mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-09-30 06:10:56 +00:00
8f79870ec8
Settle on three "flavors" of uprobe/uretprobe, installed on different kinds of instruction: nop, push, and ret. All three are testing different internal code paths emulating or single-stepping instructions, so are interesting to compare and benchmark separately. To ensure `push rbp` instruction we ensure that uprobe_target_push() is not a leaf function by calling (global __weak) noop function and returning something afterwards (if we don't do that, compiler will just do a tail call optimization). Also, we need to make sure that compiler isn't skipping frame pointer generation, so let's add `-fno-omit-frame-pointers` to Makefile. Just to give an idea of where we currently stand in terms of relative performance of different uprobe/uretprobe cases vs a cheap syscall (getpgid()) baseline, here are results from my local machine: $ benchs/run_bench_uprobes.sh base : 1.561 ± 0.020M/s uprobe-nop : 0.947 ± 0.007M/s uprobe-push : 0.951 ± 0.004M/s uprobe-ret : 0.443 ± 0.007M/s uretprobe-nop : 0.471 ± 0.013M/s uretprobe-push : 0.483 ± 0.004M/s uretprobe-ret : 0.306 ± 0.007M/s Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240301214551.1686095-1-andrii@kernel.org |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
accounting | ||
arch | ||
bootconfig | ||
bpf | ||
build | ||
certs | ||
cgroup | ||
counter | ||
crypto | ||
debugging | ||
edid | ||
firewire | ||
firmware | ||
gpio | ||
hv | ||
iio | ||
include | ||
kvm/kvm_stat | ||
laptop | ||
leds | ||
lib | ||
memory-model | ||
mm | ||
net/ynl | ||
objtool | ||
pci | ||
pcmcia | ||
perf | ||
power | ||
rcu | ||
scripts | ||
spi | ||
testing | ||
thermal | ||
time | ||
tracing | ||
usb | ||
verification | ||
virtio | ||
wmi | ||
workqueue | ||
Makefile |