a1tsal
8eaaeaa202
Fix careless error: I had the same TMW character for ~M and ~M`!
2004-02-22 09:14:56 +00:00
a1tsal
b14833b5b9
Change ^M to ~M to conform to spec.
...
Introduce ~M` (for 0F82).
2004-02-20 15:07:49 +00:00
dchandler
274e1736be
Deleted cut-and-paste goof.
2004-01-17 19:45:31 +00:00
dchandler
c69ba26c60
TString now has tracks what Roman transliteration system it is using. Next up is to make ACIPConverter handle EWTS or ACIP TStrings.
2004-01-17 19:28:54 +00:00
dchandler
48b4c5cb07
Added a Unicode->ASCII dump for debugging *->Unicode conversions. To use it, use 'java -cp Jskad.jar org.thdl.util.VerboseUnicodeDump'.
2004-01-17 17:10:12 +00:00
dchandler
4dd40809a5
A user reported that q` caused a crash with TCC keyboard #1 . Fixed. TCC keyboard #1 does not support q~ though.
2003-12-21 06:27:36 +00:00
dchandler
c1aa81e943
RFE 860190: ACIP->Unicode now gives a warning when it outputs something that can't be represented in TMW.
2003-12-16 07:45:40 +00:00
dchandler
848349fd3a
More tests.
2003-12-15 08:16:06 +00:00
dchandler
e7a9e7968f
ACIP->Unicode now uses two characters for consonants instead of one. This matches the dislike for characters like U+0F77 etc.
...
ACIP->Tibetan was not giving an error for BCWA because it parsed like BCVA. Fixed.
2003-12-15 07:32:14 +00:00
dchandler
e9f7b2dfed
If you want curly brackets around folio markers, you'll have to set
...
the system property
thdl.acip.to.x.output.curly.brackets.around.folio.markers to true.
2003-12-14 08:47:03 +00:00
dchandler
8664571577
Warnings were not being detected correctly. Fixed.
...
ACIP->Unicode uses U+0020, ' ', for whitespace. ACIP->TMW uses the
TMW whitespace for whitespace.
2003-12-14 08:38:10 +00:00
dchandler
01e65176d4
Using less memory and time to figure out if warnings occurred.
2003-12-14 07:41:15 +00:00
dchandler
76c2e969ac
Fixed ACIP->Unicode bug for YYE etc., things with full-formed
...
subjoined consonants and vowels.
Fixed ACIP->TMW for YYA etc., things with full-formed subjoined
consonants.
2003-12-14 07:36:21 +00:00
dchandler
f625c937ee
ACIP {B} was not being treated like {BA}; instead, an error was resulting. All the five prefixes were affected.
2003-12-14 05:54:07 +00:00
dchandler
581643cf59
{DAN,\nLHAG} used to be treated like {DAN, LHAG} but that got broken. Fixed.
...
Added tests for lexer's handling of ACIP spaces etc.
2003-12-10 06:55:16 +00:00
dchandler
8e673bbc2c
{NGA,} becomes {NGA\u0f0c,} now instead of {NGA\u0f0b,}.
...
Note: ACIP->Unicode for {NGA,} was not giving the Unicode that {NGA\u0f0b,} gives before.
2003-12-10 06:50:14 +00:00
dchandler
a466bad939
ACIP->TMW now supports EWTS PUA {\uF021}-style escapes. Our extended ACIP is thus TMW-complete and useful for testing.
2003-12-08 07:51:45 +00:00
dchandler
a39c5c12b0
ACIP->TMW now supports EWTS PUA {\uF021}-style escapes. Our extended ACIP is thus TMW-complete and useful for testing.
2003-12-08 07:15:27 +00:00
dchandler
b617f761d5
ACIP->TMW for {^GONG SA } used to fail; fixed.
2003-12-07 20:05:41 +00:00
dchandler
115534e688
ACIP->TMW for {^GONG SA } used to fail because we had \u0F38 in the ToWylie section. Now it's in the <?Input:Numbers?> section because I didn't want to introduce a new section. If WylieWord has trouble due to this misuse of the 'numbers' category, we'll introduce a new category, 'other'.
...
TMW->EWTS improved as a result -- {\u0F38.gonga sa } is produced now where {\u0F38agonga sa } was once produced. Even the better version is imperfect; see bug 855877.
2003-12-07 19:40:59 +00:00
dchandler
4adf87c401
Updated comments only.
2003-12-06 20:36:56 +00:00
dchandler
3f18623977
Added comments only.
2003-12-06 20:26:45 +00:00
dchandler
6232ee9170
Added comments referring to a user guide in development now.
2003-12-06 20:26:15 +00:00
dchandler
c43e9a446b
Revamped some ACIP->Tibetan error messages.
2003-12-06 20:19:40 +00:00
dchandler
c9c771d1ee
ACIP {&}, as in {KO&HAm,}, is supported.
2003-11-30 02:18:59 +00:00
dchandler
ac412c994b
Now {Pm} is treated like {PAm}; {Pm:} is like {PAm:}; {P:} is like {PA:}.
2003-11-30 02:06:48 +00:00
dchandler
e7c4cc1874
Updated to be in sync with latest EWTS draft.
2003-11-29 22:59:39 +00:00
dchandler
ffd041e32c
ACIP->TMW and ACIP->Unicode now allow for Unicode escapes like K\u0F84. This means that the lack of support for ACIP's backslash, '\\', is mitigated because you can turn ACIP {K\} into ACIP {K\u0F84}.
...
Support for U+F021-U+F0FF, the PUA that the latest EWTS uses, is not provided.
Also, we've traded some speed for memory -- DuffCode now uses bytes, not ints.
2003-11-29 22:57:12 +00:00
dchandler
dfaae4be93
ACIP->TMW and ACIP->Unicode now allow for Unicode escapes like K\u0F84. This means that the lack of support for ACIP's backslash, '\\', is mitigated because you can turn ACIP {K\} into ACIP {K\u0F84}.
...
Support for U+F021-U+F0FF, the PUA that the latest EWTS uses, is not provided.
2003-11-29 22:56:18 +00:00
dchandler
16bfeac641
These issues are non-issues; removing these comments.
2003-11-25 00:31:33 +00:00
dchandler
d3d0ff23a8
Chris Fynn and Tony Duff answered my questions about U+0F3F and U+0F3E.
2003-11-25 00:28:18 +00:00
dchandler
b8608797aa
Updated the code I used for testing to generate the file containing all glyphs in TM and all glyphs but one in TMW.
2003-11-24 05:59:32 +00:00
dchandler
5d053b41fe
Found another inconsistency between Unicode and the TM/TMW docs. I've sent e-mail to Tony Duff asking who's right, but I'm putting this in the errata under the assumption that even if Unicode is wrong, Unicode's wrong view will somehow rule the day.
...
Also, TMW->EWTS now generates \uF021-\uF0FF or \u0F00-\u0FFF escapes when appropriate. A few TMW glyphs still give errors.
Also, there's now a test to be sure that TM<->TMW and TMW->EWTS won't break in the future (except for the one glyph in TMW that isn't in TM, that one isn't tested). The baselines have not been hand-verified, but changes will be detected.
2003-11-24 05:49:15 +00:00
dchandler
9a247f5932
N+D+Ya, not N+D+ya, w+Wa, not w+wa .. use W, R, and Y where appropriate.
2003-11-24 04:55:11 +00:00
dchandler
1ec668c018
Dza is not in the latest EWTS draft.
2003-11-24 04:28:55 +00:00
dchandler
f76c089366
Using Y, R, and W everywhere needed. R+... is never needed in TM/TMW, I concluded (with 50% certainty).
2003-11-24 04:05:59 +00:00
dchandler
08c676c186
Bug fixes. Plus, now 99% in sync with the new EWTS draft. Search for 'DLC' to find a few open issues.
...
Readded the line for reversed dza; it should never have been deleted, as that breaks TM<->TMW. I tested the whole mapping by hand once; this incident shows that automation is very helpful.
'{' and '}' were swapped...
The Unicode for something was "", not "none".
+R, +W, +Y, R+ now in use (though more testing is needed)
2003-11-24 02:40:40 +00:00
dchandler
216c5b0d54
Fixed TWM->Wylie for achen. I even tested this by pretending achen could take a da prefix (when in reality it takes no prefixes).
2003-11-23 01:22:27 +00:00
dchandler
8d4fb5d13f
We crashed before when '~' was entered.
2003-11-14 04:50:55 +00:00
dchandler
b59b86fd73
Commented this to mention some recent testing.
2003-11-11 03:45:58 +00:00
dchandler
4023be9612
Better prettyprinting. Untested.
2003-11-11 03:43:26 +00:00
dchandler
4e6a9c299f
ACIP % {MTHAR%} and o {Ko} and ^ {^GONG SA} are now supported. A % always causes a warning.
2003-11-11 03:43:11 +00:00
dchandler
2cb90bd231
ACIP->Tibetan converters now warn every time {%} is encountered that U+0F14 might've been intended.
...
The Unicode for ACIP {o} is U+0F37.
2003-11-09 23:15:58 +00:00
dchandler
04816acb74
ACIP->Unicode was broken for KshR, ndRY, ndY, YY, and RY -- those
...
stacks that use full-form subjoined RA and YA consonants.
ACIP {RVA} was converting to the wrong things.
The TMW for {RVA} was converting to the wrong ACIP.
Checked all the 'DLC' tags in the ttt (ACIP->Tibetan) package.
2003-11-09 01:07:45 +00:00
dchandler
8193cef5d1
Better comments.
2003-11-09 01:07:07 +00:00
dchandler
3fa417d3ee
phywI, phywU, drwI and drwU now produce vowels and subjoined a-chungs. The Tibetan! 5.1 docs say I and U are not applicable to these stacks, but I say Jskad lets the user decide what's applicable. If you disagree, be sure to give an error message before dropping the I or U request -- we were silent.
2003-11-08 21:53:34 +00:00
dchandler
e058d6252e
phywu and drwu now produce zhabs-kyus. The Tibetan! 5.1 docs say the zhabs-kyu is not applicable to these stacks, but I say Jskad lets the user decide what's applicable. If you disagree, be sure to give an error message before dropping the zhabs-kyu request -- we were silent.
2003-11-08 21:48:08 +00:00
dchandler
55aaeef9d0
l+h+wu now produces a zhabs-kyu. The Tibetan! 5.1 docs say the zhabs-kyu is not applicable to l+h+w, but I say Jskad lets the user decide what's applicable. If you disagree, be sure to give an error message before dropping the zhabs-kyu request -- we were silent.
2003-11-08 21:23:50 +00:00
dchandler
06edf17b04
Once again, the wrong 'dreng-bu glyphs were listed in the Tibetan! 5.1 docs -- they were na-ro glyphs, actually.
2003-11-08 21:17:18 +00:00
dchandler
74d6bc61ab
The wrong 'dreng-bu glyphs were listed in the Tibetan! 5.1 docs -- they were na-ro glyphs, actually.
2003-11-08 20:25:16 +00:00
