Currently, there are two test cases with same name
"ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1", the first one is right,
the second one should be ALU64_SMOD_K because its
code is BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K.
Before:
test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS
test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS
After:
test_bpf: #170 ALU64_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS
test_bpf: #171 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 4 PASS
Fixes: daabb2b098 ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions")
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231207040851.19730-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add two tests validating that verifier's precision backtracking logic
handles BPF_ST_MEM instructions that produce fake register spill into
register slot. This is happening when non-zero constant is written
directly to a slot, e.g., *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 123.
Add both full 64-bit register spill, as well as 32-bit "sub-spill".
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231209010958.66758-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When verifier validates BPF_ST_MEM instruction that stores known
constant to stack (e.g., *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = 123), it effectively spills
a fake register with a constant (but initially imprecise) value to
a stack slot. Because read-side logic treats it as a proper register
fill from stack slot, we need to mark such stack slot initialization as
INSN_F_STACK_ACCESS instruction to stop precision backtracking from
missing it.
Fixes: 41f6f64e69 ("bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231209010958.66758-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Hou Tao says:
====================
The patch set aims to fix the problems found when inspecting the code
related with maybe_wait_bpf_programs().
Patch #1 removes unnecessary invocation of maybe_wait_bpf_programs().
Patch #2 calls maybe_wait_bpf_programs() only once for batched update.
Patch #3 adds the missed waiting when doing batched lookup_deletion on
htab of maps. Patch #4 does wait only if the update or deletion
operation succeeds. Patch #5 fixes the value of batch.count when memory
allocation fails.
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
generic_map_{delete,update}_batch() doesn't set uattr->batch.count as
zero before it tries to allocate memory for key. If the memory
allocation fails, the value of uattr->batch.count will be incorrect.
Fix it by setting uattr->batch.count as zero beore batched update or
deletion.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-6-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
There is no need to call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() if update or deletion
operation fails. So only call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() if update or
deletion operation succeeds.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When doing batched lookup and deletion operations on htab of maps,
maybe_wait_bpf_programs() is needed to ensure all programs don't use the
inner map after the bpf syscall returns.
Instead of adding the wait in __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(),
adding the wait in bpf_map_do_batch() and also removing the calling of
maybe_wait_bpf_programs() from generic_map_{delete,update}_batch().
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Just like commit 9087c6ff8d ("bpf: Call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() only
once from generic_map_delete_batch()"), there is also no need to call
maybe_wait_bpf_programs() for each update in batched update, so only
call it once in generic_map_update_batch().
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Both map_lookup_elem() and generic_map_lookup_batch() use
bpf_map_copy_value() to lookup and copy the value, and there is no
update operation in bpf_map_copy_value(), so just remove the invocation
of maybe_wait_bpf_programs() from it.
Fixes: 15c14a3dca ("bpf: Add bpf_map_{value_size, update_value, map_copy_value} functions")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Before the change on `i686-linux` `systemd` build failed as:
$ bpftool gen object src/core/bpf/socket_bind/socket-bind.bpf.o src/core/bpf/socket_bind/socket-bind.bpf.unstripped.o
Error: failed to link 'src/core/bpf/socket_bind/socket-bind.bpf.unstripped.o': Invalid argument (22)
After the change it fails as:
$ bpftool gen object src/core/bpf/socket_bind/socket-bind.bpf.o src/core/bpf/socket_bind/socket-bind.bpf.unstripped.o
libbpf: ELF section #9 has inconsistent alignment addr=8 != d=4 in src/core/bpf/socket_bind/socket-bind.bpf.unstripped.o
Error: failed to link 'src/core/bpf/socket_bind/socket-bind.bpf.unstripped.o': Invalid argument (22)
Now it's slightly easier to figure out what is wrong with an ELF file.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208215100.435876-1-slyich@gmail.com
Yafang Shao says:
====================
In the current cgroup1 environment, associating operations between a cgroup
and applications in a BPF program requires storing a mapping of cgroup_id
to application either in a hash map or maintaining it in userspace.
However, by enabling bpf_cgrp_storage for cgroup1, it becomes possible to
conveniently store application-specific information in cgroup-local storage
and utilize it within BPF programs. Furthermore, enabling this feature for
cgroup1 involves minor modifications for the non-attach case, streamlining
the process.
However, when it comes to enabling this functionality for the cgroup1
attach case, it presents challenges. Therefore, the decision is to focus on
enabling it solely for the cgroup1 non-attach case at present. If
attempting to attach to a cgroup1 fd, the operation will simply fail with
the error code -EBADF.
Changes:
- RFC -> v1:
- Collect acked-by
- Avoid unnecessary is_cgroup1 check (Yonghong)
- Keep the code patterns consistent (Yonghong)
====================
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
This new helper allows us to obtain the fd of a net_cls cgroup, which will
be utilized in the subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206115326.4295-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
In the current cgroup1 environment, associating operations between cgroups
and applications in a BPF program requires storing a mapping of cgroup_id
to application either in a hash map or maintaining it in userspace.
However, by enabling bpf_cgrp_storage for cgroup1, it becomes possible to
conveniently store application-specific information in cgroup-local storage
and utilize it within BPF programs. Furthermore, enabling this feature for
cgroup1 involves minor modifications for the non-attach case, streamlining
the process.
However, when it comes to enabling this functionality for the cgroup1
attach case, it presents challenges. Therefore, the decision is to focus on
enabling it solely for the cgroup1 non-attach case at present. If
attempting to attach to a cgroup1 fd, the operation will simply fail with
the error code -EBADF.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206115326.4295-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Because test_bad_ret main program is not written in assembly, we don't
control instruction indices in timer_cb_ret_bad() subprog. This bites us
in timer/test_bad_ret subtest, where we see difference between cpuv4 and
other flavors.
For now, make __msg() expectations not rely on instruction indices by
anchoring them around bpf_get_prandom_u32 call. Once we have regex/glob
support for __msg(), this can be expressed a bit more nicely, but for
now just mitigating the problem with available means.
Fixes: e02dea158d ("selftests/bpf: validate async callback return value check correctness")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208233028.3412690-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Andrei Matei says:
====================
bpf: fix accesses to uninit stack slots
Fix two related issues issues around verifying stack accesses:
1. accesses to uninitialized stack memory was allowed inconsistently
2. the maximum stack depth needed for a program was not always
maintained correctly
The two issues are fixed together in one commit because the code for one
affects the other.
V4 to V5:
- target bpf-next (Alexei)
V3 to V4:
- minor fixup to comment in patch 1 (Eduard)
- C89-style in patch 3 (Andrii)
V2 to V3:
- address review comments from Andrii and Eduard
- drop new verifier tests in favor of editing existing tests to check
for stack depth
- append a patch with a bit of cleanup coming out of the previous review
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208032519.260451-1-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Push the rounding up of stack offsets into the function responsible for
growing the stack, rather than relying on all the callers to do it.
Uncertainty about whether the callers did it or not tripped up people in
a previous review.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208032519.260451-4-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Privileged programs are supposed to be able to read uninitialized stack
memory (ever since 6715df8d5) but, before this patch, these accesses
were permitted inconsistently. In particular, accesses were permitted
above state->allocated_stack, but not below it. In other words, if the
stack was already "large enough", the access was permitted, but
otherwise the access was rejected instead of being allowed to "grow the
stack". This undesired rejection was happening in two places:
- in check_stack_slot_within_bounds()
- in check_stack_range_initialized()
This patch arranges for these accesses to be permitted. A bunch of tests
that were relying on the old rejection had to change; all of them were
changed to add also run unprivileged, in which case the old behavior
persists. One tests couldn't be updated - global_func16 - because it
can't run unprivileged for other reasons.
This patch also fixes the tracking of the stack size for variable-offset
reads. This second fix is bundled in the same commit as the first one
because they're inter-related. Before this patch, writes to the stack
using registers containing a variable offset (as opposed to registers
with fixed, known values) were not properly contributing to the
function's needed stack size. As a result, it was possible for a program
to verify, but then to attempt to read out-of-bounds data at runtime
because a too small stack had been allocated for it.
Each function tracks the size of the stack it needs in
bpf_subprog_info.stack_depth, which is maintained by
update_stack_depth(). For regular memory accesses, check_mem_access()
was calling update_state_depth() but it was passing in only the fixed
part of the offset register, ignoring the variable offset. This was
incorrect; the minimum possible value of that register should be used
instead.
This tracking is now fixed by centralizing the tracking of stack size in
grow_stack_state(), and by lifting the calls to grow_stack_state() to
check_stack_access_within_bounds() as suggested by Andrii. The code is
now simpler and more convincingly tracks the correct maximum stack size.
check_stack_range_initialized() can now rely on enough stack having been
allocated for the access; this helps with the fix for the first issue.
A few tests were changed to also check the stack depth computation. The
one that fails without this patch is verifier_var_off:stack_write_priv_vs_unpriv.
Fixes: 01f810ace9 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208032519.260451-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABWLsev9g8UP_c3a=1qbuZUi20tGoUXoU07FPf-5FLvhOKOY+Q@mail.gmail.com/
Add comments to the datastructure tracking the stack state, as the
mapping between each stack slot and where its state is stored is not
entirely obvious.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208032519.260451-2-andreimatei1@gmail.com
In libbpf, when determining whether we need to load vmlinux btf, we're
currently (among other things) checking whether there is any struct_ops
program present in the object. This works for most realistic struct_ops
maps, as a struct_ops map is of course typically composed of one or more
struct_ops programs. However, that technically need not be the case. A
struct_ops interface could be defined which allows a map to be specified
which one or more non-prog fields, and which provides default behavior
if no struct_ops progs is actually provided otherwise. For sched_ext,
for example, you technically only need to specify the name of the
scheduler in the struct_ops map, with the core scheduler logic providing
default behavior if no prog is actually specified.
If we were to define and try to load such a struct_ops map, we would
crash in libbpf when initializing it as obj->btf_vmlinux will be NULL:
Reading symbols from minimal...
(gdb) r
Starting program: minimal_example
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/usr/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000055555558308c in btf__type_cnt (btf=0x0) at btf.c:612
612 return btf->start_id + btf->nr_types;
(gdb) bt
type_name=0x5555555d99e3 "sched_ext_ops", kind=4) at btf.c:914
kind=4) at btf.c:942
type=0x7fffffffe558, type_id=0x7fffffffe548, ...
data_member=0x7fffffffe568) at libbpf.c:948
kern_btf=0x0) at libbpf.c:1017
at libbpf.c:8059
So as to account for such bare-bones struct_ops maps, let's update
obj_needs_vmlinux_btf() to also iterate over an obj's maps and check
whether any of them are struct_ops maps.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208061704.400463-1-void@manifault.com
Andrei Matei says:
====================
bpf: fix verification of indirect var-off stack access
V4 to V5:
- split the test into a separate patch
V3 to V4:
- include a test per Eduard's request
- target bpf-next per Alexei's request (patches didn't change)
V2 to V3:
- simplify checks for max_off (don't call
check_stack_slot_within_bounds for it)
- append a commit to protect against overflow in the addition of the
register and the offset
V1 to V2:
- fix max_off calculation for access size = 0
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231207041150.229139-1-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
This patch promotes the arithmetic around checking stack bounds to be
done in the 64-bit domain, instead of the current 32bit. The arithmetic
implies adding together a 64-bit register with a int offset. The
register was checked to be below 1<<29 when it was variable, but not
when it was fixed. The offset either comes from an instruction (in which
case it is 16 bit), from another register (in which case the caller
checked it to be below 1<<29 [1]), or from the size of an argument to a
kfunc (in which case it can be a u32 [2]). Between the register being
inconsistently checked to be below 1<<29, and the offset being up to an
u32, it appears that we were open to overflowing the `int`s which were
currently used for arithmetic.
[1] 815fb87b75/kernel/bpf/verifier.c (L7494-L7498)
[2] 815fb87b75/kernel/bpf/verifier.c (L11904)
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231207041150.229139-4-andreimatei1@gmail.com
This patch fixes a bug around the verification of possibly-zero-sized
stack accesses. When the access was done through a var-offset stack
pointer, check_stack_access_within_bounds was incorrectly computing the
maximum-offset of a zero-sized read to be the same as the register's min
offset. Instead, we have to take in account the register's maximum
possible value. The patch also simplifies how the max offset is checked;
the check is now simpler than for min offset.
The bug was allowing accesses to erroneously pass the
check_stack_access_within_bounds() checks, only to later crash in
check_stack_range_initialized() when all the possibly-affected stack
slots are iterated (this time with a correct max offset).
check_stack_range_initialized() is relying on
check_stack_access_within_bounds() for its accesses to the
stack-tracking vector to be within bounds; in the case of zero-sized
accesses, we were essentially only verifying that the lowest possible
slot was within bounds. We would crash when the max-offset of the stack
pointer was >= 0 (which shouldn't pass verification, and hopefully is
not something anyone's code attempts to do in practice).
Thanks Hao for reporting!
Fixes: 01f810ace9 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231207041150.229139-2-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsZGEUaRCHsmaX=h-efVogsRfK1FPxmkgb0Os_frnHiNdw@mail.gmail.com/
Song Liu says:
====================
Allocate bpf trampoline on bpf_prog_pack
This set enables allocating bpf trampoline from bpf_prog_pack on x86. The
majority of this work, however, is the refactoring of trampoline code.
This is needed because we need to handle 4 archs and 2 users (trampoline
and struct_ops).
1/7 through 6/7 refactors trampoline code. A few helpers are added.
7/7 finally let bpf trampoline on x86 use bpf_prog_pack.
Changes in v7:
1. Use kvmalloc for rw_image in x86/arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline. (Alexei)
2. Add comment to explain why we cannot use kvmalloc in
x86/arch_bpf_trampoline_size. (Alexei)
Changes in v6:
1. Rebase.
2. Add Acked-by and Tested-by from Jiri Olsa and Björn Töpel.
Changes in v5:
1. Adjust size of trampoline ksym. (Jiri)
2. Use "unsigned int size" arg in image management helpers.(Daniel)
Changes in v4:
1. Dropped 1/8 in v3, which is already merged in bpf-next.
2. Add Reviewed-by from Björn Töpel.
Changes in v3:
1. Fix bug in s390. (Thanks to Ilya Leoshkevich).
2. Fix build error in riscv. (kernel test robot).
Changes in v2:
1. Add missing changes in net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c.
2. Reduce one dry run in arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline. (Xu Kuohai)
3. Other small fixes.
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-1-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
There are three major changes here:
1. Add arch_[alloc|free]_bpf_trampoline based on bpf_prog_pack;
2. Let arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline handle ROX input image, this requires
arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline allocating a temporary RW buffer;
3. Update __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() to handle a RW buffer (rw_image)
and a ROX buffer (image). This part is similar to the image/rw_image
logic in bpf_int_jit_compile().
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-8-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Instead of blindly allocating PAGE_SIZE for each trampoline, check the size
of the trampoline with arch_bpf_trampoline_size(). This size is saved in
bpf_tramp_image->size, and used for modmem charge/uncharge. The fallback
arch_alloc_bpf_trampoline() still allocates a whole page because we need to
use set_memory_* to protect the memory.
struct_ops trampoline still uses a whole page for multiple trampolines.
With this size check at caller (regular trampoline and struct_ops
trampoline), remove arch_bpf_trampoline_size() from
arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() in archs.
Also, update bpf_image_ksym_add() to handle symbol of different sizes.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> # on s390x
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> # on riscv
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-7-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This helper will be used to calculate the size of the trampoline before
allocating the memory.
arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for arm64 and riscv64 can use
arch_bpf_trampoline_size() to check the trampoline fits in the image.
OTOH, arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for s390 has to call the JIT process
twice, so it cannot use arch_bpf_trampoline_size().
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> # on s390x
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> # on riscv
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-6-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
x86's implementation of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() requires
BPF_INSN_SAFETY buffer space between end of program and image_end. OTOH,
the return value does not include BPF_INSN_SAFETY. This doesn't cause any
real issue at the moment. However, "image" of size retval is not enough for
arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). This will cause confusion when we introduce
a new helper arch_bpf_trampoline_size(). To avoid future confusion, adjust
the return value to include BPF_INSN_SAFETY.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-5-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
As BPF trampoline of different archs moves from bpf_jit_[alloc|free]_exec()
to bpf_prog_pack_[alloc|free](), we need to use different _alloc, _free for
different archs during the transition. Add the following helpers for this
transition:
void *arch_alloc_bpf_trampoline(unsigned int size);
void arch_free_bpf_trampoline(void *image, unsigned int size);
void arch_protect_bpf_trampoline(void *image, unsigned int size);
void arch_unprotect_bpf_trampoline(void *image, unsigned int size);
The fallback version of these helpers require size <= PAGE_SIZE, but they
are only called with size == PAGE_SIZE. They will be called with size <
PAGE_SIZE when arch_bpf_trampoline_size() helper is introduced later.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> # on s390x
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-4-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
We are using "im" for "struct bpf_tramp_image" and "tr" for "struct
bpf_trampoline" in most of the code base. The only exception is the
prototype and fallback version of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). Update
them to match the rest of the code base.
We mix "orig_call" and "func_addr" for the argument in different versions
of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). s/orig_call/func_addr/g so they match.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> # on s390x
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-3-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently, bpf_prog_pack_free only can only free pointer to struct
bpf_binary_header, which is not flexible. Add a size argument to
bpf_prog_pack_free so that it can handle any pointer.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> # on s390x
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-2-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
To stay consistent with the naming pattern used for similar cases in BPF
UAPI (__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE, etc), rename MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE into
__MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE.
Also similar to MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE and MAX_BPF_REG, add:
#define MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE
Not all __MAX_xxx enums have such #define, so I'm not sure if we should
add it or not, but I figured I'll start with a completely backwards
compatible way, and we can drop that, if necessary.
Also adjust a selftest that used MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE enum.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206190920.1651226-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Andrii Nakryiko says:
====================
BPF token and BPF FS-based delegation
This patch set introduces an ability to delegate a subset of BPF subsystem
functionality from privileged system-wide daemon (e.g., systemd or any other
container manager) through special mount options for userns-bound BPF FS to
a *trusted* unprivileged application. Trust is the key here. This
functionality is not about allowing unconditional unprivileged BPF usage.
Establishing trust, though, is completely up to the discretion of respective
privileged application that would create and mount a BPF FS instance with
delegation enabled, as different production setups can and do achieve it
through a combination of different means (signing, LSM, code reviews, etc),
and it's undesirable and infeasible for kernel to enforce any particular way
of validating trustworthiness of particular process.
The main motivation for this work is a desire to enable containerized BPF
applications to be used together with user namespaces. This is currently
impossible, as CAP_BPF, required for BPF subsystem usage, cannot be namespaced
or sandboxed, as a general rule. E.g., tracing BPF programs, thanks to BPF
helpers like bpf_probe_read_kernel() and bpf_probe_read_user() can safely read
arbitrary memory, and it's impossible to ensure that they only read memory of
processes belonging to any given namespace. This means that it's impossible to
have a mechanically verifiable namespace-aware CAP_BPF capability, and as such
another mechanism to allow safe usage of BPF functionality is necessary.BPF FS
delegation mount options and BPF token derived from such BPF FS instance is
such a mechanism. Kernel makes no assumption about what "trusted" constitutes
in any particular case, and it's up to specific privileged applications and
their surrounding infrastructure to decide that. What kernel provides is a set
of APIs to setup and mount special BPF FS instanecs and derive BPF tokens from
it. BPF FS and BPF token are both bound to its owning userns and in such a way
are constrained inside intended container. Users can then pass BPF token FD to
privileged bpf() syscall commands, like BPF map creation and BPF program
loading, to perform such operations without having init userns privileged.
This version incorporates feedback and suggestions ([3]) received on v3 of
this patch set, and instead of allowing to create BPF tokens directly assuming
capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), we instead enhance BPF FS to accept a few new
delegation mount options. If these options are used and BPF FS itself is
properly created, set up, and mounted inside the user namespaced container,
user application is able to derive a BPF token object from BPF FS instance,
and pass that token to bpf() syscall. As explained in patch #3, BPF token
itself doesn't grant access to BPF functionality, but instead allows kernel to
do namespaced capabilities checks (ns_capable() vs capable()) for CAP_BPF,
CAP_PERFMON, CAP_NET_ADMIN, and CAP_SYS_ADMIN, as applicable. So it forms one
half of a puzzle and allows container managers and sys admins to have safe and
flexible configuration options: determining which containers get delegation of
BPF functionality through BPF FS, and then which applications within such
containers are allowed to perform bpf() commands, based on namespaces
capabilities.
Previous attempt at addressing this very same problem ([0]) attempted to
utilize authoritative LSM approach, but was conclusively rejected by upstream
LSM maintainers. BPF token concept is not changing anything about LSM
approach, but can be combined with LSM hooks for very fine-grained security
policy. Some ideas about making BPF token more convenient to use with LSM (in
particular custom BPF LSM programs) was briefly described in recent LSF/MM/BPF
2023 presentation ([1]). E.g., an ability to specify user-provided data
(context), which in combination with BPF LSM would allow implementing a very
dynamic and fine-granular custom security policies on top of BPF token. In the
interest of minimizing API surface area and discussions this was relegated to
follow up patches, as it's not essential to the fundamental concept of
delegatable BPF token.
It should be noted that BPF token is conceptually quite similar to the idea of
/dev/bpf device file, proposed by Song a while ago ([2]). The biggest
difference is the idea of using virtual anon_inode file to hold BPF token and
allowing multiple independent instances of them, each (potentially) with its
own set of restrictions. And also, crucially, BPF token approach is not using
any special stateful task-scoped flags. Instead, bpf() syscall accepts
token_fd parameters explicitly for each relevant BPF command. This addresses
main concerns brought up during the /dev/bpf discussion, and fits better with
overall BPF subsystem design.
This patch set adds a basic minimum of functionality to make BPF token idea
useful and to discuss API and functionality. Currently only low-level libbpf
APIs support creating and passing BPF token around, allowing to test kernel
functionality, but for the most part is not sufficient for real-world
applications, which typically use high-level libbpf APIs based on `struct
bpf_object` type. This was done with the intent to limit the size of patch set
and concentrate on mostly kernel-side changes. All the necessary plumbing for
libbpf will be sent as a separate follow up patch set kernel support makes it
upstream.
Another part that should happen once kernel-side BPF token is established, is
a set of conventions between applications (e.g., systemd), tools (e.g.,
bpftool), and libraries (e.g., libbpf) on exposing delegatable BPF FS
instance(s) at well-defined locations to allow applications take advantage of
this in automatic fashion without explicit code changes on BPF application's
side. But I'd like to postpone this discussion to after BPF token concept
lands.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412043300.360803-1-andrii@kernel.org/
[1] http://vger.kernel.org/bpfconf2023_material/Trusted_unprivileged_BPF_LSFMM2023.pdf
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20190627201923.2589391-2-songliubraving@fb.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230704-hochverdient-lehne-eeb9eeef785e@brauner/
v11->v12:
- enforce exact userns match in bpf_token_capable() and
bpf_token_allow_cmd() checks, for added strictness (Christian);
v10->v11:
- fix BPF FS root check to disallow using bind-mounted subdirectory of BPF
FS instance (Christian);
- further restrict BPF_TOKEN_CREATE command to be executed from inside
exactly the same user namespace as the one used to create BPF FS instance
(Christian);
v9->v10:
- slight adjustments in LSM parts (Paul);
- setting delegate_xxx options require capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) (Christian);
- simplify BPF_TOKEN_CREATE UAPI by accepting BPF FS FD directly (Christian);
v8->v9:
- fix issue in selftests due to sys/mount.h header (Jiri);
- fix warning in doc comments in LSM hooks (kernel test robot);
v7->v8:
- add bpf_token_allow_cmd and bpf_token_capable hooks (Paul);
- inline bpf_token_alloc() into bpf_token_create() to prevent accidental
divergence with security_bpf_token_create() hook (Paul);
v6->v7:
- separate patches to refactor bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_map_alloc LSM hooks, as
discussed with Paul, and now they also accept struct bpf_token;
- added bpf_token_create/bpf_token_free to allow LSMs (SELinux,
specifically) to set up security LSM blob (Paul);
- last patch also wires bpf_security_struct setup by SELinux, similar to how
it's done for BPF map/prog, though I'm not sure if that's enough, so worst
case it's easy to drop this patch if more full fledged SELinux
implementation will be done separately;
- small fixes for issues caught by code reviews (Jiri, Hou);
- fix for test_maps test that doesn't use LIBBPF_OPTS() macro (CI);
v5->v6:
- fix possible use of uninitialized variable in selftests (CI);
- don't use anon_inode, instead create one from BPF FS instance (Christian);
- don't store bpf_token inside struct bpf_map, instead pass it explicitly to
map_check_btf(). We do store bpf_token inside prog->aux, because it's used
during verification and even can be checked during attach time for some
program types;
- LSM hooks are left intact pending the conclusion of discussion with Paul
Moore; I'd prefer to do LSM-related changes as a follow up patch set
anyways;
v4->v5:
- add pre-patch unifying CAP_NET_ADMIN handling inside kernel/bpf/syscall.c
(Paul Moore);
- fix build warnings and errors in selftests and kernel, detected by CI and
kernel test robot;
v3->v4:
- add delegation mount options to BPF FS;
- BPF token is derived from the instance of BPF FS and associates itself
with BPF FS' owning userns;
- BPF token doesn't grant BPF functionality directly, it just turns
capable() checks into ns_capable() checks within BPF FS' owning user;
- BPF token cannot be pinned;
v2->v3:
- make BPF_TOKEN_CREATE pin created BPF token in BPF FS, and disallow
BPF_OBJ_PIN for BPF token;
v1->v2:
- fix build failures on Kconfig with CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL unset;
- drop BPF_F_TOKEN_UNKNOWN_* flags and simplify UAPI (Stanislav).
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Utilize newly added bpf_token_create/bpf_token_free LSM hooks to
allocate struct bpf_security_struct for each BPF token object in
SELinux. This just follows similar pattern for BPF prog and map.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-18-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a selftest that attempts to conceptually replicate intended BPF
token use cases inside user namespaced container.
Child process is forked. It is then put into its own userns and mountns.
Child creates BPF FS context object. This ensures child userns is
captured as the owning userns for this instance of BPF FS. Given setting
delegation mount options is privileged operation, we ensure that child
cannot set them.
This context is passed back to privileged parent process through Unix
socket, where parent sets up delegation options, creates, and mounts it
as a detached mount. This mount FD is passed back to the child to be
used for BPF token creation, which allows otherwise privileged BPF
operations to succeed inside userns.
We validate that all of token-enabled privileged commands (BPF_BTF_LOAD,
BPF_MAP_CREATE, and BPF_PROG_LOAD) work as intended. They should only
succeed inside the userns if a) BPF token is provided with proper
allowed sets of commands and types; and b) namespaces CAP_BPF and other
privileges are set. Lacking a) or b) should lead to -EPERM failures.
Based on suggested workflow by Christian Brauner ([0]).
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230704-hochverdient-lehne-eeb9eeef785e@brauner/
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-17-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Allow user to specify token_fd for bpf_btf_load() API that wraps
kernel's BPF_BTF_LOAD command. This allows loading BTF from unprivileged
process as long as it has BPF token allowing BPF_BTF_LOAD command, which
can be created and delegated by privileged process.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-15-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Wire up bpf_token_create and bpf_token_free LSM hooks, which allow to
allocate LSM security blob (we add `void *security` field to struct
bpf_token for that), but also control who can instantiate BPF token.
This follows existing pattern for BPF map and BPF prog.
Also add security_bpf_token_allow_cmd() and security_bpf_token_capable()
LSM hooks that allow LSM implementation to control and negate (if
necessary) BPF token's delegation of a specific bpf_cmd and capability,
respectively.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-12-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Similarly to bpf_prog_alloc LSM hook, rename and extend bpf_map_alloc
hook into bpf_map_create, taking not just struct bpf_map, but also
bpf_attr and bpf_token, to give a fuller context to LSMs.
Unlike bpf_prog_alloc, there is no need to move the hook around, as it
currently is firing right before allocating BPF map ID and FD, which
seems to be a sweet spot.
But like bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_prog_free combo, make sure that bpf_map_free
LSM hook is called even if bpf_map_create hook returned error, as if few
LSMs are combined together it could be that one LSM successfully
allocated security blob for its needs, while subsequent LSM rejected BPF
map creation. The former LSM would still need to free up LSM blob, so we
need to ensure security_bpf_map_free() is called regardless of the
outcome.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-11-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Based on upstream discussion ([0]), rework existing
bpf_prog_alloc_security LSM hook. Rename it to bpf_prog_load and instead
of passing bpf_prog_aux, pass proper bpf_prog pointer for a full BPF
program struct. Also, we pass bpf_attr union with all the user-provided
arguments for BPF_PROG_LOAD command. This will give LSMs as much
information as we can basically provide.
The hook is also BPF token-aware now, and optional bpf_token struct is
passed as a third argument. bpf_prog_load LSM hook is called after
a bunch of sanity checks were performed, bpf_prog and bpf_prog_aux were
allocated and filled out, but right before performing full-fledged BPF
verification step.
bpf_prog_free LSM hook is now accepting struct bpf_prog argument, for
consistency. SELinux code is adjusted to all new names, types, and
signatures.
Note, given that bpf_prog_load (previously bpf_prog_alloc) hook can be
used by some LSMs to allocate extra security blob, but also by other
LSMs to reject BPF program loading, we need to make sure that
bpf_prog_free LSM hook is called after bpf_prog_load/bpf_prog_alloc one
*even* if the hook itself returned error. If we don't do that, we run
the risk of leaking memory. This seems to be possible today when
combining SELinux and BPF LSM, as one example, depending on their
relative ordering.
Also, for BPF LSM setup, add bpf_prog_load and bpf_prog_free to
sleepable LSM hooks list, as they are both executed in sleepable
context. Also drop bpf_prog_load hook from untrusted, as there is no
issue with refcount or anything else anymore, that originally forced us
to add it to untrusted list in c0c852dd18 ("bpf: Do not mark certain LSM
hook arguments as trusted"). We now trigger this hook much later and it
should not be an issue anymore.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9fe88aef7deabbe87d3fc38c4aea3c69.paul@paul-moore.com/
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-10-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Remove remaining direct queries to perfmon_capable() and bpf_capable()
in BPF verifier logic and instead use BPF token (if available) to make
decisions about privileges.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Instead of performing unconditional system-wide bpf_capable() and
perfmon_capable() calls inside bpf_base_func_proto() function (and other
similar ones) to determine eligibility of a given BPF helper for a given
program, use previously recorded BPF token during BPF_PROG_LOAD command
handling to inform the decision.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-8-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add basic support of BPF token to BPF_PROG_LOAD. Wire through a set of
allowed BPF program types and attach types, derived from BPF FS at BPF
token creation time. Then make sure we perform bpf_token_capable()
checks everywhere where it's relevant.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Accept BPF token FD in BPF_BTF_LOAD command to allow BTF data loading
through delegated BPF token. BTF loading is a pretty straightforward
operation, so as long as BPF token is created with allow_cmds granting
BPF_BTF_LOAD command, kernel proceeds to parsing BTF data and creating
BTF object.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Allow providing token_fd for BPF_MAP_CREATE command to allow controlled
BPF map creation from unprivileged process through delegated BPF token.
Wire through a set of allowed BPF map types to BPF token, derived from
BPF FS at BPF token creation time. This, in combination with allowed_cmds
allows to create a narrowly-focused BPF token (controlled by privileged
agent) with a restrictive set of BPF maps that application can attempt
to create.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add new kind of BPF kernel object, BPF token. BPF token is meant to
allow delegating privileged BPF functionality, like loading a BPF
program or creating a BPF map, from privileged process to a *trusted*
unprivileged process, all while having a good amount of control over which
privileged operations could be performed using provided BPF token.
This is achieved through mounting BPF FS instance with extra delegation
mount options, which determine what operations are delegatable, and also
constraining it to the owning user namespace (as mentioned in the
previous patch).
BPF token itself is just a derivative from BPF FS and can be created
through a new bpf() syscall command, BPF_TOKEN_CREATE, which accepts BPF
FS FD, which can be attained through open() API by opening BPF FS mount
point. Currently, BPF token "inherits" delegated command, map types,
prog type, and attach type bit sets from BPF FS as is. In the future,
having an BPF token as a separate object with its own FD, we can allow
to further restrict BPF token's allowable set of things either at the
creation time or after the fact, allowing the process to guard itself
further from unintentionally trying to load undesired kind of BPF
programs. But for now we keep things simple and just copy bit sets as is.
When BPF token is created from BPF FS mount, we take reference to the
BPF super block's owning user namespace, and then use that namespace for
checking all the {CAP_BPF, CAP_PERFMON, CAP_NET_ADMIN, CAP_SYS_ADMIN}
capabilities that are normally only checked against init userns (using
capable()), but now we check them using ns_capable() instead (if BPF
token is provided). See bpf_token_capable() for details.
Such setup means that BPF token in itself is not sufficient to grant BPF
functionality. User namespaced process has to *also* have necessary
combination of capabilities inside that user namespace. So while
previously CAP_BPF was useless when granted within user namespace, now
it gains a meaning and allows container managers and sys admins to have
a flexible control over which processes can and need to use BPF
functionality within the user namespace (i.e., container in practice).
And BPF FS delegation mount options and derived BPF tokens serve as
a per-container "flag" to grant overall ability to use bpf() (plus further
restrict on which parts of bpf() syscalls are treated as namespaced).
Note also, BPF_TOKEN_CREATE command itself requires ns_capable(CAP_BPF)
within the BPF FS owning user namespace, rounding up the ns_capable()
story of BPF token.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add few new mount options to BPF FS that allow to specify that a given
BPF FS instance allows creation of BPF token (added in the next patch),
and what sort of operations are allowed under BPF token. As such, we get
4 new mount options, each is a bit mask
- `delegate_cmds` allow to specify which bpf() syscall commands are
allowed with BPF token derived from this BPF FS instance;
- if BPF_MAP_CREATE command is allowed, `delegate_maps` specifies
a set of allowable BPF map types that could be created with BPF token;
- if BPF_PROG_LOAD command is allowed, `delegate_progs` specifies
a set of allowable BPF program types that could be loaded with BPF token;
- if BPF_PROG_LOAD command is allowed, `delegate_attachs` specifies
a set of allowable BPF program attach types that could be loaded with
BPF token; delegate_progs and delegate_attachs are meant to be used
together, as full BPF program type is, in general, determined
through both program type and program attach type.
Currently, these mount options accept the following forms of values:
- a special value "any", that enables all possible values of a given
bit set;
- numeric value (decimal or hexadecimal, determined by kernel
automatically) that specifies a bit mask value directly;
- all the values for a given mount option are combined, if specified
multiple times. E.g., `mount -t bpf nodev /path/to/mount -o
delegate_maps=0x1 -o delegate_maps=0x2` will result in a combined 0x3
mask.
Ideally, more convenient (for humans) symbolic form derived from
corresponding UAPI enums would be accepted (e.g., `-o
delegate_progs=kprobe|tracepoint`) and I intend to implement this, but
it requires a bunch of UAPI header churn, so I postponed it until this
feature lands upstream or at least there is a definite consensus that
this feature is acceptable and is going to make it, just to minimize
amount of wasted effort and not increase amount of non-essential code to
be reviewed.
Attentive reader will notice that BPF FS is now marked as
FS_USERNS_MOUNT, which theoretically makes it mountable inside non-init
user namespace as long as the process has sufficient *namespaced*
capabilities within that user namespace. But in reality we still
restrict BPF FS to be mountable only by processes with CAP_SYS_ADMIN *in
init userns* (extra check in bpf_fill_super()). FS_USERNS_MOUNT is added
to allow creating BPF FS context object (i.e., fsopen("bpf")) from
inside unprivileged process inside non-init userns, to capture that
userns as the owning userns. It will still be required to pass this
context object back to privileged process to instantiate and mount it.
This manipulation is important, because capturing non-init userns as the
owning userns of BPF FS instance (super block) allows to use that userns
to constraint BPF token to that userns later on (see next patch). So
creating BPF FS with delegation inside unprivileged userns will restrict
derived BPF token objects to only "work" inside that intended userns,
making it scoped to a intended "container". Also, setting these
delegation options requires capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), so unprivileged
process cannot set this up without involvement of a privileged process.
There is a set of selftests at the end of the patch set that simulates
this sequence of steps and validates that everything works as intended.
But careful review is requested to make sure there are no missed gaps in
the implementation and testing.
This somewhat subtle set of aspects is the result of previous
discussions ([0]) about various user namespace implications and
interactions with BPF token functionality and is necessary to contain
BPF token inside intended user namespace.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230704-hochverdient-lehne-eeb9eeef785e@brauner/
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tiezhu Yang