Fix for the below coding style warning.
Warning: Move const after static - use 'static const int'
Signed-off-by: Fatih Yildirim <yildirim.fatih@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212073423.20562-1-yildirim.fatih@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This fixes checkpatch error "open brace '{' following struct go on
the same line" in file drivers/staging/wimax/i2400m/rx.c .
Signed-off-by: Hemansh Agnihotri <hemanshagnihotri27@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212033256.2116-1-hemanshagnihotri27@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
For st7789v IC, when we need continuous full screen refresh, it is best to
wait for the tearing effect line signal to arrive to avoid screen tearing.
Signed-off-by: Carlis <zhangxuezhi1@yulong.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1612706517-124617-1-git-send-email-zhangxuezhi3@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should
match open parenthesis".
Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <pritthijit.nath@icloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210211213715.7386-1-pritthijit.nath@icloud.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
In this particular case, the struct element is already flexible struct.
Thus struct element ie[] is ambiguous inside another struct. The members
of struct element ie aren't being accessed in code anywhere. The data of
u8 type is copied in it. So it has been changed to u8 ie[] to make the
sparse happy and code simple.
Warning from sparse:
drivers/stagingwfx/hif_tx.c: note: in included file (through drivers/stagingwfx/data_tx.h, drivers/staging//wfx/wfx.h):
drivers/staging//wfx/hif_api_cmd.h:103:26: warning: array of flexible structures
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <musamaanjum@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210211105026.GA45458@LEGION
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct ndis_80211_var_ie, instead of a one-element array.
Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds and
fix the following warnings:
CC [M] drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.o
In file included from ./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/drv_types.h:20,
from drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:9:
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c: In function ‘HT_caps_handler’:
./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:108:11: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
108 | (EF1BYTE(*((u8 *)(__pstart))))
| ^
./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:42:8: note: in definition of macro ‘EF1BYTE’
42 | ((u8)(_val))
| ^~~~
./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:127:4: note: in expansion of macro ‘LE_P1BYTE_TO_HOST_1BYTE’
127 | (LE_P1BYTE_TO_HOST_1BYTE(__pstart) >> (__bitoffset)) & \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_ht.h:97:55: note: in expansion of macro ‘LE_BITS_TO_1BYTE’
97 | #define GET_HT_CAPABILITY_ELE_RX_STBC(_pEleStart) LE_BITS_TO_1BYTE((_pEleStart)+1, 0, 2)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1104:58: note: in expansion of macro ‘GET_HT_CAPABILITY_ELE_RX_STBC’
1104 | if (TEST_FLAG(phtpriv->stbc_cap, STBC_HT_ENABLE_TX) && GET_HT_CAPABILITY_ELE_RX_STBC(pIE->data)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1051:75: warning: array subscript 2 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
1051 | if ((pmlmeinfo->HT_caps.u.HT_cap_element.AMPDU_para & 0x3) > (pIE->data[i] & 0x3))
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c: In function ‘check_assoc_AP’:
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1606:19: warning: array subscript 4 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
1606 | if (pIE->data[4] == 1)
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1609:20: warning: array subscript 5 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
1609 | if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_92SE)
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1613:19: warning: array subscript 5 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
1613 | if (pIE->data[5] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_SOFTAP)
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1617:20: warning: array subscript 6 is above array bounds of ‘u8[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned char[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
1617 | if (pIE->data[6] & RT_HT_CAP_USE_JAGUAR_BCUT) {
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/602434b8.jc5DoXJ0bmHoxgIL%25lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210210224937.GA11922@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
As started by commit 05a5f51ca5 ("Documentation: Replace lkml.org
links with lore"), replace lkml.org links with lore to better use a
single source that's more likely to stay available long-term.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210210233231.1664896-1-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Stack allocated buffers cannot be used for DMA
on all architectures so allocate hci_packet buffer
using kmalloc.
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede03@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210211053819.34858-1-ameynarkhede03@gmail.com
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove typedefs from include/rtl8723b_recv.h and convert one usage in
hal/rtl8723bs_recv.c to use the actual structure name in its pointer
declaration. Fixes two checkpatch warnings.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210209141051.4739-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove unnecessary blank line, and move close of multiple-line comments
to their own trailing lines. This fixes four checkpatch warnings and one
checkpatch check notice for the include/rtl8723b_hal.h file.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210209120641.3964-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove braces from both occurences of single line if blocks in
include/rtw_mlme.h, fixes two checkpatch warnings, thus clearing
this type of warning from this file.
Also swaps two if statement comparisons around, so the variable is on
the left in each one. This fixes two warnings also.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210209001043.165080-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Add braces to both branches of an if block for consistency, and also
remove braces from a single line for loop. Fixes a checkpatch check
and warning, thus clearing this file of any brace check/warning
notices.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210209001153.165135-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix the following type of checkpatch warning:
"WARNING: struct phy_ops should normally be const"
Signed-off-by: Atul Gopinathan <leoatul12@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210209081935.3084-2-leoatul12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix the following type of checkpatch error:
"ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible"
Signed-off-by: Atul Gopinathan <leoatul12@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210209081935.3084-1-leoatul12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove spaces preceding closing brace of one of the nested if statement
blocks inside the rtl92e_leisure_ps_leave function, and replace with a
tab, to align it properly with the start of the block. Fixes a
checkpatch warning.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210207194944.113613-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This removes the braces from the if statement that checks the
wps_ie_len and ieee->wps_ie values in rtllib_association_req of
rtllib_softmac.c as this block contains only one statement.
Fixes a checkpatch warning.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210207225703.114229-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
When the firmware rejects a frame (because station become asleep or
disconnected), the frame is re-queued in mac80211. However, the
re-queued frame was 8 bytes longer than the original one (the size of
the ICV for the encryption). So, when mac80211 try to send this frame
again, it is a little bigger than expected.
If the frame is re-queued secveral time it end with a skb_over_panic
because the skb buffer is not large enough.
Note it only happens when device acts as an AP and encryption is
enabled.
This patch more or less reverts the commit 049fde1304 ("staging: wfx:
drop useless field from struct wfx_tx_priv").
Fixes: 049fde1304 ("staging: wfx: drop useless field from struct wfx_tx_priv")
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210208135254.399964-1-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch fixes warnings of 'checkpatch.pl'. According to
Linux coding guidelines, code should be aligned properly to
match with open parenthesis and lines should not end with
open parenthesis.
Signed-off-by: Mahak Gupta <gmahak1@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210208025904.25928-1-gmahak1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Constify two static structs which are never modified, to allow the
compiler to put them in read-only memory.
The only usage of controller_attribute_group is to put its address in an
array of pointers to const struct attribute_group, and the only usage of
can_power_ops is to assign its address to the 'ops' field in the
regulator_desc struct, which is a pointer to const struct regulator_ops.
Reviewed-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210207202501.9494-1-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The global gpio_desc pointer and int vbus_irq were defined in the header,
instead put the definitions in the translation unit and make them static as
there's only a single consumer, and these symbols shouldn't pollute the
global namespace.
This fixes the following sparse warnings for this driver:
drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c: note: in included file:
drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h:23:18: warning: symbol 'vbus_gpio' was not
declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.h:24:5:
warning: symbol 'vbus_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210207085911.270746-1-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This removes the braces from the if statement that checks the
physical node return value in cvm_oct_phy_setup_device, as this
block contains only one statement. Fixes a style warning.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210206201701.5273-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
multiple structures contains a ieee80211_rts structure, which is required to
have at least two byte alignment, but are annotated with a __packed attribute
to force single-byte alignment:
staging/vt6656/rxtx.h:98:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct vnt_rts_g' is less than 2 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
staging/vt6656/rxtx.h:106:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct vnt_rts_ab' is less than 2 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
staging/vt6656/rxtx.h:116:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct vnt_cts' is less than 2 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
I see no reason why the structure itself would be misaligned, and all members
have at least two-byte alignment within the structure, so use the same
constraint on the sturcture itself.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210204162731.3132069-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Building this with 'make W=1' produces a couple of warnings:
rtl8723bs/include/ieee80211.h:730:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct ieee80211_assoc_request_frame' is less than 2 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
rtl8723bs/include/ieee80211.h:737:1: warning: alignment 1 of 'struct ieee80211_assoc_response_frame' is less than 2 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
The warnings are in dead code, so just remove the bits that
are obviously broken like this.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210204162956.3276523-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix some pointer declarations where '*' is not adjacent to
data name.
This fixes checkpatch.pl error: "POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar"
should be "foo *bar""
Signed-off-by: Ayush <ayush@disroot.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210204211750.102129-1-ayush@disroot.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Use min_t instead of min function in qlge/qlge_main.c
Fixes following checkpatch.pl warning:
WARNING: min() should probably be min_t(int, MAX_CPUS, num_online_cpus())
Signed-off-by: Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede02@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210205092433.4131-1-ameynarkhede02@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-14-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-13-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-12-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-11-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-10-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-9-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-7-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Acked-by: Marc Dietrich <marvin24@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-6-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
strlcpy is marked as deprecated in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst,
and there is no functional difference when the caller expects truncation
(when not checking the return value). strscpy is relatively better as it
also avoids scanning the whole source string.
This silences the related checkpatch warnings from:
5dbdb2d87c ("checkpatch: prefer strscpy to strlcpy")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210131172838.146706-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The Edimax EW-7811UN V2 uses an RTL8188EU chipset and works with this
driver.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210204085217.9743-1-martin@kaiser.cx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently the pointer 'reporter' is not being initialized and is
being read in a netdev_warn message. The pointer is not used
and is redundant, fix this by removing it and replacing the reference
to it with priv->reporter instead.
Fixes: 1053c27804 ("staging: qlge: coredump via devlink health reporter")
Reviewed-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized pointer read")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210203133834.22388-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch replaces the safe list iteration function with the
non-safe one, as no list element is being deleted.
Signed-off-by: Christian Gromm <christian.gromm@microchip.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1612265890-18246-3-git-send-email-christian.gromm@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch checks the function parameter 'bytes' before doing the
subtraction to prevent memory corruption.
Signed-off-by: Christian Gromm <christian.gromm@microchip.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1612282865-21846-1-git-send-email-christian.gromm@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
