dchandler aa5d86a6e3 The *->Unicode conversions were outputting Unicode that was not ... well-formed. They still do, but they do it less often. Chris Fynn wrote this a while back: By normal Tibetan & Dzongkha spelling, writing, and input rules Tibetan script stacks should be entered and written: 1 headline consonant (0F40->0F6A), any subjoined consonant(s) (0F90-> 0F9C), achung (0F71), shabkyu (0F74), any above headline vowel(s) (0F72 0F7A 0F7B 0F7C 0F7D and 0F80); any ngaro (0F7E, 0F82 and 0F83). Now efforts are made to ensure that the converters conform to the above rules.		2004-12-13 02:32:46 +00:00
..
apache/commons/jrcs	Initial revision	2003-07-14 12:22:29 +00:00
thdl	The *->Unicode conversions were outputting Unicode that was not	2004-12-13 02:32:46 +00:00