This patch fixes below warning reported by coccicheck
drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c:198:8-15: WARNING:
kzalloc should be used for cprb, instead of kmalloc/memset
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1587472548-105240-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Support for hibernation on s390 has been recently been removed with
commit 394216275c ("s390: remove broken hibernate / power management
support"), no need to keep unused code around.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200526093629.257649-1-cohuck@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Streamline the processing of QDIO Input Queues, and remove some
intermittent SLSB updates (no deleting of old ACKs, no redundant
transitions through NOT_INIT).
Rather than counting ACKs, we now keep track of the whole batch of
SBALs that were completed during the current polling cycle.
Most completed SBALs stay in their initial state (ie. PRIMED or ERROR),
except that the most recent SBAL in each sub-run is ACKed for
IRQ reduction.
The only logic changes happen in inbound_handle_work(), the other
delta is just a renaming of the variables that track the SBAL batch.
Note that in particular we don't need to flip the _oldest_ SBAL to
an idle state (eg. NOT_INIT or ACKed) as a guard against catching our
own tail. Since get_inbound_buffer_frontier() will never scan more than
the remaining nr_buf_used SBALs, this scenario just doesn't occur.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
s390 cannot set syscall number and reture code at the same time,
so set the appropriate flag to indicate it.
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
When strace wants to update the syscall number, it sets GPR2
to the desired number and updates the GPR via PTRACE_SETREGSET.
It doesn't update regs->int_code which would cause the old syscall
executed on syscall restart. As we cannot change the ptrace ABI and
don't have a field for the interruption code, check whether the tracee
is in a syscall and the last instruction was svc. In that case assume
that the tracer wants to update the syscall number and copy the GPR2
value to regs->int_code.
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
tracing expects to see invalid syscalls, so pass it through.
The syscall path in entry.S checks the syscall number before
looking up the handler, so it is still safe.
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
The current code returns the syscall number which an invalid
syscall number is supplied and tracing is enabled. This makes
the strace testsuite fail.
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Use __secure_computing() and pass the register data via
seccomp_data so secure computing doesn't have to fetch it
again.
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
xchg() for a single-byte location assembles to a 4-byte Compare&Swap,
wrapped into a non-trivial amount of retry code that deals with
concurrent modifications to the unaffected bytes.
Change it to a simple byte-store, but preserve the memory ordering
semantics that the CS provided.
This simplifies the generated code for a hot path, and in theory also
allows us to amortize the memory barriers over multiple SLSB updates.
CC: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
For all ddi, encoder->type holds output type as ddi,
assigning it to individual o/p types is no more valid.
Fixes: 362bfb995b ("drm/i915/tgl: Add DKL PHY vswing table for HDMI")
v2: Rebase, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200612082237.11886-1-vandita.kulkarni@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 94641eb6c6)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Rescue the GT workarounds from being buried inside init_clock_gating so
that we remember to apply them after a GT reset, and that they are
included in our verification that the workarounds are applied.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611080140.30228-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 2bcefd0d26)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Rescue the GT workarounds from being buried inside init_clock_gating so
that we remember to apply them after a GT reset, and that they are
included in our verification that the workarounds are applied.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611080140.30228-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 806a45c083)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Rescue the GT workarounds from being buried inside init_clock_gating so
that we remember to apply them after a GT reset, and that they are
included in our verification that the workarounds are applied.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611080140.30228-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit c3b93a943f)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Rescue the GT workarounds from being buried inside init_clock_gating so
that we remember to apply them after a GT reset, and that they are
included in our verification that the workarounds are applied.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611080140.30228-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 7331c356b6)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Rescue the GT workarounds from being buried inside init_clock_gating so
that we remember to apply them after a GT reset, and that they are
included in our verification that the workarounds are applied.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611080140.30228-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 19f1f627b3)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Rescue the GT workarounds from being buried inside init_clock_gating so
that we remember to apply them after a GT reset, and that they are
included in our verification that the workarounds are applied.
v2: Leave HSW_SCRATCH to set an explicit value, not or in our disable
bit.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2011
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611093015.11370-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit f93ec5fb56)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
According to BSpec the Data Island Packet should be disabled after
disabling the transcoder, but before the transcoder clock select is set
to none. On an ICL RVP, daisy-chained MST config not following this
leads to a hang with the following MCE when disabling the output:
[ 870.948739] mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 5 Bank 6: ba00000011000402
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: RIP !INEXACT! 10:<ffffffff81aca652> {poll_idle+0x92/0xb0}
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC 135a261fe61
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:706e5 TIME 1591739604 SOCKET 0 APIC 0 microcode 20
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: Run the above through 'mcelog --ascii'
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check: Processor context corrupt
[ 871.019212] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal machine check
[ 871.019212] Kernel Offset: disabled
Bspec: 4287
Fixes: fa37a21327 ("drm/i915: Stop sending DP SDPs on ddi disable")
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200609220616.6015-1-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit c980216dd2)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
In commit 5ba32c7be8 ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context
reload when rewinding RING_TAIL"), we placed the check for rewinding a
context on actually submitting the next request in that context. This
was so that we only had to check once, and could do so with precision
avoiding as many forced restores as possible. For example, to ensure
that we can resubmit the same request a couple of times, we include a
small wa_tail such that on the next submission, the ring->tail will
appear to move forwards when resubmitting the same request. This is very
common as it will happen for every lite-restore to fill the second port
after a context switch.
However, intel_ring_direction() is limited in precision to movements of
upto half the ring size. The consequence being that if we tried to
unwind many requests, we could exceed half the ring and flip the sense
of the direction, so missing a force restore. As no request can be
greater than half the ring (i.e. 2048 bytes in the smallest case), we
can check for rollback incrementally. As we check against the tail that
would be submitted, we do not lose any sensitivity and allow lite
restores for the simple case. We still need to double check upon
submitting the context, to allow for multiple preemptions and
resubmissions.
Fixes: 5ba32c7be8 ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Reviewed-by: Bruce Chang <yu.bruce.chang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200609151723.12971-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit e36ba817fa)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
We have a I915_REQUEST_NOPREEMPT flag that we set when we must prevent
the HW from preempting during the course of this request. We need to
honour this flag and protect the HW even if we have a heartbeat request,
or other maximum priority barrier, pending. As such, restrict the
timeslicing check to avoid preempting into the topmost priority band,
leaving the unpreemptable requests in blissful peace running
uninterrupted on the HW.
v2: Set the I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER to be less than
I915_PRIORITY_UNPREEMPTABLE so that we never submit a request
(heartbeat or barrier) that can legitimately preempt the current
non-premptable request.
Fixes: 2a98f4e65b ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a request")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200527162418.24755-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit b72f02d78e)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Since we temporarily disable the heartbeat and restore back to the
default value, we can use the stored defaults on the engine and avoid
using a local.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519063123.20673-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 3a230a554d)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c:129:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci
Fixes: 0f04a81784 ("pinctrl: mcp23s08: Split to three parts: core, I²C, SPI")
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
CC: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200608010253.GA79576@44f7ab9e8d59
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Use noirq suspend/resume callbacks as other drivers which implement
noirq suspend/resume callbacks (Ex:- PCIe) depend on pinctrl driver to
configure the signals used by their respective devices in the noirq phase.
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200604174935.26560-1-vidyas@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Fix the following warnings caused by reusage of the same irq_chip
instance for all spmi-gpio gpio_irq_chip instances. Instead embed
irq_chip into pmic_gpio_state struct.
gpio gpiochip2: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@2:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.
gpio gpiochip3: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@4:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.
gpio gpiochip4: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@a:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200604002817.667160-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Zou Wei