linux-stable/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c

3353 lines
100 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright © 2014 Intel Corporation
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
* to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
* the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
* and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
* Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
* paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
* Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
* THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
* FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
* DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
*/
#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_damage_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_debugfs.h>
#include "i915_drv.h"
#include "i915_reg.h"
#include "intel_atomic.h"
#include "intel_crtc.h"
#include "intel_ddi.h"
#include "intel_de.h"
#include "intel_display_types.h"
#include "intel_dp.h"
#include "intel_dp_aux.h"
#include "intel_frontbuffer.h"
#include "intel_hdmi.h"
#include "intel_psr.h"
#include "intel_psr_regs.h"
#include "intel_snps_phy.h"
#include "skl_universal_plane.h"
/**
* DOC: Panel Self Refresh (PSR/SRD)
*
* Since Haswell Display controller supports Panel Self-Refresh on display
* panels witch have a remote frame buffer (RFB) implemented according to PSR
* spec in eDP1.3. PSR feature allows the display to go to lower standby states
* when system is idle but display is on as it eliminates display refresh
* request to DDR memory completely as long as the frame buffer for that
* display is unchanged.
*
* Panel Self Refresh must be supported by both Hardware (source) and
* Panel (sink).
*
* PSR saves power by caching the framebuffer in the panel RFB, which allows us
* to power down the link and memory controller. For DSI panels the same idea
* is called "manual mode".
*
* The implementation uses the hardware-based PSR support which automatically
* enters/exits self-refresh mode. The hardware takes care of sending the
* required DP aux message and could even retrain the link (that part isn't
* enabled yet though). The hardware also keeps track of any frontbuffer
* changes to know when to exit self-refresh mode again. Unfortunately that
* part doesn't work too well, hence why the i915 PSR support uses the
* software frontbuffer tracking to make sure it doesn't miss a screen
* update. For this integration intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush()
* get called by the frontbuffer tracking code. Note that because of locking
* issues the self-refresh re-enable code is done from a work queue, which
* must be correctly synchronized/cancelled when shutting down the pipe."
*
* DC3CO (DC3 clock off)
*
* On top of PSR2, GEN12 adds a intermediate power savings state that turns
* clock off automatically during PSR2 idle state.
* The smaller overhead of DC3co entry/exit vs. the overhead of PSR2 deep sleep
* entry/exit allows the HW to enter a low-power state even when page flipping
* periodically (for instance a 30fps video playback scenario).
*
* Every time a flips occurs PSR2 will get out of deep sleep state(if it was),
* so DC3CO is enabled and tgl_dc3co_disable_work is schedule to run after 6
* frames, if no other flip occurs and the function above is executed, DC3CO is
* disabled and PSR2 is configured to enter deep sleep, resetting again in case
* of another flip.
* Front buffer modifications do not trigger DC3CO activation on purpose as it
* would bring a lot of complexity and most of the moderns systems will only
* use page flips.
*/
/*
* Description of PSR mask bits:
*
* EDP_PSR_DEBUG[16]/EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE (hsw-skl):
*
* When unmasked (nearly) all display register writes (eg. even
* SWF) trigger a PSR exit. Some registers are excluded from this
* and they have a more specific mask (described below). On icl+
* this bit no longer exists and is effectively always set.
*
* PIPE_MISC[21]/PIPE_MISC_PSR_MASK_PIPE_REG_WRITE (skl+):
*
* When unmasked (nearly) all pipe/plane register writes
* trigger a PSR exit. Some plane registers are excluded from this
* and they have a more specific mask (described below).
*
* CHICKEN_PIPESL_1[11]/SKL_PSR_MASK_PLANE_FLIP (skl+):
* PIPE_MISC[23]/PIPE_MISC_PSR_MASK_PRIMARY_FLIP (bdw):
* EDP_PSR_DEBUG[23]/EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_PRIMARY_FLIP (hsw):
*
* When unmasked PRI_SURF/PLANE_SURF writes trigger a PSR exit.
* SPR_SURF/CURBASE are not included in this and instead are
* controlled by PIPE_MISC_PSR_MASK_PIPE_REG_WRITE (skl+) or
* EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE (hsw/bdw).
*
* PIPE_MISC[22]/PIPE_MISC_PSR_MASK_SPRITE_ENABLE (bdw):
* EDP_PSR_DEBUG[21]/EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_SPRITE_ENABLE (hsw):
*
* When unmasked PSR is blocked as long as the sprite
* plane is enabled. skl+ with their universal planes no
* longer have a mask bit like this, and no plane being
* enabledb blocks PSR.
*
* PIPE_MISC[21]/PIPE_MISC_PSR_MASK_CURSOR_MOVE (bdw):
* EDP_PSR_DEBUG[20]/EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_CURSOR_MOVE (hsw):
*
* When umasked CURPOS writes trigger a PSR exit. On skl+
* this doesn't exit but CURPOS is included in the
* PIPE_MISC_PSR_MASK_PIPE_REG_WRITE mask.
*
* PIPE_MISC[20]/PIPE_MISC_PSR_MASK_VBLANK_VSYNC_INT (bdw+):
* EDP_PSR_DEBUG[19]/EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_VBLANK_VSYNC_INT (hsw):
*
* When unmasked PSR is blocked as long as vblank and/or vsync
* interrupt is unmasked in IMR *and* enabled in IER.
*
* CHICKEN_TRANS[30]/SKL_UNMASK_VBL_TO_PIPE_IN_SRD (skl+):
* CHICKEN_PAR1_1[15]/HSW_MASK_VBL_TO_PIPE_IN_SRD (hsw/bdw):
*
* Selectcs whether PSR exit generates an extra vblank before
* the first frame is transmitted. Also note the opposite polarity
* if the bit on hsw/bdw vs. skl+ (masked==generate the extra vblank,
* unmasked==do not generate the extra vblank).
*
* With DC states enabled the extra vblank happens after link training,
* with DC states disabled it happens immediately upuon PSR exit trigger.
* No idea as of now why there is a difference. HSW/BDW (which don't
* even have DMC) always generate it after link training. Go figure.
*
* Unfortunately CHICKEN_TRANS itself seems to be double buffered
* and thus won't latch until the first vblank. So with DC states
* enabled the register effctively uses the reset value during DC5
* exit+PSR exit sequence, and thus the bit does nothing until
* latched by the vblank that it was trying to prevent from being
* generated in the first place. So we should probably call this
* one a chicken/egg bit instead on skl+.
*
* In standby mode (as opposed to link-off) this makes no difference
* as the timing generator keeps running the whole time generating
* normal periodic vblanks.
*
* WaPsrDPAMaskVBlankInSRD asks us to set the bit on hsw/bdw,
* and doing so makes the behaviour match the skl+ reset value.
*
* CHICKEN_PIPESL_1[0]/BDW_UNMASK_VBL_TO_REGS_IN_SRD (bdw):
* CHICKEN_PIPESL_1[15]/HSW_UNMASK_VBL_TO_REGS_IN_SRD (hsw):
*
* On BDW without this bit is no vblanks whatsoever are
* generated after PSR exit. On HSW this has no apparant effect.
* WaPsrDPRSUnmaskVBlankInSRD says to set this.
*
* The rest of the bits are more self-explanatory and/or
* irrelevant for normal operation.
*/
drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0 which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header is different. v1: Initial version. v2: - Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() condition check. [Jouni] - Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni] - Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni] - Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni] v3: - Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni] - Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni] - Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni] - Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni] - Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni] v4: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni] - Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni] v5: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni] - Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani] - Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani] v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni] v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun] Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
2023-11-08 07:23:00 +00:00
bool intel_encoder_can_psr(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
{
if (intel_encoder_is_dp(encoder) || encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST)
return CAN_PSR(enc_to_intel_dp(encoder)) ||
CAN_PANEL_REPLAY(enc_to_intel_dp(encoder));
else
return false;
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
static bool psr_global_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
{
struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
switch (intel_dp->psr.debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK) {
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
case I915_PSR_DEBUG_DEFAULT:
if (i915->display.params.enable_psr == -1)
return connector->panel.vbt.psr.enable;
return i915->display.params.enable_psr;
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
case I915_PSR_DEBUG_DISABLE:
return false;
default:
return true;
}
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
static bool psr2_global_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
switch (intel_dp->psr.debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK) {
case I915_PSR_DEBUG_DISABLE:
case I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR1:
return false;
default:
if (i915->display.params.enable_psr == 1)
return false;
return true;
}
}
static u32 psr_irq_psr_error_bit_get(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
return DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12 ? TGL_PSR_ERROR :
EDP_PSR_ERROR(intel_dp->psr.transcoder);
}
static u32 psr_irq_post_exit_bit_get(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
return DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12 ? TGL_PSR_POST_EXIT :
EDP_PSR_POST_EXIT(intel_dp->psr.transcoder);
}
static u32 psr_irq_pre_entry_bit_get(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
return DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12 ? TGL_PSR_PRE_ENTRY :
EDP_PSR_PRE_ENTRY(intel_dp->psr.transcoder);
}
static u32 psr_irq_mask_get(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
return DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12 ? TGL_PSR_MASK :
EDP_PSR_MASK(intel_dp->psr.transcoder);
}
static i915_reg_t psr_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
{
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
return EDP_PSR_CTL(cpu_transcoder);
else
return HSW_SRD_CTL;
}
static i915_reg_t psr_debug_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
{
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
return EDP_PSR_DEBUG(cpu_transcoder);
else
return HSW_SRD_DEBUG;
}
static i915_reg_t psr_perf_cnt_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
{
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
return EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT(cpu_transcoder);
else
return HSW_SRD_PERF_CNT;
}
static i915_reg_t psr_status_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
{
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
return EDP_PSR_STATUS(cpu_transcoder);
else
return HSW_SRD_STATUS;
}
static i915_reg_t psr_imr_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
{
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
return TRANS_PSR_IMR(cpu_transcoder);
else
return EDP_PSR_IMR;
}
drm/i915/psr: Only handle interruptions of the transcoder in use It was enabling and checking PSR interruptions in every transcoder while it should keep the interruptions on the non-used transcoders masked. While doing this it gives us trouble on Tiger Lake if we are reading/writing to registers of disabled transcoders since from gen12 onwards the registers are relative to the transcoder. Instead of forcing them ON to access those registers, just avoid the accesses as they are not needed. v2 (Lucas): - Explain why we can't keep accessing all transcoders - Remove TODO about extending the irq handling to multiple instances: when/if implementing multiple instances it's pretty clear by the singleton psr that it needs to be extended - Fix intel_psr_debug_set() calling psr_irq_control() with psr.transcoder not set yet (from Imre). Now we only set the debug register right away if psr is already enabled. Otherwise we just record the value to be set when enabling the source. - Do not depend on the value of TRANSCODER_A. Just be relative to it (from Imre) - handle psr error last so we don't schedule the work before handling the other flags v3: - Adding a warning about setting reserverd bits on EDP_PSR_IMR Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-09-04 21:34:14 +00:00
static i915_reg_t psr_iir_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
{
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
return TRANS_PSR_IIR(cpu_transcoder);
else
return EDP_PSR_IIR;
}
static i915_reg_t psr_aux_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
{
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
return EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL(cpu_transcoder);
else
return HSW_SRD_AUX_CTL;
}
static i915_reg_t psr_aux_data_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder, int i)
{
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
return EDP_PSR_AUX_DATA(cpu_transcoder, i);
else
return HSW_SRD_AUX_DATA(i);
}
static void psr_irq_control(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
u32 mask;
mask = psr_irq_psr_error_bit_get(intel_dp);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ)
mask |= psr_irq_post_exit_bit_get(intel_dp) |
psr_irq_pre_entry_bit_get(intel_dp);
drm/i915/psr: Only handle interruptions of the transcoder in use It was enabling and checking PSR interruptions in every transcoder while it should keep the interruptions on the non-used transcoders masked. While doing this it gives us trouble on Tiger Lake if we are reading/writing to registers of disabled transcoders since from gen12 onwards the registers are relative to the transcoder. Instead of forcing them ON to access those registers, just avoid the accesses as they are not needed. v2 (Lucas): - Explain why we can't keep accessing all transcoders - Remove TODO about extending the irq handling to multiple instances: when/if implementing multiple instances it's pretty clear by the singleton psr that it needs to be extended - Fix intel_psr_debug_set() calling psr_irq_control() with psr.transcoder not set yet (from Imre). Now we only set the debug register right away if psr is already enabled. Otherwise we just record the value to be set when enabling the source. - Do not depend on the value of TRANSCODER_A. Just be relative to it (from Imre) - handle psr error last so we don't schedule the work before handling the other flags v3: - Adding a warning about setting reserverd bits on EDP_PSR_IMR Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-09-04 21:34:14 +00:00
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, psr_imr_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder),
psr_irq_mask_get(intel_dp), ~mask);
}
static void psr_event_print(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
u32 val, bool psr2_enabled)
{
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "PSR exit events: 0x%x\n", val);
if (val & PSR_EVENT_PSR2_WD_TIMER_EXPIRE)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tPSR2 watchdog timer expired\n");
if ((val & PSR_EVENT_PSR2_DISABLED) && psr2_enabled)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tPSR2 disabled\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_SU_DIRTY_FIFO_UNDERRUN)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tSU dirty FIFO underrun\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_SU_CRC_FIFO_UNDERRUN)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tSU CRC FIFO underrun\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_GRAPHICS_RESET)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tGraphics reset\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_PCH_INTERRUPT)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tPCH interrupt\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_MEMORY_UP)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tMemory up\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_FRONT_BUFFER_MODIFY)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tFront buffer modification\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_WD_TIMER_EXPIRE)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tPSR watchdog timer expired\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_PIPE_REGISTERS_UPDATE)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tPIPE registers updated\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_REGISTER_UPDATE)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tRegister updated\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_HDCP_ENABLE)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tHDCP enabled\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_KVMR_SESSION_ENABLE)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tKVMR session enabled\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_VBI_ENABLE)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tVBI enabled\n");
if (val & PSR_EVENT_LPSP_MODE_EXIT)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tLPSP mode exited\n");
if ((val & PSR_EVENT_PSR_DISABLE) && !psr2_enabled)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "\tPSR disabled\n");
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u32 psr_iir)
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
ktime_t time_ns = ktime_get();
if (psr_iir & psr_irq_pre_entry_bit_get(intel_dp)) {
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.last_entry_attempt = time_ns;
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"[transcoder %s] PSR entry attempt in 2 vblanks\n",
transcoder_name(cpu_transcoder));
drm/i915/psr: Only handle interruptions of the transcoder in use It was enabling and checking PSR interruptions in every transcoder while it should keep the interruptions on the non-used transcoders masked. While doing this it gives us trouble on Tiger Lake if we are reading/writing to registers of disabled transcoders since from gen12 onwards the registers are relative to the transcoder. Instead of forcing them ON to access those registers, just avoid the accesses as they are not needed. v2 (Lucas): - Explain why we can't keep accessing all transcoders - Remove TODO about extending the irq handling to multiple instances: when/if implementing multiple instances it's pretty clear by the singleton psr that it needs to be extended - Fix intel_psr_debug_set() calling psr_irq_control() with psr.transcoder not set yet (from Imre). Now we only set the debug register right away if psr is already enabled. Otherwise we just record the value to be set when enabling the source. - Do not depend on the value of TRANSCODER_A. Just be relative to it (from Imre) - handle psr error last so we don't schedule the work before handling the other flags v3: - Adding a warning about setting reserverd bits on EDP_PSR_IMR Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-09-04 21:34:14 +00:00
}
if (psr_iir & psr_irq_post_exit_bit_get(intel_dp)) {
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.last_exit = time_ns;
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"[transcoder %s] PSR exit completed\n",
transcoder_name(cpu_transcoder));
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9) {
u32 val;
val = intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, PSR_EVENT(cpu_transcoder), 0, 0);
psr_event_print(dev_priv, val, intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled);
}
drm/i915/psr: Only handle interruptions of the transcoder in use It was enabling and checking PSR interruptions in every transcoder while it should keep the interruptions on the non-used transcoders masked. While doing this it gives us trouble on Tiger Lake if we are reading/writing to registers of disabled transcoders since from gen12 onwards the registers are relative to the transcoder. Instead of forcing them ON to access those registers, just avoid the accesses as they are not needed. v2 (Lucas): - Explain why we can't keep accessing all transcoders - Remove TODO about extending the irq handling to multiple instances: when/if implementing multiple instances it's pretty clear by the singleton psr that it needs to be extended - Fix intel_psr_debug_set() calling psr_irq_control() with psr.transcoder not set yet (from Imre). Now we only set the debug register right away if psr is already enabled. Otherwise we just record the value to be set when enabling the source. - Do not depend on the value of TRANSCODER_A. Just be relative to it (from Imre) - handle psr error last so we don't schedule the work before handling the other flags v3: - Adding a warning about setting reserverd bits on EDP_PSR_IMR Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-09-04 21:34:14 +00:00
}
if (psr_iir & psr_irq_psr_error_bit_get(intel_dp)) {
drm_warn(&dev_priv->drm, "[transcoder %s] PSR aux error\n",
drm/i915/psr: Only handle interruptions of the transcoder in use It was enabling and checking PSR interruptions in every transcoder while it should keep the interruptions on the non-used transcoders masked. While doing this it gives us trouble on Tiger Lake if we are reading/writing to registers of disabled transcoders since from gen12 onwards the registers are relative to the transcoder. Instead of forcing them ON to access those registers, just avoid the accesses as they are not needed. v2 (Lucas): - Explain why we can't keep accessing all transcoders - Remove TODO about extending the irq handling to multiple instances: when/if implementing multiple instances it's pretty clear by the singleton psr that it needs to be extended - Fix intel_psr_debug_set() calling psr_irq_control() with psr.transcoder not set yet (from Imre). Now we only set the debug register right away if psr is already enabled. Otherwise we just record the value to be set when enabling the source. - Do not depend on the value of TRANSCODER_A. Just be relative to it (from Imre) - handle psr error last so we don't schedule the work before handling the other flags v3: - Adding a warning about setting reserverd bits on EDP_PSR_IMR Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-09-04 21:34:14 +00:00
transcoder_name(cpu_transcoder));
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.irq_aux_error = true;
drm/i915/psr: Only handle interruptions of the transcoder in use It was enabling and checking PSR interruptions in every transcoder while it should keep the interruptions on the non-used transcoders masked. While doing this it gives us trouble on Tiger Lake if we are reading/writing to registers of disabled transcoders since from gen12 onwards the registers are relative to the transcoder. Instead of forcing them ON to access those registers, just avoid the accesses as they are not needed. v2 (Lucas): - Explain why we can't keep accessing all transcoders - Remove TODO about extending the irq handling to multiple instances: when/if implementing multiple instances it's pretty clear by the singleton psr that it needs to be extended - Fix intel_psr_debug_set() calling psr_irq_control() with psr.transcoder not set yet (from Imre). Now we only set the debug register right away if psr is already enabled. Otherwise we just record the value to be set when enabling the source. - Do not depend on the value of TRANSCODER_A. Just be relative to it (from Imre) - handle psr error last so we don't schedule the work before handling the other flags v3: - Adding a warning about setting reserverd bits on EDP_PSR_IMR Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-09-04 21:34:14 +00:00
/*
* If this interruption is not masked it will keep
* interrupting so fast that it prevents the scheduled
* work to run.
* Also after a PSR error, we don't want to arm PSR
* again so we don't care about unmask the interruption
* or unset irq_aux_error.
*/
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, psr_imr_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder),
0, psr_irq_psr_error_bit_get(intel_dp));
queue_work(dev_priv->unordered_wq, &intel_dp->psr.work);
}
}
static bool intel_dp_get_alpm_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
u8 alpm_caps = 0;
if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_RECEIVER_ALPM_CAP,
&alpm_caps) != 1)
return false;
return alpm_caps & DP_ALPM_CAP;
}
static u8 intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
u8 val = 8; /* assume the worst if we can't read the value */
if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
DP_SYNCHRONIZATION_LATENCY_IN_SINK, &val) == 1)
val &= DP_MAX_RESYNC_FRAME_COUNT_MASK;
else
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
"Unable to get sink synchronization latency, assuming 8 frames\n");
return val;
}
static void intel_dp_get_su_granularity(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
ssize_t r;
u16 w;
u8 y;
/* If sink don't have specific granularity requirements set legacy ones */
if (!(intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] & DP_PSR2_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUIRED)) {
/* As PSR2 HW sends full lines, we do not care about x granularity */
w = 4;
y = 4;
goto exit;
}
r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY, &w, 2);
if (r != 2)
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
"Unable to read DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY\n");
/*
* Spec says that if the value read is 0 the default granularity should
* be used instead.
*/
if (r != 2 || w == 0)
w = 4;
r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR2_SU_Y_GRANULARITY, &y, 1);
if (r != 1) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
"Unable to read DP_PSR2_SU_Y_GRANULARITY\n");
y = 4;
}
if (y == 0)
y = 1;
exit:
intel_dp->psr.su_w_granularity = w;
intel_dp->psr.su_y_granularity = y;
}
drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0 which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header is different. v1: Initial version. v2: - Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() condition check. [Jouni] - Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni] - Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni] - Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni] v3: - Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni] - Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni] - Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni] - Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni] - Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni] v4: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni] - Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni] v5: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni] - Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani] - Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani] v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni] v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun] Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
2023-11-08 07:23:00 +00:00
static void _panel_replay_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
u8 pr_dpcd = 0;
intel_dp->psr.sink_panel_replay_support = false;
drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PANEL_REPLAY_CAP, &pr_dpcd);
if (!(pr_dpcd & DP_PANEL_REPLAY_SUPPORT)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
"Panel replay is not supported by panel\n");
return;
}
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
"Panel replay is supported by panel\n");
intel_dp->psr.sink_panel_replay_support = true;
}
static void _psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 =
to_i915(dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.dev);
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "eDP panel supports PSR version %x\n",
intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0]);
drm/dp: Revert "drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based quirks" This reverts commit 0883ce8146ed6074c76399f4e70dbed788582e12. Originally these quirks were added because of the issues with using the eDP backlight interfaces on certain laptop panels, which made it impossible to properly probe for DPCD backlight support without having a whitelist for panels that we know have working VESA backlight control interfaces over DPCD. As well, it should be noted it was impossible to use the normal sink OUI for recognizing these panels as none of them actually filled out their OUIs, hence needing to resort to checking EDIDs. At the time we weren't really sure why certain panels had issues with DPCD backlight controls, but we eventually figured out that there was a second interface that these problematic laptop panels actually did work with and advertise properly: Intel's proprietary backlight interface for HDR panels. So far the testing we've done hasn't brought any panels to light that advertise this interface and don't support it properly, which means we finally have a real solution to this problem. As a result, we now have no need for the force DPCD backlight quirk, and furthermore this also removes the need for any kind of EDID quirk checking in DRM. So, let's just revert it for now since we were the only driver using this. v3: * Rebase v2: * Fix indenting error picked up by checkpatch in intel_edp_init_connector() Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-6-lyude@redhat.com
2020-09-15 16:49:13 +00:00
if (drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc, DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
"PSR support not currently available for this panel\n");
return;
}
if (!(intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_SET_POWER_CAP)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
"Panel lacks power state control, PSR cannot be enabled\n");
return;
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.sink_support = true;
intel_dp->psr.sink_sync_latency =
drm/i915/psr: Set idle frame count based on sink synchronization latency DPCD 2009h "Synchronization latency in sink" has bits that tell us the maximum number of frames sink can take to resynchronize to source timing when exiting PSR. More importantly, as per eDP 1.4b, this is the "Minimum number of frames following PSR exit that the Source device needs to wait for PSR entry." We currently use this value only to setup the number frames to wait before PSR2 selective update. But, based on the above description it makes more sense to use this to configure idle frames for both PSR1 and and PSR2. This will ensure we wait the required number of frames before activation whether it is PSR1 or PSR2. The minimum number of idle frames remains 6, while allowing sink synchronization latency and VBT to increase this value. This also solves the flip-flop between sink and source frames that I noticed on my Thinkpad X260 during PSR exit. This specific panel has a value of 8h, which according to the spec means the "Source device must wait for more than eight active frames after PSR exit before initiating PSR entry. (In this case, should be provided by the panel supplier.)" VBT however has a value of 0. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180525033047.7596-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
2018-05-25 03:30:47 +00:00
intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(intel_dp);
if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 9 &&
intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] == DP_PSR2_WITH_Y_COORD_IS_SUPPORTED) {
bool y_req = intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] &
DP_PSR2_SU_Y_COORDINATE_REQUIRED;
bool alpm = intel_dp_get_alpm_status(intel_dp);
/*
* All panels that supports PSR version 03h (PSR2 +
* Y-coordinate) can handle Y-coordinates in VSC but we are
* only sure that it is going to be used when required by the
* panel. This way panel is capable to do selective update
* without a aux frame sync.
*
* To support PSR version 02h and PSR version 03h without
* Y-coordinate requirement panels we would need to enable
* GTC first.
*/
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.sink_psr2_support = y_req && alpm;
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "PSR2 %ssupported\n",
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.sink_psr2_support ? "" : "not ");
}
}
void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0 which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header is different. v1: Initial version. v2: - Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() condition check. [Jouni] - Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni] - Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni] - Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni] v3: - Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni] - Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni] - Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni] - Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni] - Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni] v4: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni] - Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni] v5: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni] - Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani] - Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani] v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni] v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun] Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
2023-11-08 07:23:00 +00:00
_panel_replay_init_dpcd(intel_dp);
drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_SUPPORT, intel_dp->psr_dpcd,
sizeof(intel_dp->psr_dpcd));
if (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0])
_psr_init_dpcd(intel_dp);
if (intel_dp->psr.sink_psr2_support) {
intel_dp->psr.colorimetry_support =
intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(intel_dp);
intel_dp_get_su_granularity(intel_dp);
}
}
static void hsw_psr_setup_aux(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
u32 aux_clock_divider, aux_ctl;
/* write DP_SET_POWER=D0 */
static const u8 aux_msg[] = {
[0] = (DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE << 4) | ((DP_SET_POWER >> 16) & 0xf),
[1] = (DP_SET_POWER >> 8) & 0xff,
[2] = DP_SET_POWER & 0xff,
[3] = 1 - 1,
[4] = DP_SET_POWER_D0,
};
int i;
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(aux_msg) > 20);
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(aux_msg); i += 4)
intel_de_write(dev_priv,
psr_aux_data_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder, i >> 2),
intel_dp_aux_pack(&aux_msg[i], sizeof(aux_msg) - i));
aux_clock_divider = intel_dp->get_aux_clock_divider(intel_dp, 0);
/* Start with bits set for DDI_AUX_CTL register */
aux_ctl = intel_dp->get_aux_send_ctl(intel_dp, sizeof(aux_msg),
aux_clock_divider);
/* Select only valid bits for SRD_AUX_CTL */
aux_ctl &= EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_TIME_OUT_MASK |
EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_MASK |
EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_PRECHARGE_2US_MASK |
EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_BIT_CLOCK_2X_MASK;
intel_de_write(dev_priv, psr_aux_ctl_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder),
aux_ctl);
}
static void intel_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
u8 dpcd_val = DP_PSR_ENABLE;
if (intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled)
return;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
/* Enable ALPM at sink for psr2 */
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_RECEIVER_ALPM_CONFIG,
DP_ALPM_ENABLE |
DP_ALPM_LOCK_ERROR_IRQ_HPD_ENABLE);
dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_ENABLE_PSR2 | DP_PSR_IRQ_HPD_WITH_CRC_ERRORS;
} else {
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.link_standby)
dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE;
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
}
if (intel_dp->psr.req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline)
dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_SU_REGION_SCANLINE_CAPTURE;
if (intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames > 0)
dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_FRAME_CAPTURE;
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, dpcd_val);
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, DP_SET_POWER_D0);
}
static u32 intel_psr1_get_tp_time(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
u32 val = 0;
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
val |= EDP_PSR_TP4_TIME_0us;
if (dev_priv->display.params.psr_safest_params) {
val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_2500us;
val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us;
goto check_tp3_sel;
}
if (connector->panel.vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time_us == 0)
val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us;
else if (connector->panel.vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time_us <= 100)
val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_100us;
else if (connector->panel.vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time_us <= 500)
drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt structure. Since spec does not mention from which VBT version this change was added to vbt.bsf file, we cannot depend on bdb->version check to change for all the platforms. There is RCR inplace for GOP team to provide the version number to make generic change. Since Kabylake with bdb version 209 is having this change, limiting this change to gen9_bc and version 209+ to unblock google. Tested on skl(bdb version 203,without options) and kabylake(bdb version 209,212) having new options. bspec 20131 v2: (Jani and Rodrigo) move the 165 version check to intel_bios.c v3: Jani Move the abstraction to intel_bios. v4: Jani Rename tp*_wakeup_time to have "us" suffix. For values outside range[0-3],default to max 2500us. Old decimal value was wake up time in multiples of 100us. v5: Jani and Rodrigo Handle option 2 in default condition. Print oustide range value. For negetive values default to 2500us. v6: Jani Handle default first and then fall through for case 2. v7: Rodrigo Apply this change for IS_GEN9_BC and vbt version > 209 v8: Puthik Add new function vbt_psr_to_us. v9: Jani Change to v7 version as it's more readable. DK add comment /*fall through*/ after case2. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1526981243-2745-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2018-05-22 09:27:23 +00:00
val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_500us;
else
drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt structure. Since spec does not mention from which VBT version this change was added to vbt.bsf file, we cannot depend on bdb->version check to change for all the platforms. There is RCR inplace for GOP team to provide the version number to make generic change. Since Kabylake with bdb version 209 is having this change, limiting this change to gen9_bc and version 209+ to unblock google. Tested on skl(bdb version 203,without options) and kabylake(bdb version 209,212) having new options. bspec 20131 v2: (Jani and Rodrigo) move the 165 version check to intel_bios.c v3: Jani Move the abstraction to intel_bios. v4: Jani Rename tp*_wakeup_time to have "us" suffix. For values outside range[0-3],default to max 2500us. Old decimal value was wake up time in multiples of 100us. v5: Jani and Rodrigo Handle option 2 in default condition. Print oustide range value. For negetive values default to 2500us. v6: Jani Handle default first and then fall through for case 2. v7: Rodrigo Apply this change for IS_GEN9_BC and vbt version > 209 v8: Puthik Add new function vbt_psr_to_us. v9: Jani Change to v7 version as it's more readable. DK add comment /*fall through*/ after case2. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1526981243-2745-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2018-05-22 09:27:23 +00:00
val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_2500us;
if (connector->panel.vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us == 0)
val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us;
else if (connector->panel.vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us <= 100)
val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us;
else if (connector->panel.vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us <= 500)
drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt structure. Since spec does not mention from which VBT version this change was added to vbt.bsf file, we cannot depend on bdb->version check to change for all the platforms. There is RCR inplace for GOP team to provide the version number to make generic change. Since Kabylake with bdb version 209 is having this change, limiting this change to gen9_bc and version 209+ to unblock google. Tested on skl(bdb version 203,without options) and kabylake(bdb version 209,212) having new options. bspec 20131 v2: (Jani and Rodrigo) move the 165 version check to intel_bios.c v3: Jani Move the abstraction to intel_bios. v4: Jani Rename tp*_wakeup_time to have "us" suffix. For values outside range[0-3],default to max 2500us. Old decimal value was wake up time in multiples of 100us. v5: Jani and Rodrigo Handle option 2 in default condition. Print oustide range value. For negetive values default to 2500us. v6: Jani Handle default first and then fall through for case 2. v7: Rodrigo Apply this change for IS_GEN9_BC and vbt version > 209 v8: Puthik Add new function vbt_psr_to_us. v9: Jani Change to v7 version as it's more readable. DK add comment /*fall through*/ after case2. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1526981243-2745-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2018-05-22 09:27:23 +00:00
val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us;
else
drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt structure. Since spec does not mention from which VBT version this change was added to vbt.bsf file, we cannot depend on bdb->version check to change for all the platforms. There is RCR inplace for GOP team to provide the version number to make generic change. Since Kabylake with bdb version 209 is having this change, limiting this change to gen9_bc and version 209+ to unblock google. Tested on skl(bdb version 203,without options) and kabylake(bdb version 209,212) having new options. bspec 20131 v2: (Jani and Rodrigo) move the 165 version check to intel_bios.c v3: Jani Move the abstraction to intel_bios. v4: Jani Rename tp*_wakeup_time to have "us" suffix. For values outside range[0-3],default to max 2500us. Old decimal value was wake up time in multiples of 100us. v5: Jani and Rodrigo Handle option 2 in default condition. Print oustide range value. For negetive values default to 2500us. v6: Jani Handle default first and then fall through for case 2. v7: Rodrigo Apply this change for IS_GEN9_BC and vbt version > 209 v8: Puthik Add new function vbt_psr_to_us. v9: Jani Change to v7 version as it's more readable. DK add comment /*fall through*/ after case2. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1526981243-2745-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2018-05-22 09:27:23 +00:00
val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us;
/*
* WA 0479: hsw,bdw
* "Do not skip both TP1 and TP2/TP3"
*/
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 9 &&
connector->panel.vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time_us == 0 &&
connector->panel.vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us == 0)
val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us;
check_tp3_sel:
if (intel_dp_source_supports_tps3(dev_priv) &&
drm_dp_tps3_supported(intel_dp->dpcd))
val |= EDP_PSR_TP_TP1_TP3;
else
val |= EDP_PSR_TP_TP1_TP2;
return val;
}
static u8 psr_compute_idle_frames(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
int idle_frames;
/* Let's use 6 as the minimum to cover all known cases including the
* off-by-one issue that HW has in some cases.
*/
idle_frames = max(6, connector->panel.vbt.psr.idle_frames);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
idle_frames = max(idle_frames, intel_dp->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1);
if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, idle_frames > 0xf))
idle_frames = 0xf;
return idle_frames;
}
static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
u32 max_sleep_time = 0x1f;
u32 val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
val |= EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAMES(psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp));
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 20)
val |= EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME(max_sleep_time);
if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.link_standby)
val |= EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY;
val |= intel_psr1_get_tp_time(intel_dp);
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20)
val |= LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY_SETUP_FRAMES(intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames);
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder),
~EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK, val);
}
static u32 intel_psr2_get_tp_time(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
u32 val = 0;
if (dev_priv->display.params.psr_safest_params)
return EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_2500us;
if (connector->panel.vbt.psr.psr2_tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us >= 0 &&
connector->panel.vbt.psr.psr2_tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us <= 50)
drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt structure. Since spec does not mention from which VBT version this change was added to vbt.bsf file, we cannot depend on bdb->version check to change for all the platforms. There is RCR inplace for GOP team to provide the version number to make generic change. Since Kabylake with bdb version 209 is having this change, limiting this change to gen9_bc and version 209+ to unblock google. Tested on skl(bdb version 203,without options) and kabylake(bdb version 209,212) having new options. bspec 20131 v2: (Jani and Rodrigo) move the 165 version check to intel_bios.c v3: Jani Move the abstraction to intel_bios. v4: Jani Rename tp*_wakeup_time to have "us" suffix. For values outside range[0-3],default to max 2500us. Old decimal value was wake up time in multiples of 100us. v5: Jani and Rodrigo Handle option 2 in default condition. Print oustide range value. For negetive values default to 2500us. v6: Jani Handle default first and then fall through for case 2. v7: Rodrigo Apply this change for IS_GEN9_BC and vbt version > 209 v8: Puthik Add new function vbt_psr_to_us. v9: Jani Change to v7 version as it's more readable. DK add comment /*fall through*/ after case2. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1526981243-2745-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2018-05-22 09:27:23 +00:00
val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_50us;
else if (connector->panel.vbt.psr.psr2_tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us <= 100)
drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt structure. Since spec does not mention from which VBT version this change was added to vbt.bsf file, we cannot depend on bdb->version check to change for all the platforms. There is RCR inplace for GOP team to provide the version number to make generic change. Since Kabylake with bdb version 209 is having this change, limiting this change to gen9_bc and version 209+ to unblock google. Tested on skl(bdb version 203,without options) and kabylake(bdb version 209,212) having new options. bspec 20131 v2: (Jani and Rodrigo) move the 165 version check to intel_bios.c v3: Jani Move the abstraction to intel_bios. v4: Jani Rename tp*_wakeup_time to have "us" suffix. For values outside range[0-3],default to max 2500us. Old decimal value was wake up time in multiples of 100us. v5: Jani and Rodrigo Handle option 2 in default condition. Print oustide range value. For negetive values default to 2500us. v6: Jani Handle default first and then fall through for case 2. v7: Rodrigo Apply this change for IS_GEN9_BC and vbt version > 209 v8: Puthik Add new function vbt_psr_to_us. v9: Jani Change to v7 version as it's more readable. DK add comment /*fall through*/ after case2. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1526981243-2745-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2018-05-22 09:27:23 +00:00
val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_100us;
else if (connector->panel.vbt.psr.psr2_tp2_tp3_wakeup_time_us <= 500)
drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt structure. Since spec does not mention from which VBT version this change was added to vbt.bsf file, we cannot depend on bdb->version check to change for all the platforms. There is RCR inplace for GOP team to provide the version number to make generic change. Since Kabylake with bdb version 209 is having this change, limiting this change to gen9_bc and version 209+ to unblock google. Tested on skl(bdb version 203,without options) and kabylake(bdb version 209,212) having new options. bspec 20131 v2: (Jani and Rodrigo) move the 165 version check to intel_bios.c v3: Jani Move the abstraction to intel_bios. v4: Jani Rename tp*_wakeup_time to have "us" suffix. For values outside range[0-3],default to max 2500us. Old decimal value was wake up time in multiples of 100us. v5: Jani and Rodrigo Handle option 2 in default condition. Print oustide range value. For negetive values default to 2500us. v6: Jani Handle default first and then fall through for case 2. v7: Rodrigo Apply this change for IS_GEN9_BC and vbt version > 209 v8: Puthik Add new function vbt_psr_to_us. v9: Jani Change to v7 version as it's more readable. DK add comment /*fall through*/ after case2. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1526981243-2745-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2018-05-22 09:27:23 +00:00
val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_500us;
else
drm/i915/psr: vbt change for psr For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt structure. Since spec does not mention from which VBT version this change was added to vbt.bsf file, we cannot depend on bdb->version check to change for all the platforms. There is RCR inplace for GOP team to provide the version number to make generic change. Since Kabylake with bdb version 209 is having this change, limiting this change to gen9_bc and version 209+ to unblock google. Tested on skl(bdb version 203,without options) and kabylake(bdb version 209,212) having new options. bspec 20131 v2: (Jani and Rodrigo) move the 165 version check to intel_bios.c v3: Jani Move the abstraction to intel_bios. v4: Jani Rename tp*_wakeup_time to have "us" suffix. For values outside range[0-3],default to max 2500us. Old decimal value was wake up time in multiples of 100us. v5: Jani and Rodrigo Handle option 2 in default condition. Print oustide range value. For negetive values default to 2500us. v6: Jani Handle default first and then fall through for case 2. v7: Rodrigo Apply this change for IS_GEN9_BC and vbt version > 209 v8: Puthik Add new function vbt_psr_to_us. v9: Jani Change to v7 version as it's more readable. DK add comment /*fall through*/ after case2. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1526981243-2745-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
2018-05-22 09:27:23 +00:00
val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_2500us;
return val;
}
static int psr2_block_count_lines(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
return intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines < 9 &&
intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines < 9 ? 8 : 12;
}
static int psr2_block_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
return psr2_block_count_lines(intel_dp) / 4;
}
static u8 frames_before_su_entry(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
u8 frames_before_su_entry;
frames_before_su_entry = max_t(u8,
intel_dp->psr.sink_sync_latency + 1,
2);
/* Entry setup frames must be at least 1 less than frames before SU entry */
if (intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames >= frames_before_su_entry)
frames_before_su_entry = intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames + 1;
return frames_before_su_entry;
}
static void dg2_activate_panel_replay(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL(intel_dp->psr.transcoder),
0, ADLP_PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SF_CONTINUOS_FULL_FRAME);
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, TRANS_DP2_CTL(intel_dp->psr.transcoder), 0,
TRANS_DP2_PANEL_REPLAY_ENABLE);
}
static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
u32 val = EDP_PSR2_ENABLE;
u32 psr_val = 0;
val |= EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAMES(psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp));
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 14 && !IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
val |= EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE;
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 && DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 13)
val |= EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE;
val |= EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU(frames_before_su_entry(intel_dp));
val |= intel_psr2_get_tp_time(intel_dp);
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
if (psr2_block_count(intel_dp) > 2)
val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_BLOCK_COUNT_NUM_3;
else
val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_BLOCK_COUNT_NUM_2;
}
/* Wa_22012278275:adl-p */
if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) && IS_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_E0)) {
static const u8 map[] = {
2, /* 5 lines */
1, /* 6 lines */
0, /* 7 lines */
3, /* 8 lines */
6, /* 9 lines */
5, /* 10 lines */
4, /* 11 lines */
7, /* 12 lines */
};
/*
* Still using the default IO_BUFFER_WAKE and FAST_WAKE, see
* comments bellow for more information
*/
int tmp;
tmp = map[intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines - TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(tmp + TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE_MIN_LINES);
tmp = map[intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines - TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(tmp + TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES);
} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines);
val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines);
} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9) {
val |= EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines);
val |= EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines);
}
if (intel_dp->psr.req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline)
val |= EDP_PSR2_SU_SDP_SCANLINE;
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20)
psr_val |= LNL_EDP_PSR_ENTRY_SETUP_FRAMES(intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled) {
u32 tmp;
tmp = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL(cpu_transcoder));
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !(tmp & PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE));
} else if (HAS_PSR2_SEL_FETCH(dev_priv)) {
intel_de_write(dev_priv, PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL(cpu_transcoder), 0);
}
/*
* PSR2 HW is incorrectly using EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL and BSpec is
* recommending keep this bit unset while PSR2 is enabled.
*/
intel_de_write(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder), psr_val);
intel_de_write(dev_priv, EDP_PSR2_CTL(cpu_transcoder), val);
}
static bool
transcoder_has_psr2(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
{
if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14)
return cpu_transcoder == TRANSCODER_A || cpu_transcoder == TRANSCODER_B;
else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
return cpu_transcoder == TRANSCODER_A;
else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9)
return cpu_transcoder == TRANSCODER_EDP;
else
return false;
}
static u32 intel_get_frame_time_us(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
{
if (!crtc_state->hw.active)
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
return 0;
return DIV_ROUND_UP(1000 * 1000,
drm_mode_vrefresh(&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode));
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
static void psr2_program_idle_frames(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
u32 idle_frames)
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, EDP_PSR2_CTL(cpu_transcoder),
EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAMES_MASK,
EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAMES(idle_frames));
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
static void tgl_psr2_enable_dc3co(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
psr2_program_idle_frames(intel_dp, 0);
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
intel_display_power_set_target_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_DC3CO);
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
static void tgl_psr2_disable_dc3co(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
intel_display_power_set_target_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
psr2_program_idle_frames(intel_dp, psr_compute_idle_frames(intel_dp));
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
}
static void tgl_dc3co_disable_work(struct work_struct *work)
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct intel_dp *intel_dp =
container_of(work, typeof(*intel_dp), psr.dc3co_work.work);
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_lock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
/* If delayed work is pending, it is not idle */
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (delayed_work_pending(&intel_dp->psr.dc3co_work))
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
goto unlock;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
tgl_psr2_disable_dc3co(intel_dp);
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
unlock:
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
static void tgl_disallow_dc3co_on_psr2_exit(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
{
if (!intel_dp->psr.dc3co_exitline)
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
return;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
cancel_delayed_work(&intel_dp->psr.dc3co_work);
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
/* Before PSR2 exit disallow dc3co*/
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
tgl_psr2_disable_dc3co(intel_dp);
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
}
static bool
dc3co_is_pipe_port_compatible(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc)->pipe;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum port port = dig_port->base.port;
if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14)
return pipe <= PIPE_B && port <= PORT_B;
else
return pipe == PIPE_A && port == PORT_A;
}
static void
tgl_dc3co_exitline_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
const u32 crtc_vdisplay = crtc_state->uapi.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->display.power.domains;
u32 exit_scanlines;
/*
* FIXME: Due to the changed sequence of activating/deactivating DC3CO,
* disable DC3CO until the changed dc3co activating/deactivating sequence
* is applied. B.Specs:49196
*/
return;
/*
* DMC's DC3CO exit mechanism has an issue with Selective Fecth
* TODO: when the issue is addressed, this restriction should be removed.
*/
if (crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch)
return;
if (!(power_domains->allowed_dc_mask & DC_STATE_EN_DC3CO))
return;
if (!dc3co_is_pipe_port_compatible(intel_dp, crtc_state))
return;
/* Wa_16011303918:adl-p */
if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) && IS_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
return;
/*
* DC3CO Exit time 200us B.Spec 49196
* PSR2 transcoder Early Exit scanlines = ROUNDUP(200 / line time) + 1
*/
exit_scanlines =
intel_usecs_to_scanlines(&crtc_state->uapi.adjusted_mode, 200) + 1;
if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, exit_scanlines > crtc_vdisplay))
return;
crtc_state->dc3co_exitline = crtc_vdisplay - exit_scanlines;
}
static bool intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
if (!dev_priv->display.params.enable_psr2_sel_fetch &&
intel_dp->psr.debug != I915_PSR_DEBUG_ENABLE_SEL_FETCH) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 sel fetch not enabled, disabled by parameter\n");
return false;
}
if (crtc_state->uapi.async_flip) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 sel fetch not enabled, async flip enabled\n");
return false;
}
return crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch = true;
}
static bool psr2_granularity_check(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
const struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg = &crtc_state->dsc.config;
const int crtc_hdisplay = crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay;
const int crtc_vdisplay = crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay;
u16 y_granularity = 0;
/* PSR2 HW only send full lines so we only need to validate the width */
if (crtc_hdisplay % intel_dp->psr.su_w_granularity)
return false;
if (crtc_vdisplay % intel_dp->psr.su_y_granularity)
return false;
/* HW tracking is only aligned to 4 lines */
if (!crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch)
return intel_dp->psr.su_y_granularity == 4;
/*
* adl_p and mtl platforms have 1 line granularity.
* For other platforms with SW tracking we can adjust the y coordinates
* to match sink requirement if multiple of 4.
*/
if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14)
y_granularity = intel_dp->psr.su_y_granularity;
else if (intel_dp->psr.su_y_granularity <= 2)
y_granularity = 4;
else if ((intel_dp->psr.su_y_granularity % 4) == 0)
y_granularity = intel_dp->psr.su_y_granularity;
if (y_granularity == 0 || crtc_vdisplay % y_granularity)
return false;
if (crtc_state->dsc.compression_enable &&
vdsc_cfg->slice_height % y_granularity)
return false;
crtc_state->su_y_granularity = y_granularity;
return true;
}
static bool _compute_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline_indication(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->uapi.adjusted_mode;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
u32 hblank_total, hblank_ns, req_ns;
hblank_total = adjusted_mode->crtc_hblank_end - adjusted_mode->crtc_hblank_start;
hblank_ns = div_u64(1000000ULL * hblank_total, adjusted_mode->crtc_clock);
/* From spec: ((60 / number of lanes) + 11) * 1000 / symbol clock frequency MHz */
req_ns = ((60 / crtc_state->lane_count) + 11) * 1000 / (crtc_state->port_clock / 1000);
if ((hblank_ns - req_ns) > 100)
return true;
/* Not supported <13 / Wa_22012279113:adl-p */
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 14 || intel_dp->edp_dpcd[0] < DP_EDP_14b)
return false;
crtc_state->req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline = true;
return true;
}
static bool _compute_psr2_wake_times(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
int io_wake_lines, io_wake_time, fast_wake_lines, fast_wake_time;
u8 max_wake_lines;
if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12) {
io_wake_time = 42;
/*
* According to Bspec it's 42us, but based on testing
* it is not enough -> use 45 us.
*/
fast_wake_time = 45;
max_wake_lines = 12;
} else {
io_wake_time = 50;
fast_wake_time = 32;
max_wake_lines = 8;
}
io_wake_lines = intel_usecs_to_scanlines(
&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode, io_wake_time);
fast_wake_lines = intel_usecs_to_scanlines(
&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode, fast_wake_time);
if (io_wake_lines > max_wake_lines ||
fast_wake_lines > max_wake_lines)
return false;
if (i915->display.params.psr_safest_params)
io_wake_lines = fast_wake_lines = max_wake_lines;
/* According to Bspec lower limit should be set as 7 lines. */
intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines = max(io_wake_lines, 7);
intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines = max(fast_wake_lines, 7);
return true;
}
static int intel_psr_entry_setup_frames(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
int psr_setup_time = drm_dp_psr_setup_time(intel_dp->psr_dpcd);
int entry_setup_frames = 0;
if (psr_setup_time < 0) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
"PSR condition failed: Invalid PSR setup time (0x%02x)\n",
intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1]);
return -ETIME;
}
if (intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode, psr_setup_time) >
adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal - adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay - 1) {
if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20) {
/* setup entry frames can be up to 3 frames */
entry_setup_frames = 1;
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
"PSR setup entry frames %d\n",
entry_setup_frames);
} else {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
"PSR condition failed: PSR setup time (%d us) too long\n",
psr_setup_time);
return -ETIME;
}
}
return entry_setup_frames;
}
static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
int crtc_hdisplay = crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay;
int crtc_vdisplay = crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay;
int psr_max_h = 0, psr_max_v = 0, max_bpp = 0;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (!intel_dp->psr.sink_psr2_support)
return false;
/* JSL and EHL only supports eDP 1.3 */
if (IS_JASPERLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "PSR2 not supported by phy\n");
return false;
}
/* Wa_16011181250 */
if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_ALDERLAKE_S(dev_priv) ||
IS_DG2(dev_priv)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "PSR2 is defeatured for this platform\n");
return false;
}
if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) && IS_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "PSR2 not completely functional in this stepping\n");
return false;
}
if (!transcoder_has_psr2(dev_priv, crtc_state->cpu_transcoder)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 not supported in transcoder %s\n",
transcoder_name(crtc_state->cpu_transcoder));
return false;
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (!psr2_global_enabled(intel_dp)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "PSR2 disabled by flag\n");
return false;
}
/*
* DSC and PSR2 cannot be enabled simultaneously. If a requested
* resolution requires DSC to be enabled, priority is given to DSC
* over PSR2.
*/
if (crtc_state->dsc.compression_enable &&
(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 14 && !IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 cannot be enabled since DSC is enabled\n");
return false;
}
if (crtc_state->crc_enabled) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 not enabled because it would inhibit pipe CRC calculation\n");
return false;
}
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
psr_max_h = 5120;
psr_max_v = 3200;
max_bpp = 30;
drm/i915/display: Simplify GLK display version tests GLK has always been a bit of a special case since it reports INTEL_GEN() as 9, but has version 10 display IP. Now we can properly represent the display version as 10 and simplify the display generation tests throughout the display code. Aside from manually adding the version to the glk_info structure, the rest of this patch is generated with a Coccinelle semantic patch. Note that we also need to switch any code that matches gen10 today but *not* GLK to be CNL-specific: @@ expression dev_priv; @@ - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 9 + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ ( - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 && E + (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) && E | - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) | - IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 10, E) + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 11, E) || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) ) @@ expression dev_priv, E, E2; @@ ( - (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - E || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) + E || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || E || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) + E || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - E || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || E2 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) + E || E2 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - (IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) | - (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) ) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ - (IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 9) && !IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 9) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ ( - !(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 10 | - (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 ) @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - E || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10) + E || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - (IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 11, E) || IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 10)) + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, 10, E) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ ( - DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) | - IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) + IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 ) @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - !(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= E) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < E v2: - Convert gen10 conditions that don't include GLK into CNL conditions. (Ville) v3: - Rework coccinelle rules so that "ver>=10" turns into "ver>=11||is_cnl." (Ville) v3.1: - Manually re-add the ".display.version = 10" to glk_info after regenerating patch via Coccinelle. v4: - Also apply cocci rules to intel_pm.c and i915_irq.c! (CI) Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210322233840.4056851-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2021-03-22 23:38:40 +00:00
} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10) {
psr_max_h = 4096;
psr_max_v = 2304;
max_bpp = 24;
drm/i915/display: rename display version macros While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went back on what we did for display: 1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly like is done for >, >=, <=? 2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we could actually repurpose it for a range check With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant. So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER() users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes, this was done by the following semantic patch: @@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@ - !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1 @@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@ - IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1 @@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@ - IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until) Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> [Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.] Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2021-04-13 05:09:53 +00:00
} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9) {
psr_max_h = 3640;
psr_max_v = 2304;
max_bpp = 24;
}
if (crtc_state->pipe_bpp > max_bpp) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 not enabled, pipe bpp %d > max supported %d\n",
crtc_state->pipe_bpp, max_bpp);
return false;
}
/* Wa_16011303918:adl-p */
if (crtc_state->vrr.enable &&
IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) && IS_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 not enabled, not compatible with HW stepping + VRR\n");
return false;
}
if (!_compute_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline_indication(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 not enabled, PSR2 SDP indication do not fit in hblank\n");
return false;
}
if (!_compute_psr2_wake_times(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 not enabled, Unable to use long enough wake times\n");
return false;
}
/* Vblank >= PSR2_CTL Block Count Number maximum line count */
if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_end -
crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start <
psr2_block_count_lines(intel_dp)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 not enabled, too short vblank time\n");
return false;
}
if (HAS_PSR2_SEL_FETCH(dev_priv)) {
if (!intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid(intel_dp, crtc_state) &&
!HAS_PSR_HW_TRACKING(dev_priv)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 not enabled, selective fetch not valid and no HW tracking available\n");
return false;
}
}
if (!psr2_granularity_check(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "PSR2 not enabled, SU granularity not compatible\n");
goto unsupported;
}
if (!crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch &&
(crtc_hdisplay > psr_max_h || crtc_vdisplay > psr_max_v)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR2 not enabled, resolution %dx%d > max supported %dx%d\n",
crtc_hdisplay, crtc_vdisplay,
psr_max_h, psr_max_v);
goto unsupported;
}
tgl_dc3co_exitline_compute_config(intel_dp, crtc_state);
return true;
unsupported:
crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch = false;
return false;
}
drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0 which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header is different. v1: Initial version. v2: - Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() condition check. [Jouni] - Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni] - Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni] - Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni] v3: - Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni] - Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni] - Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni] - Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni] - Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni] v4: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni] - Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni] v5: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni] - Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani] - Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani] v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni] v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun] Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
2023-11-08 07:23:00 +00:00
static bool _psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0 which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header is different. v1: Initial version. v2: - Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() condition check. [Jouni] - Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni] - Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni] - Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni] v3: - Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni] - Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni] - Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni] - Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni] - Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni] v4: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni] - Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni] v5: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni] - Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani] - Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani] v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni] v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun] Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
2023-11-08 07:23:00 +00:00
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
int entry_setup_frames;
/*
* Current PSR panels don't work reliably with VRR enabled
* So if VRR is enabled, do not enable PSR.
*/
if (crtc_state->vrr.enable)
drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0 which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header is different. v1: Initial version. v2: - Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() condition check. [Jouni] - Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni] - Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni] - Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni] v3: - Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni] - Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni] - Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni] - Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni] - Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni] v4: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni] - Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni] v5: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni] - Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani] - Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani] v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni] v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun] Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
2023-11-08 07:23:00 +00:00
return false;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (!CAN_PSR(intel_dp))
drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0 which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header is different. v1: Initial version. v2: - Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() condition check. [Jouni] - Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni] - Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni] - Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni] v3: - Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni] - Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni] - Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni] - Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni] - Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni] v4: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni] - Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni] v5: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni] - Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani] - Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani] v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni] v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun] Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
2023-11-08 07:23:00 +00:00
return false;
entry_setup_frames = intel_psr_entry_setup_frames(intel_dp, adjusted_mode);
if (entry_setup_frames >= 0) {
intel_dp->psr.entry_setup_frames = entry_setup_frames;
} else {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR condition failed: PSR setup timing not met\n");
return false;
}
return true;
}
void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (!psr_global_enabled(intel_dp)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "PSR disabled by flag\n");
return;
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.sink_not_reliable) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR sink implementation is not reliable\n");
return;
}
if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR condition failed: Interlaced mode enabled\n");
return;
}
/*
* FIXME figure out what is wrong with PSR+bigjoiner and
* fix it. Presumably something related to the fact that
* PSR is a transcoder level feature.
*/
if (crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR disabled due to bigjoiner\n");
return;
}
drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0 which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header is different. v1: Initial version. v2: - Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() condition check. [Jouni] - Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni] - Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni] - Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni] v3: - Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni] - Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni] - Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni] - Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni] - Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni] v4: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni] - Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni] v5: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni] - Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani] - Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani] v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni] v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun] Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
2023-11-08 07:23:00 +00:00
if (CAN_PANEL_REPLAY(intel_dp))
crtc_state->has_panel_replay = true;
else
crtc_state->has_psr = _psr_compute_config(intel_dp, crtc_state);
if (!(crtc_state->has_panel_replay || crtc_state->has_psr))
return;
crtc_state->has_psr2 = intel_psr2_config_valid(intel_dp, crtc_state);
crtc_state->infoframes.enable |= intel_hdmi_infoframe_enable(DP_SDP_VSC);
intel_dp_compute_psr_vsc_sdp(intel_dp, crtc_state, conn_state,
&crtc_state->psr_vsc);
}
void intel_psr_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(encoder);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = pipe_config->cpu_transcoder;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
u32 val;
if (!dig_port)
return;
intel_dp = &dig_port->dp;
if (!(CAN_PSR(intel_dp) || CAN_PANEL_REPLAY(intel_dp)))
return;
mutex_lock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
if (!intel_dp->psr.enabled)
goto unlock;
if (intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled) {
pipe_config->has_panel_replay = true;
} else {
/*
* Not possible to read EDP_PSR/PSR2_CTL registers as it is
* enabled/disabled because of frontbuffer tracking and others.
*/
pipe_config->has_psr = true;
}
pipe_config->has_psr2 = intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled;
pipe_config->infoframes.enable |= intel_hdmi_infoframe_enable(DP_SDP_VSC);
if (!intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled)
goto unlock;
if (HAS_PSR2_SEL_FETCH(dev_priv)) {
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL(cpu_transcoder));
if (val & PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE)
pipe_config->enable_psr2_sel_fetch = true;
}
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, TRANS_EXITLINE(cpu_transcoder));
pipe_config->dc3co_exitline = REG_FIELD_GET(EXITLINE_MASK, val);
}
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
}
static void intel_psr_activate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
transcoder_has_psr2(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder) &&
intel_de_read(dev_priv, EDP_PSR2_CTL(cpu_transcoder)) & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
drm/i915: Do not read PSR2 register in transcoders without PSR2 This fix unclaimed access warnings: [ 245.525788] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 245.525884] Unclaimed read from register 0x62900 [ 245.526154] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1234 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1100 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x40/0x50 [i915] [ 245.526160] Modules linked in: i915 x86_pkg_temp_thermal ax88179_178a coretemp usbnet crct10dif_pclmul mii crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel e1000e [last unloaded: i915] [ 245.526191] CPU: 0 PID: 1234 Comm: kms_fullmodeset Not tainted 5.1.0-rc6+ #915 [ 245.526197] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake Client Platform/TigerLake U DDR4 SODIMM RVP, BIOS TGLSFWR1.D00.2081.A10.1904182155 04/18/2019 [ 245.526273] RIP: 0010:__unclaimed_reg_debug+0x40/0x50 [i915] [ 245.526281] Code: 74 05 5b 5d 41 5c c3 45 84 e4 48 c7 c0 76 97 21 a0 48 c7 c6 6c 97 21 a0 89 ea 48 0f 44 f0 48 c7 c7 7f 97 21 a0 e8 4f 1e fe e0 <0f> 0b 83 2d 6f d9 1c 00 01 5b 5d 41 5c c3 66 90 41 57 41 56 41 55 [ 245.526288] RSP: 0018:ffffc900006bf7d8 EFLAGS: 00010086 [ 245.526297] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 245.526304] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 245.526310] RBP: 0000000000061900 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 245.526317] R10: 0000000000000006 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 245.526324] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8882914f0d58 R15: 0000000000000206 [ 245.526332] FS: 00007fed2a3c39c0(0000) GS:ffff8882a8600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 245.526340] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 245.526347] CR2: 00007fed28dff000 CR3: 00000002a086c006 CR4: 0000000000760ef0 [ 245.526354] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 245.526361] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 245.526367] PKRU: 55555554 [ 245.526373] Call Trace: [ 245.526454] gen11_fwtable_read32+0x219/0x250 [i915] [ 245.526576] intel_psr_activate+0x57/0x400 [i915] [ 245.526697] intel_psr_enable_locked+0x367/0x4b0 [i915] [ 245.526828] intel_psr_enable+0xa4/0xd0 [i915] [ 245.526946] intel_enable_ddi+0x127/0x2f0 [i915] [ 245.527075] intel_encoders_enable.isra.79+0x62/0x90 [i915] [ 245.527202] haswell_crtc_enable+0x2a2/0x850 [i915] [ 245.527337] intel_update_crtc+0x51/0x360 [i915] [ 245.527466] skl_update_crtcs+0x26c/0x300 [i915] [ 245.527603] intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x3e5/0x13c0 [i915] [ 245.527757] intel_atomic_commit+0x24d/0x2d0 [i915] [ 245.527782] drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x7b/0x90 [ 245.527799] drm_mode_setcrtc+0x1b4/0x6f0 [ 245.527856] ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [ 245.527867] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xad/0xf0 [ 245.527886] drm_ioctl+0x2f4/0x3b0 [ 245.527902] ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x180/0x180 [ 245.527935] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80 [ 245.527956] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x6d0 [ 245.527970] ? __task_pid_nr_ns+0xb6/0x200 [ 245.527991] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x70 [ 245.528009] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20 [ 245.528020] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x180 [ 245.528034] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 245.528042] RIP: 0033:0x7fed2cc7c3c7 [ 245.528050] Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 c9 3a 0d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 99 3a 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 245.528057] RSP: 002b:00007ffe36944378 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 245.528067] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe369443b0 RCX: 00007fed2cc7c3c7 [ 245.528074] RDX: 00007ffe369443b0 RSI: 00000000c06864a2 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 245.528081] RBP: 00007ffe369443b0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000564c0173ae98 [ 245.528088] R10: 0000564c0173aeb8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c06864a2 [ 245.528095] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 245.528128] irq event stamp: 140866 [ 245.528138] hardirqs last enabled at (140865): [<ffffffff819a63dc>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60 [ 245.528148] hardirqs last disabled at (140866): [<ffffffff819a624d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd/0x50 [ 245.528158] softirqs last enabled at (140860): [<ffffffff81c0038c>] __do_softirq+0x38c/0x499 [ 245.528170] softirqs last disabled at (140853): [<ffffffff810b4a09>] irq_exit+0xa9/0xc0 [ 245.528247] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1234 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1100 __unclaimed_reg_debug+0x40/0x50 [i915] [ 245.528254] ---[ end trace 366069676e98a410 ]--- Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-7-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2019-08-17 09:38:33 +00:00
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
intel_de_read(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder)) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, intel_dp->psr.active);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
lockdep_assert_held(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
/* psr1, psr2 and panel-replay are mutually exclusive.*/
if (intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled)
dg2_activate_panel_replay(intel_dp);
else if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled)
hsw_activate_psr2(intel_dp);
else
hsw_activate_psr1(intel_dp);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.active = true;
}
static u32 wa_16013835468_bit_get(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
switch (intel_dp->psr.pipe) {
case PIPE_A:
return LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_A;
case PIPE_B:
return LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_B;
case PIPE_C:
return LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_C;
case PIPE_D:
return LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_D;
default:
MISSING_CASE(intel_dp->psr.pipe);
return 0;
}
}
/*
* Wa_16013835468
* Wa_14015648006
*/
static void wm_optimization_wa(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
bool set_wa_bit = false;
/* Wa_14015648006 */
if (IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 11, 14))
set_wa_bit |= crtc_state->wm_level_disabled;
/* Wa_16013835468 */
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 12)
set_wa_bit |= crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start !=
crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay;
if (set_wa_bit)
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
0, wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp));
else
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
}
static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
u32 mask;
/*
* Only HSW and BDW have PSR AUX registers that need to be setup.
* SKL+ use hardcoded values PSR AUX transactions
*/
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 9)
hsw_psr_setup_aux(intel_dp);
/*
* Per Spec: Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking MEMUP and HPD also
* mask LPSP to avoid dependency on other drivers that might block
* runtime_pm besides preventing other hw tracking issues now we
* can rely on frontbuffer tracking.
*/
mask = EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
drm/i915/psr: Only allow PSR in LPSP mode on HSW non-ULT On HSW non-ULT (or at least on Dell Latitude E6540) external displays start to flicker when we enable PSR on the eDP. We observe a much higher SR and PC6 residency than should be possible with an external display, and indeen much higher than what we observe with eDP disabled and only the external display enabled. Looks like the hardware is somehow ignoring the fact that the external display is active during PSR. I wasn't able to redproduce this on my HSW ULT machine, or BDW. So either there's something specific about this particular laptop (eg. some unknown firmware thing) or the issue is limited to just non-ULT HSW systems. All known registers that could affect this look perfectly reasonable on the affected machine. As a workaround let's unmask the LPSP event to prevent PSR entry except while in LPSP mode (only pipe A + eDP active). This will prevent PSR entry entirely when multiple pipes are active. The one slight downside is that we now also prevent PSR entry when driving eDP with pipe B or C, but I think that's a reasonable tradeoff to avoid having to implement a more complex workaround. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 783d8b80871f ("drm/i915/psr: Re-enable PSR1 on hsw/bdw") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10092 Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240118212131.31868-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 94501c3ca6400e463ff6cc0c9cf4a2feb6a9205d) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2024-01-18 21:21:31 +00:00
EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD;
/*
* For some unknown reason on HSW non-ULT (or at least on
* Dell Latitude E6540) external displays start to flicker
* when PSR is enabled on the eDP. SR/PC6 residency is much
* higher than should be possible with an external display.
* As a workaround leave LPSP unmasked to prevent PSR entry
* when external displays are active.
*/
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8 || IS_HASWELL_ULT(dev_priv))
mask |= EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP;
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 20)
mask |= EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP;
/*
* No separate pipe reg write mask on hsw/bdw, so have to unmask all
* registers in order to keep the CURSURFLIVE tricks working :(
*/
if (IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 9, 10))
mask |= EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE;
/* allow PSR with sprite enabled */
if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
mask |= EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_SPRITE_ENABLE;
intel_de_write(dev_priv, psr_debug_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder), mask);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
psr_irq_control(intel_dp);
/*
* TODO: if future platforms supports DC3CO in more than one
* transcoder, EXITLINE will need to be unset when disabling PSR
*/
if (intel_dp->psr.dc3co_exitline)
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, TRANS_EXITLINE(cpu_transcoder), EXITLINE_MASK,
intel_dp->psr.dc3co_exitline << EXITLINE_SHIFT | EXITLINE_ENABLE);
if (HAS_PSR_HW_TRACKING(dev_priv) && HAS_PSR2_SEL_FETCH(dev_priv))
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CHICKEN_PAR1_1, IGNORE_PSR2_HW_TRACKING,
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled ?
IGNORE_PSR2_HW_TRACKING : 0);
/*
* Wa_16013835468
* Wa_14015648006
*/
wm_optimization_wa(intel_dp, crtc_state);
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9)
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), 0,
PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER |
PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT);
/*
* Wa_16014451276:adlp,mtl[a0,b0]
* All supported adlp panels have 1-based X granularity, this may
* cause issues if non-supported panels are used.
*/
if (IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(dev_priv, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, hsw_chicken_trans_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder),
0, ADLP_1_BASED_X_GRANULARITY);
/* Wa_16012604467:adlp,mtl[a0,b0] */
if (IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(dev_priv, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv,
MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), 0,
MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS_DMASC_GATING_DIS);
else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CLKGATE_DIS_MISC, 0,
CLKGATE_DIS_MISC_DMASC_GATING_DIS);
}
}
static bool psr_interrupt_error_check(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
drm/i915/psr: Make PSR registers relative to transcoders PSR registers are a mess, some have the full address while others just have the additional offset from psr_mmio_base. For BDW+ psr_mmio_base is nothing more than TRANSCODER_EDP_OFFSET + 0x800 and using it makes more difficult for people with an PSR register address or PSR register name from from BSpec as i915 also don't match the BSpec names. For HSW psr_mmio_base is _DDI_BUF_CTL_A + 0x800 and PSR registers are only available in DDIA. Other reason to make relative to transcoder is that since BDW every transcoder have PSR registers, so in theory it should be possible to have PSR enabled in a non-eDP transcoder. So for BDW+ we can use _TRANS2() to get the register offset of any PSR register in any transcoder while for HSW we have _HSW_PSR_ADJ that will calculate the register offset for the single PSR instance, noting that we are already guarded about trying to enable PSR in other port than DDIA on HSW by the 'if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A)' in intel_psr_compute_config(), this check should only be valid for HSW and will be changed in future. PSR2 registers and PSR_EVENT was added after Haswell so that is why _PSR_ADJ() is not used in some macros. The only registers that can not be relative to transcoder are PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR that are not relative to anything, so keeping it hardcoded. That changed for TGL but it will be handled in another patch. Also removing BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE from GVT because it is not used as it is the only PSR register that GVT have. v5: - Macros changed to be more explicit about HSW (Dhinakaran) - Squashed with the patch that added the tran parameter to the macros (Dhinakaran) v6: - Checking for interruption errors after module reload in the transcoder that will be used (Dhinakaran) - Using lowercase to the registers offsets v7: - Removing IS_HASWELL() from registers macros(Jani) Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-08-20 22:33:23 +00:00
u32 val;
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
drm/i915/psr: Make PSR registers relative to transcoders PSR registers are a mess, some have the full address while others just have the additional offset from psr_mmio_base. For BDW+ psr_mmio_base is nothing more than TRANSCODER_EDP_OFFSET + 0x800 and using it makes more difficult for people with an PSR register address or PSR register name from from BSpec as i915 also don't match the BSpec names. For HSW psr_mmio_base is _DDI_BUF_CTL_A + 0x800 and PSR registers are only available in DDIA. Other reason to make relative to transcoder is that since BDW every transcoder have PSR registers, so in theory it should be possible to have PSR enabled in a non-eDP transcoder. So for BDW+ we can use _TRANS2() to get the register offset of any PSR register in any transcoder while for HSW we have _HSW_PSR_ADJ that will calculate the register offset for the single PSR instance, noting that we are already guarded about trying to enable PSR in other port than DDIA on HSW by the 'if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A)' in intel_psr_compute_config(), this check should only be valid for HSW and will be changed in future. PSR2 registers and PSR_EVENT was added after Haswell so that is why _PSR_ADJ() is not used in some macros. The only registers that can not be relative to transcoder are PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR that are not relative to anything, so keeping it hardcoded. That changed for TGL but it will be handled in another patch. Also removing BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE from GVT because it is not used as it is the only PSR register that GVT have. v5: - Macros changed to be more explicit about HSW (Dhinakaran) - Squashed with the patch that added the tran parameter to the macros (Dhinakaran) v6: - Checking for interruption errors after module reload in the transcoder that will be used (Dhinakaran) - Using lowercase to the registers offsets v7: - Removing IS_HASWELL() from registers macros(Jani) Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-08-20 22:33:23 +00:00
/*
* If a PSR error happened and the driver is reloaded, the EDP_PSR_IIR
* will still keep the error set even after the reset done in the
* irq_preinstall and irq_uninstall hooks.
* And enabling in this situation cause the screen to freeze in the
* first time that PSR HW tries to activate so lets keep PSR disabled
* to avoid any rendering problems.
*/
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, psr_iir_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder));
val &= psr_irq_psr_error_bit_get(intel_dp);
drm/i915/psr: Make PSR registers relative to transcoders PSR registers are a mess, some have the full address while others just have the additional offset from psr_mmio_base. For BDW+ psr_mmio_base is nothing more than TRANSCODER_EDP_OFFSET + 0x800 and using it makes more difficult for people with an PSR register address or PSR register name from from BSpec as i915 also don't match the BSpec names. For HSW psr_mmio_base is _DDI_BUF_CTL_A + 0x800 and PSR registers are only available in DDIA. Other reason to make relative to transcoder is that since BDW every transcoder have PSR registers, so in theory it should be possible to have PSR enabled in a non-eDP transcoder. So for BDW+ we can use _TRANS2() to get the register offset of any PSR register in any transcoder while for HSW we have _HSW_PSR_ADJ that will calculate the register offset for the single PSR instance, noting that we are already guarded about trying to enable PSR in other port than DDIA on HSW by the 'if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A)' in intel_psr_compute_config(), this check should only be valid for HSW and will be changed in future. PSR2 registers and PSR_EVENT was added after Haswell so that is why _PSR_ADJ() is not used in some macros. The only registers that can not be relative to transcoder are PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR that are not relative to anything, so keeping it hardcoded. That changed for TGL but it will be handled in another patch. Also removing BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE from GVT because it is not used as it is the only PSR register that GVT have. v5: - Macros changed to be more explicit about HSW (Dhinakaran) - Squashed with the patch that added the tran parameter to the macros (Dhinakaran) v6: - Checking for interruption errors after module reload in the transcoder that will be used (Dhinakaran) - Using lowercase to the registers offsets v7: - Removing IS_HASWELL() from registers macros(Jani) Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-08-20 22:33:23 +00:00
if (val) {
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.sink_not_reliable = true;
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR interruption error set, not enabling PSR\n");
return false;
drm/i915/psr: Make PSR registers relative to transcoders PSR registers are a mess, some have the full address while others just have the additional offset from psr_mmio_base. For BDW+ psr_mmio_base is nothing more than TRANSCODER_EDP_OFFSET + 0x800 and using it makes more difficult for people with an PSR register address or PSR register name from from BSpec as i915 also don't match the BSpec names. For HSW psr_mmio_base is _DDI_BUF_CTL_A + 0x800 and PSR registers are only available in DDIA. Other reason to make relative to transcoder is that since BDW every transcoder have PSR registers, so in theory it should be possible to have PSR enabled in a non-eDP transcoder. So for BDW+ we can use _TRANS2() to get the register offset of any PSR register in any transcoder while for HSW we have _HSW_PSR_ADJ that will calculate the register offset for the single PSR instance, noting that we are already guarded about trying to enable PSR in other port than DDIA on HSW by the 'if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A)' in intel_psr_compute_config(), this check should only be valid for HSW and will be changed in future. PSR2 registers and PSR_EVENT was added after Haswell so that is why _PSR_ADJ() is not used in some macros. The only registers that can not be relative to transcoder are PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR that are not relative to anything, so keeping it hardcoded. That changed for TGL but it will be handled in another patch. Also removing BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE from GVT because it is not used as it is the only PSR register that GVT have. v5: - Macros changed to be more explicit about HSW (Dhinakaran) - Squashed with the patch that added the tran parameter to the macros (Dhinakaran) v6: - Checking for interruption errors after module reload in the transcoder that will be used (Dhinakaran) - Using lowercase to the registers offsets v7: - Removing IS_HASWELL() from registers macros(Jani) Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-08-20 22:33:23 +00:00
}
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
return true;
}
static void intel_psr_enable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, dig_port->base.port);
struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dig_port->base;
u32 val;
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, intel_dp->psr.enabled);
intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled = crtc_state->has_psr2;
intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled = crtc_state->has_panel_replay;
intel_dp->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits = 0;
intel_dp->psr.pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc)->pipe;
intel_dp->psr.transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
/* DC5/DC6 requires at least 6 idle frames */
val = usecs_to_jiffies(intel_get_frame_time_us(crtc_state) * 6);
intel_dp->psr.dc3co_exit_delay = val;
intel_dp->psr.dc3co_exitline = crtc_state->dc3co_exitline;
intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled = crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch;
intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled = false;
intel_dp->psr.req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline =
crtc_state->req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
if (!psr_interrupt_error_check(intel_dp))
return;
if (intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled)
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Enabling Panel Replay\n");
else
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Enabling PSR%s\n",
intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled ? "2" : "1");
intel_write_dp_vsc_sdp(encoder, crtc_state, &crtc_state->psr_vsc);
intel_snps_phy_update_psr_power_state(dev_priv, phy, true);
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
intel_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
intel_psr_enable_source(intel_dp, crtc_state);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.enabled = true;
drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume function This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr source when intel_psr is already enabled. - intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state. - intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable(). - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle and WA for SelectiveFetch. v3: Address Jose's review comment. - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(). - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked() - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR. v4: Address Jose's review comment. - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause() for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable". Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-06-08 08:54:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.paused = false;
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
static void intel_psr_exit(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
u32 val;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (!intel_dp->psr.active) {
if (transcoder_has_psr2(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder)) {
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, EDP_PSR2_CTL(cpu_transcoder));
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, val & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
drm/i915/psr: Make PSR registers relative to transcoders PSR registers are a mess, some have the full address while others just have the additional offset from psr_mmio_base. For BDW+ psr_mmio_base is nothing more than TRANSCODER_EDP_OFFSET + 0x800 and using it makes more difficult for people with an PSR register address or PSR register name from from BSpec as i915 also don't match the BSpec names. For HSW psr_mmio_base is _DDI_BUF_CTL_A + 0x800 and PSR registers are only available in DDIA. Other reason to make relative to transcoder is that since BDW every transcoder have PSR registers, so in theory it should be possible to have PSR enabled in a non-eDP transcoder. So for BDW+ we can use _TRANS2() to get the register offset of any PSR register in any transcoder while for HSW we have _HSW_PSR_ADJ that will calculate the register offset for the single PSR instance, noting that we are already guarded about trying to enable PSR in other port than DDIA on HSW by the 'if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A)' in intel_psr_compute_config(), this check should only be valid for HSW and will be changed in future. PSR2 registers and PSR_EVENT was added after Haswell so that is why _PSR_ADJ() is not used in some macros. The only registers that can not be relative to transcoder are PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR that are not relative to anything, so keeping it hardcoded. That changed for TGL but it will be handled in another patch. Also removing BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE from GVT because it is not used as it is the only PSR register that GVT have. v5: - Macros changed to be more explicit about HSW (Dhinakaran) - Squashed with the patch that added the tran parameter to the macros (Dhinakaran) v6: - Checking for interruption errors after module reload in the transcoder that will be used (Dhinakaran) - Using lowercase to the registers offsets v7: - Removing IS_HASWELL() from registers macros(Jani) Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-08-20 22:33:23 +00:00
}
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder));
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, val & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
drm/i915/psr: Make PSR registers relative to transcoders PSR registers are a mess, some have the full address while others just have the additional offset from psr_mmio_base. For BDW+ psr_mmio_base is nothing more than TRANSCODER_EDP_OFFSET + 0x800 and using it makes more difficult for people with an PSR register address or PSR register name from from BSpec as i915 also don't match the BSpec names. For HSW psr_mmio_base is _DDI_BUF_CTL_A + 0x800 and PSR registers are only available in DDIA. Other reason to make relative to transcoder is that since BDW every transcoder have PSR registers, so in theory it should be possible to have PSR enabled in a non-eDP transcoder. So for BDW+ we can use _TRANS2() to get the register offset of any PSR register in any transcoder while for HSW we have _HSW_PSR_ADJ that will calculate the register offset for the single PSR instance, noting that we are already guarded about trying to enable PSR in other port than DDIA on HSW by the 'if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A)' in intel_psr_compute_config(), this check should only be valid for HSW and will be changed in future. PSR2 registers and PSR_EVENT was added after Haswell so that is why _PSR_ADJ() is not used in some macros. The only registers that can not be relative to transcoder are PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR that are not relative to anything, so keeping it hardcoded. That changed for TGL but it will be handled in another patch. Also removing BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE from GVT because it is not used as it is the only PSR register that GVT have. v5: - Macros changed to be more explicit about HSW (Dhinakaran) - Squashed with the patch that added the tran parameter to the macros (Dhinakaran) v6: - Checking for interruption errors after module reload in the transcoder that will be used (Dhinakaran) - Using lowercase to the registers offsets v7: - Removing IS_HASWELL() from registers macros(Jani) Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-08-20 22:33:23 +00:00
return;
}
if (intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled) {
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, TRANS_DP2_CTL(intel_dp->psr.transcoder),
TRANS_DP2_PANEL_REPLAY_ENABLE, 0);
} else if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
tgl_disallow_dc3co_on_psr2_exit(intel_dp);
val = intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, EDP_PSR2_CTL(cpu_transcoder),
EDP_PSR2_ENABLE, 0);
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !(val & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE));
} else {
val = intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder),
EDP_PSR_ENABLE, 0);
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !(val & EDP_PSR_ENABLE));
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.active = false;
}
drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume function This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr source when intel_psr is already enabled. - intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state. - intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable(). - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle and WA for SelectiveFetch. v3: Address Jose's review comment. - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(). - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked() - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR. v4: Address Jose's review comment. - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause() for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable". Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-06-08 08:54:14 +00:00
static void intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
i915_reg_t psr_status;
u32 psr_status_mask;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
psr_status = EDP_PSR2_STATUS(cpu_transcoder);
psr_status_mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
} else {
psr_status = psr_status_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder);
psr_status_mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
}
/* Wait till PSR is idle */
if (intel_de_wait_for_clear(dev_priv, psr_status,
psr_status_mask, 2000))
drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "Timed out waiting PSR idle state\n");
drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume function This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr source when intel_psr is already enabled. - intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state. - intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable(). - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle and WA for SelectiveFetch. v3: Address Jose's review comment. - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(). - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked() - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR. v4: Address Jose's review comment. - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause() for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable". Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-06-08 08:54:14 +00:00
}
static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv,
dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.port);
drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume function This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr source when intel_psr is already enabled. - intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state. - intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable(). - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle and WA for SelectiveFetch. v3: Address Jose's review comment. - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(). - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked() - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR. v4: Address Jose's review comment. - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause() for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable". Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-06-08 08:54:14 +00:00
lockdep_assert_held(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
if (!intel_dp->psr.enabled)
return;
if (intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled)
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Disabling Panel Replay\n");
else
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Disabling PSR%s\n",
intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled ? "2" : "1");
drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume function This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr source when intel_psr is already enabled. - intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state. - intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable(). - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle and WA for SelectiveFetch. v3: Address Jose's review comment. - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(). - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked() - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR. v4: Address Jose's review comment. - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause() for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable". Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-06-08 08:54:14 +00:00
intel_psr_exit(intel_dp);
intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(intel_dp);
/*
* Wa_16013835468
* Wa_14015648006
*/
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
/* Wa_16012604467:adlp,mtl[a0,b0] */
if (IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(dev_priv, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv,
MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS(cpu_transcoder),
MTL_CLKGATE_DIS_TRANS_DMASC_GATING_DIS, 0);
else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CLKGATE_DIS_MISC,
CLKGATE_DIS_MISC_DMASC_GATING_DIS, 0);
}
intel_snps_phy_update_psr_power_state(dev_priv, phy, false);
/* Disable PSR on Sink */
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, 0);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled)
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_RECEIVER_ALPM_CONFIG, 0);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.enabled = false;
intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled = false;
intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled = false;
intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled = false;
intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled = false;
}
/**
* intel_psr_disable - Disable PSR
* @intel_dp: Intel DP
* @old_crtc_state: old CRTC state
*
* This function needs to be called before disabling pipe.
*/
void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
if (!old_crtc_state->has_psr)
return;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !CAN_PSR(intel_dp)))
return;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_lock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
cancel_work_sync(&intel_dp->psr.work);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&intel_dp->psr.dc3co_work);
}
drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume function This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr source when intel_psr is already enabled. - intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state. - intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable(). - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle and WA for SelectiveFetch. v3: Address Jose's review comment. - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(). - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked() - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR. v4: Address Jose's review comment. - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause() for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable". Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-06-08 08:54:14 +00:00
/**
* intel_psr_pause - Pause PSR
* @intel_dp: Intel DP
*
* This function need to be called after enabling psr.
*/
void intel_psr_pause(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume function This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr source when intel_psr is already enabled. - intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state. - intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable(). - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle and WA for SelectiveFetch. v3: Address Jose's review comment. - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(). - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked() - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR. v4: Address Jose's review comment. - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause() for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable". Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-06-08 08:54:14 +00:00
struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
if (!CAN_PSR(intel_dp))
return;
mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
if (!psr->enabled) {
mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
return;
}
/* If we ever hit this, we will need to add refcount to pause/resume */
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, psr->paused);
drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume function This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr source when intel_psr is already enabled. - intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state. - intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable(). - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle and WA for SelectiveFetch. v3: Address Jose's review comment. - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(). - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked() - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR. v4: Address Jose's review comment. - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause() for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable". Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-06-08 08:54:14 +00:00
intel_psr_exit(intel_dp);
intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(intel_dp);
psr->paused = true;
mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
cancel_work_sync(&psr->work);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&psr->dc3co_work);
}
/**
* intel_psr_resume - Resume PSR
* @intel_dp: Intel DP
*
* This function need to be called after pausing psr.
*/
void intel_psr_resume(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
if (!CAN_PSR(intel_dp))
return;
mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
if (!psr->paused)
goto unlock;
psr->paused = false;
intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
}
static u32 man_trk_ctl_enable_bit_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
return IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14 ? 0 :
PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE;
}
static u32 man_trk_ctl_single_full_frame_bit_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
return IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14 ?
ADLP_PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SF_SINGLE_FULL_FRAME :
PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SF_SINGLE_FULL_FRAME;
}
static u32 man_trk_ctl_partial_frame_bit_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
return IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14 ?
ADLP_PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SF_PARTIAL_FRAME_UPDATE :
PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SF_PARTIAL_FRAME_UPDATE;
}
static u32 man_trk_ctl_continuos_full_frame(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
return IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14 ?
ADLP_PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SF_CONTINUOS_FULL_FRAME :
PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SF_CONTINUOS_FULL_FRAME;
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
static void psr_force_hw_tracking_exit(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled)
intel_de_write(dev_priv,
PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL(cpu_transcoder),
man_trk_ctl_enable_bit_get(dev_priv) |
man_trk_ctl_partial_frame_bit_get(dev_priv) |
drm/i915/psr: Add continuous full frame bit together with single Currently we are observing occasionally display flickering or complete freeze. This is narrowed down to be caused by single full frame update (SFF). SFF bit after it's written gets cleared by HW in subsequent vblank i.e. when the update is sent to the panel. SFF bit is required to be written together with partial frame update (PFU) bit. After the SFF bit gets cleared by the HW psr2 man trk ctl register still contains PFU bit. If there is subsequent update for any reason we will end up having selective update/fetch configuration where start line is 0 and end line is 0. Also selective fetch configuration for the planes is not properly performed. This seems to be causing problems with some panels. Using CFF without SFF doesn't work either because it may happen that psr2 man track ctl register is overwritten by next update before vblank triggers sending the update. This is causing problems to psr_invalidate/flush. Using CFF and SFF together solves the problems as SFF is cleared only by HW in subsequent vblank and the update gets sent. Fix the flickering/freeze issue by keeping CFF bit as set when PSR2 is enabled unless there is a properly configured selective update via atomic commit. v2: - Improve commit message and comments - No functional changes This is also workaround for HSD 14014971508 Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> Reported-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Tested-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221201072308.1905679-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
2022-12-01 07:23:08 +00:00
man_trk_ctl_single_full_frame_bit_get(dev_priv) |
man_trk_ctl_continuos_full_frame(dev_priv));
/*
* Display WA #0884: skl+
* This documented WA for bxt can be safely applied
* broadly so we can force HW tracking to exit PSR
* instead of disabling and re-enabling.
* Workaround tells us to write 0 to CUR_SURFLIVE_A,
* but it makes more sense write to the current active
* pipe.
*
* This workaround do not exist for platforms with display 10 or newer
* but testing proved that it works for up display 13, for newer
* than that testing will be needed.
*/
intel_de_write(dev_priv, CURSURFLIVE(intel_dp->psr.pipe), 0);
}
void intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
if (!crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch)
return;
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(&dev_priv->drm, encoder,
crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
lockdep_assert_held(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled)
return;
break;
}
intel_de_write(dev_priv, PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL(cpu_transcoder),
crtc_state->psr2_man_track_ctl);
}
static void psr2_man_trk_ctl_calc(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
struct drm_rect *clip, bool full_update)
{
struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
u32 val = man_trk_ctl_enable_bit_get(dev_priv);
/* SF partial frame enable has to be set even on full update */
val |= man_trk_ctl_partial_frame_bit_get(dev_priv);
if (full_update) {
val |= man_trk_ctl_single_full_frame_bit_get(dev_priv);
drm/i915/psr: Add continuous full frame bit together with single Currently we are observing occasionally display flickering or complete freeze. This is narrowed down to be caused by single full frame update (SFF). SFF bit after it's written gets cleared by HW in subsequent vblank i.e. when the update is sent to the panel. SFF bit is required to be written together with partial frame update (PFU) bit. After the SFF bit gets cleared by the HW psr2 man trk ctl register still contains PFU bit. If there is subsequent update for any reason we will end up having selective update/fetch configuration where start line is 0 and end line is 0. Also selective fetch configuration for the planes is not properly performed. This seems to be causing problems with some panels. Using CFF without SFF doesn't work either because it may happen that psr2 man track ctl register is overwritten by next update before vblank triggers sending the update. This is causing problems to psr_invalidate/flush. Using CFF and SFF together solves the problems as SFF is cleared only by HW in subsequent vblank and the update gets sent. Fix the flickering/freeze issue by keeping CFF bit as set when PSR2 is enabled unless there is a properly configured selective update via atomic commit. v2: - Improve commit message and comments - No functional changes This is also workaround for HSD 14014971508 Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> Reported-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Tested-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221201072308.1905679-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
2022-12-01 07:23:08 +00:00
val |= man_trk_ctl_continuos_full_frame(dev_priv);
goto exit;
}
if (clip->y1 == -1)
goto exit;
if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14) {
val |= ADLP_PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SU_REGION_START_ADDR(clip->y1);
val |= ADLP_PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SU_REGION_END_ADDR(clip->y2 - 1);
} else {
drm_WARN_ON(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev, clip->y1 % 4 || clip->y2 % 4);
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
val |= PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SU_REGION_START_ADDR(clip->y1 / 4 + 1);
val |= PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SU_REGION_END_ADDR(clip->y2 / 4 + 1);
}
exit:
crtc_state->psr2_man_track_ctl = val;
}
static void clip_area_update(struct drm_rect *overlap_damage_area,
struct drm_rect *damage_area,
struct drm_rect *pipe_src)
{
if (!drm_rect_intersect(damage_area, pipe_src))
return;
if (overlap_damage_area->y1 == -1) {
overlap_damage_area->y1 = damage_area->y1;
overlap_damage_area->y2 = damage_area->y2;
return;
}
if (damage_area->y1 < overlap_damage_area->y1)
overlap_damage_area->y1 = damage_area->y1;
if (damage_area->y2 > overlap_damage_area->y2)
overlap_damage_area->y2 = damage_area->y2;
}
static void intel_psr2_sel_fetch_pipe_alignment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
struct drm_rect *pipe_clip)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
const struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg = &crtc_state->dsc.config;
u16 y_alignment;
/* ADLP aligns the SU region to vdsc slice height in case dsc is enabled */
if (crtc_state->dsc.compression_enable &&
(IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14))
y_alignment = vdsc_cfg->slice_height;
else
y_alignment = crtc_state->su_y_granularity;
pipe_clip->y1 -= pipe_clip->y1 % y_alignment;
if (pipe_clip->y2 % y_alignment)
pipe_clip->y2 = ((pipe_clip->y2 / y_alignment) + 1) * y_alignment;
}
/*
* TODO: Not clear how to handle planes with negative position,
* also planes are not updated if they have a negative X
* position so for now doing a full update in this cases
*
* Plane scaling and rotation is not supported by selective fetch and both
* properties can change without a modeset, so need to be check at every
* atomic commit.
*/
static bool psr2_sel_fetch_plane_state_supported(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
{
if (plane_state->uapi.dst.y1 < 0 ||
plane_state->uapi.dst.x1 < 0 ||
plane_state->scaler_id >= 0 ||
plane_state->uapi.rotation != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0)
return false;
return true;
}
/*
* Check for pipe properties that is not supported by selective fetch.
*
* TODO: pipe scaling causes a modeset but skl_update_scaler_crtc() is executed
* after intel_psr_compute_config(), so for now keeping PSR2 selective fetch
* enabled and going to the full update path.
*/
static bool psr2_sel_fetch_pipe_state_supported(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
if (crtc_state->scaler_state.scaler_id >= 0)
return false;
return true;
}
int intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
struct intel_crtc *crtc)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
struct drm_rect pipe_clip = { .x1 = 0, .y1 = -1, .x2 = INT_MAX, .y2 = -1 };
struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state, *old_plane_state;
struct intel_plane *plane;
bool full_update = false;
int i, ret;
if (!crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch)
return 0;
if (!psr2_sel_fetch_pipe_state_supported(crtc_state)) {
full_update = true;
goto skip_sel_fetch_set_loop;
}
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
/*
* Calculate minimal selective fetch area of each plane and calculate
* the pipe damaged area.
* In the next loop the plane selective fetch area will actually be set
* using whole pipe damaged area.
*/
for_each_oldnew_intel_plane_in_state(state, plane, old_plane_state,
new_plane_state, i) {
struct drm_rect src, damaged_area = { .x1 = 0, .y1 = -1,
.x2 = INT_MAX };
if (new_plane_state->uapi.crtc != crtc_state->uapi.crtc)
continue;
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
if (!new_plane_state->uapi.visible &&
!old_plane_state->uapi.visible)
continue;
if (!psr2_sel_fetch_plane_state_supported(new_plane_state)) {
full_update = true;
break;
}
/*
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
* If visibility or plane moved, mark the whole plane area as
* damaged as it needs to be complete redraw in the new and old
* position.
*/
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
if (new_plane_state->uapi.visible != old_plane_state->uapi.visible ||
!drm_rect_equals(&new_plane_state->uapi.dst,
&old_plane_state->uapi.dst)) {
if (old_plane_state->uapi.visible) {
damaged_area.y1 = old_plane_state->uapi.dst.y1;
damaged_area.y2 = old_plane_state->uapi.dst.y2;
clip_area_update(&pipe_clip, &damaged_area,
&crtc_state->pipe_src);
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
}
if (new_plane_state->uapi.visible) {
damaged_area.y1 = new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y1;
damaged_area.y2 = new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y2;
clip_area_update(&pipe_clip, &damaged_area,
&crtc_state->pipe_src);
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
}
continue;
} else if (new_plane_state->uapi.alpha != old_plane_state->uapi.alpha) {
/* If alpha changed mark the whole plane area as damaged */
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
damaged_area.y1 = new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y1;
damaged_area.y2 = new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y2;
clip_area_update(&pipe_clip, &damaged_area,
&crtc_state->pipe_src);
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
continue;
}
src = drm_plane_state_src(&new_plane_state->uapi);
drm_rect_fp_to_int(&src, &src);
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
if (!drm_atomic_helper_damage_merged(&old_plane_state->uapi,
&new_plane_state->uapi, &damaged_area))
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
continue;
damaged_area.y1 += new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y1 - src.y1;
damaged_area.y2 += new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y1 - src.y1;
damaged_area.x1 += new_plane_state->uapi.dst.x1 - src.x1;
damaged_area.x2 += new_plane_state->uapi.dst.x1 - src.x1;
clip_area_update(&pipe_clip, &damaged_area, &crtc_state->pipe_src);
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
}
/*
* TODO: For now we are just using full update in case
* selective fetch area calculation fails. To optimize this we
* should identify cases where this happens and fix the area
* calculation for those.
*/
if (pipe_clip.y1 == -1) {
drm_info_once(&dev_priv->drm,
"Selective fetch area calculation failed in pipe %c\n",
pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
full_update = true;
}
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
if (full_update)
goto skip_sel_fetch_set_loop;
/* Wa_14014971492 */
if ((IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP(dev_priv, IP_VER(14, 0), STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) || IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv)) &&
crtc_state->splitter.enable)
pipe_clip.y1 = 0;
ret = drm_atomic_add_affected_planes(&state->base, &crtc->base);
if (ret)
return ret;
intel_psr2_sel_fetch_pipe_alignment(crtc_state, &pipe_clip);
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
/*
* Now that we have the pipe damaged area check if it intersect with
* every plane, if it does set the plane selective fetch area.
*/
for_each_oldnew_intel_plane_in_state(state, plane, old_plane_state,
new_plane_state, i) {
struct drm_rect *sel_fetch_area, inter;
struct intel_plane *linked = new_plane_state->planar_linked_plane;
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
if (new_plane_state->uapi.crtc != crtc_state->uapi.crtc ||
!new_plane_state->uapi.visible)
continue;
inter = pipe_clip;
sel_fetch_area = &new_plane_state->psr2_sel_fetch_area;
if (!drm_rect_intersect(&inter, &new_plane_state->uapi.dst)) {
sel_fetch_area->y1 = -1;
sel_fetch_area->y2 = -1;
/*
* if plane sel fetch was previously enabled ->
* disable it
*/
if (drm_rect_height(&old_plane_state->psr2_sel_fetch_area) > 0)
crtc_state->update_planes |= BIT(plane->id);
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
continue;
}
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
if (!psr2_sel_fetch_plane_state_supported(new_plane_state)) {
full_update = true;
break;
}
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
sel_fetch_area = &new_plane_state->psr2_sel_fetch_area;
sel_fetch_area->y1 = inter.y1 - new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y1;
sel_fetch_area->y2 = inter.y2 - new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y1;
crtc_state->update_planes |= BIT(plane->id);
/*
* Sel_fetch_area is calculated for UV plane. Use
* same area for Y plane as well.
*/
if (linked) {
struct intel_plane_state *linked_new_plane_state;
struct drm_rect *linked_sel_fetch_area;
linked_new_plane_state = intel_atomic_get_plane_state(state, linked);
if (IS_ERR(linked_new_plane_state))
return PTR_ERR(linked_new_plane_state);
linked_sel_fetch_area = &linked_new_plane_state->psr2_sel_fetch_area;
linked_sel_fetch_area->y1 = sel_fetch_area->y1;
linked_sel_fetch_area->y2 = sel_fetch_area->y2;
crtc_state->update_planes |= BIT(linked->id);
}
}
drm/i915/display/psr: Use plane damage clips to calculate damaged area Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area. Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips. Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending of all planes can happen. v2: - do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format v4: - setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area - mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha changed v5: - taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates - adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are invisible in the new state v6: - consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it moved to calculate damaged area - remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip v7: - intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area v8: - adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping - adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from v9: - Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible - Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and new state Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-01-04 20:56:52 +00:00
skip_sel_fetch_set_loop:
psr2_man_trk_ctl_calc(crtc_state, &pipe_clip, full_update);
return 0;
}
void intel_psr_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
struct intel_crtc *crtc)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
if (!HAS_PSR(i915))
return;
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(state->base.dev, encoder,
old_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
bool needs_to_disable = false;
mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
/*
* Reasons to disable:
* - PSR disabled in new state
* - All planes will go inactive
* - Changing between PSR versions
* - Display WA #1136: skl, bxt
*/
needs_to_disable |= intel_crtc_needs_modeset(new_crtc_state);
needs_to_disable |= !new_crtc_state->has_psr;
needs_to_disable |= !new_crtc_state->active_planes;
needs_to_disable |= new_crtc_state->has_psr2 != psr->psr2_enabled;
needs_to_disable |= DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 11 &&
new_crtc_state->wm_level_disabled;
if (psr->enabled && needs_to_disable)
intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
else if (psr->enabled && new_crtc_state->wm_level_disabled)
/* Wa_14015648006 */
wm_optimization_wa(intel_dp, new_crtc_state);
mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
}
}
void intel_psr_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
struct intel_crtc *crtc)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
if (!(crtc_state->has_psr || crtc_state->has_panel_replay))
return;
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(state->base.dev, encoder,
crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
bool keep_disabled = false;
mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, psr->enabled && !crtc_state->active_planes);
keep_disabled |= psr->sink_not_reliable;
keep_disabled |= !crtc_state->active_planes;
/* Display WA #1136: skl, bxt */
keep_disabled |= DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11 &&
crtc_state->wm_level_disabled;
if (!psr->enabled && !keep_disabled)
intel_psr_enable_locked(intel_dp, crtc_state);
else if (psr->enabled && !crtc_state->wm_level_disabled)
/* Wa_14015648006 */
wm_optimization_wa(intel_dp, crtc_state);
/* Force a PSR exit when enabling CRC to avoid CRC timeouts */
if (crtc_state->crc_enabled && psr->enabled)
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
psr_force_hw_tracking_exit(intel_dp);
/*
* Clear possible busy bits in case we have
* invalidate -> flip -> flush sequence.
*/
intel_dp->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits = 0;
mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
}
}
static int _psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
/*
* Any state lower than EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_DEEP_SLEEP is enough.
* As all higher states has bit 4 of PSR2 state set we can just wait for
* EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_DEEP_SLEEP to be cleared.
*/
return intel_de_wait_for_clear(dev_priv,
EDP_PSR2_STATUS(cpu_transcoder),
EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_DEEP_SLEEP, 50);
}
static int _psr1_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
2018-06-27 20:02:49 +00:00
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
2018-06-27 20:02:49 +00:00
/*
* From bspec: Panel Self Refresh (BDW+)
* Max. time for PSR to idle = Inverse of the refresh rate + 6 ms of
* exit training time + 1.5 ms of aux channel handshake. 50 ms is
* defensive enough to cover everything.
2018-06-27 20:02:49 +00:00
*/
return intel_de_wait_for_clear(dev_priv,
psr_status_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder),
EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK, 50);
2018-06-27 20:02:49 +00:00
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
/**
* intel_psr_wait_for_idle_locked - wait for PSR be ready for a pipe update
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
* @new_crtc_state: new CRTC state
*
* This function is expected to be called from pipe_update_start() where it is
* not expected to race with PSR enable or disable.
*/
void intel_psr_wait_for_idle_locked(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(new_crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
if (!new_crtc_state->has_psr)
return;
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(&dev_priv->drm, encoder,
new_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
int ret;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
lockdep_assert_held(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
if (!intel_dp->psr.enabled)
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
continue;
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled)
ret = _psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(intel_dp);
else
ret = _psr1_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(intel_dp);
if (ret)
drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "PSR wait timed out, atomic update may fail\n");
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
}
}
static bool __psr_wait_for_idle_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
i915_reg_t reg;
u32 mask;
int err;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (!intel_dp->psr.enabled)
return false;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
reg = EDP_PSR2_STATUS(cpu_transcoder);
mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
} else {
reg = psr_status_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder);
mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
err = intel_de_wait_for_clear(dev_priv, reg, mask, 50);
if (err)
drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
"Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for re-enable\n");
/* After the unlocked wait, verify that PSR is still wanted! */
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_lock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
return err == 0 && intel_dp->psr.enabled;
}
static int intel_psr_fastset_force(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
struct drm_atomic_state *state;
struct drm_connector *conn;
int err = 0;
state = drm_atomic_state_alloc(&dev_priv->drm);
if (!state)
return -ENOMEM;
drm_modeset_acquire_init(&ctx, DRM_MODESET_ACQUIRE_INTERRUPTIBLE);
state->acquire_ctx = &ctx;
to_intel_atomic_state(state)->internal = true;
retry:
drm_connector_list_iter_begin(&dev_priv->drm, &conn_iter);
drm_for_each_connector_iter(conn, &conn_iter) {
struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
if (conn->connector_type != DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
continue;
conn_state = drm_atomic_get_connector_state(state, conn);
if (IS_ERR(conn_state)) {
err = PTR_ERR(conn_state);
break;
}
if (!conn_state->crtc)
continue;
crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, conn_state->crtc);
if (IS_ERR(crtc_state)) {
err = PTR_ERR(crtc_state);
break;
}
/* Mark mode as changed to trigger a pipe->update() */
crtc_state->mode_changed = true;
}
drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
if (err == 0)
err = drm_atomic_commit(state);
if (err == -EDEADLK) {
drm_atomic_state_clear(state);
err = drm_modeset_backoff(&ctx);
if (!err)
goto retry;
}
drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
drm_atomic_state_put(state);
return err;
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
int intel_psr_debug_set(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u64 val)
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
const u32 mode = val & I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK;
u32 old_mode;
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
int ret;
if (val & ~(I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ | I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK) ||
mode > I915_PSR_DEBUG_ENABLE_SEL_FETCH) {
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Invalid debug mask %llx\n", val);
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
return -EINVAL;
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
if (ret)
return ret;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
old_mode = intel_dp->psr.debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK;
intel_dp->psr.debug = val;
drm/i915/psr: Only handle interruptions of the transcoder in use It was enabling and checking PSR interruptions in every transcoder while it should keep the interruptions on the non-used transcoders masked. While doing this it gives us trouble on Tiger Lake if we are reading/writing to registers of disabled transcoders since from gen12 onwards the registers are relative to the transcoder. Instead of forcing them ON to access those registers, just avoid the accesses as they are not needed. v2 (Lucas): - Explain why we can't keep accessing all transcoders - Remove TODO about extending the irq handling to multiple instances: when/if implementing multiple instances it's pretty clear by the singleton psr that it needs to be extended - Fix intel_psr_debug_set() calling psr_irq_control() with psr.transcoder not set yet (from Imre). Now we only set the debug register right away if psr is already enabled. Otherwise we just record the value to be set when enabling the source. - Do not depend on the value of TRANSCODER_A. Just be relative to it (from Imre) - handle psr error last so we don't schedule the work before handling the other flags v3: - Adding a warning about setting reserverd bits on EDP_PSR_IMR Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-2-jose.souza@intel.com
2019-09-04 21:34:14 +00:00
/*
* Do it right away if it's already enabled, otherwise it will be done
* when enabling the source.
*/
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.enabled)
psr_irq_control(intel_dp);
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
if (old_mode != mode)
ret = intel_psr_fastset_force(dev_priv);
drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Currently tests modify i915.enable_psr and then do a modeset cycle to change PSR. We can write a value to i915_edp_psr_debug to force a certain PSR mode without a modeset. To retain compatibility with older userspace, we also still allow the override through the module parameter, and add some tracking to check whether a debugfs mode is specified. Changes since v1: - Rename dev_priv->psr.enabled to .dp, and .hw_configured to .enabled. - Fix i915_psr_debugfs_mode to match the writes to debugfs. - Rename __i915_edp_psr_write to intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode, simplify it and move it to intel_psr.c. This keeps all internals in intel_psr.c - Perform an interruptible wait for hw completion outside of the psr lock, instead of being forced to trywait and return -EBUSY. Changes since v2: - Rebase on top of intel_psr changes. Changes since v3: - Assign psr.dp during init. (dhnkrn) - Add prepared bool, which should be used instead of relying on psr.dp. (dhnkrn) - Fix -EDEADLK handling in debugfs. (dhnkrn) - Clean up waiting for idle in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. - Print PSR mode when trying to enable PSR. (dhnkrn) - Move changing psr debug setting to i915_edp_psr_debug_set. (dhnkrn) Changes since v4: - Return error in _set() function. - Change flag values to make them easier to remember. (dhnkrn) - Only assign psr.dp once. (dhnkrn) - Only set crtc_state->has_psr on the crtc with psr.dp. - Fix typo. (dhnkrn) Changes since v5: - Only wait for PSR idle on the PSR connector correctly. (dhnkrn) - Reinstate WARN_ON(drrs.dp) in intel_psr_enable. (dhnkrn) - Remove stray comment. (dhnkrn) - Be silent in intel_psr_compute_config on wrong connector. (dhnkrn) Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180809142101.26155-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
2018-08-09 14:21:01 +00:00
return ret;
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
static void intel_psr_handle_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
psr->sink_not_reliable = true;
/* let's make sure that sink is awaken */
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, DP_SET_POWER_D0);
}
static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct intel_dp *intel_dp =
container_of(work, typeof(*intel_dp), psr.work);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_lock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (!intel_dp->psr.enabled)
goto unlock;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (READ_ONCE(intel_dp->psr.irq_aux_error))
intel_psr_handle_irq(intel_dp);
/*
* We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable
* otherwise it keeps disabled until next full enable/disable cycle.
* PSR might take some time to get fully disabled
* and be ready for re-enable.
*/
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (!__psr_wait_for_idle_locked(intel_dp))
goto unlock;
/*
* The delayed work can race with an invalidate hence we need to
* recheck. Since psr_flush first clears this and then reschedules we
* won't ever miss a flush when bailing out here.
*/
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits || intel_dp->psr.active)
goto unlock;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
unlock:
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
}
static void _psr_invalidate_handle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled) {
u32 val;
drm/i915/psr: Send update also on invalidate Currently we are observing mouse cursor stuttering when using xrandr --scaling=1.2x1.2. X scaling/transformation seems to be doing fronbuffer rendering. When moving mouse cursor X seems to perform several invalidates and only one DirtyFB. I.e. it seems to be assuming updates are sent to panel while drawing is done. Earlier we were disabling PSR in frontbuffer invalidate call back (when drawing in X started). PSR was re-enabled in frontbuffer flush callback (dirtyfb ioctl). This was working fine with X scaling/transformation. Now we are just enabling continuous full frame (cff) in PSR invalidate callback. Enabling cff doesn't trigger any updates. It just configures PSR to send full frame when updates are sent. I.e. there are no updates on screen before PSR flush callback is made. X seems to be doing several updates in frontbuffer before doing dirtyfb ioctl. Fix this by sending single update on every invalidate callback. Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> Fixes: 805f04d42a6b ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6679 Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Reported-by: Brian J. Tarricone <brian@tarricone.org> Tested-by: Brian J. Tarricone <brian@tarricone.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221024054649.31299-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
2022-10-24 05:46:49 +00:00
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled) {
/* Send one update otherwise lag is observed in screen */
intel_de_write(dev_priv, CURSURFLIVE(intel_dp->psr.pipe), 0);
return;
drm/i915/psr: Send update also on invalidate Currently we are observing mouse cursor stuttering when using xrandr --scaling=1.2x1.2. X scaling/transformation seems to be doing fronbuffer rendering. When moving mouse cursor X seems to perform several invalidates and only one DirtyFB. I.e. it seems to be assuming updates are sent to panel while drawing is done. Earlier we were disabling PSR in frontbuffer invalidate call back (when drawing in X started). PSR was re-enabled in frontbuffer flush callback (dirtyfb ioctl). This was working fine with X scaling/transformation. Now we are just enabling continuous full frame (cff) in PSR invalidate callback. Enabling cff doesn't trigger any updates. It just configures PSR to send full frame when updates are sent. I.e. there are no updates on screen before PSR flush callback is made. X seems to be doing several updates in frontbuffer before doing dirtyfb ioctl. Fix this by sending single update on every invalidate callback. Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> Fixes: 805f04d42a6b ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6679 Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Reported-by: Brian J. Tarricone <brian@tarricone.org> Tested-by: Brian J. Tarricone <brian@tarricone.org> Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221024054649.31299-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
2022-10-24 05:46:49 +00:00
}
val = man_trk_ctl_enable_bit_get(dev_priv) |
man_trk_ctl_partial_frame_bit_get(dev_priv) |
man_trk_ctl_continuos_full_frame(dev_priv);
intel_de_write(dev_priv, PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL(cpu_transcoder), val);
intel_de_write(dev_priv, CURSURFLIVE(intel_dp->psr.pipe), 0);
intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled = true;
} else {
intel_psr_exit(intel_dp);
}
}
/**
* intel_psr_invalidate - Invalidate PSR
* @dev_priv: i915 device
* @frontbuffer_bits: frontbuffer plane tracking bits
drm/i915/psr: Use more PSR HW tracking. So far we are using frontbuffer tracking for everything and ignoring that PSR has a HW capable HW tracking for many modern usages of GPU on Core platforms and newer Atom ones. One reason for that is that we were trying to keep same infrastructure in place for VLV/CHV than the rest of platforms. But also because when this infrastructure was created the front-buffer-tracking origin wasn't that good and stable how it is today after Paulo reworked it to attend FBC cases. However this PSR implementation without HW tracking died on gen8LP. And newer platforms are starting to demand more HW tracking specially with PSR2 cases in mind. By disabling and re-enabling PSR totally every time we believe someone is going to change the front buffer content we don't allow PSR HW tracking to do this job and specially compromising the whole idea of PSR2 case where the HW tracking detect only the damaged area and do a partial screen update. So, from now on, on the platforms that has hw_tracking let's rely more on HW tracking. This also is the case in used by other drivers and more validated by SV teams. So I hope that this will lead us to less misterious bugs. v2: Only do this for platform that actually has hw tracking. v3 from DK Do this only for flips, small gradual changes are better. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com> Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307033420.3086-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
2018-03-07 03:34:20 +00:00
* @origin: which operation caused the invalidate
*
* Since the hardware frontbuffer tracking has gaps we need to integrate
* with the software frontbuffer tracking. This function gets called every
* time frontbuffer rendering starts and a buffer gets dirtied. PSR must be
* disabled if the frontbuffer mask contains a buffer relevant to PSR.
*
* Dirty frontbuffers relevant to PSR are tracked in busy_frontbuffer_bits."
*/
void intel_psr_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
drm/i915/psr: Use more PSR HW tracking. So far we are using frontbuffer tracking for everything and ignoring that PSR has a HW capable HW tracking for many modern usages of GPU on Core platforms and newer Atom ones. One reason for that is that we were trying to keep same infrastructure in place for VLV/CHV than the rest of platforms. But also because when this infrastructure was created the front-buffer-tracking origin wasn't that good and stable how it is today after Paulo reworked it to attend FBC cases. However this PSR implementation without HW tracking died on gen8LP. And newer platforms are starting to demand more HW tracking specially with PSR2 cases in mind. By disabling and re-enabling PSR totally every time we believe someone is going to change the front buffer content we don't allow PSR HW tracking to do this job and specially compromising the whole idea of PSR2 case where the HW tracking detect only the damaged area and do a partial screen update. So, from now on, on the platforms that has hw_tracking let's rely more on HW tracking. This also is the case in used by other drivers and more validated by SV teams. So I hope that this will lead us to less misterious bugs. v2: Only do this for platform that actually has hw tracking. v3 from DK Do this only for flips, small gradual changes are better. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com> Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307033420.3086-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
2018-03-07 03:34:20 +00:00
unsigned frontbuffer_bits, enum fb_op_origin origin)
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
if (origin == ORIGIN_FLIP)
drm/i915/psr: Use more PSR HW tracking. So far we are using frontbuffer tracking for everything and ignoring that PSR has a HW capable HW tracking for many modern usages of GPU on Core platforms and newer Atom ones. One reason for that is that we were trying to keep same infrastructure in place for VLV/CHV than the rest of platforms. But also because when this infrastructure was created the front-buffer-tracking origin wasn't that good and stable how it is today after Paulo reworked it to attend FBC cases. However this PSR implementation without HW tracking died on gen8LP. And newer platforms are starting to demand more HW tracking specially with PSR2 cases in mind. By disabling and re-enabling PSR totally every time we believe someone is going to change the front buffer content we don't allow PSR HW tracking to do this job and specially compromising the whole idea of PSR2 case where the HW tracking detect only the damaged area and do a partial screen update. So, from now on, on the platforms that has hw_tracking let's rely more on HW tracking. This also is the case in used by other drivers and more validated by SV teams. So I hope that this will lead us to less misterious bugs. v2: Only do this for platform that actually has hw tracking. v3 from DK Do this only for flips, small gradual changes are better. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com> Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307033420.3086-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
2018-03-07 03:34:20 +00:00
return;
for_each_intel_encoder_with_psr(&dev_priv->drm, encoder) {
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
unsigned int pipe_frontbuffer_bits = frontbuffer_bits;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_lock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
if (!intel_dp->psr.enabled) {
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
continue;
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
pipe_frontbuffer_bits &=
INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_ALL_MASK(intel_dp->psr.pipe);
intel_dp->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits |= pipe_frontbuffer_bits;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (pipe_frontbuffer_bits)
_psr_invalidate_handle(intel_dp);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
}
}
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
/*
* When we will be completely rely on PSR2 S/W tracking in future,
* intel_psr_flush() will invalidate and flush the PSR for ORIGIN_FLIP
drm/i915/display: Fix glitches when moving cursor with PSR2 selective fetch enabled Legacy cursor APIs are handled by intel_legacy_cursor_update(), that calls drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() when going through the slow/atomic path to update cursor, what was the case for PSR2 selective fetch. drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() sets drm_atomic_state->legacy_cursor_update to true when updating the cursor plane, to allow several cursor updates to happen within the same frame, as userspace does that. If drivers waited for a vblank increment at the end of every cursor movement that would cause a visible lag in the cursor. But this optimization do not properly work with PSR2 selective fetch dirt area calculation, for example if within a single frame the cursor had 3 moves the final dirt area programmed to PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL would be based in the second movement as old state and third movement as new state, not updating the area where cursor was in the first state. So here switching back to the fast path approach in intel_legacy_cursor_update() and handling cursor movements as frontbuffer rendering(psr_force_hw_tracking_exit()), that is not the most optimal for power-savings but is the solution that we have until mailbox style updates is implemented. Also removing the cursor workaround as not it is properly undestand the issue and is know that it will never cover all the cases. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-5-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-09-30 00:14:05 +00:00
* event also therefore tgl_dc3co_flush_locked() require to be changed
* accordingly in future.
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
*/
static void
drm/i915/display: Fix glitches when moving cursor with PSR2 selective fetch enabled Legacy cursor APIs are handled by intel_legacy_cursor_update(), that calls drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() when going through the slow/atomic path to update cursor, what was the case for PSR2 selective fetch. drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() sets drm_atomic_state->legacy_cursor_update to true when updating the cursor plane, to allow several cursor updates to happen within the same frame, as userspace does that. If drivers waited for a vblank increment at the end of every cursor movement that would cause a visible lag in the cursor. But this optimization do not properly work with PSR2 selective fetch dirt area calculation, for example if within a single frame the cursor had 3 moves the final dirt area programmed to PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL would be based in the second movement as old state and third movement as new state, not updating the area where cursor was in the first state. So here switching back to the fast path approach in intel_legacy_cursor_update() and handling cursor movements as frontbuffer rendering(psr_force_hw_tracking_exit()), that is not the most optimal for power-savings but is the solution that we have until mailbox style updates is implemented. Also removing the cursor workaround as not it is properly undestand the issue and is know that it will never cover all the cases. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-5-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-09-30 00:14:05 +00:00
tgl_dc3co_flush_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, unsigned int frontbuffer_bits,
enum fb_op_origin origin)
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
drm/i915/display: Fix glitches when moving cursor with PSR2 selective fetch enabled Legacy cursor APIs are handled by intel_legacy_cursor_update(), that calls drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() when going through the slow/atomic path to update cursor, what was the case for PSR2 selective fetch. drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() sets drm_atomic_state->legacy_cursor_update to true when updating the cursor plane, to allow several cursor updates to happen within the same frame, as userspace does that. If drivers waited for a vblank increment at the end of every cursor movement that would cause a visible lag in the cursor. But this optimization do not properly work with PSR2 selective fetch dirt area calculation, for example if within a single frame the cursor had 3 moves the final dirt area programmed to PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL would be based in the second movement as old state and third movement as new state, not updating the area where cursor was in the first state. So here switching back to the fast path approach in intel_legacy_cursor_update() and handling cursor movements as frontbuffer rendering(psr_force_hw_tracking_exit()), that is not the most optimal for power-savings but is the solution that we have until mailbox style updates is implemented. Also removing the cursor workaround as not it is properly undestand the issue and is know that it will never cover all the cases. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-5-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-09-30 00:14:05 +00:00
if (!intel_dp->psr.dc3co_exitline || !intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled ||
!intel_dp->psr.active)
return;
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
/*
* At every frontbuffer flush flip event modified delay of delayed work,
* when delayed work schedules that means display has been idle.
*/
if (!(frontbuffer_bits &
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_ALL_MASK(intel_dp->psr.pipe)))
drm/i915/display: Fix glitches when moving cursor with PSR2 selective fetch enabled Legacy cursor APIs are handled by intel_legacy_cursor_update(), that calls drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() when going through the slow/atomic path to update cursor, what was the case for PSR2 selective fetch. drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() sets drm_atomic_state->legacy_cursor_update to true when updating the cursor plane, to allow several cursor updates to happen within the same frame, as userspace does that. If drivers waited for a vblank increment at the end of every cursor movement that would cause a visible lag in the cursor. But this optimization do not properly work with PSR2 selective fetch dirt area calculation, for example if within a single frame the cursor had 3 moves the final dirt area programmed to PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL would be based in the second movement as old state and third movement as new state, not updating the area where cursor was in the first state. So here switching back to the fast path approach in intel_legacy_cursor_update() and handling cursor movements as frontbuffer rendering(psr_force_hw_tracking_exit()), that is not the most optimal for power-savings but is the solution that we have until mailbox style updates is implemented. Also removing the cursor workaround as not it is properly undestand the issue and is know that it will never cover all the cases. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-5-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-09-30 00:14:05 +00:00
return;
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
tgl_psr2_enable_dc3co(intel_dp);
mod_delayed_work(i915->unordered_wq, &intel_dp->psr.dc3co_work,
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
intel_dp->psr.dc3co_exit_delay);
drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel is the classic example of this use case. B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback. It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip. We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will explicitly disable DC3CO. DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames. As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames (By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been enabled after a pageflip). After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after 6 idle frames. In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get complete. v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an update. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre] v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work. hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)] v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre] v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre] Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre] Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a delayed work. [Imre] Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep sleep. [Imre] Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre] v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre] v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre] Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre] Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre] Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
2019-10-03 08:17:37 +00:00
}
static void _psr_flush_handle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled) {
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled) {
/* can we turn CFF off? */
if (intel_dp->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits == 0) {
u32 val = man_trk_ctl_enable_bit_get(dev_priv) |
drm/i915/psr: Add continuous full frame bit together with single Currently we are observing occasionally display flickering or complete freeze. This is narrowed down to be caused by single full frame update (SFF). SFF bit after it's written gets cleared by HW in subsequent vblank i.e. when the update is sent to the panel. SFF bit is required to be written together with partial frame update (PFU) bit. After the SFF bit gets cleared by the HW psr2 man trk ctl register still contains PFU bit. If there is subsequent update for any reason we will end up having selective update/fetch configuration where start line is 0 and end line is 0. Also selective fetch configuration for the planes is not properly performed. This seems to be causing problems with some panels. Using CFF without SFF doesn't work either because it may happen that psr2 man track ctl register is overwritten by next update before vblank triggers sending the update. This is causing problems to psr_invalidate/flush. Using CFF and SFF together solves the problems as SFF is cleared only by HW in subsequent vblank and the update gets sent. Fix the flickering/freeze issue by keeping CFF bit as set when PSR2 is enabled unless there is a properly configured selective update via atomic commit. v2: - Improve commit message and comments - No functional changes This is also workaround for HSD 14014971508 Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> Reported-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Tested-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221201072308.1905679-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
2022-12-01 07:23:08 +00:00
man_trk_ctl_partial_frame_bit_get(dev_priv) |
man_trk_ctl_single_full_frame_bit_get(dev_priv) |
man_trk_ctl_continuos_full_frame(dev_priv);
/*
drm/i915/psr: Add continuous full frame bit together with single Currently we are observing occasionally display flickering or complete freeze. This is narrowed down to be caused by single full frame update (SFF). SFF bit after it's written gets cleared by HW in subsequent vblank i.e. when the update is sent to the panel. SFF bit is required to be written together with partial frame update (PFU) bit. After the SFF bit gets cleared by the HW psr2 man trk ctl register still contains PFU bit. If there is subsequent update for any reason we will end up having selective update/fetch configuration where start line is 0 and end line is 0. Also selective fetch configuration for the planes is not properly performed. This seems to be causing problems with some panels. Using CFF without SFF doesn't work either because it may happen that psr2 man track ctl register is overwritten by next update before vblank triggers sending the update. This is causing problems to psr_invalidate/flush. Using CFF and SFF together solves the problems as SFF is cleared only by HW in subsequent vblank and the update gets sent. Fix the flickering/freeze issue by keeping CFF bit as set when PSR2 is enabled unless there is a properly configured selective update via atomic commit. v2: - Improve commit message and comments - No functional changes This is also workaround for HSD 14014971508 Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> Reported-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Tested-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221201072308.1905679-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
2022-12-01 07:23:08 +00:00
* Set psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled as false to allow selective
* updates. Still keep cff bit enabled as we don't have proper
* SU configuration in case update is sent for any reason after
* sff bit gets cleared by the HW on next vblank.
*/
intel_de_write(dev_priv, PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL(cpu_transcoder),
val);
intel_de_write(dev_priv, CURSURFLIVE(intel_dp->psr.pipe), 0);
intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled = false;
}
} else {
/*
* continuous full frame is disabled, only a single full
* frame is required
*/
psr_force_hw_tracking_exit(intel_dp);
}
} else {
psr_force_hw_tracking_exit(intel_dp);
if (!intel_dp->psr.active && !intel_dp->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
queue_work(dev_priv->unordered_wq, &intel_dp->psr.work);
}
}
/**
* intel_psr_flush - Flush PSR
* @dev_priv: i915 device
* @frontbuffer_bits: frontbuffer plane tracking bits
* @origin: which operation caused the flush
*
* Since the hardware frontbuffer tracking has gaps we need to integrate
* with the software frontbuffer tracking. This function gets called every
* time frontbuffer rendering has completed and flushed out to memory. PSR
* can be enabled again if no other frontbuffer relevant to PSR is dirty.
*
* Dirty frontbuffers relevant to PSR are tracked in busy_frontbuffer_bits.
*/
void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
unsigned frontbuffer_bits, enum fb_op_origin origin)
{
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
for_each_intel_encoder_with_psr(&dev_priv->drm, encoder) {
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
unsigned int pipe_frontbuffer_bits = frontbuffer_bits;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
drm/i915/psr: Use more PSR HW tracking. So far we are using frontbuffer tracking for everything and ignoring that PSR has a HW capable HW tracking for many modern usages of GPU on Core platforms and newer Atom ones. One reason for that is that we were trying to keep same infrastructure in place for VLV/CHV than the rest of platforms. But also because when this infrastructure was created the front-buffer-tracking origin wasn't that good and stable how it is today after Paulo reworked it to attend FBC cases. However this PSR implementation without HW tracking died on gen8LP. And newer platforms are starting to demand more HW tracking specially with PSR2 cases in mind. By disabling and re-enabling PSR totally every time we believe someone is going to change the front buffer content we don't allow PSR HW tracking to do this job and specially compromising the whole idea of PSR2 case where the HW tracking detect only the damaged area and do a partial screen update. So, from now on, on the platforms that has hw_tracking let's rely more on HW tracking. This also is the case in used by other drivers and more validated by SV teams. So I hope that this will lead us to less misterious bugs. v2: Only do this for platform that actually has hw tracking. v3 from DK Do this only for flips, small gradual changes are better. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com> Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307033420.3086-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
2018-03-07 03:34:20 +00:00
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_lock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
if (!intel_dp->psr.enabled) {
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
continue;
}
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
pipe_frontbuffer_bits &=
INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_ALL_MASK(intel_dp->psr.pipe);
intel_dp->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits &= ~pipe_frontbuffer_bits;
drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume function This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr source when intel_psr is already enabled. - intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state. - intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable(). - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle and WA for SelectiveFetch. v3: Address Jose's review comment. - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(). - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked() - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR. v4: Address Jose's review comment. - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause() for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable". Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-06-08 08:54:14 +00:00
/*
* If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call,
* we have to ensure that the PSR is not activated until
* intel_psr_resume() is called.
*/
if (intel_dp->psr.paused)
goto unlock;
drm/i915/display: Introduce new intel_psr_pause/resume function This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr source when intel_psr is already enabled. - intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state. - intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state. v2: Address Jose's review comment. - Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable(). - Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle and WA for SelectiveFetch. v3: Address Jose's review comment. - Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(). - Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked() - If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR. v4: Address Jose's review comment. - In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause() for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable". Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-06-08 08:54:14 +00:00
drm/i915/display: Fix glitches when moving cursor with PSR2 selective fetch enabled Legacy cursor APIs are handled by intel_legacy_cursor_update(), that calls drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() when going through the slow/atomic path to update cursor, what was the case for PSR2 selective fetch. drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() sets drm_atomic_state->legacy_cursor_update to true when updating the cursor plane, to allow several cursor updates to happen within the same frame, as userspace does that. If drivers waited for a vblank increment at the end of every cursor movement that would cause a visible lag in the cursor. But this optimization do not properly work with PSR2 selective fetch dirt area calculation, for example if within a single frame the cursor had 3 moves the final dirt area programmed to PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL would be based in the second movement as old state and third movement as new state, not updating the area where cursor was in the first state. So here switching back to the fast path approach in intel_legacy_cursor_update() and handling cursor movements as frontbuffer rendering(psr_force_hw_tracking_exit()), that is not the most optimal for power-savings but is the solution that we have until mailbox style updates is implemented. Also removing the cursor workaround as not it is properly undestand the issue and is know that it will never cover all the cases. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-5-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-09-30 00:14:05 +00:00
if (origin == ORIGIN_FLIP ||
(origin == ORIGIN_CURSOR_UPDATE &&
!intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled)) {
tgl_dc3co_flush_locked(intel_dp, frontbuffer_bits, origin);
goto unlock;
drm/i915/display: Fix glitches when moving cursor with PSR2 selective fetch enabled Legacy cursor APIs are handled by intel_legacy_cursor_update(), that calls drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() when going through the slow/atomic path to update cursor, what was the case for PSR2 selective fetch. drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() sets drm_atomic_state->legacy_cursor_update to true when updating the cursor plane, to allow several cursor updates to happen within the same frame, as userspace does that. If drivers waited for a vblank increment at the end of every cursor movement that would cause a visible lag in the cursor. But this optimization do not properly work with PSR2 selective fetch dirt area calculation, for example if within a single frame the cursor had 3 moves the final dirt area programmed to PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL would be based in the second movement as old state and third movement as new state, not updating the area where cursor was in the first state. So here switching back to the fast path approach in intel_legacy_cursor_update() and handling cursor movements as frontbuffer rendering(psr_force_hw_tracking_exit()), that is not the most optimal for power-savings but is the solution that we have until mailbox style updates is implemented. Also removing the cursor workaround as not it is properly undestand the issue and is know that it will never cover all the cases. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-5-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-09-30 00:14:05 +00:00
}
if (pipe_frontbuffer_bits == 0)
goto unlock;
/* By definition flush = invalidate + flush */
_psr_flush_handle(intel_dp);
unlock:
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
}
}
/**
* intel_psr_init - Init basic PSR work and mutex.
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
* @intel_dp: Intel DP
*
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
* This function is called after the initializing connector.
* (the initializing of connector treats the handling of connector capabilities)
* And it initializes basic PSR stuff for each DP Encoder.
*/
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
void intel_psr_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0 which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header is different. v1: Initial version. v2: - Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() condition check. [Jouni] - Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni] - Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni] - Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni] v3: - Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni] - Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni] - Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni] - Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni] - Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni] v4: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni] - Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni] v5: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni] - Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani] - Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani] v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni] v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun] Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
2023-11-08 07:23:00 +00:00
if (!(HAS_PSR(dev_priv) || HAS_DP20(dev_priv)))
return;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
/*
* HSW spec explicitly says PSR is tied to port A.
* BDW+ platforms have a instance of PSR registers per transcoder but
* BDW, GEN9 and GEN11 are not validated by HW team in other transcoder
* than eDP one.
* For now it only supports one instance of PSR for BDW, GEN9 and GEN11.
* So lets keep it hardcoded to PORT_A for BDW, GEN9 and GEN11.
* But GEN12 supports a instance of PSR registers per transcoder.
*/
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12 && dig_port->base.port != PORT_A) {
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR condition failed: Port not supported\n");
return;
}
drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0 which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header is different. v1: Initial version. v2: - Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() condition check. [Jouni] - Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni] - Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni] - Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni] v3: - Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni] - Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni] - Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni] - Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni] - Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni] v4: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni] - Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni] v5: - HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni] - Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani] - Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani] v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni] v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun] Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
2023-11-08 07:23:00 +00:00
if (HAS_DP20(dev_priv) && !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
intel_dp->psr.source_panel_replay_support = true;
else
intel_dp->psr.source_support = true;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
/* Set link_standby x link_off defaults */
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12)
/* For new platforms up to TGL let's respect VBT back again */
intel_dp->psr.link_standby = connector->panel.vbt.psr.full_link;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
INIT_WORK(&intel_dp->psr.work, intel_psr_work);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&intel_dp->psr.dc3co_work, tgl_dc3co_disable_work);
mutex_init(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
}
static int psr_get_status_and_error_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
u8 *status, u8 *error_status)
{
struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &intel_dp->aux;
int ret;
unsigned int offset;
offset = intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled ?
DP_SINK_DEVICE_PR_AND_FRAME_LOCK_STATUS : DP_PSR_STATUS;
ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, offset, status);
if (ret != 1)
return ret;
offset = intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled ?
DP_PANEL_REPLAY_ERROR_STATUS : DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS;
ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, offset, error_status);
if (ret != 1)
return ret;
*status = *status & DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK;
return 0;
}
static void psr_alpm_check(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &intel_dp->aux;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
u8 val;
int r;
if (!psr->psr2_enabled)
return;
r = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_RECEIVER_ALPM_STATUS, &val);
if (r != 1) {
drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "Error reading ALPM status\n");
return;
}
if (val & DP_ALPM_LOCK_TIMEOUT_ERROR) {
intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
psr->sink_not_reliable = true;
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"ALPM lock timeout error, disabling PSR\n");
/* Clearing error */
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(aux, DP_RECEIVER_ALPM_STATUS, val);
}
}
static void psr_capability_changed_check(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
u8 val;
int r;
r = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ESI, &val);
if (r != 1) {
drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "Error reading DP_PSR_ESI\n");
return;
}
if (val & DP_PSR_CAPS_CHANGE) {
intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
psr->sink_not_reliable = true;
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"Sink PSR capability changed, disabling PSR\n");
/* Clearing it */
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ESI, val);
}
}
void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
u8 status, error_status;
const u8 errors = DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR |
DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR |
DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR;
if (!CAN_PSR(intel_dp))
return;
mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
if (!psr->enabled)
goto exit;
if (psr_get_status_and_error_status(intel_dp, &status, &error_status)) {
drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
"Error reading PSR status or error status\n");
goto exit;
}
if (status == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR || (error_status & errors)) {
intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
psr->sink_not_reliable = true;
}
if (status == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR && !error_status)
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR sink internal error, disabling PSR\n");
if (error_status & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR RFB storage error, disabling PSR\n");
if (error_status & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR VSC SDP uncorrectable error, disabling PSR\n");
if (error_status & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR Link CRC error, disabling PSR\n");
if (error_status & ~errors)
drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
"PSR_ERROR_STATUS unhandled errors %x\n",
error_status & ~errors);
/* clear status register */
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, error_status);
psr_alpm_check(intel_dp);
psr_capability_changed_check(intel_dp);
exit:
mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
}
bool intel_psr_enabled(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
bool ret;
if (!CAN_PSR(intel_dp))
return false;
drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder supportable PSR. And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to intel_dp's intel_psr structure. It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with a single transcoder PSR case yet. v2: Fix indentation and add comments v3: Remove Blank line v4: Rebased v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment. - Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector() v6: Address Anshuman's review comments - Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of a single pipe PSR v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder PSR on BDW+ v8: Address Anshuman's review comments - Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn() v9: Fix commit message v10: Rebased v11: Address Jose's review comment. - Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl(). - In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private. - Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR. v12: Address Jose's review comment. - Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into commit_pipe_config(). - Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original on i915_psr_sink_status_show(). - Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function. - In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder. - Add an whitespace to comments. v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment. - Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro. - In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe, fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. - Update comments. v14: Address Jose's review comment - Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro. - Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure. - Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support. - Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from psr_compute_config(). - Remove redundant or unneeded codes. v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
2021-02-04 13:40:14 +00:00
mutex_lock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
ret = intel_dp->psr.enabled;
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
return ret;
}
/**
* intel_psr_lock - grab PSR lock
* @crtc_state: the crtc state
*
* This is initially meant to be used by around CRTC update, when
* vblank sensitive registers are updated and we need grab the lock
* before it to avoid vblank evasion.
*/
void intel_psr_lock(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
if (!crtc_state->has_psr)
return;
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(&i915->drm, encoder,
crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
mutex_lock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
break;
}
}
/**
* intel_psr_unlock - release PSR lock
* @crtc_state: the crtc state
*
* Release the PSR lock that was held during pipe update.
*/
void intel_psr_unlock(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
if (!crtc_state->has_psr)
return;
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(&i915->drm, encoder,
crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
break;
}
}
static void
psr_source_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct seq_file *m)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
const char *status = "unknown";
u32 val, status_val;
if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
static const char * const live_status[] = {
"IDLE",
"CAPTURE",
"CAPTURE_FS",
"SLEEP",
"BUFON_FW",
"ML_UP",
"SU_STANDBY",
"FAST_SLEEP",
"DEEP_SLEEP",
"BUF_ON",
"TG_ON"
};
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, EDP_PSR2_STATUS(cpu_transcoder));
status_val = REG_FIELD_GET(EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK, val);
if (status_val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
status = live_status[status_val];
} else {
static const char * const live_status[] = {
"IDLE",
"SRDONACK",
"SRDENT",
"BUFOFF",
"BUFON",
"AUXACK",
"SRDOFFACK",
"SRDENT_ON",
};
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, psr_status_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder));
status_val = REG_FIELD_GET(EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK, val);
if (status_val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
status = live_status[status_val];
}
seq_printf(m, "Source PSR/PanelReplay status: %s [0x%08x]\n", status, val);
}
static int intel_psr_status(struct seq_file *m, struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
const char *status;
bool enabled;
u32 val;
seq_printf(m, "Sink support: PSR = %s",
str_yes_no(psr->sink_support));
if (psr->sink_support)
seq_printf(m, " [0x%02x]", intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0]);
seq_printf(m, ", Panel Replay = %s\n", str_yes_no(psr->sink_panel_replay_support));
if (!(psr->sink_support || psr->sink_panel_replay_support))
return 0;
wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
if (psr->panel_replay_enabled)
status = "Panel Replay Enabled";
else if (psr->enabled)
status = psr->psr2_enabled ? "PSR2 enabled" : "PSR1 enabled";
else
status = "disabled";
seq_printf(m, "PSR mode: %s\n", status);
if (!psr->enabled) {
seq_printf(m, "PSR sink not reliable: %s\n",
str_yes_no(psr->sink_not_reliable));
goto unlock;
}
if (psr->panel_replay_enabled) {
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, TRANS_DP2_CTL(cpu_transcoder));
enabled = val & TRANS_DP2_PANEL_REPLAY_ENABLE;
} else if (psr->psr2_enabled) {
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, EDP_PSR2_CTL(cpu_transcoder));
enabled = val & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE;
} else {
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, psr_ctl_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder));
enabled = val & EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
}
seq_printf(m, "Source PSR/PanelReplay ctl: %s [0x%08x]\n",
str_enabled_disabled(enabled), val);
psr_source_status(intel_dp, m);
seq_printf(m, "Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x%08x\n",
psr->busy_frontbuffer_bits);
/*
* SKL+ Perf counter is reset to 0 everytime DC state is entered
*/
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, psr_perf_cnt_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder));
seq_printf(m, "Performance counter: %u\n",
REG_FIELD_GET(EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT_MASK, val));
if (psr->debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ) {
seq_printf(m, "Last attempted entry at: %lld\n",
psr->last_entry_attempt);
seq_printf(m, "Last exit at: %lld\n", psr->last_exit);
}
if (psr->psr2_enabled) {
u32 su_frames_val[3];
int frame;
/*
* Reading all 3 registers before hand to minimize crossing a
* frame boundary between register reads
*/
for (frame = 0; frame < PSR2_SU_STATUS_FRAMES; frame += 3) {
val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PSR2_SU_STATUS(cpu_transcoder, frame));
su_frames_val[frame / 3] = val;
}
seq_puts(m, "Frame:\tPSR2 SU blocks:\n");
for (frame = 0; frame < PSR2_SU_STATUS_FRAMES; frame++) {
u32 su_blocks;
su_blocks = su_frames_val[frame / 3] &
PSR2_SU_STATUS_MASK(frame);
su_blocks = su_blocks >> PSR2_SU_STATUS_SHIFT(frame);
seq_printf(m, "%d\t%d\n", frame, su_blocks);
}
seq_printf(m, "PSR2 selective fetch: %s\n",
str_enabled_disabled(psr->psr2_sel_fetch_enabled));
}
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
intel_runtime_pm_put(&dev_priv->runtime_pm, wakeref);
return 0;
}
static int i915_edp_psr_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = m->private;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = NULL;
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
return -ENODEV;
/* Find the first EDP which supports PSR */
for_each_intel_encoder_with_psr(&dev_priv->drm, encoder) {
intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
break;
}
if (!intel_dp)
return -ENODEV;
return intel_psr_status(m, intel_dp);
}
DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_edp_psr_status);
static int
i915_edp_psr_debug_set(void *data, u64 val)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
int ret = -ENODEV;
if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
return ret;
for_each_intel_encoder_with_psr(&dev_priv->drm, encoder) {
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Setting PSR debug to %llx\n", val);
wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
// TODO: split to each transcoder's PSR debug state
ret = intel_psr_debug_set(intel_dp, val);
intel_runtime_pm_put(&dev_priv->runtime_pm, wakeref);
}
return ret;
}
static int
i915_edp_psr_debug_get(void *data, u64 *val)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
return -ENODEV;
for_each_intel_encoder_with_psr(&dev_priv->drm, encoder) {
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
// TODO: split to each transcoder's PSR debug state
*val = READ_ONCE(intel_dp->psr.debug);
return 0;
}
return -ENODEV;
}
DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(i915_edp_psr_debug_fops,
i915_edp_psr_debug_get, i915_edp_psr_debug_set,
"%llu\n");
void intel_psr_debugfs_register(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct drm_minor *minor = i915->drm.primary;
debugfs_create_file("i915_edp_psr_debug", 0644, minor->debugfs_root,
i915, &i915_edp_psr_debug_fops);
debugfs_create_file("i915_edp_psr_status", 0444, minor->debugfs_root,
i915, &i915_edp_psr_status_fops);
}
static const char *psr_mode_str(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
if (intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled)
return "PANEL-REPLAY";
else if (intel_dp->psr.enabled)
return "PSR";
return "unknown";
}
static int i915_psr_sink_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
{
struct intel_connector *connector = m->private;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
static const char * const sink_status[] = {
"inactive",
"transition to active, capture and display",
"active, display from RFB",
"active, capture and display on sink device timings",
"transition to inactive, capture and display, timing re-sync",
"reserved",
"reserved",
"sink internal error",
};
static const char * const panel_replay_status[] = {
"Sink device frame is locked to the Source device",
"Sink device is coasting, using the VTotal target",
"Sink device is governing the frame rate (frame rate unlock is granted)",
"Sink device in the process of re-locking with the Source device",
};
const char *str;
int ret;
u8 status, error_status;
u32 idx;
if (!(CAN_PSR(intel_dp) || CAN_PANEL_REPLAY(intel_dp))) {
seq_puts(m, "PSR/Panel-Replay Unsupported\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
if (connector->base.status != connector_status_connected)
return -ENODEV;
ret = psr_get_status_and_error_status(intel_dp, &status, &error_status);
if (ret)
return ret;
str = "unknown";
if (intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled) {
idx = (status & DP_SINK_FRAME_LOCKED_MASK) >> DP_SINK_FRAME_LOCKED_SHIFT;
if (idx < ARRAY_SIZE(panel_replay_status))
str = panel_replay_status[idx];
} else if (intel_dp->psr.enabled) {
idx = status & DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK;
if (idx < ARRAY_SIZE(sink_status))
str = sink_status[idx];
}
seq_printf(m, "Sink %s status: 0x%x [%s]\n", psr_mode_str(intel_dp), status, str);
seq_printf(m, "Sink %s error status: 0x%x", psr_mode_str(intel_dp), error_status);
if (error_status & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR |
DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR |
DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR))
seq_puts(m, ":\n");
else
seq_puts(m, "\n");
if (error_status & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
seq_printf(m, "\t%s RFB storage error\n", psr_mode_str(intel_dp));
if (error_status & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
seq_printf(m, "\t%s VSC SDP uncorrectable error\n", psr_mode_str(intel_dp));
if (error_status & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
seq_printf(m, "\t%s Link CRC error\n", psr_mode_str(intel_dp));
return ret;
}
DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_psr_sink_status);
static int i915_psr_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
{
struct intel_connector *connector = m->private;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
return intel_psr_status(m, intel_dp);
}
DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_psr_status);
void intel_psr_connector_debugfs_add(struct intel_connector *connector)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
struct dentry *root = connector->base.debugfs_entry;
/* TODO: Add support for MST connectors as well. */
if ((connector->base.connector_type != DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP &&
connector->base.connector_type != DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort) ||
connector->mst_port)
return;
debugfs_create_file("i915_psr_sink_status", 0444, root,
connector, &i915_psr_sink_status_fops);
if (HAS_PSR(i915) || HAS_DP20(i915))
debugfs_create_file("i915_psr_status", 0444, root,
connector, &i915_psr_status_fops);
}