by normal processes.  This commit avoids these delays by moving
the expedited GP work items to a real-time-priority kthread_worker.

This option is controlled by CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD and disabled by
default on PREEMPT_RT=y kernels which disable expedited grace periods
after boot by unconditionally setting rcupdate.rcu_normal_after_boot=1.

The results were evaluated on arm64 Android devices (6GB ram) running
5.10 kernel, and capturing trace data in critical user-level code.

The table below shows the resulting order-of-magnitude improvements
in synchronize_rcu_expedited() latency:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          |   workqueues  |  kthread_worker |  Diff   |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Count                    |          725  |            688  |         |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Min Duration       (ns)  |          326  |            447  |  37.12% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Q1                 (ns)  |       39,428  |         38,971  |  -1.16% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Q2 - Median        (ns)  |       98,225  |         69,743  | -29.00% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Q3                 (ns)  |      342,122  |        126,638  | -62.98% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Max Duration       (ns)  |  372,766,967  |      2,329,671  | -99.38% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Avg Duration       (ns)  |    2,746,353  |        151,242  | -94.49% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Standard Deviation (ns)  |   19,327,765  |        294,408  |         |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The below table show the range of maximums/minimums for
synchronize_rcu_expedited() latency from all experiments:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          |   workqueues  |  kthread_worker |  Diff   |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Total No. of Experiments |           25  |             23  |         |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Largest  Maximum   (ns)  |  372,766,967  |      2,329,671  | -99.38% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Smallest Maximum   (ns)  |       38,819  |         86,954  | 124.00% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Range of Maximums  (ns)  |  372,728,148  |      2,242,717  |         |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Largest  Minimum   (ns)  |       88,623  |         27,588  | -68.87% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Smallest Minimum   (ns)  |          326  |            447  |  37.12% |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Range of Minimums  (ns)  |       88,297  |         27,141  |         |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Reported-by: Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>
Tested-by: Kyle Lin <kylelin@google.com>
Tested-by: Chunwei Lu <chunweilu@google.com>
Tested-by: Lulu Wang <luluw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-05-11 11:47:10 -07:00
Uladzislau Rezki
28b3ae4265 rcu: Introduce CONFIG_RCU_EXP_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT
Currently both expedited and regular grace period stall warnings use
a single timeout value that with units of seconds.  However, recent
Android use cases problem require a sub-100-millisecond expedited RCU CPU
stall warning.  Given that expedited RCU grace periods normally complete
in far less than a single millisecond, especially for small systems,
this is not unreasonable.

Therefore introduce the CONFIG_RCU_EXP_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT kernel
configuration that defaults to 20 msec on Android and remains the same
as that of the non-expedited stall warnings otherwise.  It also can be
changed in run-time via: /sys/.../parameters/rcu_exp_cpu_stall_timeout.

[ paulmck: Default of zero to use CONFIG_RCU_STALL_TIMEOUT. ]

Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-05-11 11:38:50 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
63c564da11 rcu: Mark ->expmask access in synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait()
This commit adds a READ_ONCE() to an access to the rcu_node structure's
->expmask field to prevent compiler mischief.  Detected by KCSAN.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-02-01 17:05:10 -08:00
Neeraj Upadhyay
4d266c247d rcu/exp: Fix check for idle context in rcu_exp_handler
For PREEMPT_RCU, the rcu_exp_handler() function checks
whether the current CPU is in idle, by calling
rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). However, rcu_exp_handler()
is called in IPI handler context. So, it should be checking
the idle context using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(). Fix this
by using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() instead of
rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). Non-preempt configuration
already uses the correct check.

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-02-01 17:05:10 -08:00
Frederic Weisbecker
81f6d49cce rcu/exp: Mark current CPU as exp-QS in IPI loop second pass
Expedited RCU grace periods invoke sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(), which
takes two passes over the leaf rcu_node structure's CPUs.  The first
pass gathers up the current CPU and CPUs that are in dynticks idle mode.
The workqueue will report a quiescent state on their behalf later.
The second pass sends IPIs to the rest of the CPUs, but excludes the
current CPU, incorrectly assuming it has been included in the first
pass's list of CPUs.

Unfortunately the current CPU may have changed between the first and
second pass, due to the fact that the various rcu_node structures'
->lock fields have been dropped, thus momentarily enabling preemption.
This means that if the second pass's CPU was not on the first pass's
list, it will be ignored completely.  There will be no IPI sent to
it, and there will be no reporting of quiescent states on its behalf.
Unfortunately, the expedited grace period will nevertheless be waiting
for that CPU to report a quiescent state, but with that CPU having no
reason to believe that such a report is needed.

The result will be an expedited grace period stall.

Fix this by no longer excluding the current CPU from consideration during
the second pass.

Fixes: b9ad4d6ed1 ("rcu: Avoid self-IPI in sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus()")
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-12-07 16:22:22 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney
147f04b14a rcu: Prevent expedited GP from enabling tick on offline CPU
If an RCU expedited grace period starts just when a CPU is in the process
of going offline, so that the outgoing CPU has completed its pass through
stop-machine but has not yet completed its final dive into the idle loop,
RCU will attempt to enable that CPU's scheduling-clock tick via a call
to tick_dep_set_cpu().  For this to happen, that CPU has to have been
online when the expedited grace period completed its CPU-selection phase.

This is pointless:  The outgoing CPU has interrupts disabled, so it cannot
take a scheduling-clock tick anyway.  In addition, the tick_dep_set_cpu()
function's eventual call to irq_work_queue_on() will splat as follows:

smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 124 at kernel/irq_work.c:95
+irq_work_queue_on+0x57/0x60
Modules linked in:
CPU: 6 PID: 124 Comm: kworker/6:2 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1+ #3
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
+rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: rcu_gp wait_rcu_exp_gp
RIP: 0010:irq_work_queue_on+0x57/0x60
Code: 8b 05 1d c7 ea 62 a9 00 00 f0 00 75 21 4c 89 ce 44 89 c7 e8
+9b 37 fa ff ba 01 00 00 00 89 d0 c3 4c 89 cf e8 3b ff ff ff eb ee <0f> 0b eb b7
+0f 0b eb db 90 48 c7 c0 98 2a 02 00 65 48 03 05 91
 6f
RSP: 0000:ffffb12cc038fe48 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000005208 RCX: 0000000000000020
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff9ad01f45a680
RBP: 000000000004c990 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff9ad01f45a680
R10: ffffb12cc0317db0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 00000000fffecee8
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000026980 R15: ffffffff9e53ae00
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ad01f580000(0000)
+knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000000de0c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu+0x59/0x70
 rcu_exp_wait_wake+0x54e/0x870
 ? sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus+0x1fc/0x390
 process_one_work+0x1ef/0x3c0
 ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
 worker_thread+0x28/0x3c0
 ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
 kthread+0x115/0x140
 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
---[ end trace c5bf75eb6aa80bc6 ]---

This commit therefore avoids invoking tick_dep_set_cpu() on offlined
CPUs to limit both futility and false-positive splats.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-12-07 16:22:22 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney
5401cc5264 rcu: Mark sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup() ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp load
The sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup() is called from rcutree_online_cpu(),
which can be invoked with interrupts enabled.  This means that
the ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp field is subject to data races from the
rcu_exp_handler() IPI handler, so this commit marks the load from
that field.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-12-07 16:22:21 -08:00
Frederic Weisbecker
6120b72e25 rcu: Remove rcu_data.exp_deferred_qs and convert to rcu_data.cpu no_qs.b.exp
Having two fields for the same purpose with subtle differences on
different RCU flavours is confusing, especially when both fields always
exist on both RCU flavours.

Fortunately, it is now safe for preemptible RCU to rely on the rcu_data
structure's ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp field, just like non-preemptible RCU.
This commit therefore removes the ad-hoc ->exp_deferred_qs field.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-12-07 16:22:21 -08:00
Frederic Weisbecker
6e16b0f7ba rcu: Move rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.exp reset to rcu_export_exp_rdp()
On non-preemptible RCU, move clearing of the rcu_data structure's
->cpu_no_qs.b.exp filed to the actual expedited quiescent state report
function, matching hw preemptible RCU handles the ->exp_deferred_qs field.

This prepares for removing ->exp_deferred_qs in favor of ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp
for both preemptible and non-preemptible RCU.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-12-07 16:22:21 -08:00
Neeraj Upadhyay
f0b2b2df54 rcu: Fix existing exp request check in sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup()
The sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup() checks to see if RCU needs
an expedited quiescent state from the incoming CPU, sending it
an IPI if so. Before sending IPI, it checks whether expedited
qs need has been already requested for the incoming CPU, by
checking rcu_data.cpu_no_qs.b.exp for the current cpu, on which
sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup() is running. This works for the
case where incoming CPU is same as self. However, for the case
where incoming CPU is different from self, expedited request
won't get marked, which can potentially delay reporting of
expedited quiescent state for the incoming CPU.

Fixes: e015a34112 ("rcu: Avoid self-IPI in sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup()")
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-09-13 16:32:46 -07:00
Juri Lelli
ebb6d30d9e rcu: Make rcu_normal_after_boot writable again
Certain configurations (e.g., systems that make heavy use of netns)
need to use synchronize_rcu_expedited() to service RCU grace periods
even after boot.

Even though synchronize_rcu_expedited() has been traditionally
considered harmful for RT for the heavy use of IPIs, it is perfectly
usable under certain conditions (e.g. nohz_full).

Make rcupdate.rcu_normal_after_boot= again writeable on RT (if NO_HZ_
FULL is defined), but keep its default value to 1 (enabled) to avoid
regressions. Users who need synchronize_rcu_expedited() will boot with
rcupdate.rcu_normal_after_ boot=0 in the kernel cmdline.

Reflect the change in synchronize_rcu_expedited_wait() by removing the
WARN related to CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT.

Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-09-13 16:32:46 -07:00
Sangmoon Kim
565cfb9e64 rcu/tree: Add a trace event for RCU CPU stall warnings
This commit adds a trace event which allows tracing the beginnings of RCU
CPU stall warnings on systems where sysctl_panic_on_rcu_stall is disabled.

The first parameter is the name of RCU flavor like other trace events.
The second parameter indicates whether this is a stall of an expedited
grace period, a self-detected stall of a normal grace period, or a stall
of a normal grace period detected by some CPU other than the one that
is stalled.

RCU CPU stall warnings are often caused by external-to-RCU issues,
for example, in interrupt handling or task scheduling.  Therefore,
this event uses TRACE_EVENT, not TRACE_EVENT_RCU, to avoid requiring
those interested in tracing RCU CPU stalls to rebuild their kernels
with CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=y.

Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sangmoon Kim <sangmoon.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-03-15 13:53:24 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
b08ea1de6a rcu: Mark obtuse portion of stall warning as internal debug
There is a rather obtuse string that can be printed as part of an
expedited RCU CPU stall-warning message that starts with "blocking
rcu_node structures".  Under normal conditions, most of this message
is just repeating the list of CPUs blocking the current expedited grace
period, but in a manner that is rather difficult to read.  This commit
therefore marks this message as "(internal RCU debug)" in an effort to
give people the option of avoiding wasting time attempting to extract
nonexistent additional meaning from this portion of the message.

Reported-by: Jonathan Lemon <bsd@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-01-04 13:54:40 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney
7487ea07df rcu: Initialize at declaration time in rcu_exp_handler()
This commit moves the initialization of the CONFIG_PREEMPT=n version of
the rcu_exp_handler() function's rdp and rnp local variables into their
respective declarations to save a couple lines of code.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24 18:36:03 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
68c2f27e01 rcu: Expedited grace-period sleeps to idle priority
This commit converts the schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() call used
by RCU's expedited grace-period processing to schedule_timeout_idle().
This conversion avoids polluting the load-average with RCU-related
sleeping.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-06-29 11:58:50 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
f736e0f1a5 Merge branches 'fixes.2020.04.27a', 'kfree_rcu.2020.04.27a', 'rcu-tasks.2020.04.27a', 'stall.2020.04.27a' and 'torture.2020.05.07a' into HEAD
fixes.2020.04.27a:  Miscellaneous fixes.
kfree_rcu.2020.04.27a:  Changes related to kfree_rcu().
rcu-tasks.2020.04.27a:  Addition of new RCU-tasks flavors.
stall.2020.04.27a:  RCU CPU stall-warning updates.
torture.2020.05.07a:  Torture-test updates.
2020-05-07 10:18:32 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
654db05cee rcu: Use data_race() for RCU expedited CPU stall-warning prints
Although the accesses used to determine whether or not an expedited
stall should be printed are an integral part of the concurrency algorithm
governing use of the corresponding variables, the values that are simply
printed are ancillary.  As such, it is best to use data_race() for these
accesses in order to provide the greatest latitude in the use of KCSAN
for the other accesses that are an integral part of the algorithm.  This
commit therefore changes the relevant uses of READ_ONCE() to data_race().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27 11:04:37 -07:00
Lai Jiangshan
5f5fa7ea89 rcu: Don't use negative nesting depth in __rcu_read_unlock()
Now that RCU flavors have been consolidated, an RCU-preempt
rcu_read_unlock() in an interrupt or softirq handler cannot possibly
end the RCU read-side critical section.  Consider the old vulnerability
involving rcu_read_unlock() being invoked within such a handler that
interrupted an __rcu_read_unlock_special(), in which a wakeup might be
invoked with a scheduler lock held.  Because rcu_read_unlock_special()
no longer does wakeups in such situations, it is no longer necessary
for __rcu_read_unlock() to set the nesting level negative.

This commit therefore removes this recursion-protection code from
__rcu_read_unlock().

[ paulmck: Let rcu_exp_handler() continue to call rcu_report_exp_rdp(). ]
[ paulmck: Adjust other checks given no more negative nesting. ]
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27 11:03:50 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
314eeb43e5 rcu: Add *_ONCE() and data_race() to rcu_node ->exp_tasks plus locking
There are lockless loads from the rcu_node structure's ->exp_tasks field,
so this commit causes all stores to use WRITE_ONCE() and all lockless
loads to use READ_ONCE() or data_race(), with the latter for debug
prints.  This code also did a unprotected traversal of the linked list
pointed into by ->exp_tasks, so this commit also acquires the rcu_node
structure's ->lock to properly protect this traversal.  This list was
traversed unprotected only when printing an RCU CPU stall warning for
an expedited grace period, so the odds of seeing this in production are
not all that high.

This data race was reported by KCSAN.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27 11:01:15 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
aa93ec620b Merge branches 'doc.2020.02.27a', 'fixes.2020.03.21a', 'kfree_rcu.2020.02.20a', 'locktorture.2020.02.20a', 'ovld.2020.02.20a', 'rcu-tasks.2020.02.20a', 'srcu.2020.02.20a' and 'torture.2020.02.20a' into HEAD
doc.2020.02.27a: Documentation updates.
fixes.2020.03.21a: Miscellaneous fixes.
kfree_rcu.2020.02.20a: Updates to kfree_rcu().
locktorture.2020.02.20a: Lock torture-test updates.
ovld.2020.02.20a: Updates to callback-overload handling.
rcu-tasks.2020.02.20a: RCU-tasks updates.
srcu.2020.02.20a: SRCU updates.
torture.2020.02.20a: Torture-test updates.
2020-03-21 17:15:11 -07:00
Paul E. McKenney
58c53360b3 rcutorture: Allow boottime stall warnings to be suppressed
In normal production, an RCU CPU stall warning at boottime is often
just as bad as at any other time.  In fact, given the desire for fast
boot, any sort of long-term stall at boot is a bad idea.  However,
heavy rcutorture testing on large hyperthreaded systems can generate
boottime RCU CPU stalls as a matter of course.  This commit therefore
provides a kernel boot parameter that suppresses reporting of boottime
RCU CPU stall warnings and similarly of rcutorture writer stalls.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-02-20 16:03:30 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney
59ee0326cc rcutorture: Suppress forward-progress complaints during early boot
Some larger systems can take in excess of 50 seconds to complete their
early boot initcalls prior to spawing init.  This does not in any way
help the forward-progress judgments of built-in rcutorture (when
rcutorture is built as a module, the insmod or modprobe command normally
cannot happen until some time after boot completes).  This commit
therefore suppresses such complaints until about the time that init
is spawned.

This also includes a fix to a stupid error located by kbuild test robot.

[ paulmck: Apply kbuild test robot feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[ paulmck: Fix to nohz_full slow-expediting recovery logic, per bpetkov. ]
[ paulmck: Restrict splat to CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y kernels and simplify. ]
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
2020-02-20 16:03:30 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney
b0c18c8773 rcu: Add WRITE_ONCE to rcu_node ->exp_seq_rq store
The rcu_node structure's ->exp_seq_rq field is read locklessly, so
this commit adds the WRITE_ONCE() to a load in order to provide proper
documentation and READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() pairing.

This data race was reported by KCSAN.  Not appropriate for backporting
due to failure being unlikely.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-02-20 15:58:22 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney
24bb9eccf7 rcu: Fix exp_funnel_lock()/rcu_exp_wait_wake() datarace
The rcu_node structure's ->exp_seq_rq field is accessed locklessly, so
updates must use WRITE_ONCE().  This commit therefore adds the needed
WRITE_ONCE() invocation where it was missed.

This data race was reported by KCSAN.  Not appropriate for backporting
due to failure being unlikely.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-02-20 15:58:21 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney
59d8cc6b2e rcu: Forgive slow expedited grace periods at boot time
Boot-time processing often loops in the kernel longer than one might
prefer, which can prevent expedited grace periods from completing in
a timely manner.  This in turn triggers a splat In nohz_full CPUs  One
could argue that long-looping code should be fixed, but on the other hand,
boot time is a bit special.

This commit therefore removes the splat.  Later commits will add the
splat back in, but in a way that removes false positives.

Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-25 12:00:40 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney
0e247386d9 Merge branches 'doc.2019.12.10a', 'exp.2019.12.09a', 'fixes.2020.01.24a', 'kfree_rcu.2020.01.24a', 'list.2020.01.10a', 'preempt.2020.01.24a' and 'torture.2019.12.09a' into HEAD
doc.2019.12.10a: Documentations updates
exp.2019.12.09a: Expedited grace-period updates
fixes.2020.01.24a: Miscellaneous fixes
kfree_rcu.2020.01.24a: Batch kfree_rcu() work
list.2020.01.10a: RCU-protected-list updates
preempt.2020.01.24a: Preemptible RCU updates
torture.2019.12.09a: Torture-test updates
2020-01-24 10:37:27 -08:00
Lai Jiangshan
77339e61aa rcu: Provide wrappers for uses of ->rcu_read_lock_nesting
This commit provides wrapper functions for uses of ->rcu_read_lock_nesting
to improve readability and to ease future changes to support inlining
of __rcu_read_lock() and __rcu_read_unlock().

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24 10:27:33 -08:00
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
90326f0521 rcu: Use CONFIG_PREEMPTION where appropriate
The config option `CONFIG_PREEMPT' is used for the preemption model
"Low-Latency Desktop". The config option `CONFIG_PREEMPTION' is enabled
when kernel preemption is enabled which is true for the preemption model
`CONFIG_PREEMPT' and `CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT'.

Use `CONFIG_PREEMPTION' if it applies to both preemption models and not
just to `CONFIG_PREEMPT'.

Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2019-12-09 12:37:51 -08:00