David Vernet 7d35eb1a18 bpf, docs: s/eBPF/BPF in standards documents ... There isn't really anything other than just "BPF" at this point, so referring to it as "eBPF" in our standards document just causes unnecessary confusion. Let's just be consistent and use "BPF". Suggested-by: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw@obs.cr> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230828155948.123405-4-void@manifault.com		2023-08-30 16:36:10 +02:00
..
abi.rst	bpf, docs: Add abi.rst document to standardization subdirectory	2023-08-30 16:35:58 +02:00
index.rst	bpf, docs: Add abi.rst document to standardization subdirectory	2023-08-30 16:35:58 +02:00
instruction-set.rst	bpf, docs: s/eBPF/BPF in standards documents	2023-08-30 16:36:10 +02:00