2016-04-06 21:10:49 +00:00
|
|
|
# Contributing
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-13 23:36:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Contributions should be made via pull requests. Pull requests will be reviewed
|
|
|
|
by one or more maintainers and merged when acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This project is in an early state, making the impact of contributions much
|
|
|
|
greater than at other stages. In this respect, it is important to consider any
|
|
|
|
changes or additions for their future impact more so than their current impact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Successful Changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We ask that before contributing, please make the effort to coordinate with the
|
|
|
|
maintainers of the project before submitting large or high impact PRs. This
|
|
|
|
will prevent you from doing extra work that may or may not be merged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRs that are just submitted without any prior communication will likely be
|
|
|
|
summarily closed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While pull requests are the methodology for submitting changes to code, changes
|
|
|
|
are much more likely to be accepted if they are accompanied by additional
|
|
|
|
engineering work. While we don't define this explicitly, most of these goals
|
2017-01-19 17:18:18 +00:00
|
|
|
are accomplished through communication of the design goals and subsequent
|
2016-12-13 23:36:59 +00:00
|
|
|
solutions. Often times, it helps to first state the problem before presenting
|
|
|
|
solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Typically, the best methods of accomplishing this are to submit an issue,
|
|
|
|
stating the problem. This issue can include a problem statement and a
|
|
|
|
checklist with requirements. If solutions are proposed, alternatives should be
|
|
|
|
listed and eliminated. Even if the criteria for elimination of a solution is
|
2017-01-19 17:18:18 +00:00
|
|
|
frivolous, say so.
|
2016-12-13 23:36:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-14 00:32:56 +00:00
|
|
|
Larger changes typically work best with design documents, similar to those found
|
2016-12-13 23:36:59 +00:00
|
|
|
in `design/`. These are focused on providing context to the design at the time
|
|
|
|
the feature was conceived and can inform future documentation contributions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Commit Messages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are times for one line commit messages and this is not one of them.
|
|
|
|
Commit messages should follow best practices, including explaining the context
|
|
|
|
of the problem and how it was solved, including in caveats or follow up changes
|
|
|
|
required. They should tell the story of the change and provide readers
|
|
|
|
understanding of what led to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you're lost about what this even means, please see [How to Write a Git
|
|
|
|
Commit Message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/) for a start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In practice, the best approach to maintaining a nice commit message is to
|
|
|
|
leverage a `git add -p` and `git commit --amend` to formulate a solid
|
|
|
|
changeset. This allows one to piece together a change, as information becomes
|
|
|
|
available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you squash a series of commits, don't just submit that. Re-write the commit
|
|
|
|
message, as if the series of commits was a single stroke of brilliance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That said, there is no requirement to have a single commit for a PR, as long as
|
|
|
|
each commit tells the story. For example, if there is a feature that requires a
|
|
|
|
package, it might make sense to have the package in a separate commit then have
|
|
|
|
a subsequent commit that uses it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remember, you're telling part of the story with the commit message. Don't make
|
2016-12-14 23:17:22 +00:00
|
|
|
your chapter weird.
|
2016-12-13 23:36:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-06 21:10:49 +00:00
|
|
|
## Sign your work
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the patch. Your
|
|
|
|
signature certifies that you wrote the patch or otherwise have the right to pass
|
|
|
|
it on as an open-source patch. The rules are pretty simple: if you can certify
|
|
|
|
the below (from [developercertificate.org](http://developercertificate.org/)):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Developer Certificate of Origin
|
|
|
|
Version 1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
|
|
|
|
660 York Street, Suite 102,
|
|
|
|
San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
|
|
|
|
license document, but changing it is not allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
|
|
|
|
have the right to submit it under the open source license
|
|
|
|
indicated in the file; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
|
|
|
|
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
|
|
|
|
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
|
|
|
|
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
|
|
|
|
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
|
|
|
|
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
|
|
|
|
in the file; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
|
|
|
|
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
|
|
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
|
|
|
|
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
|
|
|
|
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
|
|
|
|
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
|
|
|
|
this project or the open source license(s) involved.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then you just add a line to every git commit message:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@email.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you set your `user.name` and `user.email` git configs, you can sign your
|
|
|
|
commit automatically with `git commit -s`.
|