dchandler
b617f761d5
ACIP->TMW for {^GONG SA } used to fail; fixed.
2003-12-07 20:05:41 +00:00
dchandler
115534e688
ACIP->TMW for {^GONG SA } used to fail because we had \u0F38 in the ToWylie section. Now it's in the <?Input:Numbers?> section because I didn't want to introduce a new section. If WylieWord has trouble due to this misuse of the 'numbers' category, we'll introduce a new category, 'other'.
...
TMW->EWTS improved as a result -- {\u0F38.gonga sa } is produced now where {\u0F38agonga sa } was once produced. Even the better version is imperfect; see bug 855877.
2003-12-07 19:40:59 +00:00
dchandler
597cf408dd
Fixed help message.
2003-12-07 19:10:36 +00:00
dchandler
4adf87c401
Updated comments only.
2003-12-06 20:36:56 +00:00
dchandler
3f18623977
Added comments only.
2003-12-06 20:26:45 +00:00
dchandler
6232ee9170
Added comments referring to a user guide in development now.
2003-12-06 20:26:15 +00:00
dchandler
c43e9a446b
Revamped some ACIP->Tibetan error messages.
2003-12-06 20:19:40 +00:00
dchandler
c9c771d1ee
ACIP {&}, as in {KO&HAm,}, is supported.
2003-11-30 02:18:59 +00:00
dchandler
ac412c994b
Now {Pm} is treated like {PAm}; {Pm:} is like {PAm:}; {P:} is like {PA:}.
2003-11-30 02:06:48 +00:00
dchandler
e7c4cc1874
Updated to be in sync with latest EWTS draft.
2003-11-29 22:59:39 +00:00
dchandler
ffd041e32c
ACIP->TMW and ACIP->Unicode now allow for Unicode escapes like K\u0F84. This means that the lack of support for ACIP's backslash, '\\', is mitigated because you can turn ACIP {K\} into ACIP {K\u0F84}.
...
Support for U+F021-U+F0FF, the PUA that the latest EWTS uses, is not provided.
Also, we've traded some speed for memory -- DuffCode now uses bytes, not ints.
2003-11-29 22:57:12 +00:00
dchandler
dfaae4be93
ACIP->TMW and ACIP->Unicode now allow for Unicode escapes like K\u0F84. This means that the lack of support for ACIP's backslash, '\\', is mitigated because you can turn ACIP {K\} into ACIP {K\u0F84}.
...
Support for U+F021-U+F0FF, the PUA that the latest EWTS uses, is not provided.
2003-11-29 22:56:18 +00:00
dchandler
946d8cbc72
Updated the code I used for testing to generate the file containing all glyphs in TM and all glyphs but one in TMW.
2003-11-29 16:22:26 +00:00
dchandler
16bfeac641
These issues are non-issues; removing these comments.
2003-11-25 00:31:33 +00:00
dchandler
d3d0ff23a8
Chris Fynn and Tony Duff answered my questions about U+0F3F and U+0F3E.
2003-11-25 00:28:18 +00:00
dchandler
b8608797aa
Updated the code I used for testing to generate the file containing all glyphs in TM and all glyphs but one in TMW.
2003-11-24 05:59:32 +00:00
dchandler
8d18ac53cb
N+D+Ya, not N+D+ya, w+Wa, not w+wa .. use W, R, and Y where appropriate.
...
Found another inconsistency between Unicode and the TM/TMW docs. I've sent e-mail to Tony Duff asking who's right, but I'm putting this in the errata under the assumption that even if Unicode is wrong, Unicode's wrong view will somehow rule the day.
Also, TMW->EWTS now generates \uF021-\uF0FF or \u0F00-\u0FFF escapes when appropriate. A few TMW glyphs still give errors.
Also, there's now a test to be sure that TM<->TMW and TMW->EWTS won't break in the future (except for the one glyph in TMW that isn't in TM, that one isn't tested). The baselines have not been hand-verified, but changes will be detected.
2003-11-24 05:50:42 +00:00
dchandler
5d053b41fe
Found another inconsistency between Unicode and the TM/TMW docs. I've sent e-mail to Tony Duff asking who's right, but I'm putting this in the errata under the assumption that even if Unicode is wrong, Unicode's wrong view will somehow rule the day.
...
Also, TMW->EWTS now generates \uF021-\uF0FF or \u0F00-\u0FFF escapes when appropriate. A few TMW glyphs still give errors.
Also, there's now a test to be sure that TM<->TMW and TMW->EWTS won't break in the future (except for the one glyph in TMW that isn't in TM, that one isn't tested). The baselines have not been hand-verified, but changes will be detected.
2003-11-24 05:49:15 +00:00
dchandler
9a247f5932
N+D+Ya, not N+D+ya, w+Wa, not w+wa .. use W, R, and Y where appropriate.
2003-11-24 04:55:11 +00:00
dchandler
1ec668c018
Dza is not in the latest EWTS draft.
2003-11-24 04:28:55 +00:00
dchandler
f76c089366
Using Y, R, and W everywhere needed. R+... is never needed in TM/TMW, I concluded (with 50% certainty).
2003-11-24 04:05:59 +00:00
dchandler
08c676c186
Bug fixes. Plus, now 99% in sync with the new EWTS draft. Search for 'DLC' to find a few open issues.
...
Readded the line for reversed dza; it should never have been deleted, as that breaks TM<->TMW. I tested the whole mapping by hand once; this incident shows that automation is very helpful.
'{' and '}' were swapped...
The Unicode for something was "", not "none".
+R, +W, +Y, R+ now in use (though more testing is needed)
2003-11-24 02:40:40 +00:00
dchandler
216c5b0d54
Fixed TWM->Wylie for achen. I even tested this by pretending achen could take a da prefix (when in reality it takes no prefixes).
2003-11-23 01:22:27 +00:00
dchandler
37e8dfa917
The menu now says (Buggy) in front of "Convert Selection from Wylie to Tibetan" because this feature is, you guessed it, buggy.
2003-11-22 22:48:41 +00:00
dchandler
113480a882
X is now better supported, so this changed.
2003-11-15 20:00:59 +00:00
dchandler
8d4fb5d13f
We crashed before when '~' was entered.
2003-11-14 04:50:55 +00:00
dchandler
b59b86fd73
Commented this to mention some recent testing.
2003-11-11 03:45:58 +00:00
dchandler
4023be9612
Better prettyprinting. Untested.
2003-11-11 03:43:26 +00:00
dchandler
4e6a9c299f
ACIP % {MTHAR%} and o {Ko} and ^ {^GONG SA} are now supported. A % always causes a warning.
2003-11-11 03:43:11 +00:00
dchandler
2cb90bd231
ACIP->Tibetan converters now warn every time {%} is encountered that U+0F14 might've been intended.
...
The Unicode for ACIP {o} is U+0F37.
2003-11-09 23:15:58 +00:00
dchandler
084e12a02c
Import Wylie is a buggy feature. The menu now calls it "(Buggy) Import Wylie...". t+s+w doesn't even convert correctly!
...
Bug-free EWTS->TMW using the org.thdl.tib.text.ttt codebase will be here soon.
2003-11-09 01:25:58 +00:00
dchandler
04816acb74
ACIP->Unicode was broken for KshR, ndRY, ndY, YY, and RY -- those
...
stacks that use full-form subjoined RA and YA consonants.
ACIP {RVA} was converting to the wrong things.
The TMW for {RVA} was converting to the wrong ACIP.
Checked all the 'DLC' tags in the ttt (ACIP->Tibetan) package.
2003-11-09 01:07:45 +00:00
dchandler
8193cef5d1
Better comments.
2003-11-09 01:07:07 +00:00
dchandler
dbd9c80ca0
Special tests for rwa and r+wa, which are the only two different stacks with the same hash key modulo - and +.
2003-11-09 01:06:26 +00:00
dchandler
85e1e0701e
Fixed crashing bug in Import Wylie.
2003-11-08 23:32:53 +00:00
dchandler
8fbd8850f8
New feature: Convert Selection from TWM to ACIP.
2003-11-08 23:22:06 +00:00
dchandler
bab47c4910
There are now extensive tests to make sure that each Tibetan stack in TMW can be typed in using EWTS and correctly converted to TMW and then back to EWTS. These tests unearthed new bugs in the Tibetan! 5.1 docs.
2003-11-08 22:11:24 +00:00
dchandler
3fa417d3ee
phywI, phywU, drwI and drwU now produce vowels and subjoined a-chungs. The Tibetan! 5.1 docs say I and U are not applicable to these stacks, but I say Jskad lets the user decide what's applicable. If you disagree, be sure to give an error message before dropping the I or U request -- we were silent.
2003-11-08 21:53:34 +00:00
dchandler
e058d6252e
phywu and drwu now produce zhabs-kyus. The Tibetan! 5.1 docs say the zhabs-kyu is not applicable to these stacks, but I say Jskad lets the user decide what's applicable. If you disagree, be sure to give an error message before dropping the zhabs-kyu request -- we were silent.
2003-11-08 21:48:08 +00:00
dchandler
55aaeef9d0
l+h+wu now produces a zhabs-kyu. The Tibetan! 5.1 docs say the zhabs-kyu is not applicable to l+h+w, but I say Jskad lets the user decide what's applicable. If you disagree, be sure to give an error message before dropping the zhabs-kyu request -- we were silent.
2003-11-08 21:23:50 +00:00
dchandler
06edf17b04
Once again, the wrong 'dreng-bu glyphs were listed in the Tibetan! 5.1 docs -- they were na-ro glyphs, actually.
2003-11-08 21:17:18 +00:00
dchandler
f626a04d72
Tests t+r+n glyph.
2003-11-08 20:28:34 +00:00
dchandler
74d6bc61ab
The wrong 'dreng-bu glyphs were listed in the Tibetan! 5.1 docs -- they were na-ro glyphs, actually.
2003-11-08 20:25:16 +00:00
dchandler
a0ae0bf70d
Fixes bug 800164. Jskad users can now enter t+r+n on the keyboard. Wylie Word should work for t+r+n too.
2003-11-08 17:50:10 +00:00
dchandler
0ac90d7c0f
Nathanial -> Nathaniel
2003-11-08 03:42:51 +00:00
dchandler
e3f1ed5914
Removed a DOS EOF character (^Z). I haven't a clue how it crept in -- the lexer doesn't let that kind of thing get into tsheg bars.
2003-10-27 13:58:45 +00:00
dchandler
94a43d3f39
Now anything not clearly native Tibetan is colored green when coloring is enabled. G'EEm is "native", though -- the only "vowel" that implies non-nativeness is {:}, as in {KA:}.
2003-10-26 18:56:48 +00:00
dchandler
5c36dd81d3
Fixed bug 830332, "Convert selected ACIP=>Tibetan busted".
2003-10-26 18:25:25 +00:00
dchandler
e74547d743
GA-YOGS now parses like G-YOGS and GAYOGS do.
2003-10-26 18:06:38 +00:00
dchandler
61cf19932e
ACIP {B5} and {7'} were problematic; that's fixed.
2003-10-26 17:47:35 +00:00
