After previous fix for zero extension test_verifier tests #65 and #66 now
fail. Before the fix we can see the alu32 mov op at insn 10
10: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=invP(id=0,
smin_value=4294967168,smax_value=4294967423,
umin_value=4294967168,umax_value=4294967423,
var_off=(0x0; 0x1ffffffff),
s32_min_value=-2147483648,s32_max_value=2147483647,
u32_min_value=0,u32_max_value=-1)
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
10: (bc) w1 = w1
11: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=invP(id=0,
smin_value=0,smax_value=2147483647,
umin_value=0,umax_value=4294967295,
var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff),
s32_min_value=-2147483648,s32_max_value=2147483647,
u32_min_value=0,u32_max_value=-1)
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
After the fix at insn 10 because we have 's32_min_value < 0' the following
step 11 now has 'smax_value=U32_MAX' where before we pulled the s32_max_value
bound into the smax_value as seen above in 11 with smax_value=2147483647.
10: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=inv(id=0,
smin_value=4294967168,smax_value=4294967423,
umin_value=4294967168,umax_value=4294967423,
var_off=(0x0; 0x1ffffffff),
s32_min_value=-2147483648, s32_max_value=2147483647,
u32_min_value=0,u32_max_value=-1)
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
10: (bc) w1 = w1
11: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=inv(id=0,
smin_value=0,smax_value=4294967295,
umin_value=0,umax_value=4294967295,
var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff),
s32_min_value=-2147483648, s32_max_value=2147483647,
u32_min_value=0, u32_max_value=-1)
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
The fall out of this is by the time we get to the failing instruction at
step 14 where previously we had the following:
14: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=inv(id=0,
smin_value=72057594021150720,smax_value=72057594029539328,
umin_value=72057594021150720,umax_value=72057594029539328,
var_off=(0xffffffff000000; 0xffffff),
s32_min_value=-16777216,s32_max_value=-1,
u32_min_value=-16777216,u32_max_value=-1)
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
14: (0f) r0 += r1
We now have,
14: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=inv(id=0,
smin_value=0,smax_value=72057594037927935,
umin_value=0,umax_value=72057594037927935,
var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffffffffff),
s32_min_value=-2147483648,s32_max_value=2147483647,
u32_min_value=0,u32_max_value=-1)
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
14: (0f) r0 += r1
In the original step 14 'smin_value=72057594021150720' this trips the logic
in the verifier function check_reg_sane_offset(),
if (smin >= BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF || smin <= -BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF) {
verbose(env, "value %lld makes %s pointer be out of bounds\n",
smin, reg_type_str[type]);
return false;
}
Specifically, the 'smin <= -BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF' check. But with the fix
at step 14 we have bounds 'smin_value=0' so the above check is not tripped
because BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF=1<<29.
We have a smin_value=0 here because at step 10 the smaller smin_value=0 means
the subtractions at steps 11 and 12 bring the smin_value negative.
11: (17) r1 -= 2147483584
12: (17) r1 -= 2147483584
13: (77) r1 >>= 8
Then the shift clears the top bit and smin_value is set to 0. Note we still
have the smax_value in the fixed code so any reads will fail. An alternative
would be to have reg_sane_check() do both smin and smax value tests.
To fix the test we can omit the 'r1 >>=8' at line 13. This will change the
err string, but keeps the intention of the test as suggseted by the title,
"check after truncation of boundary-crossing range". If the verifier logic
changes a different value is likely to be thrown in the error or the error
will no longer be thrown forcing this test to be examined. With this change
we see the new state at step 13.
13: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=invP(id=0,
smin_value=-4294967168,smax_value=127,
umin_value=0,umax_value=18446744073709551615,
s32_min_value=-2147483648,s32_max_value=2147483647,
u32_min_value=0,u32_max_value=-1)
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
Giving the expected out of bounds error, "value -4294967168 makes map_value
pointer be out of bounds" However, for unpriv case we see a different error
now because of the mixed signed bounds pointer arithmatic. This seems OK so
I've only added the unpriv_errstr for this. Another optino may have been to
do addition on r1 instead of subtraction but I favor the approach above
slightly.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/159077333942.6014.14004320043595756079.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
When we have pointer type that is known to be non-null we only follow
the non-null branch. This adds tests to cover the map_value pointer
returned from a map lookup. To force an error if both branches are
followed we do an ALU op on R10.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/159009168650.6313.7434084136067263554.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
When we have pointer type that is known to be non-null and comparing
against zero we only follow the non-null branch. This adds tests to
cover this case for reference tracking. Also add the other case when
comparison against a non-zero value and ensure we still fail with
unreleased reference.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/159009166599.6313.1593680633787453767.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
Check that verifier allows passing a map of type:
BPF_MAP_TYPE_REUSEPORT_SOCKARRARY, or
BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP, or
BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH
... to bpf_sk_select_reuseport helper.
Suggested-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200430104738.494180-1-jakub@cloudflare.com
Now that bpf_map_lookup_elem() is white-listed for SOCKMAP/SOCKHASH,
replace the tests which check that verifier prevents lookup on these map
types with ones that ensure that lookup operation is permitted, but only
with a release of acquired socket reference.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200429181154.479310-3-jakub@cloudflare.com
Currently the following prog types don't fall back to bpf_base_func_proto()
(instead they have cgroup_base_func_proto which has a limited set of
helpers from bpf_base_func_proto):
* BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE
* BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SYSCTL
* BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT
I don't see any specific reason why we shouldn't use bpf_base_func_proto(),
every other type of program (except bpf-lirc and, understandably, tracing)
use it, so let's fall back to bpf_base_func_proto for those prog types
as well.
This basically boils down to adding access to the following helpers:
* BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32
* BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id
* BPF_FUNC_get_numa_node_id
* BPF_FUNC_tail_call
* BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns
* BPF_FUNC_spin_lock (CAP_SYS_ADMIN)
* BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock (CAP_SYS_ADMIN)
* BPF_FUNC_jiffies64 (CAP_SYS_ADMIN)
I've also added bpf_perf_event_output() because it's really handy for
logging and debugging.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200420174610.77494-1-sdf@google.com
This patch adds a test to test_verifier that writes the lower 8 bits of
R10 (aka FP) using BPF_B to an array map and reads the result back. The
expected behavior is that the result should be the same as first copying
R10 to R9, and then storing / loading the lower 8 bits of R9.
This test catches a bug that was present in the x86-64 JIT that caused
an incorrect encoding for BPF_STX BPF_B when the source operand is R10.
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200418232655.23870-2-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
When check_xadd() verifies an XADD operation on a pointer to a stack slot
containing a spilled pointer, check_stack_read() verifies that the read,
which is part of XADD, is valid. However, since the placeholder value -1 is
passed as `value_regno`, check_stack_read() can only return a binary
decision and can't return the type of the value that was read. The intent
here is to verify whether the value read from the stack slot may be used as
a SCALAR_VALUE; but since check_stack_read() doesn't check the type, and
the type information is lost when check_stack_read() returns, this is not
enforced, and a malicious user can abuse XADD to leak spilled kernel
pointers.
Fix it by letting check_stack_read() verify that the value is usable as a
SCALAR_VALUE if no type information is passed to the caller.
To be able to use __is_pointer_value() in check_stack_read(), move it up.
Fix up the expected unprivileged error message for a BPF selftest that,
until now, assumed that unprivileged users can use XADD on stack-spilled
pointers. This also gives us a test for the behavior introduced in this
patch for free.
In theory, this could also be fixed by forbidding XADD on stack spills
entirely, since XADD is a locked operation (for operations on memory with
concurrency) and there can't be any concurrency on the BPF stack; but
Alexei has said that he wants to keep XADD on stack slots working to avoid
changes to the test suite [1].
The following BPF program demonstrates how to leak a BPF map pointer as an
unprivileged user using this bug:
// r7 = map_pointer
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_7, small_map),
// r8 = launder(map_pointer)
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_7, -8),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
((struct bpf_insn) {
.code = BPF_STX | BPF_DW | BPF_XADD,
.dst_reg = BPF_REG_FP,
.src_reg = BPF_REG_1,
.off = -8
}),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_FP, -8),
// store r8 into map
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG1, BPF_REG_7),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -4),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_ARG2, 0, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN()
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200416211116.qxqcza5vo2ddnkdq@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com/
Fixes: 17a5267067 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200417000007.10734-1-jannh@google.com
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf 2020-04-10
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.
We've added 13 non-merge commits during the last 7 day(s) which contain
a total of 13 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) JIT code emission fixes for riscv and arm32, from Luke Nelson and Xi Wang.
2) Disable vmlinux BTF info if GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT is used, from Slava Bacherikov.
3) Fix oob write in AF_XDP when meta data is used, from Li RongQing.
4) Fix bpf_get_link_xdp_id() handling on single prog when flags are specified,
from Andrey Ignatov.
5) Fix sk_assign() BPF helper for request sockets that can have sk_reuseport
field uninitialized, from Joe Stringer.
6) Fix mprotect() test case for the BPF LSM, from KP Singh.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Here are 3 SPDX patches for 5.7-rc1.
One fixes up the SPDX tag for a single driver, while the other two go
through the tree and add SPDX tags for all of the .gitignore files as
needed.
Nothing too complex, but you will get a merge conflict with your current
tree, that should be trivial to handle (one file modified by two things,
one file deleted.)
All 3 of these have been in linux-next for a while, with no reported
issues other than the merge conflict.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iG0EABECAC0WIQT0tgzFv3jCIUoxPcsxR9QN2y37KQUCXodg5A8cZ3JlZ0Brcm9h
aC5jb20ACgkQMUfUDdst+ykySQCgy9YDrkz7nWq6v3Gohl6+lW/L+rMAnRM4uTZm
m5AuCzO3Azt9KBi7NL+L
=2Lm5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'spdx-5.7-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/spdx
Pull SPDX updates from Greg KH:
"Here are three SPDX patches for 5.7-rc1.
One fixes up the SPDX tag for a single driver, while the other two go
through the tree and add SPDX tags for all of the .gitignore files as
needed.
Nothing too complex, but you will get a merge conflict with your
current tree, that should be trivial to handle (one file modified by
two things, one file deleted.)
All three of these have been in linux-next for a while, with no
reported issues other than the merge conflict"
* tag 'spdx-5.7-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/spdx:
ASoC: MT6660: make spdxcheck.py happy
.gitignore: add SPDX License Identifier
.gitignore: remove too obvious comments
Its possible to have divergent ALU32 and ALU64 bounds when using JMP32
instructins and ALU64 arithmatic operations. Sometimes the clang will
even generate this code. Because the case is a bit tricky lets add
a specific test for it.
Here is pseudocode asm version to illustrate the idea,
1 r0 = 0xffffffff00000001;
2 if w0 > 1 goto %l[fail];
3 r0 += 1
5 if w0 > 2 goto %l[fail]
6 exit
The intent here is the verifier will fail the load if the 32bit bounds
are not tracked correctly through ALU64 op. Similarly we can check the
64bit bounds are correctly zero extended after ALU32 ops.
1 r0 = 0xffffffff00000001;
2 w0 += 1
2 if r0 > 3 goto %l[fail];
6 exit
The above will fail if we do not correctly zero extend 64bit bounds
after 32bit op.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560430155.10843.514209255758200922.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
After changes to add update_reg_bounds after ALU ops and 32-bit bounds
tracking truncation of boundary crossing range will fail earlier and with
a different error message. Now the test error trace is the following
11: (17) r1 -= 2147483584
12: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=invP(id=0,smin_value=-2147483584,smax_value=63)
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
12: (17) r1 -= 2147483584
13: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=invP(id=0,
umin_value=18446744069414584448,umax_value=18446744071562068095,
var_off=(0xffffffff00000000; 0xffffffff))
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
13: (77) r1 >>= 8
14: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0)
R1_w=invP(id=0,
umin_value=72057594021150720,umax_value=72057594029539328,
var_off=(0xffffffff000000; 0xffffff),
s32_min_value=-16777216,s32_max_value=-1,
u32_min_value=-16777216)
R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
14: (0f) r0 += r1
value 72057594021150720 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds
Because we have 'umin_value == umax_value' instead of previously
where 'umin_value != umax_value' we can now fail earlier noting
that pointer addition is out of bounds.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560428103.10843.6316594510312781186.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
With current ALU32 subreg handling and retval refine fix from last
patches we see an expected failure in test_verifier. With verbose
verifier state being printed at each step for clarity we have the
following relavent lines [I omit register states that are not
necessarily useful to see failure cause],
#101/p bpf_get_stack return R0 within range FAIL
Failed to load prog 'Success'!
[..]
14: (85) call bpf_get_stack#67
R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=48,imm=0)
R3_w=inv48
15:
R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
15: (b7) r1 = 0
16:
R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
R1_w=inv0
16: (bf) r8 = r0
17:
R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
R1_w=inv0
R8_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
17: (67) r8 <<= 32
18:
R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
R1_w=inv0
R8_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372032559808512,
umax_value=18446744069414584320,
var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000000),
s32_min_value=0,
s32_max_value=0,
u32_max_value=0,
var32_off=(0x0; 0x0))
18: (c7) r8 s>>= 32
19
R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
R1_w=inv0
R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648,
smax_value=2147483647,
var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
19: (cd) if r1 s< r8 goto pc+16
R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
R1_w=inv0
R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648,
smax_value=0,
var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
20:
R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
R1_w=inv0
R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648,
smax_value=0,
R9=inv48
20: (1f) r9 -= r8
21: (bf) r2 = r7
22:
R2_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=48,imm=0)
22: (0f) r2 += r8
value -2147483648 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds
After call bpf_get_stack() on line 14 and some moves we have at line 16
an r8 bound with max_value 48 but an unknown min value. This is to be
expected bpf_get_stack call can only return a max of the input size but
is free to return any negative error in the 32-bit register space. The
C helper is returning an int so will use lower 32-bits.
Lines 17 and 18 clear the top 32 bits with a left/right shift but use
ARSH so we still have worst case min bound before line 19 of -2147483648.
At this point the signed check 'r1 s< r8' meant to protect the addition
on line 22 where dst reg is a map_value pointer may very well return
true with a large negative number. Then the final line 22 will detect
this as an invalid operation and fail the program. What we want to do
is proceed only if r8 is positive non-error. So change 'r1 s< r8' to
'r1 s> r8' so that we jump if r8 is negative.
Next we will throw an error because we access past the end of the map
value. The map value size is 48 and sizeof(struct test_val) is 48 so
we walk off the end of the map value on the second call to
get bpf_get_stack(). Fix this by changing sizeof(struct test_val) to
24 by using 'sizeof(struct test_val) / 2'. After this everything passes
as expected.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560426019.10843.3285429543232025187.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
After changes to add update_reg_bounds after ALU ops and adding ALU32
bounds tracking the error message is changed in the 32-bit right shift
tests.
Test "#70/u bounds check after 32-bit right shift with 64-bit input FAIL"
now fails with,
Unexpected error message!
EXP: R0 invalid mem access
RES: func#0 @0
7: (b7) r1 = 2
8: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0) R1_w=invP2 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
8: (67) r1 <<= 31
9: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0) R1_w=invP4294967296 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
9: (74) w1 >>= 31
10: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0) R1_w=invP0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
10: (14) w1 -= 2
11: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0) R1_w=invP4294967294 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
11: (0f) r0 += r1
math between map_value pointer and 4294967294 is not allowed
And test "#70/p bounds check after 32-bit right shift with 64-bit input
FAIL" now fails with,
Unexpected error message!
EXP: R0 invalid mem access
RES: func#0 @0
7: (b7) r1 = 2
8: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0) R1_w=inv2 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
8: (67) r1 <<= 31
9: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0) R1_w=inv4294967296 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
9: (74) w1 >>= 31
10: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0) R1_w=inv0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
10: (14) w1 -= 2
11: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,imm=0) R1_w=inv4294967294 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
11: (0f) r0 += r1
last_idx 11 first_idx 0
regs=2 stack=0 before 10: (14) w1 -= 2
regs=2 stack=0 before 9: (74) w1 >>= 31
regs=2 stack=0 before 8: (67) r1 <<= 31
regs=2 stack=0 before 7: (b7) r1 = 2
math between map_value pointer and 4294967294 is not allowed
Before this series we did not trip the "math between map_value pointer..."
error because check_reg_sane_offset is never called in
adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(). Instead we have a register state that looks
like this at line 11*,
11: R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=8,
smin_value=0,smax_value=0,
umin_value=0,umax_value=0,
var_off=(0x0; 0x0))
R1_w=invP(id=0,
smin_value=0,smax_value=4294967295,
umin_value=0,umax_value=4294967295,
var_off=(0xfffffffe; 0x0))
R10=fp(id=0,off=0,
smin_value=0,smax_value=0,
umin_value=0,umax_value=0,
var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm
11: (0f) r0 += r1
In R1 'smin_val != smax_val' yet we have a tnum_const as seen
by 'var_off(0xfffffffe; 0x0))' with a 0x0 mask. So we hit this check
in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals()
if ((known && (smin_val != smax_val || umin_val != umax_val)) ||
smin_val > smax_val || umin_val > umax_val) {
/* Taint dst register if offset had invalid bounds derived from
* e.g. dead branches.
*/
__mark_reg_unknown(env, dst_reg);
return 0;
}
So we don't throw an error here and instead only throw an error
later in the verification when the memory access is made.
The root cause in verifier without alu32 bounds tracking is having
'umin_value = 0' and 'umax_value = U64_MAX' from BPF_SUB which we set
when 'umin_value < umax_val' here,
if (dst_reg->umin_value < umax_val) {
/* Overflow possible, we know nothing */
dst_reg->umin_value = 0;
dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX;
} else { ...}
Later in adjust_calar_min_max_vals we previously did a
coerce_reg_to_size() which will clamp the U64_MAX to U32_MAX by
truncating to 32bits. But either way without a call to update_reg_bounds
the less precise bounds tracking will fall out of the alu op
verification.
After latest changes we now exit adjust_scalar_min_max_vals with the
more precise umin value, due to zero extension propogating bounds from
alu32 bounds into alu64 bounds and then calling update_reg_bounds.
This then causes the verifier to trigger an earlier error and we get
the error in the output above.
This patch updates tests to reflect new error message.
* I have a local patch to print entire verifier state regardless if we
believe it is a constant so we can get a full picture of the state.
Usually if tnum_is_const() then bounds are also smin=smax, etc. but
this is not always true and is a bit subtle. Being able to see these
states helps understand dataflow imo. Let me know if we want something
similar upstream.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158507161475.15666.3061518385241144063.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
Overlapping header include additions in macsec.c
A bug fix in 'net' overlapping with the removal of 'version'
string in ena_netdev.c
Overlapping test additions in selftests Makefile
Overlapping PCI ID table adjustments in iwlwifi driver.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The existing tests attempt to check that JMP32 JSET ignores the upper
bits in the operand registers. However, the tests missed one such bug in
the x32 JIT that is only uncovered when a previous instruction pollutes
the upper 32 bits of the registers.
This patch adds a new test case that catches the bug by first executing
a 64-bit JSET to pollute the upper 32-bits of the temporary registers,
followed by a 32-bit JSET which should ignore the upper 32 bits.
Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200305234416.31597-2-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
Expand dummy prog generation such that we can easily check on return
codes and add few more test cases to make sure we keep on tracking
pruning behavior.
# ./test_verifier
[...]
#1066/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 1 OK
#1067/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 2 OK
Summary: 1580 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Also verified that JIT dump of added test cases looks good.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/df7200b6021444fd369376d227de917357285b65.1576789878.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
Three test cases are added.
Test 1: jmp32 'reg op imm'.
Test 2: jmp32 'reg op reg' where dst 'reg' has unknown constant
and src 'reg' has known constant
Test 3: jmp32 'reg op reg' where dst 'reg' has known constant
and src 'reg' has unknown constant
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191121170651.449096-1-yhs@fb.com
Add a loop test with 32 bit register against 0 immediate:
# ./test_verifier 631
#631/p taken loop with back jump to 1st insn, 2 OK
Disassembly:
[...]
1b: test %edi,%edi
1d: jne 0x0000000000000014
[...]
Pretty much similar to prior "taken loop with back jump to 1st
insn" test case just as jmp32 variant.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
The main changes are:
1) Add the ability to use unaligned chunks in the AF_XDP umem. By
relaxing where the chunks can be placed, it allows to use an
arbitrary buffer size and place whenever there is a free
address in the umem. Helps more seamless DPDK AF_XDP driver
integration. Support for i40e, ixgbe and mlx5e, from Kevin and
Maxim.
2) Addition of a wakeup flag for AF_XDP tx and fill rings so the
application can wake up the kernel for rx/tx processing which
avoids busy-spinning of the latter, useful when app and driver
is located on the same core. Support for i40e, ixgbe and mlx5e,
from Magnus and Maxim.
3) bpftool fixes for printf()-like functions so compiler can actually
enforce checks, bpftool build system improvements for custom output
directories, and addition of 'bpftool map freeze' command, from Quentin.
4) Support attaching/detaching XDP programs from 'bpftool net' command,
from Daniel.
5) Automatic xskmap cleanup when AF_XDP socket is released, and several
barrier/{read,write}_once fixes in AF_XDP code, from Björn.
6) Relicense of bpf_helpers.h/bpf_endian.h for future libbpf
inclusion as well as libbpf versioning improvements, from Andrii.
7) Several new BPF kselftests for verifier precision tracking, from Alexei.
8) Several BPF kselftest fixes wrt endianess to run on s390x, from Ilya.
9) And more BPF kselftest improvements all over the place, from Stanislav.
10) Add simple BPF map op cache for nfp driver to batch dumps, from Jakub.
11) AF_XDP socket umem mapping improvements for 32bit archs, from Ivan.
12) Add BPF-to-BPF call and BTF line info support for s390x JIT, from Yauheni.
13) Small optimization in arm64 JIT to spare 1 insns for BPF_MOD, from Jerin.
14) Fix an error check in bpf_tcp_gen_syncookie() helper, from Petar.
15) Various minor fixes and cleanups, from Nathan, Masahiro, Masanari,
Peter, Wei, Yue.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add two tests to check that stack slot marking during backtracking
doesn't trigger 'spi > allocated_stack' warning.
One test is using BPF_ST insn. Another is using BPF_STX.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Copy-paste of existing test
"calls: cross frame pruning - liveness propagation"
but ran with different parentage chain heuristic
which stresses different path in precision tracking logic.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Use BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to check that precision
tracking works as expected by comparing every step it takes.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
There is a small merge conflict in libbpf (Cc Andrii so he's in the loop
as well):
for (i = 1; i <= btf__get_nr_types(btf); i++) {
t = (struct btf_type *)btf__type_by_id(btf, i);
if (!has_datasec && btf_is_var(t)) {
/* replace VAR with INT */
t->info = BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_INT, 0, 0);
<<<<<<< HEAD
/*
* using size = 1 is the safest choice, 4 will be too
* big and cause kernel BTF validation failure if
* original variable took less than 4 bytes
*/
t->size = 1;
*(int *)(t+1) = BTF_INT_ENC(0, 0, 8);
} else if (!has_datasec && kind == BTF_KIND_DATASEC) {
=======
t->size = sizeof(int);
*(int *)(t + 1) = BTF_INT_ENC(0, 0, 32);
} else if (!has_datasec && btf_is_datasec(t)) {
>>>>>>> 72ef80b5ee
/* replace DATASEC with STRUCT */
Conflict is between the two commits 1d4126c4e1 ("libbpf: sanitize VAR to
conservative 1-byte INT") and b03bc6853c ("libbpf: convert libbpf code to
use new btf helpers"), so we need to pick the sanitation fixup as well as
use the new btf_is_datasec() helper and the whitespace cleanup. Looks like
the following:
[...]
if (!has_datasec && btf_is_var(t)) {
/* replace VAR with INT */
t->info = BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_INT, 0, 0);
/*
* using size = 1 is the safest choice, 4 will be too
* big and cause kernel BTF validation failure if
* original variable took less than 4 bytes
*/
t->size = 1;
*(int *)(t + 1) = BTF_INT_ENC(0, 0, 8);
} else if (!has_datasec && btf_is_datasec(t)) {
/* replace DATASEC with STRUCT */
[...]
The main changes are:
1) Addition of core parts of compile once - run everywhere (co-re) effort,
that is, relocation of fields offsets in libbpf as well as exposure of
kernel's own BTF via sysfs and loading through libbpf, from Andrii.
More info on co-re: http://vger.kernel.org/bpfconf2019.html#session-2
and http://vger.kernel.org/lpc-bpf2018.html#session-2
2) Enable passing input flags to the BPF flow dissector to customize parsing
and allowing it to stop early similar to the C based one, from Stanislav.
3) Add a BPF helper function that allows generating SYN cookies from XDP and
tc BPF, from Petar.
4) Add devmap hash-based map type for more flexibility in device lookup for
redirects, from Toke.
5) Improvements to XDP forwarding sample code now utilizing recently enabled
devmap lookups, from Jesper.
6) Add support for reporting the effective cgroup progs in bpftool, from Jakub
and Takshak.
7) Fix reading kernel config from bpftool via /proc/config.gz, from Peter.
8) Fix AF_XDP umem pages mapping for 32 bit architectures, from Ivan.
9) Follow-up to add two more BPF loop tests for the selftest suite, from Alexei.
10) Add perf event output helper also for other skb-based program types, from Allan.
11) Fix a co-re related compilation error in selftests, from Yonghong.
====================
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Add 2 tests that check JIT code generation to jumps to 1st insn.
1st test is similar to syzbot reproducer.
The backwards branch is never taken at runtime.
2nd test has branch to 1st insn that executes.
The test is written as two bpf functions, since it's not possible
to construct valid single bpf program that jumps to 1st insn.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Software event output is only enabled by a few prog types.
This test is to ensure that all supported types are enabled for
bpf_perf_event_output successfully.
Signed-off-by: Allan Zhang <allanzhang@google.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Use BPF_REG_1 for source and destination of gso_segs read,
to exercise "bpf: fix access to skb_shared_info->gso_segs" fix.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Suggested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This test looks up a 32-bit map element and then loads it using a 64-bit
load. This does not work on s390, which is a big-endian machine.
Since the point of this test doesn't seem to be loading a smaller value
using a larger load, simply use a 32-bit load.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
BPF_LDX_MEM is used to load the least significant byte of the retrieved
test_val.index, however, on big-endian machines it ends up retrieving
the most significant byte.
Change the test to load the whole int in order to make it
endianness-independent.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Mirror existing wide store tests with wide loads. The only significant
difference is expected error string.
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Move the file and rename internal BPF_SOCK_ADDR define to
BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE. This selftest will be extended in the next commit
with the wide loads.
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Make sure that wide stores are allowed at proper (aligned) addresses.
Note that user_ip6 is naturally aligned on 8-byte boundary, so
correct addresses are user_ip6[0] and user_ip6[2]. msg_src_ip6 is,
however, aligned on a 4-byte bondary, so only msg_src_ip6[1]
can be wide-stored.
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
There are currently no tests for ALU64 shift operations when the shift
amount is 0. This adds 6 new tests to make sure they are equivalent
to a no-op. The x32 JIT had such bugs that could have been caught by
these tests.
Cc: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2019-06-19
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
The main changes are:
1) new SO_REUSEPORT_DETACH_BPF setsocktopt, from Martin.
2) BTF based map definition, from Andrii.
3) support bpf_map_lookup_elem for xskmap, from Jonathan.
4) bounded loops and scalar precision logic in the verifier, from Alexei.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This set of tests is a rewrite of Edward's earlier tests:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/877221/
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
fix tests that incorrectly assumed that the verifier
cannot track constants through stack.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
If the result of the division is LLONG_MIN, current tests do not detect
the error since the return value is truncated to a 32-bit value and ends
up being 0.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Check that bpf_map_lookup_elem lookup and structure
access operats correctly.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently, the AF_XDP code uses a separate map in order to
determine if an xsk is bound to a queue. Instead of doing this,
have bpf_map_lookup_elem() return a xdp_sock.
Rearrange some xdp_sock members to eliminate structure holes.
Remove selftest - will be added back in later patch.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
eBPF ISA specification requires high 32-bit cleared when only low 32-bit
sub-register is written. JIT back-ends must guarantee this semantics when
doing code-gen.
This patch complete unit tests for all of those insns that could be visible
to JIT back-ends and defining sub-registers, if JIT back-ends failed to
guarantee the mentioned semantics, these unit tests will fail.
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
It is better to centralize all sub-register zero extension checks into an
independent file.
This patch takes the first step to move existing sub-register zero
extension checks into subreg.c.
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Add three tests to test_verifier/basic_instr that make sure that the
high 32-bits of the destination register is cleared after an ALU32
and/or/xor.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
The current method to compare 64-bit numbers for conditional jump is:
1) Compare the high 32-bit first.
2) If the high 32-bit isn't the same, then goto step 4.
3) Compare the low 32-bit.
4) Check the desired condition.
This method is right for unsigned comparison, but it is buggy for signed
comparison, because it does signed comparison for low 32-bit too.
There is only one sign bit in 64-bit number, that is the MSB in the 64-bit
number, it is wrong to treat low 32-bit as signed number and do the signed
comparison for it.
This patch fixes the bug and adds a testcase in selftests/bpf for such bug.
Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
This patch adds verifier tests for the bpf_sk_storage:
1. ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
2. Map and helper compatibility (e.g. disallow bpf_map_loookup_elem)
It also takes this chance to remove the unused struct btf_raw_data
and uses the BTF encoding macros from "test_btf.h".
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This tests that:
* a BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE cannot be attached if it
uses either:
* a variable offset to the tracepoint buffer, or
* an offset beyond the size of the tracepoint buffer
* a tracer can modify the buffer provided when attached to a writable
tracepoint in bpf_prog_test_run
Signed-off-by: Matt Mullins <mmullins@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The first test case, for pointer null checks, is equivalent to the
following pseudo-code. It checks that the verifier does not complain on
line 6 and recognizes that ptr isn't null.
1: ptr = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);
2: ret = subprog(ptr) {
3: return ptr != NULL;
4: }
5: if (ret)
6: value = *ptr;
The second test case, for packet bound checks, is equivalent to the
following pseudo-code. It checks that the verifier does not complain on
line 7 and recognizes that the packet is at least 1 byte long.
1: pkt_end = ctx.pkt_end;
2: ptr = ctx.pkt + 8;
3: ret = subprog(ptr, pkt_end) {
4: return ptr <= pkt_end;
5: }
6: if (ret)
7: value = *(u8 *)ctx.pkt;
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@orange.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add two tests to check that sequence of 1024 jumps is verifiable.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Test that verifier handles new argument types properly, including
uninitialized or partially initialized value, misaligned stack access,
etc.
Example of output:
#456/p ARG_PTR_TO_LONG uninitialized OK
#457/p ARG_PTR_TO_LONG half-uninitialized OK
#458/p ARG_PTR_TO_LONG misaligned OK
#459/p ARG_PTR_TO_LONG size < sizeof(long) OK
#460/p ARG_PTR_TO_LONG initialized OK
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2019-04-12
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
The main changes are:
1) Improve BPF verifier scalability for large programs through two
optimizations: i) remove verifier states that are not useful in pruning,
ii) stop walking parentage chain once first LIVE_READ is seen. Combined
gives approx 20x speedup. Increase limits for accepting large programs
under root, and add various stress tests, from Alexei.
2) Implement global data support in BPF. This enables static global variables
for .data, .rodata and .bss sections to be properly handled which allows
for more natural program development. This also opens up the possibility
to optimize program workflow by compiling ELFs only once and later only
rewriting section data before reload, from Daniel and with test cases and
libbpf refactoring from Joe.
3) Add config option to generate BTF type info for vmlinux as part of the
kernel build process. DWARF debug info is converted via pahole to BTF.
Latter relies on libbpf and makes use of BTF deduplication algorithm which
results in 100x savings compared to DWARF data. Resulting .BTF section is
typically about 2MB in size, from Andrii.
4) Add BPF verifier support for stack access with variable offset from
helpers and add various test cases along with it, from Andrey.
5) Extend bpf_skb_adjust_room() growth BPF helper to mark inner MAC header
so that L2 encapsulation can be used for tc tunnels, from Alan.
6) Add support for input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN so that
users can define a subset of allowed __sk_buff fields that get fed into
the test program, from Stanislav.
7) Add bpf fs multi-dimensional array tests for BTF test suite and fix up
various UBSAN warnings in bpftool, from Yonghong.
8) Generate a pkg-config file for libbpf, from Luca.
9) Dump program's BTF id in bpftool, from Prashant.
10) libbpf fix to use smaller BPF log buffer size for AF_XDP's XDP
program, from Magnus.
11) kallsyms related fixes for the case when symbols are not present in
BPF selftests and samples, from Daniel
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Extend test_verifier with various test cases around the two kernel
extensions, that is, {rd,wr}only map support as well as direct map
value access. All passing, one skipped due to xskmap not present
on test machine:
# ./test_verifier
[...]
#948/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 1 OK
#949/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 2 OK
#950/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', good access OK
#951/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 1 OK
#952/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 2 OK
Summary: 1410 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Minor comment merge conflict in mlx5.
Staging driver has a fixup due to the skb->xmit_more changes
in 'net-next', but was removed in 'net'.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Test the case when reg->smax_value is too small/big and can overflow,
and separately min and max values outside of stack bounds.
Example of output:
# ./test_verifier
#856/p indirect variable-offset stack access, unbounded OK
#857/p indirect variable-offset stack access, max out of bound OK
#858/p indirect variable-offset stack access, min out of bound OK
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Test that verifier rejects indirect stack access with variable offset in
unprivileged mode and accepts same code in privileged mode.
Since pointer arithmetics is prohibited in unprivileged mode verifier
should reject the program even before it gets to helper call that uses
variable offset, at the time when that variable offset is trying to be
constructed.
Example of output:
# ./test_verifier
...
#859/u indirect variable-offset stack access, priv vs unpriv OK
#859/p indirect variable-offset stack access, priv vs unpriv OK
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Test that verifier rejects indirect access to uninitialized stack with
variable offset.
Example of output:
# ./test_verifier
...
#859/p indirect variable-offset stack access, uninitialized OK
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Add a test to generate 1m ld_imm64 insns to stress the verifier.
Bump the size of fill_ld_abs_vlan_push_pop test from 4k to 29k
and jump_around_ld_abs from 4k to 5.5k.
Larger sizes are not possible due to 16-bit offset encoding
in jump instructions.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Test different scenarios of indirect variable-offset stack access: out of
bound access (>0), min_off below initialized part of the stack,
max_off+size above initialized part of the stack, initialized stack.
Example of output:
...
#856/p indirect variable-offset stack access, out of bound OK
#857/p indirect variable-offset stack access, max_off+size > max_initialized OK
#858/p indirect variable-offset stack access, min_off < min_initialized OK
#859/p indirect variable-offset stack access, ok OK
...
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch adds a test case with an excessive number of call stack frames
in dead code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@orange.com>
Tested-by: Xiao Han <xiao.han@orange.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Commit 7640ead939 ("bpf: verifier: make sure callees don't prune
with caller differences") connected up parentage chains of all
frames of the stack. It didn't, however, ensure propagate_liveness()
propagates all liveness information along those chains.
This means pruning happening in the callee may generate explored
states with incomplete liveness for the chains in lower frames
of the stack.
The included selftest is similar to the prior one from commit
7640ead939 ("bpf: verifier: make sure callees don't prune with
caller differences"), where callee would prune regardless of the
difference in r8 state.
Now we also initialize r9 to 0 or 1 based on a result from get_random().
r9 is never read so the walk with r9 = 0 gets pruned (correctly) after
the walk with r9 = 1 completes.
The selftest is so arranged that the pruning will happen in the
callee. Since callee does not propagate read marks of r8, the
explored state at the pruning point prior to the callee will
now ignore r8.
Propagate liveness on all frames of the stack when pruning.
Fixes: f4d7e40a5b ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Make sure that returning a struct sock_common * reference invokes
the reference tracking machinery in the verifier.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Make the BPF_SK_LOOKUP macro take a helper function, to ease
writing tests for new helpers.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding verifier tests to ensure the ptr returned from bpf_tcp_sock() and
bpf_sk_fullsock() cannot be accessed after bpf_sk_release() is called.
A few of the tests are derived from a reproducer test by Lorenz Bauer.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Non-zero imm value in the second part of the ldimm64 instruction for
BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD is invalid, and thus must be rejected. The map fd
only ever sits in the first instructions' imm field. None of the BPF
loaders known to us are using it, so risk of regression is minimal.
For clarity and consistency, the few insn->{src_reg,imm} occurrences
are rewritten into insn[0].{src_reg,imm}. Add a test case to the BPF
selftest suite as well.
Fixes: 0246e64d9a ("bpf: handle pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insn")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add two additional tests for further asserting the
BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER logic with cases that were missed
previously.
Cc: Marek Majkowski <marek@cloudflare.com>
Cc: Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
This patch tests accessing the skb->sk and the new helpers,
bpf_sk_fullsock and bpf_tcp_sock.
The errstr of some existing "reference tracking" tests is changed
with s/bpf_sock/sock/ and s/socket/sock/ where "sock" is from the
verifier's reg_type_str[].
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
RISC-V does, in-general, not have "efficient unaligned access". When
testing the RISC-V BPF JIT, some selftests failed in the verification
due to misaligned access. Annotate these tests with the
F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS flag.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
add bpf_spin_lock tests to test_verifier.c that don't require
latest llvm with BTF support
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
We don't have this helper if the kernel was compiled without
CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS. Setting prog_type to BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT
let's verifier correctly skip this test based on the missing
prog_type support in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Break up the rest of test_verifier tests into separate
files.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Break up the first 10 kLoC of test verifier test cases
out into smaller files. Looks like git line counting
gets a little flismy above 16 bit integers, so we need
two commits to break up test_verifier.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
test_verifier.c has grown to be very long (almost 16 kLoC),
and it is very conflict prone since we always add tests at
the end.
Try to break it apart a little bit. Allow test snippets
to be defined in separate files and include them automatically
into the huge test array.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
