6540b260bd
inserting 5 characters at a time and then skipping ahead just one position. I don't think this affected correctness. I believe there's still a terrible (exponential?) slowdown as the input file gets bigger, however. Perhaps not -- but we run through the first 1000 TMW glyphs in 6 seconds, the 20th thousand takes at least 60 seconds. Is TMW->Wylie faster than TMW->Unicode? If so, why? Thought: don't use a DuffPane within TibetanConverter -- it can only add overhead, right? My hprof profile said that the conversion was taking just a couple of percent of the work; the rest was going to display-related stuff that you should only see if you were displaying the document. I'm not! |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
tshegbar | ||
acip_keyboard.ini | ||
DuffCellRenderer.java | ||
DuffCode.java | ||
DuffData.java | ||
InvalidWylieException.java | ||
package.html | ||
sambhota_keyboard_1.ini | ||
tcc_keyboard_1.ini | ||
tcc_keyboard_2.ini | ||
THDLWylieConstants.java | ||
TibetanDocument.java | ||
TibetanHTML.java | ||
TibetanKeyboard.java | ||
TibetanLabelView.java | ||
TibetanMachineWeb.java | ||
TibetanRTFEditorKit.java | ||
TibetanRTFViewFactory.java | ||
TibetanSyllable.java | ||
TibTextUtils.java | ||
tibwn.ini |